The days are numbered for unthinking and automatic support of the Apartheid State of Israel.
Americans can no longer stomach their bigotry, racism and brutality towards the Palestinians, almost in parallel to America's disgust of the bigotry, racism and police brutality on the homeland.
Just this weekend Bernie signaled that we have to change the current situation in an almost half-hour interview on one of the main Sunday shows.
It's only a matter of time.
Sorry but that is IMO ust wishful thinking and more or less totally off from reality whilst ignoring the bigger picture.
As I had pointed out in many posts - this our present world is facing a collision between the US (that want's to keep it's economic global dominance, whilst trying to expand it further) and a China that want's to expand it's share of global economic dominance. The USA tries to take additional influence onto what it regards to be their tools - e.g. NATO/B-9/ and the EU added on by e.g. Australia, Japan and Korea. China came up with BRIC and the Silk-road project to gain supporters and to weaken the US alliance.
The e.g. Palestinian, Iran, Ukraine and Taiwan issue are simply - pieces/results of general global manipulation, by which the USA can justify it's presence and actions and make it's opposition look bad. Far more important for the USA is to get their back free towards present financial commitments/burdens (military and foreign policy related costs) to concentrate solely onto China. Opposing US global dominance, was formerly more or less just the Soviet-Union - since 2000 it was the ever increasing economic and political power of China and Russia.
The Soviet-Union dominated the Islamic Middle-East - so an unresolved Palestinian issue was very useful for the Soviet Union. The USSR went down the drain but almost simultaneously Iran, Syria, Saudi-Arabia and Iraq wanted to step into this Middle-east power vacuum. setting them automatically onto a collision course with the USA - who now regarded it as their own unopposed and private playground. The only realistic ally the USA has till now in the Middle-East is only Israel - the others are far too prone towards internal political instability and their "flexible" agendas towards the USA, so an unresolved Palestinian issue furthers Islamic hardliner reactions and that is exactly what the USA needs, in order to justify their military and political presence and to forge additional alliances.
So the Ukraine issue has forced the EU and the European part of NATO to increase it's military spending's and the political will to even get into a war - therefore reducing the financial burden of the USA. The USA is still the main financier - but NATO/EU is taking a larger share then ever before. The USA can't totally rely onto NATO which is on the European side dominated by Germany, France, UK and Italy. Turkey is a headache for the USA on it's own. However due to history and it's related culture and causes, the "new" NATO members are far more easily maneuvered by the USA into an anti-Russian stand. And an anti-Russian stance might be easily transferred onto an anti-China stance.
As such the USA is taking advantage of this situation by instituting a B9 group within NATO. Clearly taking into calculation that this "new" NATO block would be able to level out political and military setbacks caused by a possible reluctant e.g. Germany, France, etc. Therefore willingly/intentionally causing a rift within the "old" EU NATO organization.
The USA is very used to, and was rather successful making use of it's military to enforce their goals in the past 120 years. It has become a norm for US policy to include military actions. China on the other hand has made very little use of it's military in the past 60 years - some border issues with India and a three week border war with Vietnam.
However China is very aware that US foreign policies don't work out without a military involvement (war). Therefore it has and is readying itself for for exactly that scenario.
IMO China will not attack anyone - if not being clearly threatened in their national security regarding their immediate homeland. A situation the USA has never been exposed to in the past 120 years, (Cuba crisis aside, for which the USA was even willing to go into a Nuclear confrontation/war) but China and a hundred countries and more have experienced just that. Almost entirely due to the US-USSR confrontation.
Therefore the Palestinian issue - also works for China, by pointing out that a repressive, UN law breaking state, is being fully backed by the USA. China however holds back mostly in that regard, due to it's good and important diplomatic/economic relationship with Israel.
China's political path and offer is very clear - are you with us and therefore profit from trade and economic cooperation, (whilst obtaining global domination for themselves) or do you prefer a USA global domination, which will eventually get you into a war with your neighbor or wherever globally.
Since this is an American forum - let me clearly state that politics are politics and these do not necessarily reflect a populations general mindset in regards to a specific political party that beholds the former, present and future government of the USA. But the US elites - regardless of their party allegiance all behold the same primary agenda - USA No.1 (brainwashed down to most Americans in the past 120 years), and all applied means are considered/propagated as legitimate and righteous in order to keep it that way.
For the world it doesn't really matter if democrats or republicans rule - but a senile warmongering Biden, a loudmouth Trump, a silly boy like Bush jun. or a ruthless capitalist as Bush sen. are extremely dangerous for our planet and your own country. Personally I liked Reagan best - no real wars at all - outspoken and headstrong, and never openly insulted other heads of states or caused serious friction. He kept and even ensured the USA as No.1. via diplomatically and economically out maneuvering the USSR. Never mind the Iran-contra issue -nobody is perfect, or his show of force towards the superpower Grenada. But just as in the Grenada issue the eradication of communism was his primary goal, which he achieved without setting the world on fire. Job well done.