Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hey P2, why do you hate Ron Paul so much?
What is it about his beliefs that you find so objectionable?
Hey P2, why do you hate Ron Paul so much?
What is it about his beliefs that you find so objectionable?
Not much, as I am a conservative with a libertarian tilt. You've missed the point - the lib establishment realizes he's unelectable, and knows (OBVIOUSLY) obama can't run on his disastrous record, and they want to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by having the republicans nominate someone who can't win - exactly what they did in 2008 hyping McCain.
Not much, as I am a conservative with a libertarian tilt. You've missed the point - the lib establishment realizes he's unelectable, and knows (OBVIOUSLY) obama can't run on his disastrous record, and they want to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by having the republicans nominate someone who can't win - exactly what they did in 2008 hyping McCain.
ron will get the nomination, and then dethrown obama. americans want a real "change" and this man is it.
Nobody, except for a loyal cadre of inter web posters hypes Ron Paul
All too true. The notion that any political group invested in the status quo would 'hype' Paul is quite naive.
Flat contradiction of manifest reality - the lib media has ENDLESSLY reported on him favorably.
Not much, as I am a conservative with a libertarian tilt. You've missed the point - the lib establishment realizes he's unelectable, and knows (OBVIOUSLY) obama can't run on his disastrous record, and they want to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by having the republicans nominate someone who can't win - exactly what they did in 2008 hyping McCain.
Fascinating. So, what exactly does 'electable' mean?
Not much, as I am a conservative with a libertarian tilt. You've missed the point - the lib establishment realizes he's unelectable, and knows (OBVIOUSLY) obama can't run on his disastrous record, and they want to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by having the republicans nominate someone who can't win - exactly what they did in 2008 hyping McCain.
Fascinating. So, what exactly does 'electable' mean?
e·lect·a·ble (-lkt-bl)
adj.
Able to be elected, especially to public office: an electable candidate.
Hey P2, why do you hate Ron Paul so much?
What is it about his beliefs that you find so objectionable?
Not much, as I am a conservative with a libertarian tilt. You've missed the point - the lib establishment realizes he's unelectable, and knows (OBVIOUSLY) obama can't run on his disastrous record, and they want to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by having the republicans nominate someone who can't win - exactly what they did in 2008 hyping McCain.
Why do you insist that he is unelectable?
Would you not vote for him if he won the nomination?
Fascinating. So, what exactly does 'electable' mean?
e·lect·a·ble (-lkt-bl)
adj.
Able to be elected, especially to public office: an electable candidate.
by that definition, he is electable. so...i guess you need to work on your vocabulary?
if someone can cast a vote for someone, then that person is electable. thats the definition...electable does not mean that it will happen, it means the chance of being elected is there, no matter how small...
There's no chance. If he were nominated, then the lib media would go over all his libertarian remarks for the last umpteent years and use them against him. Very few people in this country have studied libertarianism - they don't know its arguments, its intellectual support, its history - nothing. In the hands of the defamation experts of the lib media, he'll be easily packaged to the uninformed, gullible public as an "extremist", etc. This will happen exactly like they did with McCain in 2008: they'll promoite him till he gets the nomination, and then turn on him - the net result? Four more years of obama.
Not much, as I am a conservative with a libertarian tilt. You've missed the point - the lib establishment realizes he's unelectable, and knows (OBVIOUSLY) obama can't run on his disastrous record, and they want to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by having the republicans nominate someone who can't win - exactly what they did in 2008 hyping McCain.
Why do you insist that he is unelectable?
Because he is in fact unelectable.
Would you not vote for him if he won the nomination?
OF COURSE. I'd vote for Mickey Mouse if he were obama's opponent.
There's no chance. If he were nominated, then the lib media would go over all his libertarian remarks for the last umpteent years and use them against him. Very few people in this country have studied libertarianism - they don't know its arguments, its intellectual support, its history - nothing. In the hands of the defamation experts of the lib media, he'll be easily packaged to the uninformed, gullible public as an "extremist", etc. This will happen exactly like they did with McCain in 2008: they'll promoite him till he gets the nomination, and then turn on him - the net result? Four more years of obama.
Though I think the notion that this is some kind of conspiracy is a bit much, your concerns about how Paul would be attacked are reasonable enough. Pretty much anyone who represents a real challenge to the status quo is going to get lambasted by the powers-that-be and the mainstream media.
If you're simply arguing that there's no way things are ever going to change, well, you may be right. But why give in that easily? I intend to vote, and campaign for, the candidates that I think are the best. If the country rejects them, then they reject them. I don't buy the 'lesser-of-two-evils' crap.
Things always change, given enough time, but right now in 2011, the liberal/left controls everything whereby opinion can be strongly influenced: the media, thae academy, even the K12 schools.
Why do you insist that he is unelectable?
Because he is in fact unelectable.
Would you not vote for him if he won the nomination?
OF COURSE. I'd vote for Mickey Mouse if he were obama's opponent.
He's already been elected to office, multiple times.
As Liberty said, indeed you do need to work on your vocabulary as well as your understanding of facts versus opinions.
Because he is in fact unelectable.
OF COURSE. I'd vote for Mickey Mouse if he were obama's opponent.
He's already been elected to office, multiple times.
As Liberty said, indeed you do need to work on your vocabulary as well as your understanding of facts versus opinions.
Noooooo.......... I was referring to >>PRESIDENT<<, to which he's not and cannot be elected, my facts are completely valid, and I did use the word right.
Things always change, given enough time, but right now in 2011, the liberal/left controls everything whereby opinion can be strongly influenced: the media, thae academy, even the K12 schools.