buttercup
Diamond Member
- Apr 9, 2010
- 12,299
- 9,418
- 2,220
From an evolutionary standpoint, yes. Our nearest ancestor is the chimpanzee, known to eat meat.
Do you believe the Biblical worldview, or the Darwinian worldview? Make up your mind.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From an evolutionary standpoint, yes. Our nearest ancestor is the chimpanzee, known to eat meat.
You get artificially produced B12 that would never occur in nature.You are REALLY showing your ignorance on this thread.
First of all, B12 is not an animal product, it's produced by bacteria, found in soil and water.
You don't have to eat a dead animal to get B12.
And what you probably aren't even aware of is that these days because of poor soil, livestock are injected with B12, so in many cases THEY TOO are being supplemented.
So if you get it through eating animals, you are getting it second-hand, filtered through the dead body of an abused, exploited, tortured and often sick innocent being.
We simply skip the middle-man, and get B12 in an isolated form, not filtered through a dead body.![]()
I pose the evolutionary worldview for those who believe it.Do you believe the Biblical worldview, or the Darwinian worldview? Make up your mind.
You get artificially produced B12 that would never occur in nature.
They occasionally eat insects, but mostly fruits and vegetables. They don't hunt down sentient mammals like fallen ManFrom an evolutionary standpoint, yes. Our nearest ancestor is the chimpanzee, known to eat meat.
I make sure to get it from nutritional yeast. I doubt I'm deficient but I really don't pay attention to that vitamin because, like you said, we require so littleAgain, B12 is not an animal product, it is produced by microbes, such as bacteria, in soil and water. In the old days, both humans and animals got B12 from food grown in soil.
But because of poor soil these days and very unnatural factory farms, again, the animals YOU eat are, for the most part, unnaturally supplemented to get B12.
So again YOU are also getting it second-hand. The only difference is YOU are getting it filtered through a dead body.
I prefer to not get my B12 filtered through a dead body, of a sick, abused, exploited animal.
And as Blues Man already said to you, we need so little B12 that it's so easy to get, even without a supplement. There are foods fortified with B12.
They occasionally eat insects, but mostly fruits and vegetables. They don't hunt down sentient mammals like fallen Man
I pose the evolutionary worldview for those who believe it.
What is important is the extended consequences of one's actions. If I eat meat produced organically and killed humanely, by extension I have solved all your problems with it, haven't I?
Most of the animal products I consume don't require the death of the animal, namely eggs and dairy products. I eat about one-fifth of the average meat consumption here. So, the consequences of my diet regarding meat would lay to rest most of the general objections to it.
Another important point is that the artificial B12 that you depend on was created by godless evolutionist scientists for the purpose of deliberately overpopulating the earth which would, and has, exacerbated most of the world's societal and economic problems. Ironically those populations are now demanding a higher standard of living, including...drum roll please...more animal-based foods.
Please google this subject. Prepare to be horrified.They occasionally eat insects, but mostly fruits and vegetables. They don't hunt down sentient mammals like fallen Man
Educate yourself, google the topic. I'll await your apology.Ok.
There is no such thing as "humane slaughter." The word humane means characterized by compassion. There is nothing compassionate about terrorizing and needlessly killing an innocent animal who is just like a small child.
Here's a quote for you: To examine whether something is humane, first determine if you would want it done to you.
I'm sorry, but both eggs and dairy involve killing.
All over the world, it is standard practice to kill baby male chicks, en masse, because they are useless to the egg industry. These beautiful newborn baby male chicks - creations of God - are literally treated like garbage.
View attachment 823793
Similarly, the dairy industry sells off baby calves - who are also useless to the dairy industry - for veal, or soft leather, so they are also killed at a very young age.
Also, nearly ALL dairy cows - after being exploited for their milk - are "thanked" for their "service" by being killed for cheap hamburger meat.
So vegetarians - people who don't eat meat but consume dairy - are paying for needless killing, whether they realize that or not.
We already went over the B12 BS you are spewing.
Almost everything you have stated on this thread is incorrect, whether based on sincere ignorance, or outright lies.
Educate yourself, google the topic. I'll await your apology.
"What the hell is even that?Another important point is that the artificial B12 that you depend on was created by godless evolutionist scientists for the purpose of deliberately overpopulating the earth which would.....
Some people love the process of ARGUING. They pick a position and defend it. They have no desire to grow as ChristiansAlso, Woodznutz , I'm getting tired of your habit of NEVER addressing what I post to you, you just ignore everything and keep trying to throw the same crap against the wall over and over.
So if you're going to keep ignoring 95% of what I post, then I'm not going to waste my time anymore, I have other things to do today.
The context is the slaughtering of animals.There is no such thing as "humane slaughter." The word humane means characterized by compassion.
I raised laying hens. I never killed any when they stopping laying. I fed them and let them run around with the others. Of course, they would eventually die naturally, so harvesting them as stewing chicken is a good use of them.I'm sorry, but both eggs and dairy involve killing.
I argue based on facts, you on emotions. So, who's being 'argumentative.'? You and Buttercup are the ones who have hardened your positions, to wit: No consumption of animal products is acceptable by anyone, not even by those in the third world who subsist on it.Some people love the process of ARGUING. They pick a position and defend it. They have no desire to grow as Christians
I have addressed the points that I consider central.Also, Woodznutz , I'm getting tired of your habit of NEVER addressing what I post to you, you just ignore everything and keep trying to throw the same crap against the wall over and over.
So if you're going to keep ignoring 95% of what I post, then I'm not going to waste my time anymore, I have other things to do today.
The context is the slaughtering of animals.
hu·mane
[hyo͞oˈmān]
ADJECTIVE
- having or showing compassion or benevolence:
"regulations ensuring the humane treatment of animals"
SIMILAR:
compassionate
kind
kindly
kindhearted
considerate
- inflicting the minimum of pain:
"humane methods of killing"
I raised laying hens. I never killed any when they stopping laying. I fed them and let them run around with the others. Of course, they would eventually die naturally, so harvesting them as stewing chicken is a good use of them.
Male calves from a dairy herd are often raised as beef steers, if the dairy farmer can find someone to take them, otherwise they are often just killed.
A decade longer than 40 years like I said and that was synthetically produced B 12 and that was laboratory synthesisB12 wasn't developed until the 1970's.