Who are the Palestinians? An Arab Invention.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 61768
  • Start date Start date
...Mark Twain said Israel was like a barren wasteland when he visited, void of human beings, vegetation, life. It wasn't until the Jews returned that everything was restored to its former beauty. Once the Arabs saw the Jews return and make the land beautiful it suddenly become theirs as if they ever had a claim to it. They do not...

Got to ask, have you ever read "Innocents Abroad"? Probably not, otherwise you'd have come across the descriptions the Zionist Hasbara department leaves out, “The narrow canon in which Nablous, or Shechem, is situated, is under high cultivation, and the soil is exceedingly black and fertile. It is well watered, and its affluent vegetation gains effect by contrast with the barren hills that tower on either side” or “Sometimes, in the glens, we came upon luxuriant orchards of figs, apricots, pomegranates, and such things, but oftener the scenery was rugged, mountainous, verdureless and forbidding” or
“We came finally to the noble grove of orange-trees in which the Oriental city of Jaffa lies buried”, amongst others. This was in 1867, 15 years before the first European Jewish settlers arrived en masse in 1882. Another thing tha Hasbara department omits is the fact that 90% of these settlers left before accomplishing anything of note. Zionist epic fail number1
Hasbara was founded in 2001. Innocents Abroad was published in 1869. Your suggestion is quite impossible. Grasping at straws requires a straw to in fact be in existence. Check your dates the next time. No cigar for you.

What suggestion is that, pray tell? The fact that the Hasbara department cherry-picks Mark Twain's book about his journey in 1867 which was published in 1869 in order to provide a false picture of Palestine to promote the myth that the Zionists "made the desert bloom"? Or are you just talking out of your posterior again?

Even with those couple of left-out sentences, the majority of Twain's description of Palestine is that of a forgotten wasteland. So what if a couple of places were in bloom? Any people who aren't totally retarded could have a couple of gardens here and there.
He also said that the land was void of human population yet the Arabs would have the world believe that the land was overflowing with Arabs! That simply is not the case. Were there a few Arab nomads dotted across the land here and there? Sure! But does a nomad have a legal claim to a land he camps out on? No.

See post #300
 
This is Gaza. Take a look at this video, the luxurious homes, market places, playing at the beach, beautiful cars, market places full of fresh food and good life Israeli's have given these people. Does this look like an oppressed people? Do you see any starving people in this video? Any ethnic cleansing? No? That is because there isn't any of that going on! You've been had!!!



This is Gaza? Destitute? Deprived? Oppressed? Think again! Gated communities, beautiful homes, a lifestyle on par with any Israeli citizen. Be sure to share this video by email and message boards and let people see the Gaza that mainstream media is portraying is grossly inaccurate!


When was the film made?
Who made the film?
 
Adriani Relandi 1696 is one of the many who traveled the land and wrote about what was in the area,

Erm, no he didn't. He never left the Netherlands, between 1693 and 1699 he was studying for his doctorate at the University of Utrecht. He used his prodigious language skills to compile "Palaestina ex monumentis veteribus illustrata" from other works written in Arabic and Syriac. Another Hasbara fail, and just to make the point again, Zionists lie, period.
 
What suggestion is that, pray tell? The fact that the Hasbara department cherry-picks Mark Twain's book about his journey in 1867 which was published in 1869 in order to provide a false picture of Palestine to promote the myth that the Zionists "made the desert bloom"? Or are you just talking out of your posterior again?

Even with those couple of left-out sentences, the majority of Twain's description of Palestine is that of a forgotten wasteland. So what if a couple of places were in bloom? Any people who aren't totally retarded could have a couple of gardens here and there.
After it has been debunked, surely you do not subscribe to the bogus notion that Palestine was empty land before the European Zionist settlement in the late nineteenth early twentieth century.



Who is native to Israel's land? Is it really the Arabs, who claim to be? Or is that just fiction? When did the Arabs settle in Israel? Do they go back to time immemorial, the way it is heard over and over in the media?

Adriani Relandi 1696 is one of the many who traveled the land and wrote about what was in the area, as did many others(all report the same findings):

Siebald Rieter,Johann Tucker, Arnold Van Harff ,Father Michael Nuad, Martin Kabatnik,Felix Fabri, Count Constantine Francois Volney,Alphonse de Lamartine, Mark Twain,Sir George Gawler, Sir George Adam Smith,Edward Robinson - found Palestine virtually empty, except for Jewish communities in Jerusalem, Safed, Shechem, Hebron,Gaza,Ramleh,Acre, Sidon, Tyre, Haifa, Irsuf, Caesarea, and El Arish, and throughout Galilee towns - Kfar Alma, Ein Zeitim, Biria, Pekiin, Kfar Hanania, Kfar Kana, Kfar Yassif.

To stay, these Jews had submitted to innumerable conquerors, taxes, pogroms and degradation. But they stayed. In 1799, Palestine was still so much in need of people that Napoleon Bonaparte championed a full-scale return of Jews.

"The land in Palestine is lacking in people to till its fertile soil". British archaeologist Thomas Shaw, mid-1700's

"Palestine is a ruined and desolate land". Count Constantine François Volney, XVIII century French author and historian

"The country is in a considerable degree empty of inhabitants and therefore its greatest need is of a body of population". James Finn, British Consul in 1857
--------------------------------
"Palaestina ex monumentis veteribus illustrata" - a detailed geographical survey of Palestine in 1696 written in Latin by Adriaan Reland published by Willem Broedelet, Utrecht, in 1714.

Residents of the country mainly concentrated in cities: Jerusalem, Acre, Safed, Jaffa, Tiberias and Gaza.

In most cities, the majority of residents are Christians, Jews and others, very few Muslims who generally are Bedouin, seasonal workers who came to serve as Seasonal workers in agriculture or building. v v
Nablus: 120 muslims, 70 Samaritans
Nazareth: 700 people - all Christians
Umm al-Fahm: 50 people-10 families, ALL Christian
Gaza: 550 people- 300 Jews,250 Christian(Jews engaged in agriculture ,Christians deal with the trading and transporting the products)
Tiberias: 300 residents, all Jews.
Safed: about 200 inhabitants, all Jews
Jerusalem :5000 people,most of them (3,500) Jews,the rest - Christian (1000) Muslim (500)

_________
So how have the Arabs gotten away with claiming they were the native inhabitants of the land, even of Jerusalem when in fact there were very few Arab Nomads seen anywhere in the vicinity?

We've seen Mark Twain's observation and it coincides with what these men had to say too. Doesn't it?


In 1799, Palestine was still so much in need of people that Napoleon Bonaparte championed a full-scale return of Jews.

"The land in Palestine is lacking in people to till its fertile soil". British archaeologist Thomas Shaw, mid-1700's

"Palestine is a ruined and desolate land". Count Constantine François Volney, XVIII century French author and historian

"The country is in a considerable degree empty of inhabitants and therefore its greatest need is of a body of population". James Finn, British Consul in 1857.

Out of the mouths of two or three witnesses we see the matter established......... although in this particular case we have over a dozen eye witnesses all confirming Mark Twain's account .....

You write bunk, propaganda, and fiction. There is no way to reason with you.

If you cannot handle the truth there is a simple solution. Leave.


Pity you don't take your own advice, as it's clear that you and truth are complete stranger to each other.
 
In any case, we have documentary film and photographs that shows what Palestine was like within the same general period of time. Jaffa port in 1867 for example:

1024px-F%C3%A9lix_Bonfils_%28French%29_-_Jaffa%2C_Vue_G%C3%A9n%C3%A9rale_Prise_de_la_Mer_-_Palestine_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg
Authentic photograph but the Jews were living there, not Arabs. There were very few Arabs and they were nomads. The didn't live in the dwelling places shown in this photograph you are showing. The Jews did. See this film about the Jews living in Ottoman Palestine and you'll see the truth. Interesting story about this film I'm posting. It was viewed on the eve of the first world war and aferward all copies disappeared. By a miracle of God a negative of the film was later discovered in 1939 and today we have this:


notation: Remember that in 1917 when territories became part of the English colony , English Foreign Minister Balfourd, was author of Declaration on Palestine named after him , which created the Palestinan Mandate, to provide a home for the Jews.


There's no 'd' in Balfour, just sayin' no need to thank me. Oh, and Palestine never became an official British colony; that's why the Mandate system was invented, to expand the Empire by the back door.
 
Did I mention that the Palestine National Football team were all Jewish? Yes. They were. Where were the Arabs? There were no Arabs on the team. Zero.

Mandatory Palestine national football team - Wikipedia

Wikipedia implies the Arabs weren't interested in the sport but what about soccer? The Palestine Soccer Team was all Jewish too!
Palestine-football-team-e1432827875904.png

All Jews, no Arabs.... what to think? Palestine Football Assoc 1928 - All Jewish


Main articles: History of the Israel national football team and Mandatory Palestine national football team

Football has a long tradition in Israel. The game was originally introduced during the time of the Ottoman Empire. The Palestinian Football Association was formed in August 1928, and joined FIFA in June 1929,

The British Mandate of Palestine national team made its debut against Egypt in 1934 FIFA World Cup qualification, losing 1–7 in Cairo. The team played five international matches, including a friendly match against Lebanon, until the British Mandate for Palestine was dissolved.

Israel national football team - Wikipedia

Given the British introduced the sport of Football to Palestine after WW1, according to the "Encyclopedia of World Soccer" by richard Henshaw, there wouldn't have been many native Palestinians (Muslim Christian or Jewish) skilled enough or interested enough to play at an international level. The jewish European settlers on the other hand, would have been very familiar with the game as it was widespread in Europe, where they originated. Another Zionist lie debunked.
 
From a Pre-WWII Book of Flags:

original.jpg

Is this the flag of Arabs or Jews? I say Jews. What say you?

Yeah, Larousse got it wrong. That's a Zionist flag and was never recognised as the flag of Palestine which was the Union Jack until 1948. Another Zionist lie debunked.
 
When you come to think about it, it's really strange. I'm Jewish and I have the right to move to Dallas or Paris or Rio. Yet some people would deprive me of the right to move to Hebron, the one place where Judaism was actually born. Very ironic.

What the **** does your religion have to do with your right to live in a certain land?

It's blood that gives you rights to land, not religion.

I'm a brahmin by birth, we claim to be directly descended from a sage. 2,000 ******* years, and we have been in teh same place with the same people since the patriarchs walked the earth, so it's a lot more believable than some Euro thinking he's descended from the patriarchs.

In our religion we do patrilineal descent. But if my descendants breed with everyone but Indians for generations we no longer have a blood claim to teh land.

Even if technically my descendants are practicing members of caste and the males share my Y, by religions standards full members of caste. My clan can't go marching to reseat themselves in the shadow of the Himalayas on "our" land. I don't feel that would be appropriate and I'm only the first generation removed from Indian blood with my father being born there. How could you be so pompous?

So how in your mind does your insignificant connection to the land give you any right to it? You can't prove you're descended from the patriarchs. You can't trace your line back at all, you've been living as a minority in a society a world away.

You think you have a claim to Palestine relative the people descended from those who stayed? What?

Even if you were a Tunisian, you were breeding with Tunisians not Palestinians. And I doubt you're descended from Tunisians and Jews. I suspect mostly Europeans with some real semite ancestors long ago

I'm not "pompous", I was just stating the irony. I'm a kohen with a certain DNA that only kohanim have. Why are ppl who have a foul, potty mouth, so angry all the time? You on the Palestinian side and a guy from the Zionist side are always so angry, and say obscenities all the time. So I guess it has nothing to do with being right or wrong, since you're both on different sides.
 
Last edited:
9,000 Photos from 1800’s British Mandate of Palestine – with no trace of ‘Palestinians’ By Palestine/Israel Conflict, February 13, 2013 (thanks to Dan F):

Where ARE all those Palestinians, the proclaimed one million of them who lived in Israel before they were ‘displaced’? Nowhere.

Nowhere, because they never existed.And where are all the mosques for those “1 million Palestinians”? With Muslims comes mosques. There can be no Muslim population without a large proportion of mosques. If they had been 1 million at the turn of the Century, or even in 1920 after they began immigrating to fight the British, with their rapid population growth Palestine would consist of over 40 million people today and not 4 million. That alone proves the Palestinian jihad lies. Their population is small because they are new invaders and occupiers who arrived late with an aim to commit jihad. They never lost land that was never theirs to begin with! The British army permitted merely a few Ottomans to remain due to religious observations, the rest was Jewish. In reality according to eyewitness reports the barren British Mandate had a very small number of people living on it.

Félix Bonfils (1831-1885) was French photographer and writer who was active in the Middle East. Four years after his arrival he reported 15,000 prints of Egypt, Palestine, Syria, and Greece, and 9,000 stereoscopic-views. He traveled to the region several times and we hear of no mass population of Palestinians, which contradicts everything the Palestinians lie about to the world.

His pictures did not manage to capture any photographs of a single so-called ‘Palestinian’ who are suppose to have lost land to Jewish occupation, if we believe Arab propaganda. All he found was a few bedouines passing through and some remnants of the Ottoman Turks. Guess why? Because the “Palestinian” people as we know them today never existed.The original philistines which the Arab jihadi’s named themselves after were a small group of lawless bandits who occupied the region near Gaza by force and died out before the birth of Christ. Islam was created over 600 years after the death of Christ and is the world’s youngest religion.

Palestinians are a fake creation ordered and constructed by the Grand Mufti Haj Mohammed Effendi Amin el-Husseini [1889-1974]. They were basically discovered (formed and invented) and originate from mass immigration from Egypt and Saudi Arabia with purpose to commit jihad. The Egyptian fighters ended up in Gaza and the Saudi fighters ended up in the West Bank according to their rout of entry.This has been well documented by British government reports from the British Mandate and from Transjordan. It also fits the video clips and rants by Hamas leaders, who seem well aware that Palestinians are fake yet continue to argue that they ‘lost land’. We are dealing with a terrorist organization here, and not a people who became victims of loss of land.It is also important to pay attention to the fact that once Israel had been assigned to be returned to the Jewish people in 1917, Muslims rapidly began to pour into the region from other countries with a purpose to kill them.The first conflict and killing in Israel/Palestine was initiated by the Muslims. At that point to control the population influx the British government stopped Jewish people from entering the area. So for a short span, the Muslim population suddenly became a majority. Not for natural reasons but due to their rapid invasion and occupation. Therefore, if we look at timeline of events in history we will quite easily see that the REAL occupiers of the region are the Muslims.
32-137g.jpg

755px-birket_israel_19th_century.jpg
Félix Bonfils (1831-1885): Birket, Israel in late 1800’s.
769px-Jews_at_Western_Wall_by_Felix_Bonfils%2C_1870s.jpg
Félix Bonfils (1831-1885): Jews at the Western wall in 1870.
tumblr_kub1gdTEXJ1qzsm5ho1_500.jpg
Félix Bonfils (1831-1885): Yessayi Garabedian, the Armenian Patriarch in Jerusalem.
felix-bonfils-modern-jericho.jpg

Félix Bonfils (1831-1885): W.C. Prime 1857 in “Tent Life in the Holy Land”
felix-bonfils-solomons-pools.jpg

Félix Bonfils (1831-1885): From Thomas Shaw, Travels and Observations Relating to Several Parts of Barbary and the Levant, London, 1767, S. 331 ff.
dome-of-the-rock-1875.jpg

Félix Bonfils (1831-1885): Dome of the Rock 1875 (Where are all the “Palestinians” in their so-called displaced and occupied holiest site?). The Dome of the Rock was originally a Jewish synagogue, and later, a Christian cathedral but was conquered and occupied by Muslims who converted it to a mosque. The entire region was bathing in blood from the Muslim conquest.

Editor’s note: The Dome of the Rock was a supremacist project by the leader of the Muslim world in the first half of the twentieth century. Amin al Husseini made the dome his special project. It had fallen into a state of utter disrepair, but al-Husseini saw it to his political advantage to restore it.
The dilapidated Dome of the Rock was a decaying old relic well into the 20th century. It was of no import and it was no longer used as a place of worship. When the calls for a Jewish state were reverberating throughout the world, the annihilationist leader of the Muslim world and Hitler ally, Mufti al Husseini, realized that he had to create a territorial fiction in order to deny the Jewish people their holiest site.

It was that devout Jew-hater, the Mufti Al Husseini, who undertook the gold plating of the dome (above right) and the making of improvements to the Al Aqsa mosque.

This served the purpose of enhancing the importance of Jerusalem in the Islamic world; up until that point, it had been an insignificant religious backwater for Muslims. Photos of Jerusalem before this time show a relatively colorless and nondescript dome on top of the Temple Mount.

Read more about the Dome here andhere)..



9,000 Photos from Palestine in 1800's – with no trace of Muslims or mosques - Geller Report
Jews at the Western Wall in 1870. No trace of Arabs........

769px-Jews_at_Western_Wall_by_Felix_Bonfils%2C_1870s.jpg

Not many Jewish people either...
 
You forgot to mention that the Dome of the Rock was originally a Jewish synagogue and later it was transformed into a Cathedral and then later when the land was conquered and taken over by Muslims it was converted from a church into a Mosque. So as a Mosque, no it didn't stand there for 1300 years. Only in your confused mind.

Well I never mentioned any of the above because there's no evidence that the Dome of the Rock was ever a Jewish synagogue, having been built in 691CE by the Ummayids, that's highly unlikely. Yes, the Crusaders turned it into a church while they ruled Jerusalem and then it was re-converted back into a Mosque when Jerusalem was reconquered ans has remained a mosque ever since. My mind isn't confused, unlike some.
 
Wow, 10 more pages of this crap to look through, you have been busy this weekend. Taking a break now,

giphy.gif
 
15th post
<snip>and a Roman Catholic<snip>

Keep digging monti. If you are a Roman Catholic, why do you many times refer to the Bible as a fairy tale? Your lies and hypocrisy knows no bounds.
I have many Catholic family members and they don't believe the Bible either. At best they have been taught to believe it is stories / allegories but not to be taken literally. They believe that they should obey the Pope. Not God. In essence, they believe the Pope has the authority of God and that the same type of authority / power belongs to their priests as well. They believe their priests have the power to forgive their sins and that their salvation can only come through the Roman Catholic Church. None of this is scriptural but when they are shown that in the bible their response is they don't believe the bible or take it literally.

If they believed the bible they would know that Jesus never taught his church to build an army, to have a court system or a Vatican, to hoard billions in gold,silver, precious gems and art work in a Vatican vault, Jesus never told the church to establish a bank (Vatican banks) nor create the United Nations to seize lands, whole islands, castles, palaces, archaelogical sites, private properties for their own private pleasure and use (UNESCO World Heritage: UNESCO World Heritage Sites: UN Controls Priceless Lands and Monuments | Alternative), Jesus never appointed a Vicar, that Jesus never taught a church to start a war or seek world dominating political power over Kings, Queens and Presidents. Jesus never taught any church to raise up death squads and spy agencies who murder in the name of God - such as the Jesuits are. Roman Catholicism is actually based on a Babylonian religion that has nothing to do with the Bible. We talk about the Palestinians being an Arab invention but who was behind the scenes orchestrating this from beginning to end? The Vatican. Of course. They are the force behind the UN, the IMF, the World Bank, the wealth of the Vatican is greater than any other single organization on earth. It's utterly corrupt, evil and the religious component that has been set in place for the future One World Order Government. The Vatican's goal has always been the same, to take Jerusalem for its headquarters. They having been using the Muslims to accomplish this goal - for centuries - read Dr. Alberto Rivera - ex - Jesuit and he will explain why the Vatican is using the Muslims. What will happen in the end?

I suspect that after the Vatican uses the Muslims to wipe out the Jews and Christians who resist Rome's authority they will turn on the Muslims for one final crusade and kill them all. The Vatican has always worked both sides of every war, every coup, every agenda. It's their way of being in control of both sides.
Thank-you for explaining the New Testament on Sunday for us.
I've explained what isn't in the New Testament (in part). If you'd like to know what is in the New Testament open your KJV Bible and read it. I believe the Word of God is your answer, Eloy. You seem very unhappy and you shouldn't have to live your entire life this way. If you will give your life to Jesus Christ and follow Him He will open your eyes to the truth about Israel and you won't feel this hatred and bitterness for His brethren any longer.

You know, this is an interesting fact. I've never seen a Muslim who left Islam and become a born again Christian stay mad at Israel. In fact, the hate they had for the Jews disappeared and in its place they felt great love for the Jewish people! As if they had awoke to the truth. I pray that happens for you. I don't desire to see any of you end up in hell but if you insist on sending yourselves there by hanging onto these lies what can anyone do?
I read that Jesus was killed by the Romans at the demand of the Jews but they were different people from Jews from the Bronx who are living in occupied Palestine.
Unless the Jews in the Bronx are 2,000 years old they would most definitely be "different people." As for the people living in "Occupied Palestine"? I believe you are talking about Israel. Israel belongs to the Jews (all of it). There are presently some people who don't belong there. Those people call themselves Palestinians (beginning in the 1960's) but are in reality Arabs and Egyptians who need to pack up their bags and go back to their own lands.
 
You forgot to mention that the Dome of the Rock was originally a Jewish synagogue and later it was transformed into a Cathedral and then later when the land was conquered and taken over by Muslims it was converted from a church into a Mosque. So as a Mosque, no it didn't stand there for 1300 years. Only in your confused mind.

Well I never mentioned any of the above because there's no evidence that the Dome of the Rock was ever a Jewish synagogue, having been built in 691CE by the Ummayids, that's highly unlikely. Yes, the Crusaders turned it into a church while they ruled Jerusalem and then it was re-converted back into a Mosque when Jerusalem was reconquered ans has remained a mosque ever since. My mind isn't confused, unlike some.
It was a Jewish synagogue (notice the dome and the link / information posted about early synagogue structures and domes) which the Romans later turned into a cathedral and later on when the Muslims came in and took it over it was turned it into a Mosque. Is there any land, any building, anything the Moslems didn't steal from other people by conquest or terrorism? Pakistan was carved out of India too. Mohammad was born in 570 A.D. so look sometime before 600 A.D. for who the original occupants were of lands, etc. As for the Jews? They were in Israel thousands of years before Mohammad was even a twinkle in his mothers eye and afterward as well. AND THERE WERE NO MOSQUES THEN EITHER.

Your Koran identifies Israel as given to the Jews by God. There is no mention of Jerusalem or Palestinians in your Koran. There is no religious connection between Israel and Islam. You've got one Muslim Cleric who even went on record stating there as no religious significance to Muslims connected to Israel or Jerusalem and that the Palestinians were an "Arab Invention." The cat is out of the bag. Could this be the sequel to the tale of the rat in the hat?
 
Last edited:
Anyone who thinks Israel has a right to exist under international law without the right of return is quite obviously ignorant or just a ******* bigoted piece of shit.

Anyone who thinks Israel is a democracy without the right of return is an ignorant or bigoted piece of shit.

Anyone who thinks Ashkenazi have a right to Palestine can't ******* read or is a bigot.

List goes on and on. Soon in the states voicing these opinions will be one step away from being a white nationalist.

Looking at bannon that may be sooner than most of us had anticipated.
There will be no right of return nor going to pre-67 lines. When you wage war against a sovereign nation you don't get to pretend as if it never happened. There are consequences. Something the Muslims have failed to learn because everyone continues to appease them. The UN is not dictating to Israel what she will or will not do through "international law." Israel is a Sovereign Nation and a Jewish State and should be acknowledged as such. The world (all of it) must acknowledge and respect this fact. Jerusalem (all of it) is the Capitol of Israel. This too must be acknowledged and respected. The best thing to do with the UN is turn in membership (every nation) and walk away. It is an abysmal failure and was used as a weapon against Israel. The UN is a disgrace. If the nations which fund it (primarily the USA) leave it, others will follow. President Trump certainly looks like the man to lead the way.

Who's going to enforce that? lol

5 million Jews who's society can collapse at any moment due to outside sanctions/

They're not North Korea, they can't sustain the occupation without a functioning economy.

With the right rising in Europe. And America being brown. The prospects for Israelis setting the terms grow dimmer every day.

If I was an Israeli Nationalist I'd be willing to go back to 48 at this point (assuming I didn't have a fear of god punishing me for doing so, lol).

Things are not looking good. What do you think will happen if Europeans and Americans just cut off air travel? Rich Jews will leave en masse and the economy will fall apart.

Much less actual sanctions or banks pulling out (although I don't know what bank is giong to have the balls to **** with Israel lol)
You worry way too much. We're talking about Israel here. G-d is in full control. What part of that don't you get? Should the day come that America is wiped off the map (or fallen never to arise again), Israel will continue on to another day because her help does not come from man (or any nation) albeit some may not realize this. Israel's help comes from G-d and he does not need anyone's help to keep His own people. Your post reminds me of Psalm 2. God laughs at the heathen who rage and the people who imagine a vain thing.

Psalm 2 King James Version (KJV)

2 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?

2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his anointed, saying,

3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.

4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.

5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure.

6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.

7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.

9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.

10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.

11 Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling.

12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.

King James Version (KJV)
Public Domain


https://www.biblegateway.com/plus?utm_source=bg&utm_medium=sidebar&utm_campaign=bgplus_learnmore-4
 
The UN documents are falsified because the UN has an agenda against Israel.

Prove it.
Gladly. The UN Chief admits UN bias and discrimination against Israel. UN General Assembly President openly show his bias against Israel. The UN record proves it's bias against Israel. The World continues to ignore it. The facts and evidence do not lie. The UN has an agenda against Israel.

6be9573837110995fd9df2c87d9dd193.jpg

Understatement of the century by Ban Ki Moon, UN Sec. General

un-general-assembly-president-peter-thomson-wearing-a-palestinian-flag-8216432.png

Flagrant and disgraceful disrespect to Israel openly show at UN Meeting

Screen-Shot-2016-11-08-at-10.39.52-PM.png

How recent is UN bias against Israel? It's still going on. The UN must go.

un-resolutions-against-israel.png

A picture worth MORE THAN a thousand words..........


unwatch.png

What's wrong with this picture? Zero condemnations for Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, Fatah, Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad terrorist groups........ ONE, THAT'S RIGHT, FOLKS,ONE CONDEMNATION FOR ISIS, 4 for Islamic republic of Iran (who vows to wipe Israel off the map) and are you ready for it? 57 CONDEMNATIONS AGAINST ISRAEL FROM THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL! BIAS? YOU BET THE UN IS BIAS. THE UN IS A SEETHING CAULDRON OF HATRED AGAINST THE JEWISH STATE OF ISRAEL.


john-adams-quote-facts.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom