Why Do TDS-infected liberals Have Such A Hard Time Conceding that Trump’s Conviction is Destined to be Reversed?

So, you're cool with your *pResident cheating on his wife with a porn star. You're 'good' with that as long as you believe pedos, trannies and illegal immigrants and every leftist is getting 'owned'. Is that the long and short of it? :dunno:

You’re cool with Obama being a homosexual and having sex with random men while he was married to Michelle. You’re okay with Ruben Gallego dumping his pregnant wife to marry another woman. You were okay with BJ Clinton having dozens of affairs as Governor and having an affair while in the White House. You’re good with all that as long as you can promote LGTBQ nonsense, keep abortion legal, and keep importing millions of illegals, all to “own” conservatives.

So spare us the phony outrage that we support a man who supposedly had an affair 20 years ago.
 
You’re cool with Obama being a homosexual and having sex with random men while he was married to Michelle.
What? :dunno: Seems to me none of what you said is plausible. Or even provable, as the man has two daughters. Am I supposed to believe he was 'gay on the side'?!? :auiqs.jpg:

That is a yarn. Thanks.
Ruben Gallego dumping his pregnant wife to marry another woman.
The 'pregnant wife' is the current Mayor of Phoenix, AZ. I think she's surviving just fine without him, genius. :rolleyes:
BJ Clinton having dozens of affairs as Governor and having an affair while in the White House.
Dozens? Got any sources besides Lewinsky or Epstein? :dunno:
You’re good with all that as long as you can promote LGTBQ nonsense, keep abortion legal, and keep importing millions of illegals, all to “own” conservatives.
I see you just say shyt, just to say it, because you are politically toxic, Ie. a right winger troll. Fair enough. :rolleyes: None of what you said is a thing that I can see with my own eyes happening right now. So, WTF are you talking about?!? :dunno:
So spare us the phony outrage that we support a man who supposedly had an affair 20 years ago.
No, you support a man far, far worse than that.
 
Your need for diversion and contempt for democracy are noted.

if you are upset by the judicial rulings regarding Willis, I suspect that she is as well, but they must be respected.
You on the left always bleat about how you're all about defending democracy but when the dust settles...you're always the ones who shit all over it! You'll do ANYTHING if it means keeping power!
 
A. I didn’t ask you, Lib.

B. It’s irrelevant.

C. It’s off topic.

D. You’re still a dishonest shitlib troll.

E. You’ve got it bad.

Now, although you tried to deflect, the fact remains that you liberals cannot fathom it, this bogus conviction is destined to get reversed.

Yes. We all know that. And that means I didn’t say anything untrue, you simp. The fact is that there was no “other crime” he sought to commit or aid in or conceal.

Besides, the entries weren’t false in the first place.

You’re an idiot. The underlying crimes were misdemeanors. The add-on of the “other crimes [sic]” was what elevated the charges to felonies.

Again, not a thing I said was a lie or even inaccurate. You moron.

I wouldn’t expect a retarded scumbag like you to understand. It all always sails over your pinhead.

False. It’s only “clear” to assholes like you because you want it to be true. It still isn’t.

Never happened at all.

Nonsense. Everyone with a functioning brain ((which of course excludes assholes like you)) knows full well that there was no coverup of anything. It was legal to pay her for an NDA. And the NDA payment was not at all akin to a campaign contribution Nonsense (and that bullshit claim was never proved anyway).

There was no violation of any campaign finance law.


Which also never happened.

One last thing. You’re way too verbose when you spew your idiotic theories. So, if you continue to feel the urge to lie and lie and lie, work on being concise. Until then, gfy.
1. In America, I don’t need you to ask me to say what I want to say.
2. It’s relevant because you used the copycat term.
3. You included it in your topic.
4. No dishonesty in saying that “TDS” is a copycat term borrowed from “Bush derangement syndrome”, “Clinton derangement syndrome”, and Obama derangement syndrome. Trump supporters pretend it’s an original term.
5. You’re triggered because you thought Trumpers invented the term.


Bonus: I triggered you.

1779265683084.gif
 
What? :dunno: Seems to me none of what you said is plausible. Or even provable, as the man has two daughters. Am I supposed to believe he was 'gay on the side'?!? :auiqs.jpg:

Oh, so when someone comes forward with detailed accusations, has the dates that it happened, now suddenly that’s not enough? Larry Sinclair gave detailed accounts of the hotel, the Obama driver, and what happened.

Your argument is that a married man with kids wouldn’t have gay sex? :itsok:
 
The 'pregnant wife' is the current Mayor of Phoenix, AZ. I think she's surviving just fine without him, genius. :rolleyes:

By that logic Melania is the First Lady, so she seems to be doing just fine. Thanks for proving my point. You don’t care at all if someone cheats on his wife, or even abandons his wife while she is about to give birth.
 
You keep saying that and yet your pedo has multiple accusers against him, appears more than anybody in the small percentage of files that have trickled out, and has staked his entire Presidency on hiding the evidence,
I look at their usage of the term "TDS" as a public service.

It's how they identify themselves publicly as cult members.

It lets me know that any attempts at communication with them are pointless.
 
Dozens? Got any sources besides Lewinsky or Epstein? :dunno:
Now you’re just playing dumb?

Ever hear of Trooper-gate? Several state troopers testified that over the many years as Governor, Clinton used state troopers to shuttle him and his mistresses around:

IMG_1180.webp




The whole thing was so embarrassing for Democrats that they pivoted to the “consenting adults” talking points when it came to sexual degeneracy. That these affairs were just none of our business since everyone was a “consenting adult”. Although there were also allegations of sexual assault and even rape, but Dems back then didn’t just “believe all women”.


Unlike Trump accusers, these women came forward in public and had detailed accounts of what happened to them.


IMG_1181.webp



IMG_1182.webp
 
I see you just say shyt, just to say it, because you are politically toxic, Ie. a right winger troll. Fair enough. :rolleyes: None of what you said is a thing that I can see with my own eyes happening right now. So, WTF are you talking about?!? :dunno:
In other words you can’t refute what I said, so now just filibuster with ad hominem attacks.

None of what I said “is a thing” while you conveniently ignore all the accusations against BJ Clinton and pretend he didn’t get caught red handed with having an affair while in the White House and lied about it under oath.

Ruben Gallego left his pregnant wife for a younger staffer, that’s a fact. You’d vote for him if he ran for President.

You leftwingers are so pathetic.
 
You’re cool with Obama being a homosexual and having sex with random men while he was married to Michelle. You’re okay with Ruben Gallego dumping his pregnant wife to marry another woman. You were okay with BJ Clinton having dozens of affairs as Governor and having an affair while in the White House. You’re good with all that as long as you can promote LGTBQ nonsense, keep abortion legal, and keep importing millions of illegals, all to “own” conservatives.

So spare us the phony outrage that we support a man who supposedly had an affair 20 years ago.
Don’t forget Biden and an affair with “Dr” Jill and ruined her marriage.
 

Why Do TDS-infected liberals Have Such A Hard Time Conceding that Trump’s Conviction is Destined to be Reversed?​


First off, this thread is in “politics” because the opposing POV thread is also in “Politics.” That one was never officially flagged as an unclean start troll thread. It is, of course, but if it isn’t flagged, then this one shouldn’t be, either.

The topic itself is just a few thoughts about how illegitimate the NYC felony case was.

See: Donald Trump's lawyers urge New York appeals court to overturn 'egregious' civil fraud verdict

Aside from the fact that, at most, the claims made against Trump amounted to mere misdemeanors. But misdemeanors were already time barred. So in order to “get” Trump, the partisan hack NYC DA in New York County cobbled together a bizarre theory of the case to “elevate” the time l-barred misdemeanors to “felonies.”

And he refused to give a straight answer to the pertinent question about what the “other crime” was. Indeed, it’s not even clear, given the way the jury got charged on that issue, that the verdict reflects a unanimous verdict.

Also, the persecution was allowed to introduce “evidence” about Presidential actions or statements which the SCOTUS decision arguably forbids.

This doesn’t even touch upon the refusal of that weird judge to recuse himself.

OIP.RFK_d8XeHd1RBEKrxhWMOQHaGn
 
Falsify business records with the intent to defraud? Oh, you mean like Tish James did with her mortgage applications? Those kind of falsified business records?
Yes, exactly. The only difference between James' case and Trump's was that two separate Grand Juries failed to indict Leticia James. Most likely because the charges against her were just a bogus political revenge witch hunt from Trump's weaponized Justice Department.
Trump on the other hand had a mountain of incriminating evidence for a Grand Jury to charge. His ex attorney and personal "fixer" Michael Cohen had all the receipts and spilled the beans.
So yes, the two cases were similar in that they both involved bank fraud, but they were different in that Trump is guilty and James isn't.

Anymore dumb questions?
 
There's an entire wikipedia page about the women that have accused him of rape including a 13 year old who bit his penis as he tried to violently force himself on her. How stunningly retarded are you that you think there is only 1? :cuckoo:

And we haven't even been able to see the Epstein cabal files that he is desperately hiding.
You will believe anything
 
Yes, exactly. The only difference between James' case and Trump's was that two separate Grand Juries failed to indict Leticia James. Most likely because the charges against her were just a bogus political revenge witch hunt from Trump's weaponized Justice Department.
Trump on the other hand had a mountain of incriminating evidence for a Grand Jury to charge. His ex attorney and personal "fixer" Michael Cohen had all the receipts and spilled the beans.
So yes, the two cases were similar in that they both involved bank fraud, but they were different in that Trump is guilty and James isn't.

Anymore dumb questions?
Um, she was indicted, liar.


 
Um, she was indicted, liar.
That indictment was dismissed after a federal judge derermined that interim U.S. Attorney, Lindsey Halligan, was appointed unlawfully.

Try to keep up you moron.
 
15th post
Most likely because the charges against her were just a bogus political revenge witch hunt from Trump's weaponized Justice Department.
Or a Trump hating GJ initiated the 'Hoagie' protocol.

His ex attorney and personal "fixer" Michael Cohen had all the receipts and spilled the beans.
And later claimed he was cooerced by the prosecution.
 
A. I didn’t ask you, Lib.

B. It’s irrelevant.

C. It’s off topic.

D. You’re still a dishonest shitlib troll.

E. You’ve got it bad.

Now, although you tried to deflect, the fact remains that you liberals cannot fathom it, this bogus conviction is destined to get reversed.

Yes. We all know that. And that means I didn’t say anything untrue, you simp. The fact is that there was no “other crime” he sought to commit or aid in or conceal.
Most of what you say is untrue.
I just explained to you that the crime the falsified business records concealed was an undeclared (therefore illegal) campaign contribution.
Besides, the entries weren’t false in the first place.
Sure they were. An accurate record would have been ledgered something like "$130,000 to Stormy Daniels for her silence."
Instead the money was paid to Michael Cowen with the instructions for him to then pay Daniels from his own personal account.
Yeah....sounds totally legit to me!
You’re an idiot. The underlying crimes were misdemeanors.
According to NY state law you are full of caca. If the undelying crime (fraudulent business records) is committed to conceal another crime (illegal campaign contribution) then that underlying crime becomes a felony.
This point seems to be having a paeticularly hard time sinking into that thick skull of yours huh?
It's probably just cognitive dissonance. Your TDS (Trump Devotion Syndrome) won't allow you to seriously consider that your cult god could actually be legitimately guilty of anything.
The add-on of the “other crimes [sic]” was what elevated the charges to felonies.
False
Again, not a thing I said was a lie or even inaccurate. You moron.
False
I wouldn’t expect a retarded scumbag like you to understand. It all always sails over your pinhead.
Ain't you cute!
False. It’s only “clear” to assholes like you because you want it to be true. It still isn’t.
**** off ya twit!
Never happened at all.
False
Nonsense. Everyone with a functioning brain ((which of course excludes assholes like you)) knows full well that there was no coverup of anything.
Why not just pay Stormy directly then and write the cost of the NDA down as a $130,000 campaign contribution.
It was legal to pay her for an NDA.
Sure it was. Just not legal to record it as attorney fees.
And the NDA payment was not at all akin to a campaign contribution Nonsense (and that bullshit claim was never proved anyway).
Sure it was. That proof resulted in felonies Simp.
There was no violation of any campaign finance law.
The verdict disagrees with your dim-witted legal theory.
Which also never happened.
Your TDS has made you deliriius.
One last thing. You’re way too verbose when you spew your idiotic theories. So, if you continue to feel the urge to lie and lie and lie, work on being concise. Until then, gfy.
Good to see you too!
 
Back
Top Bottom