Why did Fauci denounce Hydroxychloroquine?

[colfax_m]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

 

[sarahgop]

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

True. The OP who posted this thread is brilliant.

 

[d0gbreath]

I heard that it wasn't used to save agent orange at Walter Reed.

 

[Lesh]

I heard that it wasn't used to save agent orange at Walter Reed.

Of course it was not. You n fact can you point out any hospital currently using it?

The state of Oklahoma is trying to sell off their stock in this boondoggle... cheap

 

[Nostra]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

 

[colfax_m]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

My handlers? You mean the doctors and scientists that taught me to critically evaluate medical literature over the course of greater than 10 years of formal post-secondary education?

 

[Nostra]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

My handlers? You mean the doctors and scientists that taught me to critically evaluate medical literature over the course of greater than 10 years of formal post-secondary education?

No, the ones who tell you to say every study that contradicts your political views are no good.

Those handlers.

 

[colfax_m]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

My handlers? You mean the doctors and scientists that taught me to critically evaluate medical literature over the course of greater than 10 years of formal post-secondary education?

No, the ones who tell you to say every study that contradicts your political views are no good.

Those handlers.

Those are your handlers. The ones who don't bother to tell you what the study says, just hands it to you and expect you to believe it without asking questions. You don't read the studies. You don't read the studies that contradict those studies. You just believe and repeat things like "well there's 219 studies" without understanding if or why that matters.

Me on the other hand actually read the literature, as much as we can, and realize that the best data shows it doesn't work.

 

[Nostra]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

My handlers? You mean the doctors and scientists that taught me to critically evaluate medical literature over the course of greater than 10 years of formal post-secondary education?

No, the ones who tell you to say every study that contradicts your political views are no good.

Those handlers.

Those are your handlers. The ones who don't bother to tell you what the study says, just hands it to you and expect you to believe it without asking questions. You don't read the studies. You don't read the studies that contradict those studies. You just believe and repeat things like "well there's 219 studies" without understanding if or why that matters.

Me on the other hand actually read the literature, as much as we can, and realize that the best data shows it doesn't work.

You didn't read 219 studies, Dumbass. Nobody believes that lie.

They are peer reviewed, which is what you clowns claim is the Gold Standard.

 

[colfax_m]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

My handlers? You mean the doctors and scientists that taught me to critically evaluate medical literature over the course of greater than 10 years of formal post-secondary education?

No, the ones who tell you to say every study that contradicts your political views are no good.

Those handlers.

Those are your handlers. The ones who don't bother to tell you what the study says, just hands it to you and expect you to believe it without asking questions. You don't read the studies. You don't read the studies that contradict those studies. You just believe and repeat things like "well there's 219 studies" without understanding if or why that matters.

Me on the other hand actually read the literature, as much as we can, and realize that the best data shows it doesn't work.

You didn't read 219 studies, Dumbass. Nobody believes that lie.

They are peer reviewed, which is what you clowns claim is the Gold Standard.

Oh, Nostra. The quality of a study goes well beyond peer review.

Didn't you know that?

 

[Nostra]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

My handlers? You mean the doctors and scientists that taught me to critically evaluate medical literature over the course of greater than 10 years of formal post-secondary education?

No, the ones who tell you to say every study that contradicts your political views are no good.

Those handlers.

Those are your handlers. The ones who don't bother to tell you what the study says, just hands it to you and expect you to believe it without asking questions. You don't read the studies. You don't read the studies that contradict those studies. You just believe and repeat things like "well there's 219 studies" without understanding if or why that matters.

Me on the other hand actually read the literature, as much as we can, and realize that the best data shows it doesn't work.

You didn't read 219 studies, Dumbass. Nobody believes that lie.

They are peer reviewed, which is what you clowns claim is the Gold Standard.

Oh, Nostra. The quality of a study goes well beyond peer review.

Didn't you know that?

Not what you MMGW Cultists have been saying since you switched from the impending ice age to we are all gonna die because of MMGW.

 

[colfax_m]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

My handlers? You mean the doctors and scientists that taught me to critically evaluate medical literature over the course of greater than 10 years of formal post-secondary education?

No, the ones who tell you to say every study that contradicts your political views are no good.

Those handlers.

Those are your handlers. The ones who don't bother to tell you what the study says, just hands it to you and expect you to believe it without asking questions. You don't read the studies. You don't read the studies that contradict those studies. You just believe and repeat things like "well there's 219 studies" without understanding if or why that matters.

Me on the other hand actually read the literature, as much as we can, and realize that the best data shows it doesn't work.

You didn't read 219 studies, Dumbass. Nobody believes that lie.

They are peer reviewed, which is what you clowns claim is the Gold Standard.

Oh, Nostra. The quality of a study goes well beyond peer review.

Didn't you know that?

Not what you MMGW Cultists have been saying since you switched from the impending ice age to we are all gonna die because of MMGW.

We are talking about medical literature, silly.

Did you know that different studies have different methodologies and that those methodologies make the study stronger or weaker?

 

[Nostra]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

My handlers? You mean the doctors and scientists that taught me to critically evaluate medical literature over the course of greater than 10 years of formal post-secondary education?

No, the ones who tell you to say every study that contradicts your political views are no good.

Those handlers.

Those are your handlers. The ones who don't bother to tell you what the study says, just hands it to you and expect you to believe it without asking questions. You don't read the studies. You don't read the studies that contradict those studies. You just believe and repeat things like "well there's 219 studies" without understanding if or why that matters.

Me on the other hand actually read the literature, as much as we can, and realize that the best data shows it doesn't work.

You didn't read 219 studies, Dumbass. Nobody believes that lie.

They are peer reviewed, which is what you clowns claim is the Gold Standard.

Oh, Nostra. The quality of a study goes well beyond peer review.

Didn't you know that?

Not what you MMGW Cultists have been saying since you switched from the impending ice age to we are all gonna die because of MMGW.

We are talking about medical literature, silly.

Did you know that different studies have different methodologies and that those methodologies make the study stronger or weaker?

We were talking "peer reviewed" Dumbass.

Please try to keep up.

 

[colfax_m]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

My handlers? You mean the doctors and scientists that taught me to critically evaluate medical literature over the course of greater than 10 years of formal post-secondary education?

No, the ones who tell you to say every study that contradicts your political views are no good.

Those handlers.

Those are your handlers. The ones who don't bother to tell you what the study says, just hands it to you and expect you to believe it without asking questions. You don't read the studies. You don't read the studies that contradict those studies. You just believe and repeat things like "well there's 219 studies" without understanding if or why that matters.

Me on the other hand actually read the literature, as much as we can, and realize that the best data shows it doesn't work.

You didn't read 219 studies, Dumbass. Nobody believes that lie.

They are peer reviewed, which is what you clowns claim is the Gold Standard.

Oh, Nostra. The quality of a study goes well beyond peer review.

Didn't you know that?

Not what you MMGW Cultists have been saying since you switched from the impending ice age to we are all gonna die because of MMGW.

We are talking about medical literature, silly.

Did you know that different studies have different methodologies and that those methodologies make the study stronger or weaker?

We were talking "peer reviewed" Dumbass.

Please try to keep up.

You're talking about peer reviewed. I'm talking about study methodology.

You don't want to talk about methodology because you don't know anything about it. Do you?

 

[Nostra]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

My handlers? You mean the doctors and scientists that taught me to critically evaluate medical literature over the course of greater than 10 years of formal post-secondary education?

No, the ones who tell you to say every study that contradicts your political views are no good.

Those handlers.

Those are your handlers. The ones who don't bother to tell you what the study says, just hands it to you and expect you to believe it without asking questions. You don't read the studies. You don't read the studies that contradict those studies. You just believe and repeat things like "well there's 219 studies" without understanding if or why that matters.

Me on the other hand actually read the literature, as much as we can, and realize that the best data shows it doesn't work.

You didn't read 219 studies, Dumbass. Nobody believes that lie.

They are peer reviewed, which is what you clowns claim is the Gold Standard.

Oh, Nostra. The quality of a study goes well beyond peer review.

Didn't you know that?

Not what you MMGW Cultists have been saying since you switched from the impending ice age to we are all gonna die because of MMGW.

We are talking about medical literature, silly.

Did you know that different studies have different methodologies and that those methodologies make the study stronger or weaker?

We were talking "peer reviewed" Dumbass.

Please try to keep up.

You're talking about peer reviewed. I'm talking about study methodology.

You don't want to talk about methodology because you don't know anything about it. Do you?

I see, you are ignorant of what peer review means. It looks at the methodology to ensure accurate conclusions were made.


Within the scientific community, peer review has become an essential component of the academic writing process. It helps ensure that papers published in scientific journals answer meaningful research questions and draw accurate conclusions based on professionally executed experimentation. Submission of low quality manuscripts has become increasingly prevalent, and peer review acts as a filter to prevent this work from reaching the scientific community. The major advantage of a peer review process is that peer-reviewed articles provide a trusted form of scientific communication.

 

[WEATHER53]

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Too effective. Covid would have been off the table months before the voting

 

[jc456]

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

you think you get to make that call? hilarious you condescension monkey.

BTW, Masks don't prevent a virus.

 

[colfax_m]

219 peer reviewed studies all showing the efficacy of HCQ. I've already cited them several times, but you keep lying because facts somehow impugn your filthy Reich.

All suffering from the same issues of poor quality.

I think I said this already, but poor quality data doesn't become high quality by virtue of volume. The best data fails to show any benefit. These are facts.

Did he hate Trump so much he wanted people to die? Is he just a cold blooded killer? Is he just an ignorant boob? Could he make more money by pushing something else? Personally, i think its all of the above but i want to hear from all of you.

Dr. Mengele denounced Hydroxychloroquine because it runs about a dollar a dose. NO ONE is buying a mansion on the coast from a drug that costs a dollar a dose. The Fauci virus was his chance to cash in - BIG TIME.

Plus an immediate solution could not be allowed to appear before the election.

You're embarrassing yourself.

What's that?

{

There are currently 292 studies, including 219 peer-reviewed studies (as of May 15, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. It is also effective as a prophylaxis. The drug is very cheap to manufacture.​

See the data here. More data here.}​

Fucktard fraud.

Account Suspended

Colfax will be along shortly to tell us those studies are no good cuz he was told by his handlers they didn't do them right.

BAM!

Nailed it!

**** me for being consistent, right?

You still haven't answered if you have the ability to tell the difference between good studies and bad studies.

But I think we both know the answer.

Of course you are consistent. You repeat anything your handlers tell you.

You are a good lil Sheeple.

My handlers? You mean the doctors and scientists that taught me to critically evaluate medical literature over the course of greater than 10 years of formal post-secondary education?

No, the ones who tell you to say every study that contradicts your political views are no good.

Those handlers.

Those are your handlers. The ones who don't bother to tell you what the study says, just hands it to you and expect you to believe it without asking questions. You don't read the studies. You don't read the studies that contradict those studies. You just believe and repeat things like "well there's 219 studies" without understanding if or why that matters.

Me on the other hand actually read the literature, as much as we can, and realize that the best data shows it doesn't work.

You didn't read 219 studies, Dumbass. Nobody believes that lie.

They are peer reviewed, which is what you clowns claim is the Gold Standard.

Oh, Nostra. The quality of a study goes well beyond peer review.

Didn't you know that?

Not what you MMGW Cultists have been saying since you switched from the impending ice age to we are all gonna die because of MMGW.

We are talking about medical literature, silly.

Did you know that different studies have different methodologies and that those methodologies make the study stronger or weaker?

We were talking "peer reviewed" Dumbass.

Please try to keep up.

You're talking about peer reviewed. I'm talking about study methodology.

You don't want to talk about methodology because you don't know anything about it. Do you?

I see, you are ignorant of what peer review means. It looks at the methodology to ensure accurate conclusions were made.


Within the scientific community, peer review has become an essential component of the academic writing process. It helps ensure that papers published in scientific journals answer meaningful research questions and draw accurate conclusions based on professionally executed experimentation. Submission of low quality manuscripts has become increasingly prevalent, and peer review acts as a filter to prevent this work from reaching the scientific community. The major advantage of a peer review process is that peer-reviewed articles provide a trusted form of scientific communication.

I'm well aware of peer review.

Peer review doesn't take weak studies and make them stronger.

Studies based on weak methodology will always be weak.

Do you understand that methodologies impact the strength of those conclusions?

 

[colfax_m]

you think you get to make that call? hilarious you condescension monkey.

What makes you think I'm the one making the call?

 

[jc456]

You don't want to talk about methodology because you don't know anything about it. Do you?

tell us what you mean?