why are democrats directing the majority of their vitriol at Justice Thomas over the Roe V Wade ruling ?

The Federal government didn't make that decision for anyone.

And your privacy rights were never in place and were never stripped. There is no constitutionally protected right to privacy at the federal level. Call your state representative.

And, unlike your complaint that you never knew life without Roe, 63 million babies never knew life because of Roe.
That's not true. There were nearly as many abortions prior to Roe, done illegally and legally combined, as there are now, with abortion being legal. They are just safer now.....and done with a doctor's assistance when medically done....where infection possibilities are controlled and monitored.

Around our founding father's time, there was no real birth control, and it wasn't a bunch of loose women getting abortions, it was married women, already with 6 to 10 children in tow, seeking aborticant concoctions.
 
It goes to the State OR it goes to the People.... In this case of privacy, it would be reserved for the People, and not for the State to decide.....up and to the point of say....quickening...
And by "the people" you mean unelected rulers in DC.

What Dobbs did is return the issue to the people of the many states - which is the definition of democracy.

But for you Nazis, democracy is bad - democracy undermines our duhmobcracy...
 
from prominent leftist celebrities to the leaders in the dem party and commentators on the msm the majority of anger over the SC decision on Roe V Wade is being directed at Clarence Thomas ? hes been vilified by everyone from Samuel Jackson ,Whoopi Goldberg , Hillary and Lightfoot ... and they all know that he wasnt the author of the recent Roe opinion ! Justice Alito not Thomas was the author of the majority opinion that was used to argue for the overturning Roe V Wade ! while i agree and applaud with the courts decision i find it strange that dems seem to be angrier at a black man [Thomas] that agreed with the opinion written by a white man Alito ! is this proof that dems absolutely abhor any black man that has independent thought that doesnt comply with there point of view more than they would dislike a white man that doesnt hold their views ? with the vicious attacks being leveled at Thomas it would seem so ...

You’re right. Alitto is equally scummy
 
shooting down the evil concept of killing baby in the womb for any reason is scummy eh ? typical leftist insanity .
Save it Fundie. America supports abortion choice.

YOU are the outlier here
 
wow ! the hatred and bigotry for Thomas from the left is disgusting ... just read the posts dems have already made in this thread !
Am old so was around to watch the whole conformation hearing for Thomas. Two things I would note.
Thomas only had nine months on the appellate court before being nominated, He was underqualified for the highest job.
The Democrat's let him be voted in BECAUSE he was black.
His wife has the right to her own opinion, The money thing, bad judgment or unsuitable behavior?
 
It goes to the State OR it goes to the People.... In this case of privacy, it would be reserved for the People, and not for the State to decide.....up and to the point of say....quickening...

Wrong. It goes to the States if their constitutions allow it. There's an inherent police power (not like men in blue police but societal order police power) that the States have by default. So the combination of common law police power, the States constitutions, and any constitutional (state or federal) law is what decides where a power goes between the States and the People.
 
That's not true. There were nearly as many abortions prior to Roe, done illegally and legally combined, as there are now, with abortion being legal. They are just safer now.....and done with a doctor's assistance when medically done....where infection possibilities are controlled and monitored.

Around our founding father's time, there was no real birth control, and it wasn't a bunch of loose women getting abortions, it was married women, already with 6 to 10 children in tow, seeking aborticant concoctions.
Bull crap. There would have been piles of dead aborting-people bodies in the alleys if it were as you say. Abortion was rare, in comparison, before Roe.

And, as I have said before, I don't care if the aborting-person dies during or from the commission of their crime.
 
And by "the people" you mean unelected rulers in DC.

What Dobbs did is return the issue to the people of the many states - which is the definition of democracy.

But for you Nazis, democracy is bad - democracy undermines our duhmobcracy...

Politicians have no business interfering in private medical decisions of women. You are the Nazis imposing your will on others.
 
Politicians have no business interfering in private medical decisions of women. You are the Nazis imposing your will on others.
Politicians absolutely must get involved in the protection of those without a voice. Only Nazis would kill 63 million human beings for fun.
 
So you say. Abortion is not murder. You are the evil that wants to enslave us.
Abortion is most certainly murder.

I am completely pro-choice. We just disagree on when the choice was made: the choice was made when the woman agreed to have recreational sex. She doesn't get to change her mind after that.
 
from prominent leftist celebrities to the leaders in the dem party and commentators on the msm the majority of anger over the SC decision on Roe V Wade is being directed at Clarence Thomas ? hes been vilified by everyone from Samuel Jackson ,Whoopi Goldberg , Hillary and Lightfoot ... and they all know that he wasnt the author of the recent Roe opinion ! Justice Alito not Thomas was the author of the majority opinion that was used to argue for the overturning Roe V Wade ! while i agree and applaud with the courts decision i find it strange that dems seem to be angrier at a black man [Thomas] that agreed with the opinion written by a white man Alito ! is this proof that dems absolutely abhor any black man that has independent thought that doesnt comply with there point of view more than they would dislike a white man that doesnt hold their views ? with the vicious attacks being leveled at Thomas it would seem so ...


Obviously no one would expect Thomas to write the SCOTUS decision since I don't think he has EVER written a single SCOTUS decision. But clearly Thomas has always been the most conservative and least ethically principled of all the SCOTUS justices.

Although Alito wrote the ruling, it obvious is ridiculously invalid.

{...
“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” Alito wrote.

“The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely — the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,” Alito wrote.

“That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be ‘deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition’ and ’implicit in the concept of ordered liberty,” he added.
...}

Anyone who thinks the constitution creates or list rights would be really ignorant.
It does not.
All it does is define some jurisdiction restrictions on the federal government, which states ignored until the 14th amendment.
And what this ruling does is essentially overrule the 14th amendment, putting back in the Antebellum condition of before the Civil War.
That is not just ridiculous, but treasonous.
The traitors in the SCOTUS should be hanging from lampposts.
 

Forum List

Back
Top