Ron Paul on The Tulsi Gabbard Show: Our Civil Liberties Are Under Attack!

Ron was, is and will always be a champion of the constitution and for the cause of Individual liberty. And history will record him as such.

Also. Unlike your standard trustees in the red/blue duopoly, true believers in the cause of liberty itself are not blind followers. Not yesterday. Not today. Not tomorrow. Not any day. They do not seek to be led. They're doers. They lead by example. So to contend that Ron is the past is to contend that without him that the cause of liberty is extinguished. He puts his pants on just like the rest of us who share in the cause do. The cause of liberty will live, long after the statesman is gone. Have faith in that.

So, my friend, you could no be any farther from the truth of the matter.


Your libertarian hero could not get 10% in a NH primary.

Defending the confederacy was part of his problem.

A true libertarian would assess the confederacy with these words

PAY YOUR LABOR
NO HUMAN CAN BE DEFINED AS PROPERTY
DO NOT ATTACK A US MILITARY BASE
 
Yes it's interesting Mr EMH

where , may i ask, would you predict this is going?

~S~


Not good at predicting, but as others here have noticed, a desantis Gabbard ticket has a lot of synergy

Tulsi - served in congress and military, excellent resume for desantis vp

East and west
Male and female
Both extremely articulate, bright, and energetic
 
Not good at predicting, but as others here have noticed, a desantis Gabbard ticket has a lot of synergy

Tulsi - served in congress and military, excellent resume for desantis vp

East and west
Male and female
Both extremely articulate, bright, and energetic
I didn't think of that, so thx ~S~
 
Your libertarian hero could not get 10% in a NH primary.

Defending the confederacy was part of his problem.

A true libertarian would assess the confederacy with these words

PAY YOUR LABOR
NO HUMAN CAN BE DEFINED AS PROPERTY
DO NOT ATTACK A US MILITARY BASE

You'd do well to educate yourself a little better on the man's actual position before just blindly regurgitating low value pablum like that.

Start here...

 
Gosh. He knocked the smirk off the faces of those low info smut muppets so hard with that history lesson that all they could do was call him a name at the end.
 

In other news, you 'libertarians' should go to Somalia or some other libertarian paradise free from govt. oppressors n stuff and show us all how wonderful your theories are. Oh, but none of you actually believe they work, you just want to squat here and babble nonsense behind a wall of govt. protections and a military you despise keeping you from having to actually practice what you preach. Ron Paul certainly never practiced what he ran around beating his chest over, we know that for certain, and neither has any other 'libertarian'.
 
You'd do well to educate yourself a little better on the man's actual position before just blindly regurgitating low value pablum like that.

Start here...



lol 'libertarians' never have any 'positions', they just run around spouting slogans and babbling 'Guvmint suck N Stuff' over and over.
 
Gosh. He knocked the smirk off the faces of those low info smut muppets so hard with that history lesson that all they could do was call him a name at the end.

Hey so far you went an entire thread without sniveling 'STATIST' as a response, as if that was supposed to mean something.
 
lol the poor pays for everybody else off the sweat of their backs. Profits and productivity don't come from Burb Brats sitting around palying with their 401K's or CEO's sittign arund trying to manipulate their bennies and stock options.

You STILL PUSHING the "rich brat -- elitist slime on Libertarians? You ever WATCH A LIBERTARIAN CONVENTION? It's a slice of working America dude. Including the guy who drops his pants while at the podium. :eek:

Take your bennies and stock options and go hit San Fran Nan and her poorly driving husband with that shit. Just leave us OUT of your proletariat fantasies --- "m-kay????
 
Ron Paul was not good for the cause of libertarianism.

Ron is the past.

Tulsi gets more libertarian by the hour, which is a good thing, since she perhaps has a future.

Funny, the left is spewing hate at desantis and tulsi. They know who they fear the most in a general...l

Ron Paul was exactly what appeals to most 'libertarians', he invented whatever he felt like at the moment, and no real guiding philosophy, and certainly didn't practice what he preached, just made up excuses for his own benefit to keep buying votes in his district, no different than the GOP porksters who were even bigger frauds, like Newt Gingrich.

They have zero to do with the Foundes and original intent, one of their primary lies as a Party. There are almost no 'libertarians' proposing an end to the 'corporate personhood' legal fiction or drastically restricting the limited liability protection for shareholders of private corporations, something the Founders would never have supported, and they would have limited the abuses of bankruptcy laws so beloved by incompetent swindlers and executives to cheat the public. for instance. They babble a lot about 'personal responsibility', but of course wouldn't be caught dead doing away with such laws and holding corporate owners responsible for their company's failures. There are plenty of other similar lacks of demanding accountability re social issues as well, but of course since 'libertarianism' is a fantasy fiction people can just make up whatever they want to claim about it to suit their need at the moment, then just proclaim anybody who doesn't buy the bullshit as 'statists n stuff'.

lol it's just a fantasy for teenagers and sociopaths.
 
Your libertarian hero could not get 10% in a NH primary.

Defending the confederacy was part of his problem.

A true libertarian would assess the confederacy with these words

PAY YOUR LABOR
NO HUMAN CAN BE DEFINED AS PROPERTY
DO NOT ATTACK A US MILITARY BASE

They only got 10% because 90% of that 10% were just making protest votes against the two other Parties, not because they really buy into the bullshit 'logic'. I do the same thing on my ballots, or vote for the 'i's on the list. I never vote straight ticket on anything, and I don't mark ballot slots that have people from Dem or GOP in races that I don't know anything about.
 
You STILL PUSHING the "rich brat -- elitist slime on Libertarians? You ever WATCH A LIBERTARIAN CONVENTION? It's a slice of working America dude. Including the guy who drops his pants while at the podium. :eek:

Take your bennies and stock options and go hit San Fran Nan and her poorly driving husband with that shit. Just leave us OUT of your proletariat fantasies --- "m-kay????

It's a convention of nutjobs.
 
They lead by example.
vs exception, which displaces them from 'we the peeps' servitude......
In other news, you 'libertarians' should go to Somalia or some other libertarian paradise free from govt. oppressors n stuff and show us all how wonderful your theories are.
1666864324021.png

~S~
 
vs exception, which displaces them from 'we the peeps' servitude......

View attachment 716266
~S~

Ah, now it's Fun With Jefferson time, Mr. Libertarian himself. Try this one on for size:


Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.- Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

The Founders liked deporting people.

We can also note Jefferson used Federal troops to enforce a trade embargo. Neither of these seems to fit the usual 'libertarian' rambling, but I'm sure they have 'explanations', same as they do for their Hero hypocrite and fraud Ron Paul.

And, you will really hate Jefferson's ideas on how to tax wealthy speculators, traders, and bankers out of existence.lol there was a very good reason he agreed to the Compromise of 1791 and getting the Federal capital far away from New York City and Philly both.
 
Ah, now it's Fun With Jefferson time, Mr. Libertarian himself. Try this one on for size:


Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.- Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

The Founders liked deporting people.

We can also note Jefferson used Federal troops to enforce a trade embargo. Neither of these seems to fit the usual 'libertarian' rambling, but I'm sure they have 'explanations', same as they do for their Hero hypocrite and fraud Ron Paul.

And, you will really hate Jefferson's ideas on how to tax wealthy speculators, traders, and bankers out of existence.lol there was a very good reason he agreed to the Compromise of 1791 and getting the Federal capital far away from New York City and Philly both.
'Ol Tom is referring to 'we the peeps' here , not 'those in authority' Dudley

That said , yes he was drafting constraints , apparently w/out a clue as to what an overwhelming government could abuse

THAT is the dif betwixt those times and our time

thx ~S~
 

Forum List

Back
Top