Who loves censorship?

[EvMetro]

Let's first be clear on what censorship is, here is how Wikipedia defines censorship:

"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies."

Notice that censorship is censorship, regardless of if it is the government, a private institution, or other controlling bodies. If a private institution suppresses speech, it is still censorship. Censorship is still censorship, even when it isn't the government that is doing it.

Censorship is still censorship, regardless of if it is legal or not, regardless of if it is a violation of our first amendment rights or not, regardless of if it is right or wrong. Censorship is simply suppression of speech that is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient".

So who loves censorship? All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch.

 

[progressive hunter]

Let's first be clear on what censorship is, here is how Wikipedia defines censorship:

"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies."

Notice that censorship is censorship, regardless of if it is the government, a private institution, or other controlling bodies. If a private institution suppresses speech, it is still censorship. Censorship is still censorship, even when it isn't the government that is doing it.

Censorship is still censorship, regardless of if it is legal or not, regardless of if it is a violation of our first amendment rights or not, regardless of if it is right or wrong. Censorship is simply suppression of speech that is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient".

So who loves censorship? All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch.

google seems to love it,,

“Extreme censorship in REAL TIME”: Google is 1984-ing this Doctor’s societal DIAGNOSIS, thus VERIFYING it.

It might take a second for the implication in the soft-spoken video to sink in, but when it does … whoa nellie. Censorship, propaganda, and manipulation are a subtle business. Sure, popular c…

therightscoop.com

 

[Death-Ninja]

Democratic fascists adore censorship almost as much as they adore murdering babies, the only good democrats are boostered democrats, booster up democrats, do the sacred earth mother a solid....

 

[Pete7469]

Deliberately ignorant bed wetting collectivist Lefts Syndrome parasites HATE the concept of the free exchange of ideas. This has been evident since the rise of fascist and socialist regimes around the world. It's not good enough among these parasites that they can wallow in the bliss of their own ignorance, they're determined to prevent anyone else from being exposed to reality.

 

[konradv]

Let's first be clear on what censorship is, here is how Wikipedia defines censorship:

"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies."

Notice that censorship is censorship, regardless of if it is the government, a private institution, or other controlling bodies. If a private institution suppresses speech, it is still censorship. Censorship is still censorship, even when it isn't the government that is doing it.

Censorship is still censorship, regardless of if it is legal or not, regardless of if it is a violation of our first amendment rights or not, regardless of if it is right or wrong. Censorship is simply suppression of speech that is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient".

So who loves censorship? All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch.

Righties want their god-given right to be a-holes, if they so desire, but also want to whine when called out on their a-holery. Can’t have it both ways. Either act like social human beings or develop a thick skin.

 

[progressive hunter]

Righties want their god-given right to be a-holes, if they so desire, but also want to whine when called out on their a-holery. Can’t have it both ways. Either act like social human beings or develop a thick skin.

we will just go ahead and mark you down as being OK with censorship,,

 

[EvMetro]

Righties want their god-given right to be a-holes, if they so desire, but also want to whine when called out on their a-holery. Can’t have it both ways. Either act like social human beings or develop a thick skin.

Thank you for validating the last part of the opening post, where I posted: "All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch."

 

[EvMetro]

google seems to love it,,

“Extreme censorship in REAL TIME”: Google is 1984-ing this Doctor’s societal DIAGNOSIS, thus VERIFYING it.

It might take a second for the implication in the soft-spoken video to sink in, but when it does … whoa nellie. Censorship, propaganda, and manipulation are a subtle business. Sure, popular c…

therightscoop.com

And google is the left. Lefties cannot survive without censorship.

 

[progressive hunter]

And google is the left. Lefties cannot survive without censorship.

I see a pattern developing,,

 

[EvMetro]

Lefts Syndrome parasites HATE the concept of the free exchange of ideas.

That's because nobody likes lefty ideas. Censorship and other forms of cheating and authoritarianism are the only way they can implement lefty ideas.

 

[jackflash]

Let's first be clear on what censorship is, here is how Wikipedia defines censorship:

"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies."

Notice that censorship is censorship, regardless of if it is the government, a private institution, or other controlling bodies. If a private institution suppresses speech, it is still censorship. Censorship is still censorship, even when it isn't the government that is doing it.

Censorship is still censorship, regardless of if it is legal or not, regardless of if it is a violation of our first amendment rights or not, regardless of if it is right or wrong. Censorship is simply suppression of speech that is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient".

So who loves censorship? All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch.

I'm not for sure on this one but I'll take a stab @ it. Possibly Big Tech???

 

[Dogmaphobe]

From what I have seen, I would say the answer to the question posed is "every single Democrat in this forum who has commented on the subject.

 

[Pete7469]

Righties want their god-given right to be a-holes, if they so desire, but also want to whine when called out on their a-holery. Can’t have it both ways. Either act like social human beings or develop a thick skin.

WTF are you bloviating about bed wetter? There are no bigger, wallowed out assholes and k-hunts than you sniveling douchebags. I was a libturd in my youth also, so don't assume I'm unaware of the argumentative tactics you pathetic trolls use to irritate people. Then when some of the most esteemed and intellectual of all "right wingers" finally lose their shit, you sniveling parasites seek sympathy.



You bed wetters have no fucking skin at all. You're constantly pissing and moaning about "micro aggressions" and insisting everyone who rejects your authoritarian despotic tyranny is "anti-science" or "anti (LOL) intellectual". Ignore the fact people who embraced marxism allowed megalomaniac cults of personality like stalin to wipe out 20 million of his own peasants. When fuck sticks like you stop burning down cities when cops kill thug pieces of shit, you just might elevate your selves to social rats. Until then I want all of your DNA flushed down Planned Unparenthood toilets where it belongs.

Fuckin queer....


.

 

[Flopper]

Let's first be clear on what censorship is, here is how Wikipedia defines censorship:

"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies."

Notice that censorship is censorship, regardless of if it is the government, a private institution, or other controlling bodies. If a private institution suppresses speech, it is still censorship. Censorship is still censorship, even when it isn't the government that is doing it.

Censorship is still censorship, regardless of if it is legal or not, regardless of if it is a violation of our first amendment rights or not, regardless of if it is right or wrong. Censorship is simply suppression of speech that is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient".

So who loves censorship? All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch.

Censorship is not just desirable but essential. It begins with the reporter who decides what information he has learned should be in his story. Next the editor of the website, paper, or periodical decides what needs to be cut. Once the public gets it, they will censor it as they pass on the story so it fits into their system of beliefs.

When it comes to government censorship, it depends on what is being censored. Suppose, you're a goverment offical and you have the power to suppress information that would cause great harm to the country but you have both the legal and constitutional obligation to release it.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Let's first be clear on what censorship is, here is how Wikipedia defines censorship:

"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies."

Notice that censorship is censorship, regardless of if it is the government, a private institution, or other controlling bodies. If a private institution suppresses speech, it is still censorship. Censorship is still censorship, even when it isn't the government that is doing it.

Censorship is still censorship, regardless of if it is legal or not, regardless of if it is a violation of our first amendment rights or not, regardless of if it is right or wrong. Censorship is simply suppression of speech that is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient".

So who loves censorship? All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch.

A newspaper wants to publish troop movements during a time of war, which will result in the deaths of those troops.

The government prohibits the publication of that information, supported by the courts, ruled to not be in violation of the First Amendment.

is this censorship warranted?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Let's first be clear on what censorship is, here is how Wikipedia defines censorship:

"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies."

Notice that censorship is censorship, regardless of if it is the government, a private institution, or other controlling bodies. If a private institution suppresses speech, it is still censorship. Censorship is still censorship, even when it isn't the government that is doing it.

Censorship is still censorship, regardless of if it is legal or not, regardless of if it is a violation of our first amendment rights or not, regardless of if it is right or wrong. Censorship is simply suppression of speech that is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient".

So who loves censorship? All we have to do is watch how this thread unfolds, and we will see one side of the aisle supporting and defending censorship, and the other condemning it. Watch.

A media entity wants to publish child pornography, which is not entitled to First Amendment protections.

The government prohibits the publication of that child pornography.

is this censorship warranted?

 

[progressive hunter]

A newspaper wants to publish troop movements during a time of war, which will result in the deaths of those troops.

The government prohibits the publication of that information, supported by the courts, ruled to not be in violation of the First Amendment.

is this censorship warranted?

thats not the type of censorship this discussion is about,,

so your premise is a lie

 

[progressive hunter]

A media entity wants to publish child pornography, which is not entitled to First Amendment protections.

The government prohibits the publication of that child pornography.

is this censorship warranted?

are you advocating for child porn??

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Righties want their god-given right to be a-holes, if they so desire, but also want to whine when called out on their a-holery. Can’t have it both ways. Either act like social human beings or develop a thick skin.

The irony…

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

Hey, man, dig that crazy lunatic.....

Who likes censorship?
We like censorship!

They're such great censorships!
We like censorship

Who worships censorship?
We worship censorship

Who wears short shorts?
We wear short shorts

Who loves censorship?
We love censorship!



(If you know the tune to the song I used......you win a kick in the head!)