No liberals don't hate Christianity, what we do hate is that fact that some whites and the majority of whites in some geographic areas of this country have defiled God's word to enrich themselves, marginalize others and foster their racism.
The Shocking 'Slave Bible': Here Are the Parts That Were Deleted to Manipulate Slaves
“We skip over the Israelites in slavery in Egypt being let out,” said Schmidt.
Other references to freedom were also omitted.
“They’re highlighting themes of being submissive, the same thing goes on with the New Testament as well,” he said.
“The whole book of Revelation is left out, so there is no new Kingdom, no new world, nothing to look forward to,” Schmidt explained.
The Shocking 'Slave Bible': Here Are the Parts That Were Deleted to Manipulate Slaves
White evangelicals love Trump and aren't confused about why. No one should be.
Evangelical denominations formed from these splits in the South were usually comprised of people who had made money from slavery or supported it. After the Civil War many were more likely to have supported the Ku Klux Klan and approved of (or participated in) lynching.
Decades later, the Rev. Jerry Falwell, the evangelical leader, opposed sanctions on South Africa's apartheid regime and insulted Bishop Desmond Tutu, a Nobel Prize Peace winner, as a "phony."
the 2019 Annual Convention of the Southern Baptists was opened with a gavel owned by John A. Broadus, a slaveholder, white supremacist and the founder of their seminary.
Opinion | Don't be confused about why evangelicals love Trump. It's about race.
Bernhardt[1] (or Ben) Klassen February 20, 1918 (O.S. February 7, 1918) – August 6, 1993) was an American politician and white
supremacist religious leader. He founded the Church of the Creator with the publication of his book Nature's Eternal Religion in 1973. Klassen was openly racist and antisemitic, and first popularized the term "Racial Holy War" within the white nationalist movement.
Ben Klassen first popularized the term "Racial Holy War" (RaHoWa) within the white nationalist movement. He also consistently called black people "ni66ers" in public discourse as well as in the literature of the COTC, as opposed to many white nationalist leaders who use relatively more polite terms in public. Klassen wrote, "Furthermore, in looking up the word in Webster's dictionary I found the term 'ni66er' very descriptive: 'a vulgar, offensive term of hostility and contempt for the black man'. I can't think of anything that defines better and more accurately what our position... should be... If we are going to be for racial integrity and racial purity... we must take a hostile position toward the ni66er. We must give him nothing but contempt."
Ben Klassen - Wikipedia
what we do hate is that fact that some whites and the majority of whites in some geographic areas of this country have defiled God's word to enrich themselves, marginalize others and foster their racism.
SOME whites.... and the majority in SOME geographic areas.
Ok, I agree with that. So we're talking about what.... 1% of the population?
Here's what the rest of us, are having a problem with.
1. There are a few alt-Right crazy people. They are loud, and obnoxious, and the rest of us find them ridiculous and annoying. We tolerate their existence, and that's about it.
The left-wing reads into this 'tolerance' of their freedom of speech, as being supportive. As if, not trying to march people to an American version of Auschwitz, means we somehow support their views.
No, we actually are just living out 'tolerance' that the left claims to believe in, while practicing what they preach.
2. There is a massive hypocrisy on the left, about being pro-heritage, and being pro-racists.
If a black person, pushes "Black History Month", where they are being obviously "pro-black", I don't see anyone on the left-wing automatically assuming they are racists, and hating their racism.
Yet, if anyone here says they are pro-white.... without you finding out anything at all about that person's views or ideology, without knowing anything more about what "pro-white" means to the person saying it.... they are automatically judged to be a racists person, engaging in racists ideology.
Between these two things, having a few tiny groups of super loud people, and people who simply want to promote their own heritage, the left-wing has condemned a vast swath of the country without cause, just like Hillary and her "basket of deplorables" comment.
If we started a new cable TV channel, called White Entertainment Television, what would the left-wing do? It would be a massive outcry.
Everyone involved would be labeled racists and white supremacists.
Celebrities, Music, News, Fashion, Entertainment, TV Shows and Video
Where is the outrage? Where are the people calling this "Black Entertainment Television" racists, and black supremacists?
How many times have I heard that so-and-so company, or rally, or gathering of any kind, isn't diverse enough? Yet if you go to Howard University, and just look at their home page.... every photo is a black student, or a black teacher. Zero diversity.
Howard University Home
Where is the outrage? Where are the calls that they are obviously racists?
See this is the problem. There are roughly 3 to 4 black posters on this forum itself, that repeatedly make claims of the superiority of black culture. There are several of them. For over a year now, have come on here promoting black culture, and black history, and black achievements.
I have yet to see a single left-winger stand up and call them out for being racists.
Yet if someone posts on here the achievements of white culture, white history, and white achievements... they are instantly attacked as racists and white supremacists.
There are two problems with that.....
1. The worst thing you can do, is attack someone, or some group, that actually is racists. The entire ideology of white supremacy, is that they are under attack. You doing that, justifies their claims.
2. It makes you a hypocrite. You discredit your own view point, when two different groups push identical beliefs, but it's bad for one, and good for the other.
This is the problem with people on your side of the argument.
