- Thread starter
- #161
Yes you mock them, so I don't know why you pretend to care about them. Just start being honest.
Corporate and financial elite don't care about the bottom people for the most part I agree, but they do care about the job existing so that helps them with employment.
Those of you who try to "stick it to the elite" by wanting to tax and regulate the financial elite are too stupid to understand what you're doing, they'll just pass on those costs to the bottom people. for ex.) the little guy who works for them or the little guy who buys their products. These are the people you end up ripping off with your anti-capitalism views.
What you call mockery, I think of as tough love. I just want to smack you guys upside the head to call attention to what's going on in this country. The corporate interests are doing everything in their power to maximize profits at the expense of the rank and file worker. Now with Citizens United, they have immense funds to influence government in their favor. As a result, the middle class is dying. People are working longer hours for less and the market for anything other than essential goods and services is drying up. Far from seeing the error of this business model, they are doubling down and making things even tougher for you and me.
This country needs the things that the Tea Party is most opposed to. Collective bargaining, a strong safety net, and more income equality.
I'm not sure how talking shit about janitors is showing them tough love. Sounds a hell of a lot more like being an asshole just to be an asshole.
Yes corporate interests are doing everything they can to maximize profits. That HELPS the little guy. Competition makes products and services better and cheaper. Competition brings choices, choices bring jobs.
All you'd have to do is take a basic economics 101 course at your nearest community college to realize that more regulations and more taxes does nothing but hurt the economy.
As in all other things, a little moderation is in order for this train of thought. You seem fairly reasonable yet you express the notion (and maybe I'm misinterpreting you) that regulation is bad. Would you think regulation were bad if the water you drank were tainted with industrial pollution because the corporation that dumped it thought it was unreasonably expensive to clean up?