Why don’t republicans seem to understand the consequences of tax cuts?

It is purely about spending. Most of the tax cuts we've had in the last 30 years have not cut revenue.


They have in fact dramatically increased revenue to the point that in the last FY, it was nearly $5,000 billion.
 
Spending isn't a different issue that revenues?

Really? Explain how they aren't different. This should be a hoot.

Using 2020 revenues to try to back up your dumbassery exposes how weak your game is. Why do you think there was a slight dip in revenues in only 2020, Simp? Tell us what you think caused this.
Paying people to stay home?
 
Always fun to make you look the fool....


Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; . . .
Where does that say anything about where the process begins?

You're an imbecile.
 
Not once. With the budgets breaking the government shutdown in the last 10 years being done over overwhelming Republican opposition.

We didn't default, because democrats were able to find enough votes to prevent it.
They didn't stop the deficit from exploding.
 

Forum List

Back
Top