OH??? in what context?Yet you specifically referred to 'death camps'.
Focus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
OH??? in what context?Yet you specifically referred to 'death camps'.
Focus.
Why didnt the indians just said "listen if you hate the roma, and want to kill them, we will give them assylym in india"? I mean better then complete extermination in gas chambers?
This context.OH??? in what context?
BS!!!! they KNEW by the mid thirties as did the US government and even my functionally illiterate maternal grandfather ( excellent baker---but fortunately smart enough to flee Poland sometime circa 1900 ) His brothers felt safe in Austria-----big mistake!!!They heard rumors, but didn't actually know the full gravity of what was going on. There was a running joke mothers would tell their children. "If you're bad, they'll take you to Dachau!". They didn't know these were death camps, as the propaganda machine branded them as political prisoner and dissident labor camps.
Now that's funny, I don't care who said it.The smarter nationalists -- like Mao and Ho Chi Minh -- understood that the defeat of the USSR and of the democracies by Japanese militarism and German fascism was the Greater Evil, and so they took part in the war effort with the Lesser Evils against the Greater.
There's an even broader question involved.Now that's funny, I don't care who said it.
During the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, while key decisions were debated by the victorious Allied powers, a multitude of smaller nations and colonies held their breath, waiting to see how their fates would be decided. President Woodrow Wilson, in his Fourteen Points, had called for “a free, open-minded, and absolutely impartial adjustment of all colonial claims,” giving equal weight to the opinions of the colonized peoples and the colonial powers. Among those nations now paying close attention to Wilson's words and actions were the budding nationalist leaders of four disparate non-Western societies—Egypt, India, China, and Korea. That spring, Wilson's words would help ignite political upheavals in all four of these countries.
This book is the first to place the 1919 Revolution in Egypt, the Rowlatt Satyagraha in India, the May Fourth movement in China, and the March First uprising in Korea in the context of a broader “Wilsonian moment” that challenged the existing international order. Using primary source material from America, Europe, and Asia, historian Erez Manela tells the story of how emerging nationalist movements appropriated Wilsonian language and adapted it to their own local culture and politics as they launched into action on the international stage. The rapid disintegration of the Wilsonian promise left a legacy of disillusionment and facilitated the spread of revisionist ideologies and movements in these societies; future leaders of Third World liberation movements—Mao Zedong, Ho Chi Minh, and Jawaharlal Nehru, among others—were profoundly shaped by their experiences at the time.
Lol. Through the policy of US hegemony? That was hardly 'missing', more like 'dismissing'.We missed an opportunity. We missed it again after WWII.
Not 'hegemony' Although after WWII we had to become militarists, given the Soviet expansion and transformation into a serious military power. But we could have beat Moscow at its own game in the Third World. We had no stake in preserving the British and French empires. It's a long discussion, which we ought to have, maybe in another thread.Lol. Through the policy of US hegemony? That was hardly 'missing', more like 'dismissing'.
Yes. Hegemony.Not 'hegemony'