Joseph Kent (director of the National Counterterrorism Center) resigns

But you just can't accept the facts that there's nothing supporting your hatred for Trump.

Really?

War in Iran for Israel.
$39 trillion debt.
Ending DOGE
Still funding the Dept. of Ed.
Government ownership of corporations (socialism)
The Epstein files.
Increased debt ceiling
Vetoing 1 spending bill in 5 years
Bombing 7 countries in 1 year
Lying about reasons to go to war
2 Assaults on our 2A
FISA 702 (warrantless spying on Americans)


Is that enough? Because I have more. I have a lot more.

What you can't accept is the fact that you've been "neo-conned" by a north eastern liberal. So you spend you days trying to spin & dodge everything for Trump, just to save face. That's all you Trump loyalist are doing, is trying to save face.
 
A lot of people were for Trump becoming president again. Now they're not.
Why? Because they learned some hard cold facts about him, that proved he's a lying NEOCON.


The point: People change their mind when presented with new evidence and facts. It's human nature.
Yeah right

They would be soooo much better off with kamala harris

I know they would not be

But I dont think a few loudmouth finger wetters speak for the rest of us
 
Thought we were talking about Kent.

I must be in the wrong thread.

What you said.

"But you just can't accept the facts that there's nothing supporting your hatred for Trump."

Stop playing, troll..
 
Yeah right

They would be soooo much better off with kamala harris

I know they would not be

But I dont think a few loudmouth finger wetters speak for the rest of us

Harris has nothing to do with people ending their support for Trump.
 
Harris has nothing to do with people ending their support for Trump.
Yes Harris is part of the story

If the slobbering mob no longer wants trump that means they now wanted harris instead

Thats no good
 
“There’s no question that Iraq was a threat to the people of the United States.”
• White House spokeswoman Claire Buchan, 8/26/03

“We ended the threat from Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction.”
• President Bush, 7/17/03

Iraq was “the most dangerous threat of our time.”
• White House spokesman Scott McClellan, 7/17/03

“Saddam Hussein is no longer a threat to the United States because we removed him, but he was a threat…He was a threat. He’s not a threat now.”
• President Bush, 7/2/03

“Absolutely.”
• White House spokesman Ari Fleischer answering whether Iraq was an “imminent threat,” 5/7/03

“We gave our word that the threat from Iraq would be ended.”
• President Bush 4/24/03

“The threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction will be removed.”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 3/25/03

“It is only a matter of time before the Iraqi regime is destroyed and its threat to the region and the world is ended.”
• Pentagon spokeswoman Victoria Clarke, 3/22/03

“The people of the United States and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder.”
• President Bush, 3/19/03

“The dictator of Iraq and his weapons of mass destruction are a threat to the security of free nations.”
• President Bush, 3/16/03

“This is about imminent threat.”
• White House spokesman Scott McClellan, 2/10/03

Iraq is “a serious threat to our country, to our friends and to our allies.”
• Vice President Dick Cheney, 1/31/03

Iraq poses “terrible threats to the civilized world.”
• Vice President Dick Cheney, 1/30/03

Iraq “threatens the United States of America.”
• Vice President Cheney, 1/30/03

“Iraq poses a serious and mounting threat to our country. His regime has the design for a nuclear weapon, was working on several different methods of enriching uranium, and recently was discovered seeking significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 1/29/03

“Well, of course he is.”
• White House Communications Director Dan Bartlett responding to the question “is Saddam an imminent threat to U.S. interests, either in that part of the world or to Americans right here at home?”, 1/26/03

“Saddam Hussein possesses chemical and biological weapons. Iraq poses a threat to the security of our people and to the stability of the world that is distinct from any other. It’s a danger to its neighbors, to the United States, to the Middle East and to the international peace and stability. It’s a danger we cannot ignore. Iraq and North Korea are both repressive dictatorships to be sure and both pose threats. But Iraq is unique. In both word and deed, Iraq has demonstrated that it is seeking the means to strike the United States and our friends and allies with weapons of mass destruction.”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 1/20/03

“The Iraqi regime is a threat to any American. … Iraq is a threat, a real threat.”
• President Bush, 1/3/03

“The world is also uniting to answer the unique and urgent threat posed by Iraq whose dictator has already used weapons of mass destruction to kill thousands.”
• President Bush, 11/23/02

“I would look you in the eye and I would say, go back before September 11 and ask yourself this question: Was the attack that took place on September 11 an imminent threat the month before or two months before or three months before or six months before? When did the attack on September 11 become an imminent threat? Now, transport yourself forward a year, two years or a week or a month…So the question is, when is it such an immediate threat that you must do something?”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 11/14/02

“Saddam Hussein is a threat to America.”
• President Bush, 11/3/02

“I see a significant threat to the security of the United States in Iraq.”
• President Bush, 11/1/02

“There is real threat, in my judgment, a real and dangerous threat to American in Iraq in the form of Saddam Hussein.”
• President Bush, 10/28/02

“The Iraqi regime is a serious and growing threat to peace.”
• President Bush, 10/16/02

“There are many dangers in the world, the threat from Iraq stands alone because it gathers the most serious dangers of our age in one place. Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists.”
• President Bush, 10/7/02

“The Iraqi regime is a threat of unique urgency.”
• President Bush, 10/2/02

“There’s a grave threat in Iraq. There just is.”
• President Bush, 10/2/02

“This man poses a much graver threat than anybody could have possibly imagined.”
• President Bush, 9/26/02

“No terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people and the stability of the world than the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 9/19/02

“Some have argued that the nuclear threat from Iraq is not imminent – that Saddam is at least 5-7 years away from having nuclear weapons. I would not be so certain. And we should be just as concerned about the immediate threat from biological weapons. Iraq has these weapons.”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 9/18/02

“Iraq is busy enhancing its capabilities in the field of chemical and biological agents, and they continue to pursue an aggressive nuclear weapons program. These are offensive weapons for the purpose of inflicting death on a massive scale, developed so that Saddam Hussein can hold the threat over the head of any one he chooses. What we must not do in the face of this mortal threat is to give in to wishful thinking or to willful blindness.”
• Vice President Dick Cheney, 8/29/02
 
“There’s no question that Iraq was a threat to the people of the United States.”
• White House spokeswoman Claire Buchan, 8/26/03

“We ended the threat from Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction.”
• President Bush, 7/17/03

Iraq was “the most dangerous threat of our time.”
• White House spokesman Scott McClellan, 7/17/03

“Saddam Hussein is no longer a threat to the United States because we removed him, but he was a threat…He was a threat. He’s not a threat now.”
• President Bush, 7/2/03

“Absolutely.”
• White House spokesman Ari Fleischer answering whether Iraq was an “imminent threat,” 5/7/03

“We gave our word that the threat from Iraq would be ended.”
• President Bush 4/24/03

“The threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction will be removed.”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 3/25/03

“It is only a matter of time before the Iraqi regime is destroyed and its threat to the region and the world is ended.”
• Pentagon spokeswoman Victoria Clarke, 3/22/03

“The people of the United States and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder.”
• President Bush, 3/19/03

“The dictator of Iraq and his weapons of mass destruction are a threat to the security of free nations.”
• President Bush, 3/16/03

“This is about imminent threat.”
• White House spokesman Scott McClellan, 2/10/03

Iraq is “a serious threat to our country, to our friends and to our allies.”
• Vice President Dick Cheney, 1/31/03

Iraq poses “terrible threats to the civilized world.”
• Vice President Dick Cheney, 1/30/03

Iraq “threatens the United States of America.”
• Vice President Cheney, 1/30/03

“Iraq poses a serious and mounting threat to our country. His regime has the design for a nuclear weapon, was working on several different methods of enriching uranium, and recently was discovered seeking significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 1/29/03

“Well, of course he is.”
• White House Communications Director Dan Bartlett responding to the question “is Saddam an imminent threat to U.S. interests, either in that part of the world or to Americans right here at home?”, 1/26/03

“Saddam Hussein possesses chemical and biological weapons. Iraq poses a threat to the security of our people and to the stability of the world that is distinct from any other. It’s a danger to its neighbors, to the United States, to the Middle East and to the international peace and stability. It’s a danger we cannot ignore. Iraq and North Korea are both repressive dictatorships to be sure and both pose threats. But Iraq is unique. In both word and deed, Iraq has demonstrated that it is seeking the means to strike the United States and our friends and allies with weapons of mass destruction.”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 1/20/03

“The Iraqi regime is a threat to any American. … Iraq is a threat, a real threat.”
• President Bush, 1/3/03

“The world is also uniting to answer the unique and urgent threat posed by Iraq whose dictator has already used weapons of mass destruction to kill thousands.”
• President Bush, 11/23/02

“I would look you in the eye and I would say, go back before September 11 and ask yourself this question: Was the attack that took place on September 11 an imminent threat the month before or two months before or three months before or six months before? When did the attack on September 11 become an imminent threat? Now, transport yourself forward a year, two years or a week or a month…So the question is, when is it such an immediate threat that you must do something?”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 11/14/02

“Saddam Hussein is a threat to America.”
• President Bush, 11/3/02

“I see a significant threat to the security of the United States in Iraq.”
• President Bush, 11/1/02

“There is real threat, in my judgment, a real and dangerous threat to American in Iraq in the form of Saddam Hussein.”
• President Bush, 10/28/02

“The Iraqi regime is a serious and growing threat to peace.”
• President Bush, 10/16/02

“There are many dangers in the world, the threat from Iraq stands alone because it gathers the most serious dangers of our age in one place. Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists.”
• President Bush, 10/7/02

“The Iraqi regime is a threat of unique urgency.”
• President Bush, 10/2/02

“There’s a grave threat in Iraq. There just is.”
• President Bush, 10/2/02

“This man poses a much graver threat than anybody could have possibly imagined.”
• President Bush, 9/26/02

“No terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people and the stability of the world than the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 9/19/02

“Some have argued that the nuclear threat from Iraq is not imminent – that Saddam is at least 5-7 years away from having nuclear weapons. I would not be so certain. And we should be just as concerned about the immediate threat from biological weapons. Iraq has these weapons.”
• Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 9/18/02

“Iraq is busy enhancing its capabilities in the field of chemical and biological agents, and they continue to pursue an aggressive nuclear weapons program. These are offensive weapons for the purpose of inflicting death on a massive scale, developed so that Saddam Hussein can hold the threat over the head of any one he chooses. What we must not do in the face of this mortal threat is to give in to wishful thinking or to willful blindness.”
• Vice President Dick Cheney, 8/29/02
 
And you proved it going after Trump via Kent.

Thanks for playing.

I go after all RINO's and democrats.

All you do is simp for Trump even after all this.

War in Iran for Israel.
$39 trillion debt.
Ending DOGE
Still funding the Dept. of Ed.
Government ownership of corporations (socialism)
The Epstein files.
Increased debt ceiling
Vetoing 1 spending bill in 5 years
Bombing 7 countries in 1 year
Lying about reasons to go to war
2 Assaults on our 2A
FISA 702 (warrantless spying on Americans)
 
All you do is simp for Trump even after all this.
Looks like you simp for The Squad......never realized Massie and MTG slept with the Squad.

HCv3rqvWQAAlIVd.webp


Meet the Muslim-American Businessman Bankrolling 'Squad' Dems, Anti-AIPAC Outfits, and… Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie

Sam Mahrouq, a Texas-based real estate, tech, and auto dealership tycoon who said he was born in a Palestinian refugee camp, shelled out $7,000 to Massie last year, the maximum allowed per cycle, FEC filings show. His wife Rania, daughter Raneem, and son Zaid Mahrouq each gave the same amount. Another $7,000 donation came from a Mohammad Mahrouq—the FEC filing shows that his address matches the rest of the family's and that he is employed by Ikon Technologies, a large software firm Sam Mahrouq founded and owns, but no other information could be found about him.

Sam Mahrouq also donated $9,000 to Greene and her People Over Politicians PAC.


 
Last edited:
Looks like you simp for The Squad......never realized Massie and MTG slept with the Squad.

View attachment 1233130


Meet the Muslim-American Businessman Bankrolling 'Squad' Dems, Anti-AIPAC Outfits, and… Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie

Sam Mahrouq, a Texas-based real estate, tech, and auto dealership tycoon who said he was born in a Palestinian refugee camp, shelled out $7,000 to Massie last year, the maximum allowed per cycle, FEC filings show. His wife Rania, daughter Raneem, and son Zaid Mahrouq each gave the same amount. Another $7,000 donation came from a Mohammad Mahrouq—the FEC filing shows that his address matches the rest of the family's and that he is employed by Ikon Technologies, a large software firm Sam Mahrouq founded and owns, but no other information could be found about him.

Sam Mahrouq also donated $9,000 to Greene and her People Over Politicians PAC.




Massie supports a non interventionist foreign policy. So why wouldn't he donate? Something Trump promised when he was campaigning.

The Right (Massie & Greene): He supports them because they frequently vote against foreign military aid and are skeptical of U.S. involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts.

Not to mention, you keep dodging these.

Trumps record.

War in Iran for Israel.
$39 trillion debt.
Ending DOGE
Still funding the Dept. of Ed.
Government ownership of corporations (socialism)
The Epstein files.
Increased debt ceiling
Vetoing 1 spending bill in 5 years
Bombing 7 countries in 1 year
Lying about reasons to go to war
2 Assaults on our 2A
FISA 702 (warrantless spying on Americans)
 
Massie supports a non interventionist foreign policy. So why wouldn't he donate? Something Trump promised when he was campaigning.

The Right (Massie & Greene): He supports them because they frequently vote against foreign military aid and are skeptical of U.S. involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts.

Why would he be stupid enough to take monies from the same person who funds the democrats who hate Jews and America?

Stands next to the Anti-Semites which you now support.

Trumps record.

War in Iran for Israel. - Military operation in the interest of national security.

$39 trillion debt. - Inflation have anything to contribute to that?

Ending DOGE - Most involved are now government employees, doing what they were tasked with.

Still funding the Dept. of Ed. - Merging it into other departments, passing it off to the states. This upsets you? Eliminating the Department of Indoctrination?

Government ownership of corporations (socialism) - Anytime under any president any entity takes government money, the government now has an equity stake in it.

The Epstein files. - Still no pictures of Trump partying with little girls, I feel your pain.

Increased debt ceiling - to meet existing obligations or we couldn't cover the bills. (inflated prices)

Vetoing 1 spending bill in 5 years - ?

Bombing 7 countries in 1 year - Why was it done?

Lying about reasons to go to war - I haven't heard.

2 Assaults on our 2A - BTSOOM

FISA 702 (warrantless spying on Americans) - Expires next month, what's your point?
 
15th post
Joe Kent is right. I am glad that some people in the Administration still have a sense of morals, and integrity to follow through with their convictions.
 
Back
Top Bottom