why are democrats directing the majority of their vitriol at Justice Thomas over the Roe V Wade ruling ?

[Rigby5]

Find that in the Constitution, please. Get your nurse to read it for you.

First of all, the constitution does not contain ALL individual rights.
But the First Amendment states:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

In essence, First Amendment rights protect an individual's religious freedom, the free press, and free expression from interference by the federal government. Through more than two hundred years of court cases, the U.S. Supreme Court has been tasked with interpreting the First Amendment to determine the breadth of these fundamental rights.
And while state did impose religious beliefs before the 14th amendment, that clearly has not been legal since then.

 

[Rigby5]

according to the declaration of independence our rights are ordained from god .

The Founders were mostly "Deists", not Christians, and considered "God" to be more of just a physical process, like evolution.
But the Declaration of Independence was just opinions Jefferson, and not a legal body.
Those who believe in monarchies also believed god was the source of royal divine right as well.
So religion is no help at all.
The point is the Founders and our current society is based on there not being any special concentration of authority, but that legal authority is equally distributed to all human beings, NOT god.

 

[struth]

Obviously no one would expect Thomas to write the SCOTUS decision since I don't think he has EVER written a single SCOTUS decision. But clearly Thomas has always been the most conservative and least ethically principled of all the SCOTUS justices.

Although Alito wrote the ruling, it obvious is ridiculously invalid.

{...
“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” Alito wrote.

“The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely — the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,” Alito wrote.

“That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be ‘deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition’ and ’implicit in the concept of ordered liberty,” he added.
...}

Anyone who thinks the constitution creates or list rights would be really ignorant.
It does not.
All it does is define some jurisdiction restrictions on the federal government, which states ignored until the 14th amendment.
And what this ruling does is essentially overrule the 14th amendment, putting back in the Antebellum condition of before the Civil War.
That is not just ridiculous, but treasonous.
The traitors in the SCOTUS should be hanging from lampposts.

you don’t know muc about Thomas, he’s written numerous opinions

and the rest of your post clearly highlights your know nothing about the 14th amendment, or jurisprudence

 

[Uncensored2008]

Obviously no one would expect Thomas to write the SCOTUS decision since I don't think he has EVER written a single SCOTUS decision. But clearly Thomas has always been the most conservative and least ethically principled of all the SCOTUS justices.

Although Alito wrote the ruling, it obvious is ridiculously invalid.

{...
“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” Alito wrote.

“The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely — the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,” Alito wrote.

“That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be ‘deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition’ and ’implicit in the concept of ordered liberty,” he added.
...}

Anyone who thinks the constitution creates or list rights would be really ignorant.
It does not.
All it does is define some jurisdiction restrictions on the federal government, which states ignored until the 14th amendment.
And what this ruling does is essentially overrule the 14th amendment, putting back in the Antebellum condition of before the Civil War.
That is not just ridiculous, but treasonous.
The traitors in the SCOTUS should be hanging from lampposts.

Your welcome to your ignorant opinion, regardless of how contrary to reality it is.

Thomas is by far the most ethical of the SCOTUS justices.

As for your fucking lie about opinions written by Justice Thomas - well you are just a liar..

Supreme Court Collection: Opinions by Justice Thomas

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Rigby5]

The Federal government didn't make that decision for anyone.

And your privacy rights were never in place and were never stripped. There is no constitutionally protected right to privacy at the federal level. Call your state representative.

And, unlike your complaint that you never knew life without Roe, 63 million babies never knew life because of Roe.

Wrong.
Individual rights are not at all created by or even remotely listed in the Constitution.
The founders clearly said they were infinite, could not be listed, and should not be pretended to be created, since then they could just as arbitrarily be rescinded.

There most certainly IS a right to privacy, and it has been constitutionally protected ever since the 14th amendment.
You are totally and completely wrong.
If there were no legal right to privacy, then there would be no need for search warrants, you could rip the clothes off women on the street, etc.

 

[Rigby5]

you don’t know muc about Thomas, he’s written numerous opinions

and the rest of your post clearly highlights your know nothing about the 14th amendment, or jurisprudence

Wrong.
Over the course of the Supreme Court’s term, according to Adam Feldman of the Empirical Scotus blog, Thomas was the senior Justice in the majority only five times.
So of all the hundreds of SCOTUS opinions during the tenure of Thomas, he has only written 5 majority opinions.

And exactly what do you think I have wrong about the 14th amendment?
Clearly the federal government did not all defend individual rights against state abuse before the 14th amendment, but they did after.
That has to be the main point of the 14th amendment.
And clearly no one should be against that improvement.

As for "jurisprudence", the points is that in a democratic republic, the ONLY source of legal authority comes from the defense of inherent individual rights.
So rights are not granted by government and can not be arbitrarily be infringed by government except when necessary in order to defend the rights of others.
So the states attempting to infringe upon a woman's right to control her own body, family, privacy, etc., is totally illegal.

 

[Rigby5]

Your welcome to your ignorant opinion, regardless of how contrary to reality it is.

Thomas is by far the most ethical of the SCOTUS justices.

As for your fucking lie about opinions written by Justice Thomas - well you are just a liar..

Supreme Court Collection: Opinions by Justice Thomas

www.law.cornell.edu

Wrong.
I did not read them all, but found your linked list to include minority singular opinions as well as majority, so does not count.
Anyone can have minority opinions, but it is only when you represent the majority that it matters to our discussion.

 

[struth]

Wrong.
Over the course of the Supreme Court’s term, according to Adam Feldman of the Empirical Scotus blog, Thomas was the senior Justice in the majority only five times.
So of all the hundreds of SCOTUS opinions during the tenure of Thomas, he has only written 5 majority opinions.

And exactly what do you think I have wrong about the 14th amendment?
Clearly the federal government did not all defend individual rights against state abuse before the 14th amendment, but they did after.
That has to be the main point of the 14th amendment.
And clearly no one should be against that improvement.

He’s drastically horribly incorrect

 

[Uncensored2008]

Wrong.

You're lying against an enemy of your Reich.

I did not read them all, but found your linked list to include minority singular opinions as well as majority, so does not count.
Anyone can have minority opinions, but it is only when you represent the majority that it matters to our discussion.

You lied to smear Thomas - you are without integrity or ethics.

 

[JohnDB]

The Founders were mostly "Deists", not Christians, and considered "God" to be more of just a physical process, like evolution.
But the Declaration of Independence was just opinions Jefferson, and not a legal body.
Those who believe in monarchies also believed god was the source of royal divine right as well.
So religion is no help at all.
The point is the Founders and our current society is based on there not being any special concentration of authority, but that legal authority is equally distributed to all human beings, NOT god.

Absolutely false and misleading.

The founding fathers ALL Believed in God and Jesus. Every signer to the Declaration of Independence may not have been a lawyer but ALL had a seminary degree. Thomas Jefferson tried to sell his own English translation of the Bible that he, himself translated to the Government.

Take one look at Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography(free E copies everywhere) ....the most proclaimed "Deist" of them all.

First lines are "First of all I would like to thank God..."

Read him for yourself instead of spouting rhetoric nonsense someone told you that was a half-wit to begin with.

Being a Deist meant that you did not align yourself with a particular denomination...it did not mean that you were an atheist/agnostic but only claimed you believed in God to keep from getting killed or injured. It simply meant "Non-denominational.

 

[Rigby5]

You're lying against an enemy of your Reich.


You lied to smear Thomas - you are without integrity or ethics.

So you would prefer states to dictate over the individual choices of women?
How could that be anything but a draconian police state?

 

[BackAgain]

why are democrats directing the majority of their vitriol at Justice Thomas over the Roe V Wade ruling ?​

Because the Dim Party is racist to its roots and Justice Thomas is a black man who declines to bow and scrape.

Funny thing:

Dobbs is now “settled law.”

 

[Rigby5]

Absolutely false and misleading.

The founding fathers ALL Believed in God and Jesus. Every signer to the Declaration of Independence may not have been a lawyer but ALL had a seminary degree. Thomas Jefferson tried to sell his own English translation of the Bible that he, himself translated to the Government.

Take one look at Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography(free E copies everywhere) ....the most proclaimed "Deist" of them all.

First lines are "First of all I would like to thank God..."

Read him for yourself instead of spouting rhetoric nonsense someone told you that was a half-wit to begin with.

Being a Deist meant that you did not align yourself with a particular denomination...it did not mean that you were an atheist/agnostic but only claimed you believed in God to keep from getting killed or injured. It simply meant "Non-denominational.

I did not say that a Deist was atheist/agnostic, but clearly a "non-denominational" person does not believe in the dictates of any church.
Instead they believe and trust in the feelings of each and every individual.
So no Deist would ever support state anti-abortion laws.
Those state laws ARE totally and completely denominational, evil, and against all principles of a democratic republic.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Absolutely false and misleading.

The founding fathers ALL Believed in God and Jesus. Every signer to the Declaration of Independence may not have been a lawyer but ALL had a seminary degree. Thomas Jefferson tried to sell his own English translation of the Bible that he, himself translated to the Government.

Take one look at Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography(free E copies everywhere) ....the most proclaimed "Deist" of them all.

First lines are "First of all I would like to thank God..."

Read him for yourself instead of spouting rhetoric nonsense someone told you that was a half-wit to begin with.

Being a Deist meant that you did not align yourself with a particular denomination...it did not mean that you were an atheist/agnostic but only claimed you believed in God to keep from getting killed or injured. It simply meant "Non-denominational.

Far be it from Rigby5 to ever post anything that is true or accurate.

But your definition of "Deist" is not accurate either.

I agree with you that the founders were in large deeply religious.

Franklin was indeed a Deist. Deists were not Atheists as you noted, but they held that the creator - God - created the universe and basically walked away. They held that Jesus was the path to Salvation, but the good works were the means, That rationality was the key to understanding and the revelation is a myth.

 

[struth]

You're lying against an enemy of your Reich.


You lied to smear Thomas - you are without integrity or ethics.

to be fair he didn’t lie…he didn’t mow…he was merely just repeating what the demaklan propagandist say about the only black man on the court.

 

[Rigby5]

why are democrats directing the majority of their vitriol at Justice Thomas over the Roe V Wade ruling ?​

Because the Dim Party is racist to its roots and Justice Thomas is a black man who declines to bow and scrape.

Funny thing:

Dobbs is now “settled law.”

Not at all.
Dobbs is in total violation of the 14th amendment, and essentially puts this country back to when slavery was legal, because state over ruled the federal constitution.
That clearly is treason and those offending justices should be hanging from lampposts.

 

[kaz]

Let me break it down for you chief, it's because he's the one trying to not only destroy women's constitutional right to Abortion. It's because he decided to put in his little wish list of other freedom's and rights he wants to abolish next.

It's not even complicated.

No, it's not that complicated, you didn't say anything. You just prattled your racist bull shit and eventually stopped talking so we knew you were done

 

[kaz]

Not at all.
Dobbs is in total violation of the 14th amendment, and essentially puts this country back to when slavery was legal, because state over ruled the federal constitution.
That clearly is treason and those offending justices should be hanging from lampposts.

It's Captain Hyperbole! Rah, rah, rah!

Slavery is like the Nazis, huh, Captain?

 

[BackAgain]

Not at all.

Wrong. Fully.

Dobbs is in total violation of the 14th amendment,

Not. It isn’t.

and essentially puts this country back to when slavery was legal,

No. It doesn’t.

because state over ruled the federal constitution.

Nope.

That clearly is treason

Words have meaning. Your misuse of the word “treason” does not have meaning.

and those offending justices should be hanging from lampposts.

What an evil, retarded and unAmerican thing to say even if it’s just hyperbole.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

from prominent leftist celebrities to the leaders in the dem party and commentators on the msm the majority of anger over the SC decision on Roe V Wade is being directed at Clarence Thomas ? hes been vilified by everyone from Samuel Jackson ,Whoopi Goldberg , Hillary and Lightfoot ... and they all know that he wasnt the author of the recent Roe opinion ! Justice Alito not Thomas was the author of the majority opinion that was used to argue for the overturning Roe V Wade ! while i agree and applaud with the courts decision i find it strange that dems seem to be angrier at a black man [Thomas] that agreed with the opinion written by a white man Alito ! is this proof that dems absolutely abhor any black man that has independent thought that doesnt comply with there point of view more than they would dislike a white man that doesnt hold their views ? with the vicious attacks being leveled at Thomas it would seem so ...

Read the Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade

The majority opinion was written by Justice Samuel Alito.

www.politico.com

Because he's black. Black folks aren't allowed to think for themselves.