The United Healthcare CEO assassination...what's next?

Yes there are… and I believe they should all be voided. Article I, Section 8 lays out seventeen SPECIFIC powers for Congress to legislate and authorize money for. Anything not in that list belongs to the States. I’m still not finding medical issues or insurance in that list of powers.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; . . .

Beyond the clear-notice requirement and the anti-coercion rule, the Court evaluates Spending Clause legislation using three additional factors. First, spending must be in pursuit of the general welfare.
This determination is largely for Congress to make.
The Court substantially defers to Congress’s decision that a particular expenditure advances the general welfare.



Between 1960 and 1965, the health coverage debate was a front burner issue in Congress, with dozens of proposals introduced and testimonies given by representatives of major organizations, including the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Association, and the AFL-CIO.

After Congress passed the legislation in the summer of 1965, President Lyndon Johnson decided to sign the bill with former President Truman at the Truman Presidential Library in Independence, MO, in order to recognize Truman’s early effort to establish a national health insurance program.
 
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; . . .

Beyond the clear-notice requirement and the anti-coercion rule, the Court evaluates Spending Clause legislation using three additional factors. First, spending must be in pursuit of the general welfare.
This determination is largely for Congress to make.
The Court substantially defers to Congress’s decision that a particular expenditure advances the general welfare.



Between 1960 and 1965, the health coverage debate was a front burner issue in Congress, with dozens of proposals introduced and testimonies given by representatives of major organizations, including the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Association, and the AFL-CIO.

After Congress passed the legislation in the summer of 1965, President Lyndon Johnson decided to sign the bill with former President Truman at the Truman Presidential Library in Independence, MO, in order to recognize Truman’s early effort to establish a national health insurance program.
…and they were WRONG in this opinion… mostly because they applied General Welfare and Common Defense to individuals rather than to the Nation, which is what it properly refers to.

If Common Defense is an individual issue, when do I get issued my US Marine for personal protection?
 
…and they were WRONG in this opinion… mostly because they applied General Welfare and Common Defense to individuals rather than to the Nation,
WTF?
They were wrong because YOU said so?
which is what it properly refers to.
No, it doesn't.
The constitution is for all Americans, not just a few.


First, spending must be in pursuit of the general welfare.
This determination is largely for Congress to make.

If Common Defense is an individual issue, when do I get issued my US Marine for personal protection?
I didn't state that, YOU did.
 
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; . . .

Beyond the clear-notice requirement and the anti-coercion rule, the Court evaluates Spending Clause legislation using three additional factors. First, spending must be in pursuit of the general welfare.
This determination is largely for Congress to make.
The Court substantially defers to Congress’s decision that a particular expenditure advances the general welfare.



Between 1960 and 1965, the health coverage debate was a front burner issue in Congress, with dozens of proposals introduced and testimonies given by representatives of major organizations, including the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Association, and the AFL-CIO.

After Congress passed the legislation in the summer of 1965, President Lyndon Johnson decided to sign the bill with former President Truman at the Truman Presidential Library in Independence, MO, in order to recognize Truman’s early effort to establish a national health insurance program.
"general welfare" an ignorant statists wet dream :lol:
 
the founders: "hey, lets start a country based on individualism and let people run their lives how they see fit"
statist POS: "hey lets ruin this country built on individualism and give all of our power to a corrupt central government!"
:spinner:
 
the founders: "hey, lets start a country based on individualism and let people run their lives how they see fit"
statist POS: "hey lets ruin this country built on individualism and give all of our power to a corrupt central government!"
:spinner:
Like I said..........Ignorant.
What country in the entire world, doesn't have a government.
Syria excluded,
 
Then it would need to be signed by the president into law.
Then we would be like Syria.
Overthrown.

Yes, it is.

BS.
Ok, the prez is onboard and signs it. The govt kills millions of people all from a power they made up that you support. You statists have been brainwashed to think "general" means whatever in the **** congress says it does. But it isnt. Read the ******* constitution.
"general" is the opposite of individual. It means everyone. So how is stealing from one to give to another, "general welfare" THINK
 
Ok, the prez is onboard and signs it. The govt kills millions of people all from a power they made up that you support. You statists have been brainwashed to think "general" means whatever in the **** congress says it does.
WTF?
You're brain dead.
You RWNJ's think general means whatever the **** YOU think it means?
But it isnt. Read the ******* constitution.
YES it does.
"general" is the opposite of individual. It means everyone.
No shit.
So how is stealing from one to give to another, "general welfare"
The general welfare of all the people.

So, do you think Florida, Georgia and North Carolina should be on their own?
Should California be on their own?

You should try it sometime.
 
You RWNJ's think general means whatever the **** YOU think it means?
No I go by what it actually means, goober. General is the opposite of individual.
Here, let me teach you like you are just learning English.
gen·er·al
[ˈjen(ə)rəl]
adjective
general (adjective)
  1. affecting or concerning all or most people, places, or things; widespread:


 
15th post
No I go by what it actually means, goober. General is the opposite of individual.
Here, let me teach you like you are just learning English.
gen·er·al
[ˈjen(ə)rəl]
adjective
general (adjective)
  1. affecting or concerning all or most people, places, or things; widespread:

WTF?
THAT'S what I just told you.
 
WTF?
They were wrong because YOU said so?

No, it doesn't.
The constitution is for all Americans, not just a few.
The Constitution is for the NATION. The fact that you don’t understand that makes any further communication between us pointless.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom