Baron
Platinum Member
Anything is crooked by lying Hillary, even the TV debates.The entirely political 'establishment' and MSM presstitutes are against Trump. Nothing is bad in fight against him, even bogus and tricky 'debates'.
The words 'Moral' and 'Liberal' are antonymous.
This is exactly what happened. This "moderator", or as many are calling him, "the third debater", was anything but unbiased. It was clear that he came in with an agenda, whether his own or set forth for him, to attack Donald Trump and rescue Hillary Clinton in her time of need.
Holt continuously threw "hardball" questions towards Donald Trump, such as ones about his tax returns, the birther issue, and his support of the Iraq War.
Meanwhile, he asked Hillary Clinton NO, I repeat, NO real questions that the American public wants and deserves to hear, such as her part in the Benghazi debacle, that resulted in the death of innocent lives under her watch.
He asked no questions, and this one is mind boggling, about her 30,000-plus missing emails that she had deleted while Secretary of Defense.
He asked her no questions about the lies her campaign has been telling about her failing health and he asked her nothing about the corruption that has surrounded the Clinton Foundation.
It would be one thing if these topics weren't major news and were just speculation. The fact is, they are NOT and they HAVE been major news topics, even on the highly corrupt MSM.
Despite the fact that this was a 2-on-1 debate, Donald Trump still held his ground, did not falter, and appeared very presidential, choosing not to attack Hillary on her husband's countless rape charges and settlements of sexual harassment, proving he can be tempered and "the bigger person" in the room.
The Debate Results - Who Won? Who Lost? Who Was The Mystery Third Debater? | Zero Hedge
The words 'Moral' and 'Liberal' are antonymous.
This is exactly what happened. This "moderator", or as many are calling him, "the third debater", was anything but unbiased. It was clear that he came in with an agenda, whether his own or set forth for him, to attack Donald Trump and rescue Hillary Clinton in her time of need.
Holt continuously threw "hardball" questions towards Donald Trump, such as ones about his tax returns, the birther issue, and his support of the Iraq War.
Meanwhile, he asked Hillary Clinton NO, I repeat, NO real questions that the American public wants and deserves to hear, such as her part in the Benghazi debacle, that resulted in the death of innocent lives under her watch.
He asked no questions, and this one is mind boggling, about her 30,000-plus missing emails that she had deleted while Secretary of Defense.
He asked her no questions about the lies her campaign has been telling about her failing health and he asked her nothing about the corruption that has surrounded the Clinton Foundation.
It would be one thing if these topics weren't major news and were just speculation. The fact is, they are NOT and they HAVE been major news topics, even on the highly corrupt MSM.
Despite the fact that this was a 2-on-1 debate, Donald Trump still held his ground, did not falter, and appeared very presidential, choosing not to attack Hillary on her husband's countless rape charges and settlements of sexual harassment, proving he can be tempered and "the bigger person" in the room.
The Debate Results - Who Won? Who Lost? Who Was The Mystery Third Debater? | Zero Hedge
