Why do leftists focus on the mythological "assault rifle" when most gun violence is committed with a handgun?

Is it because rural white people own AR style weapons while inner city blacks use handguns?

I can't think of ANY logical reason for this fixation on a weapon that is seldom used during the commission of a crime while at the same time ignoring the epidemic of handgun violence in inner cities.


Well, as best I can figure - the dumbass fascists use the "AR" as "Assault Rifle" when it is not - never has been and never will be. The "AR" actually means - "Armalite Rifle" and was given that moniker by the architect Eugene Stoner.

I have noticed that these idiots have never considered that the Thompson machine gun (Tommy Gun) or the "Browning Automatic Rifle" are actually "assault weapons"

The civilian version is neither an "assault rifle" nor is it "automatic" capable. I have a Remington 700 rifle with a scope. I can take a head off at 700 yards - but it isn't a "scary black" rifle.......

It's nothing more than a lack of understanding or just complete incompetence on the fascists part. However, it doesn't change their zeal to get rid of ANY private gun ownership by civilians, a necessary part of takeover.

These assholes fool no one........no one.
You are correct, it is never possible to pin down the term “assault rifle”

The goal should be to reduce the lethality of these weapons in mass shootings. Banned weapons should be defined by rate of fire and magazine capacity.

Cut down on the number of bullets that can be fired in an assault


I see....so am I correct when I can only assume that you would be OK with a flintlock smooth bore rifle.....for the stupid "masses"?

Depends…

How many rounds per second can a flintlock fire?
How many school children have been slaughtered with a flintlock?
how many people have been killed after they gave up their guns to an oppressive government??

over 120 million,,

How many in the US where there are 330 million guns?
Ignore history. Great idea.
The mind of a federal supremacist is a fascinating thing. No other word for that level of ignorance and dishonesty.
Show me in AMERICAN HISTORY with a Constitution

That is easy show how the US government has a history of being abusive.
Even though we had a constitution, American history is full of theft and murder by the government.
Slavery is one example, but the way the US government treated the Native Americans is another.
Another example is how the US bought CA, AZ, UT, NV, NM, OK, FL and many other states from Mexico, under treaties protecting the rights and property of the million or so Mexicans living on Spanish land grants in those states, and then stole almost all of the properties through deliberate murder of the Mexican citizens who had legal ownership.

Not only is the US government corrupt and abusive, but all governments not only are, but tend to get worse over time.
All governments in all of history eventually get so bad they have to be destroyed.
This government is no different.
We need to be able to destroy it when it becomes necessary to do so.


Thus the Second Amendment.

American Marxists still can't get past "the right of the People to keep... arms". Keep. Then comes "bear".
 
Is it because rural white people own AR style weapons while inner city blacks use handguns?

I can't think of ANY logical reason for this fixation on a weapon that is seldom used during the commission of a crime while at the same time ignoring the epidemic of handgun violence in inner cities.


Well, as best I can figure - the dumbass fascists use the "AR" as "Assault Rifle" when it is not - never has been and never will be. The "AR" actually means - "Armalite Rifle" and was given that moniker by the architect Eugene Stoner.

I have noticed that these idiots have never considered that the Thompson machine gun (Tommy Gun) or the "Browning Automatic Rifle" are actually "assault weapons"

The civilian version is neither an "assault rifle" nor is it "automatic" capable. I have a Remington 700 rifle with a scope. I can take a head off at 700 yards - but it isn't a "scary black" rifle.......

It's nothing more than a lack of understanding or just complete incompetence on the fascists part. However, it doesn't change their zeal to get rid of ANY private gun ownership by civilians, a necessary part of takeover.

These assholes fool no one........no one.
You are correct, it is never possible to pin down the term “assault rifle”

The goal should be to reduce the lethality of these weapons in mass shootings. Banned weapons should be defined by rate of fire and magazine capacity.

Cut down on the number of bullets that can be fired in an assault


I see....so am I correct when I can only assume that you would be OK with a flintlock smooth bore rifle.....for the stupid "masses"?

Depends…

How many rounds per second can a flintlock fire?
How many school children have been slaughtered with a flintlock?
how many people have been killed after they gave up their guns to an oppressive government??

over 120 million,,

How many in the US where there are 330 million guns?
Ignore history. Great idea.
The mind of a federal supremacist is a fascinating thing. No other word for that level of ignorance and dishonesty.
Show me in AMERICAN HISTORY with a Constitution

That is easy show how the US government has a history of being abusive.
Even though we had a constitution, American history is full of theft and murder by the government.
Slavery is one example, but the way the US government treated the Native Americans is another.
Another example is how the US bought CA, AZ, UT, NV, NM, OK, FL and many other states from Mexico, under treaties protecting the rights and property of the million or so Mexicans living on Spanish land grants in those states, and then stole almost all of the properties through deliberate murder of the Mexican citizens who had legal ownership.

Not only is the US government corrupt and abusive, but all governments not only are, but tend to get worse over time.
All governments in all of history eventually get so bad they have to be destroyed.
This government is no different.
We need to be able to destroy it when it becomes necessary to do so.


Thus the Second Amendment.

American Marxists still can't get past "the right of the People to keep... arms". Keep. Then comes "bear".

I always love the part that states "Shall NOT be infringed"
 
Because if they had a clue then they would actually be trying to restrict criminals and not guns. But can not have that. Better to restrict guns and law enforcement. Because guns and law enforcement are probably not going to vote for them anyway.

You mean things like background checks?
I see you still really have no clue. Background checks are not preformed on criminals. Most criminals do not get the guns they use from places that preform background checks. The normal everyday citizen does though. So thanks to the idiots they restrict the law abiding while letting the criminal free reign.
 
Is it because rural white people own AR style weapons while inner city blacks use handguns?

I can't think of ANY logical reason for this fixation on a weapon that is seldom used during the commission of a crime while at the same time ignoring the epidemic of handgun violence in inner cities.


Well, as best I can figure - the dumbass fascists use the "AR" as "Assault Rifle" when it is not - never has been and never will be. The "AR" actually means - "Armalite Rifle" and was given that moniker by the architect Eugene Stoner.

I have noticed that these idiots have never considered that the Thompson machine gun (Tommy Gun) or the "Browning Automatic Rifle" are actually "assault weapons"

The civilian version is neither an "assault rifle" nor is it "automatic" capable. I have a Remington 700 rifle with a scope. I can take a head off at 700 yards - but it isn't a "scary black" rifle.......

It's nothing more than a lack of understanding or just complete incompetence on the fascists part. However, it doesn't change their zeal to get rid of ANY private gun ownership by civilians, a necessary part of takeover.

These assholes fool no one........no one.
You are correct, it is never possible to pin down the term “assault rifle”

The goal should be to reduce the lethality of these weapons in mass shootings. Banned weapons should be defined by rate of fire and magazine capacity.

Cut down on the number of bullets that can be fired in an assault


I see....so am I correct when I can only assume that you would be OK with a flintlock smooth bore rifle.....for the stupid "masses"?

Depends…

How many rounds per second can a flintlock fire?
How many school children have been slaughtered with a flintlock?
how many people have been killed after they gave up their guns to an oppressive government??

over 120 million,,

How many in the US where there are 330 million guns?
There's actually more like 600 million to a billion.


Just saying.

Most families have over a dozen guns.
There are many different uses for example, like pistol, shotgun, long rifle, short range rifle, cheap plinkers, etc., then there are different types of interest, like bolt action, blow back, recoil locked, gas operated, etc., then there are family heirlooms, like the rifle gramps had from the Civil War, WWI, WWII, etc.
There are more than 30 million AR-15s owned in the US alone.
I've got semi-auto, lever action, double barrel side by side, and pump action long guns as well as multiple handguns going all the way back to a Colt SAA made in 1901 that my great grandfather probably shot several people with (he was a real mean bastard from all accounts) to modern day autos like my Glocks. And everything in between..... and I don't have an especially big collection, compared to most Texans.
 
Why do leftists focus on the mythological "assault rifle" when most gun violence is committed with a handgun?
@@@@@@

AR-15s are the best weapon for defense from marauding Black Lies Matter and ANTIFA bullies
Strangely Hammers are used to kill more people than pistols and rifles combined.
 
Because of its name, "assault weapon". Assault and weapon are both scary names and we know anytime someone wants something banned wording is important to push their agenda. Gun or handgun aren't scary sounding at all.

And when you want people to not think about something and simply agree to it immediately, if you want people to be willing to give up their rights and freedoms easily all you need to do is scare them. People as individuals are fairly smart, but in large groups they are stupid and easily scared. Scared groups of american citizens always want a fast, easy, simple solution that sounds like it will instantly solve all their perceived problems.
Actually the AR is an acronym for "Armalite Rifle". It has nothing to do with assault.
 
Why do leftists focus on the mythological "assault rifle" when most gun violence is committed with a handgun?
@@@@@@

AR-15s are the best weapon for defense from marauding Black Lies Matter and ANTIFA bullies
Strangely Hammers are used to kill more people than pistols and rifles combined.
A ball peen does do an excellent job, I gotta say.
 
Because of its name, "assault weapon". Assault and weapon are both scary names and we know anytime someone wants something banned wording is important to push their agenda. Gun or handgun aren't scary sounding at all.

And when you want people to not think about something and simply agree to it immediately, if you want people to be willing to give up their rights and freedoms easily all you need to do is scare them. People as individuals are fairly smart, but in large groups they are stupid and easily scared. Scared groups of american citizens always want a fast, easy, simple solution that sounds like it will instantly solve all their perceived problems.
Actually the AR is an acronym for "Armalite Rifle". It has nothing to do with assault.

Ok, did I mention AR-15 specifically? No, so what are you even talking about?

And I said assualt weapon, the intials would be AW which again has nothing to do with AR.

Do you actually read and consider things before you feel the need to inject your "insight and wisdom" into it?

And what exactly was the point of that response? Seriously, what did that have to do with the topic of this thread?
 
Is it because rural white people own AR style weapons while inner city blacks use handguns?

I can't think of ANY logical reason for this fixation on a weapon that is seldom used during the commission of a crime while at the same time ignoring the epidemic of handgun violence in inner cities.

How clever of you to define gun ownership by the owners color.
If the AR is seldom used by the white guys, why would you have it?
Oh. It's that personal protection crap again. Got it. Silly me.
Considering farms are trashed every week I'm surprised you get any sleep.
 
Is it because rural white people own AR style weapons while inner city blacks use handguns?

I can't think of ANY logical reason for this fixation on a weapon that is seldom used during the commission of a crime while at the same time ignoring the epidemic of handgun violence in inner cities.


Well, as best I can figure - the dumbass fascists use the "AR" as "Assault Rifle" when it is not - never has been and never will be. The "AR" actually means - "Armalite Rifle" and was given that moniker by the architect Eugene Stoner.

I have noticed that these idiots have never considered that the Thompson machine gun (Tommy Gun) or the "Browning Automatic Rifle" are actually "assault weapons"

The civilian version is neither an "assault rifle" nor is it "automatic" capable. I have a Remington 700 rifle with a scope. I can take a head off at 700 yards - but it isn't a "scary black" rifle.......

It's nothing more than a lack of understanding or just complete incompetence on the fascists part. However, it doesn't change their zeal to get rid of ANY private gun ownership by civilians, a necessary part of a takeover.

These assholes fool no one........no one.
This is exactly it. An AR is nothing more than a different styled hunting rifle. But most people don't understand that AR doesn't mean Assault Rifle, and the MSM and politicians understand that most people don't understand the difference between and actual assault rifle and an AR rifle. SMH.
 
Most families have over a dozen guns.
Most families have ZERO guns. You promote bullshit so authoritatively. It would be nice if any of it was accurate

and

A. Something like 3,000 school children have been killed in school shootings. Most by assault weapons

B. The massive number of hand guns floating around is a big part of why cops treat everyone they encountered as armed and dangerous and why they act the way they do.
 
Most families have over a dozen guns.
Most families have ZERO guns. You promote bullshit so authoritatively. It would be nice if any of it was accurate

and

A. Something like 3,000 school children have been killed in school shootings. Most by assault weapons

B. The massive number of hand guns floating around is a big part of why cops treat everyone they encountered as armed and dangerous and why they act the way they do.
why are you leaving out that guns stop up to 3 million violent crimes a year??

if not for guns your numbers would be a lot higher,,
 

Forum List

Back
Top