Nothing funnier than watching a misogynist religious nutter get upset when people don't buy their crazy.
No, they just used inaccurate terms. The thing is, if Bush had gotten up there and said, "We think that Saddam has expired cans of mustard gas he buried in 1991, but they've probably lost their potency by now, but let's invade to make sure", everyone would have laughed at him.
BUt he talked about Nukes and Anthrax and other scary shit. Which they never found. But we found those old cans of mustard gas who gave the guys who dug them up mild burns... so there's that.
And yet the practice of partial birth abortion is well known and new abortion laws do indeed permit such things if it can be justified on the grounds of the mother's health (mental health as well) and we all know any woman can claim her mental health will be imperiled by the burden of her child and no doctor in the world will contradict her claim. The law is infanticide legalized.
Well, when you use terms like "Partial Birth Abortion" to describe a Dilation and extraction, (The clinical name for the procedure) it's hard to take you seriously.
The reality is, no woman is going to abort a healthy fetus at 9 months. No doctor is going to perform that operation unless the fetus is really deformed. And at the end of the day, it's none of your ******* business.
You are being typically idiotic and all one needs to do is read the provisions of the bill. Read the bill, champ. Women have been known to carry their child to full term and then reject them. The phenomenon is not unknown. Read the bill!
And search your tiny brain to see how NY's new abortion law differs from the old and why the state has had to change provisions of their criminal code due to it.
Yes, they modify the criminal code all the time. No biggie. Still not infanticide.
No white people will take a black child into their home so this piece in HuffPo is what....
a long exercise in comedy?
Wouldn't know, don't care. I've already pointed out that there are thousands of black kids languishing in the system now. And there's a train of thought that placing a black kid with a white family might not necessarily be good for them.
Your asinine comment implies you know more about a certain piece of legislation than the person who sponsored it. That's the absolute height of your idiocy and dishonesty and I don't see how anyone can ever say something stupider and more presumptive than that.
Yawn... naw, I'm just less polite than Ms. Tran.... I'd have given that Bible Thumping asshole an earful... Her mistake was being polite to a misogynist.
Do you need to use smaller words? No. Just the truth. You haven't demonstrated what you claim
Actually, I have.
So to summon you are a ******* liar and coward! Sanger was a racist as my quote demonstrates and your attempt to put her racism all on the science of the day is bullshit
and you probably know that.
She was probably no more racist than any other white person in 1912. Probably a lot less. But let's grant for the moment she was. She wasn't an expert on racial matters, she was an expert on birth control, and black leaders thanked her efforts to make family planning available to black women.
Or let's put it a way your tiny little brain can grasp. We've recently discovered some writings of Albert Einstein that showed he was racist as shit against Asian people.
Einstein was a racist? His 1920s travel diaries contain shocking slurs against Chinese people
Did that make him wrong about nuclear fission?
You want to change the subject again and the way you've been trapped by your own lies I can see why. And yes, it's ironic how Margaret Sanger's own organization became a front for an abortion mill.
Naw, man, I just understand CONTEXT. Sanger was against abortion because in 1920, it was actually kind of dangerous. Nobody got arrested for having abortions and no one got arrested for performing them unless they fucked up and injured the woman.
Today abortions are totally safe for women, if done by a competent provider. (Poor women get characters like Gosnell, unfortunately).