Which Is The Worse Hate Crime....

[PoliticalChic]

Was that meant to be taken seriously? Sounds like something a woman would say as a joke.

It destroyed a generation and a community.


Modern Liberalism is the spawn of Karl Marx, the pillar of whose doctrine is the destruction of the family, and religion.



These are two of the aims of the CPUSA (Communist Party, USA):

a. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce

b. . Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."





7." Murphy Brown's out-of-wedlock pregnancy mocked the importance of fathers and glamorized single motherhood at a time when the "breakdown of family structure" is causing "lawless social anarchy."
Single Moms, Hillary's Cookies and 'Murphy Brown'



8. "CBS Boss Allegedly Told Producer To Sleep Around For Success"
Hostile environment: CBS boss allegedly told producer to sleep around for success - Hot Air

 

[IM2]

And the welfare state started in 1910, then was modified in 1935.

Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 provided grants to states as Aid To Dependent Children. Eventually the name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children. This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children and no daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. Aid to Dependent Children functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states with mothers’ aid laws that began in 1910.

The ADC plan was written by two ladies who had been former directors of what was at the time called the U.S. Children’s Bureau. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers had no support from a husband no matter how they got into that position. From the Children's Bureau in 1910 until 1965, no one talked about how the welfare state was wrong and created the disintegration of the white family. I read no lectures about the irresponsible white father. The program was not denigrated as something creating dependence on government; it was seen as essential assistance needed to help women without husbands who had children. Only when the law required that others besides whites be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. “The problem facing blacks today is not whites; it is black criminals.

In his May 17 speech from Buffalo, Biden scolded his white listeners for their apparent apathy: “We have to refuse to live in a country where Black people going about a weekly grocery shopping can be gunned down by weapons of war deployed in a racist cause.” Biden may not have noticed, but sorrow and outrage over the attack were universal.

Furthermore, awful as the Buffalo massacre was, it was almost sui generis. White-supremacist shootings like the Buffalo massacre are so rare that they do not show up statistically in the tidal wave of black homicide victims between the ages of ten and 34. Blacks going about their quotidian chores in inner-city areas do have reason to fear, but the threat is not from white supremacists. It is from other blacks.”
Using the Buffalo Tragedy for Racial Propaganda | City Journal



"324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years
324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years – American Free Press
americanfreepress.net

 

[IM2]

Let's see if you can figure out why that is related to this:






The report states: “White adults spend 36 percent more time than black adults reading to young children, and three times more time talking with and listening to them. Other analyses find that black mothers are about two-thirds as likely as white mothers to read to toddlers daily.”

Later, the report offers this striking factoid: “By age 6, white children have typically spent 1,300 more hours engaged in conversations with adults than black children.”

EPI’s report endeavors to show that these differences are not simply the result of comparing rich against poor. After noting that the number of books in a home is “a reliable indicator of home intellectual environment,” EPI offers this striking chart:



Overall, white homes had 2.5 times as many books as black homes. But the most surprising finding is that the top quintile of black homes reported having fewer books (69) than the bottom quintile of white homes (71).

These differences in reading to and talking with children begin to add up even before kids get to school...

Report: Negligent Parenting Hurts Black Students' Performance​

A newly-published report says that some parenting choices and attitudes can hurt the success of black students in school.

www.breitbart.com

Lets see if you can use real information. When parents have tooo work 2 jobs because they don't make enough to live on with one, there is going to be negligence. Now you want to continually skip over a causal factor to post parody from Breitbart.

 

[IM2]

9. “The problem facing blacks today is not whites; it is black criminals.

In his May 17 speech from Buffalo, Biden scolded his white listeners for their apparent apathy: “We have to refuse to live in a country where Black people going about a weekly grocery shopping can be gunned down by weapons of war deployed in a racist cause.” Biden may not have noticed, but sorrow and outrage over the attack were universal.

Furthermore, awful as the Buffalo massacre was, it was almost sui generis. White-supremacist shootings like the Buffalo massacre are so rare that they do not show up statistically in the tidal wave of black homicide victims between the ages of ten and 34. Blacks going about their quotidian chores in inner-city areas do have reason to fear, but the threat is not from white supremacists. It is from other blacks.”
Using the Buffalo Tragedy for Racial Propaganda | City Journal



"324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years
324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years – American Free Press
americanfreepress.net


View attachment 649039



View attachment 649040

And you will find that whites have killed the same number of people.

 

[IM2]

There was another mass shooting today. I doubt the shooter was black. I could be wrong but...

 

[Ringtone]

That is incorrect. I have posted the numbers.

In 2017, Demos published a study titled, “The Asset Value of Whiteness: Understanding the Racial Wealth Gap.” On page 10 this statement is written:

"The median white single parent has 2.2 times more wealth than the median black two-parent household and 1.9 times more wealth than the median Latino two-parent household.

Your observation is wholly unrelated to the Moynihan determinant.

But, of course, your problem is that you can't get past historical injustices. New flash: white people don't owe you a damn thing beyond a respectful regard for your natural rights. Go pound dirt, plantation negro and would-be enslaver of others.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Lets see if you can use real information. When parents have tooo work 2 jobs because they don't make enough to live on with one, there is going to be negligence. Now you want to continually skip over a causal factor to post parody from Breitbart.

Let's look for the cause:

With respect to the education gap, how is it that 'racism' is responsible for these areas in which black students fall short when compared to white and Asian students:

The number of days absent from school

The number of hours spent watching TV

The number of pages read for homework

Quantity and quality of reading material in the home

The presence of two parents in the home.

How does 'racism' explain these ...deficiencies????

How are white folks responsible???

 

[PoliticalChic]

There was another mass shooting today. I doubt the shooter was black. I could be wrong but...

The greatest 'serial killer' in the history of this nation is black.....you didn't know that????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Your observation is wholly unrelated to the Moynihan determinant.

But, of course, your problem is that you can't get past historical injustices. New flash: white people don't owe you a damn thing beyond a respectful regard for your natural rights. Go pound dirt, plantation negro and would-be enslaver of others.

Moynihan was prescient.
And his views of the best thing for black Americans were the same as those of the views of Frederick Douglass, who said the following in April, 1865. His speech was called What the Black Man Wants."


"Everybody has asked the question, and they learned to ask it early of the abolitionists, "What shall we do with the Negro?" I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us!

Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall!

I am not for tying or fastening them on the tree in any way, except by nature's plan, and if they will not stay there, let them fall. And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone!

If you see him on his way to school, let him alone, don't disturb him! If you see him going to the dinner table at a hotel, let him go! If you see him going to the ballot- box, let him alone, don't disturb him! [Applause.] If you see him going into a work-shop, just let him alone,--your interference is doing him a positive injury."






Douglass spoke in 1865.

There was a period during which blacks competed successfully sans government programs.

Then came the 1960's and the "War on Poverty."

I'll bet you would agree that the 'War' did not produce the results that were promised.


NY Democrat Senator, the brilliant Daniel Patrick Moynihan, called for the same things as Douglass, calling it 'benign neglect' of blacks.


I suggest that Liberal politicians also realize the truth of the Douglass-Moynihan ideas, but have an ulterior agenda, one that is not based on benefiting blacks.
It is based on buying their votes.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And the welfare state started in 1910, then was modified in 1935.

Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 provided grants to states as Aid To Dependent Children. Eventually the name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children. This was welfare folks. Assistance for single moms with children and no daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded. Aid to Dependent Children functioned mainly to provide federal grants to help the states with mothers’ aid laws that began in 1910.

The ADC plan was written by two ladies who had been former directors of what was at the time called the U.S. Children’s Bureau. The Children’s Bureau’s goal was to provide aid to all children whose mothers had no support from a husband no matter how they got into that position. From the Children's Bureau in 1910 until 1965, no one talked about how the welfare state was wrong and created the disintegration of the white family. I read no lectures about the irresponsible white father. The program was not denigrated as something creating dependence on government; it was seen as essential assistance needed to help women without husbands who had children. Only when the law required that others besides whites be included did the story change to how the welfare state was wrong and destructive.

. "The biggest problem facing the Black community today, says Elder, is the absence of fathers. In the 1960s, most Black children were raised in two-parent households. That changed when our government’s War on Poverty began.

The handouts sent the message that it’s the government’s job, not your responsibility, to take care of you and your kids. “A mother with two children makes more money than she would make on minimum wage because of all the goodies she gets through the welfare state!”

Now, he says, Black Lives Matter actually encourages the breakup of families. Their website does say, “disrupt the Western-prescribed, nuclear family.”

That’s a Karl Marx idea straight from “The Communist Manifesto.” BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors proudly describes herself as a “trained Marxist.”

John Stossel: Anti-racist racists

BLACK LIVES MATTER protests led many people to want to do something useful to reduce racial injustice. Racial justice groups are being flooded with money.

www.unionleader.com

 

[IM2]

We see a repeat from poli chic about 350,000 blacks killed in 35 years. According to the American Heart Association, hypertension-related deaths in the black community increased from 171,259 to 270,839 annually from 2000-2018. Most of these people died from hypertension caused by the stress of living with white racism. Racism was outlawed on paper by 1965. That makes racism a crime. Racism is a crime that continues to be perpetrated against blacks and all people of color in the United States. According to these numbers more than 4 million blacks died due to hypertension caused by racism between 2000-2018., judging by the trends shown by the American Heart Association. At least 10x more blacks died from the stress of living with racism than blacks killing each other. That's white on black killing and it must stop.

 

[PoliticalChic]

We see a repeat from poli chic about 350,000 blacks killed in 35 years. According to the American Heart Association, hypertension-related deaths in the black community increased from 171,259 to 270,839 annually from 2000-2018. Most of these people died from hypertension caused by the stress of living with white racism. Racism was outlawed on paper by 1965. That makes racism a crime. Racism is a crime that continues to be perpetrated against blacks and all people of color in the United States. According to these numbers more than 4 million blacks died due to hypertension caused by racism between 2000-2018., judging by the trends shown by the American Heart Association. At least 10x more blacks died from the stress of living with racism than blacks killing each other. That's white on black killing and it must stop.

You must be right.....things are simply peachy-keen for black Americans.

They are just soooooooooo lucky to have brilliant leadership in folks like you.

They should just keep voting for the bullwhip and lynching party, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. The Democrats have been eminently successful in destroying this nation.





“A Democratic congresswoman laid out the chain of reasoning these bodies will likely use to characterize “white supremacist” terror groups: “America has a racism problem. America has a hate problem, and America has a domestic terrorism problem,” said Texas representative Veronica Escobar.

Expect the government to use the college campus definitions of “racism” and “hate”: any political position with which the Left disagrees.

If you don’t think that children should have their innocence stripped from them by premature knowledge of sexuality, you are filled with hate.

If you think that a country has a right to determine who crosses its border, you are filled with hate.

If you think that college admissions and faculty hiring should be based on academic merit, you are filled with hate.

If you think parents should have a role in deciding whether their children are castrated, you are filled with hate.”
Using the Buffalo Tragedy for Racial Propaganda | City Journal



Between the desire
And the spasm
Between the potency
And the existence
Between the essence
And the descent
Falls the Shadow
For Thine is the Kingdom

For Thine is
Life is
For Thine is the

This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.

TS Eliot

 

[22lcidw]

Lets see if you can use real information. When parents have tooo work 2 jobs because they don't make enough to live on with one, there is going to be negligence. Now you want to continually skip over a causal factor to post parody from Breitbart.

The only way to increase two parent families and wages is to reduce the extreme feminism. Resources are not infinite. So some get more than others. An increase in families with males as breadwinners and higher wages would make thing better. Not perfect. But better.

 

[IM2]

Moynihan was prescient.
And his views of the best thing for black Americans were the same as those of the views of Fredrick Douglass, who said the following in April, 1865. His speech was called What the Black Man Wants."


"Everybody has asked the question, and they learned to ask it early of the abolitionists, "What shall we do with the Negro?" I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us!

Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall!

I am not for tying or fastening them on the tree in any way, except by nature's plan, and if they will not stay there, let them fall. And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone!

If you see him on his way to school, let him alone, don't disturb him! If you see him going to the dinner table at a hotel, let him go! If you see him going to the ballot- box, let him alone, don't disturb him! [Applause.] If you see him going into a work-shop, just let him alone,--your interference is doing him a positive injury."






Douglass spoke in 1865.

There was a period during which blacks competed successfully sans government programs.

Then came the 1960's and the "War on Poverty."

I'll bet you would agree that the 'War' did not produce the results that were promised.


NY Democrat Senator, the brilliant Daniel Patrick Moynihan, called for the same things as Douglass, calling it 'benign neglect' of blacks.


I suggest that Liberal politicians also realize the truth of the Douglass-Moynihan ideas, but have an ulterior agenda, one that is not based on benefiting blacks.
It is based on buying their votes.

Moynihan was wrong. He was wrong when he wrote it and only idiots repeat this. And how funny that you try using Frederick Douglass while you argue against reparations because no one today was alive in 1865. Moynihan was wrong. I think that as a black person I can say that as an expert.

Frederick Douglass said this too:

“If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.” -Frederick Douglass

 

[Ringtone]

BS. You guys still worship the confederacy.

When did you stop beating your wife, IM2?
___________________________


My retort, in bold above, was wrongfully deleted. I had to educate the moderator:

In no way, shape, or form is my comment a family attack! Your ignorance does not make my comment inappropriate.​

​

When did you stop beating your wife? is a nearly two-centuries-old idiomatic expression of the loaded question fallacy. In this case, it's being used as a retort to a loaded claim.​

​

The demagogic, race-baiting Marxist IM2 made the following loaded claim:​

​

You guys still worship the confederacy.​

​

He is talking to proponents of the Anglo-American tradition of natural law, the founding sociopolitical philosophy of our nation summarized in the Declaration of Independence. Slavery and the Confederacy are anathema to the imperatives of natural law. We do not worship the Confederacy, let alone slavery. IM2 is the statist thug who spits on the imperatives of natural law.​

​

His is a loaded statement, essentially, calling us racists and oppressors.​

​

When did you stop beating your wife? is my loaded retort in kind. In other words, I see what he did there. Right back at him. It's figurative language, not literal.​

​

I'm calling him a liar, for crying out loud! The expression has absolutely nothing to do with his wife, assuming he has one. LOL!​

 

[PoliticalChic]

The only way to increase two parent families and wages is to reduce the extreme feminism. Resources are not infinite. So some get more than others. An increase in families with males as breadwinners and higher wages would make thing better. Not perfect. But better.

"The only way to increase two parent families and wages...."

It is the government's theft by way of taxes that requires two earners.

Taxes, taxation: What if you find that based on Federal taxes, state taxes, local taxes, gas tax, sales tax, parking fees, license fees, speed cameras, tolls, hidden taxes of all sorts......

....and the insidious tax, inflation.........amounted to more than half your income at least? Taxation to the point of slavery......or, at least serfdom.

"The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.".Lenin

Democrats learned quite a bit from their forebears.




And lots of the taxes go to buy votes for the Democrats:
A survey by the Maxwell Poll on the political affiliation of those receiving government aid showed this to be the case.

Type of Benefit Received	Percent Voting Democrat	Percent Voting Republican
Public Housing	81%​	12%​
Medicaid	74%​	16%​
Food Stamps	67%​	20%​
Unemployment Compensation	66%​	21%​
Disability (from Govt.)	64%​	25%​
Welfare/Public Assistance	63%​	22%​

Attributing the problem to red states is false; the problem lies in the blue parts of the red states.


Read more at http://rare.us/story/81-of-people-r...p-of-the-handout-iceberg/#rWzw1ZXPvQXUEQAM.99

 

[IM2]

When did you stop beating your wife, IM2?
___________________________


My retort, in bold above, was wrongfully deleted. I had to educate the moderator:

In no way, shape, or form is my comment a family attack! Your ignorance does not make my comment inappropriate.​

​

When did you stop beating your wife? is a nearly two-centuries-old idiomatic expression of the loaded question fallacy. In this case, it's being used as a retort to a loaded claim.​

​

The demagogic, race-baiting Marxist IM2 made the following loaded claim:​

​

You guys still worship the confederacy.​

​

He is talking to proponents of the Anglo-American tradition of natural law, the founding sociopolitical philosophy of our nation summarized in the Declaration of Independence. Slavery and the Confederacy are anathema to the imperatives of natural law. We do not worship the Confederacy, let alone slavery. IM2 is the statist thug who spits on the imperatives of natural law.​

​

His is a loaded statement, essentially, calling us racists and oppressors.​

​

When did you stop beating your wife? is my loaded retort in kind. In other words, I see what he did there. Right back at him. It's figurative language, not literal.​

​

I'm calling him a liar, for crying out loud! The expression has absolutely nothing to do with his wife, assuming he has one. LOL!​

You asked a dumb question. Republicans do still worship the confederacy.

 

[IM2]

"The only way to increase two parent families and wages...."

It is the government's theft by way of taxes that requires two earners.

Taxes, taxation: What if you find that based on Federal taxes, state taxes, local taxes, gas tax, sales tax, parking fees, license fees, speed cameras, tolls, hidden taxes of all sorts......

....and the insidious tax, inflation.........amounted to more than half your income at least? Taxation to the point of slavery......or, at least serfdom.

"The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.".Lenin

Democrats learned quite a bit from their forebears.




And lots of the taxes go to buy votes for the Democrats:
A survey by the Maxwell Poll on the political affiliation of those receiving government aid showed this to be the case.

Type of Benefit Received	Percent Voting Democrat	Percent Voting Republican
Public Housing	81%​	12%​
Medicaid	74%​	16%​
Food Stamps	67%​	20%​
Unemployment Compensation	66%​	21%​
Disability (from Govt.)	64%​	25%​
Welfare/Public Assistance	63%​	22%​

Attributing the problem to red states is false; the problem lies in the blue parts of the red states.


Read more at http://rare.us/story/81-of-people-r...p-of-the-handout-iceberg/#rWzw1ZXPvQXUEQAM.99

So republicans would support a 15 per hour national minimum wage.