Who thinks that the Iranian WMD program was destroyed?

[zaangalewa]

there's a history of collusion back to FDR

Huh? ¿FDR? ¿history? ¿collusion?

Zaang

zaangalewa is no name - it's a kind of phone number. So "Zaang" = “No connection at this number!”

our recent foreign policy

(1) "our" = Donald Trump?
(2) "our" = United States of America?
(3) "our" = whole western world?

since the mullahs took over basically boiled down to paying them off to leave Israel alone

What has Israel to do with the Mullahs of the Iran? Nothing or nothing? And who payed what to whom why?

but the reality of greater Israel

The what?

became a tad hard to ignore

Eh?

further.......this is why JFK didn't want Israel to have nukes

~S~

I do not listen now to this what your people say what JFK said or not said. No one likes that anyone has nukes at all. My opinion is this weapon came 300-400 years too early. Now some have nukes. But no one else should get nukes. Reason for: The number of relations between x-parts are x!-relations. 1->1=1, 2->1*2=2, 3->1*2*3=6, 4->1*2*3*4=24 ... or with other words: 10 nations have 10! relations. So 10 nations have 1*2*3*4*5*6*7*8*9*10 = 3,628,800 relations all together with each other. But 5 nations have only 120 relations with each other. This are much less relations for a serios conflict. 1 more or 1 less nuclear power makes a big difference.

 

[sparky]

I do not listen

rather apparent..... ~S~

 

[zaangalewa]

rather apparent..... ~S~

Selbsterkenntnis ist auch eine Erkenntnis. Sie in andere zu projizieren wohl eher nicht.

Translate it in your own.

 

[sparky]

absurd message

keep digging that hole zaang..... ~S~

 

[Dr.Destructo]

Like Edgetho said..........nothing is ever completely destroyed.

Trump had the hits on known stations, and Im sure there are many unknown ones nobody knows about.

I'm hoping they blow themselves up and save the rest of the world from having to worry about them.

But, if they want to proceed.......the USA can send over twice as many bombers. No prob. They'll be back in time for lunch and a movie.

​

 

[jc456]

Yes, the US is back, back to 2003 when we were lead into a war by a bumbling fool in the oval office.

Location is not the issue. I copied this link from another poster on here.

In a First, America Dropped 30,000-Pound Bunker-Busters—But Iran’s Concrete May Be Unbreakable, Scientists Say

President Trump is claiming the strikes “obliterated” three underground nuclear sites in Iran protected by military grade concrete. The truth may be more complicated.

www.popularmechanics.com

https://archive.is/Fjf7a (no paywall)

If Iran was using multi layered UHPC concrete which they most likely were, then there is no functional way to penetrate their facilities with a direct hit from MOPs, much less ones that don't even penetrate all the way to the actual facility since MOPS can only penetrate up to 200 ft and Fordow is 300 ft deep. I'm guessing this was what the leaked intel was trying to say.

what the fk are you referring to? where are US boots on the ground in combat?

 

[jc456]

And yet you continued to claim I didn't post it.

Make up your mind.

wrong thread, but for grins, point to a link in your post. My ask was for the link, not commentary.

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

And?

And Iran's foreign minister, Araqchi confirms the destruction of the targeted facilities...

(Timestamped)

 

[Zavulon]

Nothing is ever destroyed completely. Physics.

What does it matter? We set them back by several years, that's what matters.

The question should be: "How many years did we set back Iran's quest for Nuclear Weapons?" And I would answer: "Between 3 and ten"

If the Mad Mullahs want to start up again, we can't stop them but we can slow them down. Just like the last few days.

Like my Daddy used to say, "I can't make you do what I tell you, but I can make you wish you had"

Don't fall for the dimocrap scum schoolyard bullshit. You're too smart for that. Don't let them frame the question. They are scum and not at all interested in what's best for America or Americans.

We set back the Mad Mullahs enough that they're not going to be hitting anybody with a Nuke any time soon.

No. May be, Trump decreased Persian probability to develop and produce their own nuclear weapons (or slowed their nuclear program). May be not. But, by attacking a civilian nuclear infrastructure he definitely de facto ended nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and significantly increased Iran's chances to buy proper and modern nuclear weapons.

 

[Zavulon]

nobody but the regime in Iran wants Iran to have the bomb.

It depends. There is a lot of things, that might be worse than nuclear Iran (at least for their neighbours).

 

[yidnar]

If they wanted it so badly it would have been created long long ago.

you understand very little about the enrichment process ..

 

[Clipper]

Nope, never once have I heard him make such a statement. post a link.

I don't have time to post a link to the tens of thousands of lies that coxsucker has told.

 

[jc456]

I don't have time to post a link to the tens of thousands of lies that coxsucker has told.

no one has time for your nonsense without proof.

 

[krichton]

You have zero proof they weren't

That entire from the river to the sea thingy might be a hint

Planning to use a nuke? Even when Iran replied with an attack after their nuclear facilities were bombed, they notified everyone ahead of time of the strike to make sure no one was killed. They did this through back channels when they struck Al Assad air base. I'm not saying 100% that Iran wouldn't use a nuke, but leaders who would do this would have to be bat shit out of their minds. Nothing I've seen out of Iran would suggest this. This is just plain, Iran is evilllllll, rhetoric, nothing more. They are so much more tame and measured than Saddam ever was.

 

[krichton]

you understand very little about the enrichment process ..

Does enrichment take 30 years?

 

[krichton]

no one has time for your nonsense without proof.

LOL. NO ONE knows more than Trump!

 

[jc456]

LOL. NO ONE knows more than Trump!

All kinds of statements in there, one I didn't hear was I know more about everything than anyone. Not even in that list did he say that for all of what he said;

More than you
More than most

Just those two lines eliminates your effort and rating is a fail.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Who truly knows ? Certainly no one basing their opinion on whats reported.

It does appear, however, Iran was significantly grabbed by the *****.

 

[krichton]

it's why they use two in the same hole. You know that right?

So? I've seen no evidence that they were so precise with their targeting, but it really doesn't matter, because even multiple direct hits without 300 feet of rock separating the facility and the bomb would not smash through UHPC concrete. It's like trying to get through tank armor with a bullet. You can fire at the same spot all day it won't make a difference.

 

[jc456]

So? I've seen no evidence that they were so precise with their targeting, but it really doesn't matter, because even multiple direct hits without 300 feet of rock separating the facility and the bomb would not smash through UHPC concrete. It's like trying to get through tank armor with a bullet. You can fire at the same spot all day it won't make a difference.

well we can't help you. The photo's were released with six precise holes and 12 bombs dropped. You don't want to look, well horse, you get no water.