Why don’t republicans seem to understand the consequences of tax cuts?

Link to the source FuckBoi. Why are there no links to your source? There is no link to your source because it came from the CATO Institute.

"In review, The Cato Institute is a right-leaning Libertarian think tank that advocates for privatizing many aspects of Government, such as schools and social security. Cato is also opposed to Campaign Finance Reform and often is criticized for human-influenced climate change denial. While Cato advocates for right-wing economic policies, they support socially liberal positions such as Gay Marriage, Marijuana Legalization, and liberalized immigration."

Get a new schtick, Simp.


FISCAL YEARREVENUE
FY 2021$4.05 trillion
FY 2020$3.42 trillion
FY 2019$3.46 trillion
FY 2018$3.33 trillion
FY 2017$3.32 trillion
FY 2016$3.27 trillion
FY 2015$3.25 trillion
FY 2014$3.02 trillion
FY 2013$2.78 trillion
FY 2012$2.45 trillion
FY 2011$2.30 trillion
FY 2010$2.16 trillion
FY 2009$2.11 trillion
FY 2008$2.52 trillion
FY 2007$2.57 trillion
FY 2006$2.41 trillion
FY 2005$2.15 trillion
FY 2004$1.88 trillion
FY 2003$1.78 trillion
FY 2002$1.85 trillion
FY 2001$1.99 trillion

 
Let's look at how the Reagan tax cuts massively increased revenues......



FY 1989$991.1 billion
FY1988$909.2 billion
FY 1987$854.3 billion
FY 1986$769.2 billion
FY 1985$734.0 billion
FY 1984$666.4 billion
FY 1983$600.6 billion
FY 1982$617.8 billion
 
"Rates of growth requested? WTF are you babbling about you uneducated idiot.

You post "rates of growth requested" if you want to see "rates of growth requested". :cuckoo:
Just forking do it, or acknowledge that you don't know how.

This is why you answer questions put to you the first time, Tool.
 
Get a new schtick, Simp.


FISCAL YEARREVENUE
FY 2021$4.05 trillion
FY 2020$3.42 trillion
FY 2019$3.46 trillion
FY 2018$3.33 trillion
FY 2017$3.32 trillion
FY 2016$3.27 trillion
FY 2015$3.25 trillion
FY 2014$3.02 trillion
FY 2013$2.78 trillion
FY 2012$2.45 trillion
FY 2011$2.30 trillion
FY 2010$2.16 trillion
FY 2009$2.11 trillion
FY 2008$2.52 trillion
FY 2007$2.57 trillion
FY 2006$2.41 trillion
FY 2005$2.15 trillion
FY 2004$1.88 trillion
FY 2003$1.78 trillion
FY 2002$1.85 trillion
FY 2001$1.99 trillion

DO THE MATH, LOSER!
 
Link us up to the economic definition of "rates of growth requested".
You were asked to calculate CAGRs for 2 periods....

Though that's Sumerian to morons, it's actually very easy to do.

But you're a moron.

Hence the Shuffle.
 
You were asked to calculate CAGRs for 2 periods....

Though that's Sumerian to morons, it's actually very easy to do.

But you're a moron.

Hence the Shuffle.
So you have no link to the economic definition of "rates of growth requested"?
 
Let's look at how the Reagan tax cuts massively increased revenues......



FY 1989$991.1 billion
FY1988$909.2 billion
FY 1987$854.3 billion
FY 1986$769.2 billion
FY 1985$734.0 billion
FY 1984$666.4 billion
FY 1983$600.6 billion
FY 1982$617.8 billion


Looks like more than a 50% increase in revenues to me......
 
From 10/17 - 10/18, personal incomes rose nearly 5%.

Personal income tax receipts FELL 1.15%

In that same year, spending rose 3.3%.


Supply Side Math.
WTF does that have to do with the massive revenue increase due to Reagan's tax cuts in the 80s, Simp? :cuckoo:
 
Yes...I requested that you post a pair of rates..

Those would be "the rates requested", specifically CAGR.

Now admit you have no idea what I'm talking about.
You seem confused. For some reason you think you can tell me what to do. If you want something posted, you post it, Simp.

Let's see this CAGR you are so worried about, Dumbass.:auiqs.jpg:
 

Forum List

Back
Top