Why Do TDS-infected liberals Have Such A Hard Time Conceding that Trump’s Conviction is Destined to be Reversed?

:auiqs.jpg:

“During my time with prosecutors, both in preparation for and during the trials, it was clear they were interested only in testimony from me that would enable them to convict President Trump,” he noted of Bragg’s case.

“When my testimony was insufficient for a point the prosecution sought to make, prosecutors frequently asked inappropriate leading questions to elicit answers that supported their narrative.”
____________
“You may reasonably ask why I am speaking out now. The answer is simple.
I have witnessed firsthand the damage done when prosecutors pick their target first and then seek evidence to fit a predetermined narrative,” he concluded.

“Justice must be more than effective; it must be credible,” he added. “When politics and prosecution become indistinguishable, public trust erodes.”



 
That indictment was dismissed after a federal judge derermined that interim U.S. Attorney, Lindsey Halligan, was appointed unlawfully.

Try to keep up you moron.
She was indicted, stupid.


You lied.
 
She was indicted, stupid.


You lied.
Cool!
Then according to your owm logic here Trump has also been convicted.
Thank you for inadvertently making MY point for me (again).
I'm tempted to say I hate manipulating you like this...but it's actually lots of fun!
:auiqs.jpg:
 
Why does Trump's cult have such a hard time respecting the law?
First, it’s not a cult no matter how often you make that ridiculous empty claim.
Secondly, we are the ones who do respect the law. You and your fellow shitlib troll imbeciles don’t.
He's a convicted felon
A conviction which is destined to be properly reversed on appeal. Try to keep that in your wee little mind, ya moron.
unless and until an appeal succeeds.
No shit. At least you recognize that a conviction and always forever.
The judicial system also determined that he is a sexual abuser and a business fraud.
No. It didn’t. A NY civil jury found concluded that he had sexually abused the absolutely insane complainant. That doesn’t make it true. And having had some of his businesses run poorly doesn’t make him a business fraud, either. You shithead.
Multiple appeals, audits, investigations, and recounts comfirmed the certified result of the 2020 presidential election,
Allegedly. But we continue to see evidence of how those preconceived determinations are doubtful. Not that a tool like you would admit it.
yet the loser and his lickspittles still can't handle the democratic process.
If there had indeed been cheating, then that is what undermines the democratic process.
 
Nope. Sorry. My claim that the orange bag 'O shyt is now immune to tax audits for life is not made up. :dunno: Are U Ok? Do you need a safe space? :dunno: Boom, motherfuqer. :rolleyes:
Post #46.
Bullshit.

His sole immunity is for PRIOR tax years.

The agreement doesn’t address possible future audits for future tax years. Why do you always lie, Fumblin Dickweed?


Say it with me you asshole troll liar:

For PAST tax years.

Now, go away. You’re a gnat.
 

Why Do TDS-infected liberals Have Such A Hard Time Conceding that Trump’s Conviction is Destined to be Reversed?​


I only see one problem: as I understand it, when his conviction goes to the higher court, the higher court will not review or reevaluate any of the evidence in the trial, but they will only be allowed to reconsider procedural errors done by the lower court.

But I sure hope his conviction is thrown out as calling Trump a "convict" and a "felon" is literally the ONLY thing the Left has gotten for satisfaction after eleven years of trying and billions spent by the Left in trying to destroy the guy.
 
Why Do TDS-infected liberals Have Such A Hard Time Conceding that Trump’s Conviction is Destined to be Reversed?

🤷‍♂️
 
1. In America, I don’t need you to ask me to say what I want to say.
True. But still, I didn’t and wouldn’t ask a scumbag lying troll like you.
2. It’s relevant because you used the copycat term.
No. It’s irrelevant. You do have TDS. But the origins of that phrase don’t make a damn bit of difference. You petty twit troll.
3. You included it in your topic.
The phrase “TDS?” WOW. You can read. You twit.

4. No dishonesty in saying that “TDS” is a copycat term borrowed from “Bush derangement syndrome”, “Clinton derangement syndrome”, and Obama derangement syndrome. Trump supporters pretend it’s an original term.
Who gives a ****. Your TDS may turn out to be one of the rare cases which become terminal. Get help. You need it, you moron.
5. You’re triggered because you thought Trumpers invented the term.
No. And that’s still irrelevant. I’ll say it again. It doesn’t matter who first coined that or any related term. You’re only fixated on intro engage in deflection.

When you’re so clearly and obviously bothered by the valid accusation, it appears that you’re the one “triggered.”
I’m sure a simpleton lying sack of shit like you won’t understand this, but it’s still true. You claiming that anyone is triggered doesn’t make it true.

I enjoy exposing you for the dishonest dickbag you always are.



😎


***Mod Note: Please refrain from using words in the word filter list. ~~~AyeCantSeeYou
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Heavily redacted and carefully selected pages that serve as a fraction of the full files, and most of which are just reference sheets and legal crap.

We've got his dick getting bitten by a child and our pedo POTUS using his fingers to measure children's vulvas among other things in just what the pedo's were willing to release. Get off your party's dick and support releasing the files, or remain a pedophile protecting pervert for the rest of your life.
3.5 million pages have been released, including 2k videos and 180k images

Of that around 200k pages had redactions


Hardly heavily redacted
 
First, it’s not a cult no matter how often you make that ridiculous empty claim.
Secondly, we are the ones who do respect the law. You and your fellow shitlib troll imbeciles don’t.

A conviction which is destined to be properly reversed on appeal. Try to keep that in your wee little mind, ya moron.

No shit. At least you recognize that a conviction and always forever.

No. It didn’t. A NY civil jury found concluded that he had sexually abused the absolutely insane complainant. That doesn’t make it true. And having had some of his businesses run poorly doesn’t make him a business fraud, either. You shithead.

Allegedly. But we continue to see evidence of how those preconceived determinations are doubtful. Not that a tool like you would admit it.

If there had indeed been cheating, then that is what undermines the democratic process.
Under America's judicial system, Trump is a convicted felon.

That is the legal reality, not a political opinion.


 
I only see one problem: as I understand it, when his conviction goes to the higher court, the higher court will not review or reevaluate any of the evidence in the trial, but they will only be allowed to reconsider procedural errors done by the lower court.
Your understanding is not exactly fully accurate. While it is true that (for the most part) appellate courts focus on whether the law (as charged to the jury by the trial judge) was proper, it is still true that appellate courts also consider the evidence. Indeed, they are called upon to act as a “thirteenth” juror.
But I sure hope his conviction is thrown out as calling Trump a "convict" and a "felon" is literally the ONLY thing the Left has gotten for satisfaction after eleven years of trying and billions spent by the Left in trying to destroy the guy.
It seems your hope will be met. It was a truly vile deliberate abuse of prosecutorial powers. It cannot stand.
 
What? :dunno: Seems to me none of what you said is plausible. Or even provable, as the man has two daughters. Am I supposed to believe he was 'gay on the side'?!? :auiqs.jpg:
What’s truly hysterical is that your wee little “mind” believes that those young women are his biological daughters. :auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Dumbass. I already agreed with that.


Again. I already noted that he has been convicted. The distinction is that it will cease being a criminal conviction when the case gets oberturned on appeal.

Thanks for your utterly uninteresting and uninformative reiteration of something I haven’t denied.

You’re pretty ******* dense, Shitlips.
"it will cease being a criminal conviction when the case gets oberturned on appeal."

You are not authorized to pre-rule, Nostro.

Your personal opinion is of no relevance.
 
Last edited:
Your understanding is not exactly fully accurate. While it is true that (for the most part) appellate courts focus on whether the law (as charged to the jury by the trial judge) was proper, it is still true that appellate courts also consider the evidence. Indeed, they are called upon to act as a “thirteenth” juror.

That's good to hear because Trump's conviction was the biggest tissue of BS I have ever seen, worthy of a banana republic.
  1. They elevated an expired misdemeanor to an active felony based solely on the assumption that Trump tried to alter the outcome of the election, something democrats have done 500 times with impunity, despite the fact that he was only settling out of court then because the complainant WAITED until the election to try to charge him!
  2. The entire case was based on some other crime that the prosecution never defined, therefore, denying his lawyers the ability to defend against.
  3. Trump was refused the presentation of expert witnesses.
  4. The prosecution in part based part of its case on the word of a convicted purgerer.
  5. Making payments in an out of court settlement isn't a crime.
  6. Trump did not make the payments, his lawyer or accountant did.
  7. The jury was given contradictory instructions where each juror could disagree on the conviction, make up their own guilt, yet still all find him guilty, not even knowing of what nor all 12 agreeing.
Somewhere in there has to be the grounds to throw any conviction produced from such a trial out.
 
15th post
True. But still, I didn’t and wouldn’t ask a scumbag lying troll like you.

No. It’s irrelevant. You do have TDS. But the origins of that phrase don’t make a damn bit of difference. You petty twit troll.

The phrase “TDS?” WOW. You can read. You twit.


Who gives a ****. Your TDS may turn out to be one of the rare cases which become terminal. Get help. You need it, you moron.

No. And that’s still irrelevant. I’ll say it again. It doesn’t matter who first coined that or any related term. You’re only fixated on intro engage in deflection.

When you’re so clearly and obviously bothered by the valid accusation, it appears that you’re the one “triggered.”

I’m sure a simpleton lying sack of shit like you won’t understand this, but it’s still true. You claiming that anyone is triggered doesn’t make it true.

I enjoy exposing you for the dishonest dickbag you always are.

Go take a couple of Midol, ya little *****.

😎
Don’t hide your frustration under a cool and collected emoji because you know it doesn’t reflect your triggered state. You hate losing arguments, especially from me. Doing research before typing would save you lots of anguish.
 
You are not authorized to pre-rule, Nostro.
Not authorized by YOU to give an opinion on a discussion board??? :auiqs.jpg:
Wow, you really are a tub of brain-lard.

Your personal opinion is of no relevance.
Only about 10,000X more relevant and worthwhile than your every bloviating, knuckleheaded BS post here combined.
 
"it will cease being a criminal conviction when the case gets oberturned on appeal."

You are not authorized to pre-rule, Nostro.

Your personal opinion is of no relevance.
Of course I am authorized to assess the likelihood of a reversal. Your permission (or anybody else’s permission) is not required nor is it of any value.
You don’t have to agree and I couldn’t possibly care less about your disagreement. You have not the slightest bit of comprehension about the legal issues that will sink the purely political prosecutor’s alleged “case” against President Trump.
 
Don’t hide your frustration under a cool and collected emoji because you know it doesn’t reflect your triggered state. You hate losing arguments, especially from me. Doing research before typing would save you lots of anguish.
🥱

I see that you are still the only one triggered.

The rest of your mindless spew stands as confirmation of that fact. 👍
 
Back
Top Bottom