Who is right? Gabbard or Trump?

[Billiejeens]

Gabbard's job is to be right, so she is.

Poor marky

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Tulsi Gabbard recently stated that Iran is nowhere close to building a nuclear weapon but Trump disputes that. Gabbard was chosen by Trump to be the Director of Intelligence, so who is right?



and this was Trump's response:



This situation is one that does put us not only on the brink of a worldwide Nuclear War because of POLITICS and EGO, but it also asks the question "are the people chosen by Trump good at what they do, or just Trump lackey's"?

Just yesterday:

Trump approves Iran attack plan but has not made final decision, reports say.​

I thought you were worried Trump filled his cabinet with yes people. Guess not. I like having her input, and his, and Israel’s,

Seems like a good idea to have as many different opinions as possible.

 

[Clipper]

Bullshit. None of Gabbards testimony has been edited out of the record, you ******* lying disgusting jackass Democratic party of Jim Crow, slavery, authoritarianism and racial discrimination supporter.

Yes it was, you asswipe. You don't have enough sense to come in out of the rain, retard.

Have another shit sandwich.

 

[Clipper]

Breaking: Trump and Gabbard have a good laugh at the Dem's feeble attempts to stir up trouble.

They'll both be under a bus by year's end.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

When you are enriching uranium to close to weapons grade then you are close. There was no reason to enrich uranium to that level.

It all comes down to what is close and when do you react instead of appease. Obie figured ten years then they could go ahead and have nukes was fine. Surprisingly Israel thinks maybe the are closer and should never get one. People in the government have decided on their own timeline as to when they would have them

Honestly I think I like Israel’s position. Let’s not play the timeline game of when Iran may actually put together a nuke and make sure it’s never, today.

 

[Luckyone]

**** you, lying scuzball. Why don't you man up and apologize for lying to the USMB forum instead of continuing to be a disgusting coward?

why don't you, you have been proven wrong?

 

[MarcATL]

Trump was elected to be right, so he is.
Tulsi Gabbard is subordinate to Trump.
Checkmate, she loses.

So why does Trump have her there?

Does he want to be surrounded by incompetence or what?

 

[g5000]

Tulsi Gabbard recently stated that Iran is nowhere close to building a nuclear weapon but Trump disputes that. Gabbard was chosen by Trump to be the Director of Intelligence, so who is right?

In this case, Gabbard is probably right.

But we must remember she was a strong defender of the mass murderer Assad of Syria.

And she's a socialist.

Also, Trump has always been a denier of intelligence.

See what I did there?

 

[Mac1958]

One thing that is "for sure" here. Evidently, Trump doesn't trust his OWN Intelligence Director to come up with the right information. Why did he choose HER? and Hegseth? They are both either incompetent or Trump is incompetent in choosing them.

Yeah, that's the concern. Given Trump's temperament and the people with whom he surrounds himself, I do worry about the decision-making process here. I don't want him following someone's advice simply because they were the one who flattered him the most that morning. We know how important that is.

I don't think he wants to bomb or get involved any deeper militarily. My guess is that this is just his standard flamboyant threat-making version of "negotiating", and that he'll TACO if things don't go his way.

 

[BluesLegend]

They'll both be under a bus by year's end.

Then you woke up from your dream in your mom's basement.

 

[Muhammed]

why don't you, you have been proven wrong?

**** you, lying imbecile.

You lied, *****. And it was the video that you linked to proved that you lied.

And you're too much of a cowardly little ***** to just man up and apologize to the USMB forum for lying to them again.

In post #17 you flat out lied about what Trump said.

Tulsi Gabbard stated "Iran is nowhere near a nuclear weapon", and Trump said "I don't care what she said (his OWN Director of Intelligence), she is wrong!"

Trump did not say "she is wrong!", you ******* liar. You just made it up. And I called you out for misquoting him in your cowardly feeble attempt to save face.

**** off. You're a liar and a coward.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

Tulsi Gabbard recently stated that Iran is nowhere close to building a nuclear weapon but Trump disputes that. Gabbard was chosen by Trump to be the Director of Intelligence, so who is right?



and this was Trump's response:



This situation is one that does put us not only on the brink of a worldwide Nuclear War because of POLITICS and EGO, but it also asks the question "are the people chosen by Trump good at what they do, or just Trump lackey's"?

Just yesterday:

Trump approves Iran attack plan but has not made final decision, reports say.​

Any president and their cabinet don't always agree on subjects, but the final decision always rests with the president. Even members of the politburos in Communist nations don't always disagree on topics, except in the situation with Communist nations, the individuals who disagree with the supreme leader, disappear, or in North Korea's case, strapped in front of a cannon and blown apart.

 

[Luckyone]

**** you, lying imbecile.

You lied, *****. And it was the video that you linked to proved that you lied.

And you're too much of a cowardly little ***** to just man up and apologize to the USMB forum for lying to them again.

In post #17 you flat out lied about what Trump said.



Trump did not say "she is wrong!", you ******* liar. You just made it up. And I called you out for misquoting him in your cowardly feeble attempt to save face.

**** off. You're a liar and a coward.

You do have one achievement, you "lying imbecile" and that is becoming the #58 person on my ignore list. You do nothing but insult, you are a total idiot, biased to the nth degree, and a total waste of time!

 

[Sunni Man]

So why does Trump have her there?
Does he want to be surrounded by incompetence or what?

Pres.Trump doesn't like to be surrounded by "Yes" men and women.
He likes hearing from advisers with opposing views.
Because it helps him in making the best possible decisions on the various issues.

 

[Muhammed]

You do have one achievement, you "lying imbecile" and that is becoming the #58 person on my ignore list.

Your concession is accepted.

 

[Luckyone]

Pres.Trump doesn't like to be surrounded by "Yes" men and women.
He likes hearing from advisers with opposing views.
Because it helps him in making the best possible decisions on the various issues.

Pure misinformation and BS coming from you

AI Overview

When forming his administration, Donald Trump has been reported to prioritize loyalty. Critics have suggested that this emphasis on loyalty has, at times, come at the expense of high-level experience and competence. Some commentators have raised concerns about the potential consequences of these appointments for the effectiveness and functioning of the government.

Why does President Trump constantly change staff? Does this hinder accomplishing tasks?

Bruce Golightly

Former Systems Administrator at Carnegie Mellon University (1986–2010)Author has 18.9K answers and 5.2M answer views6y
Originally Answered: Why does President Trump have so many personnel changes in his administration? Has any other president had this many changes? To the best of my knowledge, the turnover rate in the Trump administration is unprecedented, I find that troubling.

I remember Trump talking about how he was going to fill positions with the very best people. After two years, an impressive number of the people have been fired. I find that even more troubling. More have resigned, opening questions about why they feel compelled to leave.

Anecdotal reports suggest that Trump values personal loyalty and will not tolerate dissension or criticism. This is supported by public statements attacking anything and everything that is even slightly critical.

In Trump's first presidency, his turnover rate was 92%, which is an all-time high. He did not accept dissent from anyone.

President Trump's “A Team” turnover is 92% as of January 20, 2021.

 

[Lesh]

Wut? Do you not believe the IAEA reports on Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium?

Link to them

 

[Luckyone]

Trump was elected to be right, so he is.
Tulsi Gabbard is subordinate to Trump.
Checkmate, she loses.

The question in the OP was NOT about who wins but who is right. Of course, Trump is going to win against Gabbard or anyone else in his cabinet. He is the president. Nonetheless, winning does not insure that the right decision was made.

 

[Lesh]

The question in the OP was NOT about who wins but who is right. Of course, Trump is going to win against Gabbard or anyone else in his cabinet. He is the president. Nonetheless, winning does not insure that the right decision was made.

Ala Bush

 

[MarathonMike]

Link to them

You would just ignore the report. I won't waste my time.