Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

[Old Rocks]

Fellow, your understanding, or lack thereof, of science, is so profound as to be laughable. What you are saying is that anything that science finds that disagrees with your primitive religious beliefs is not science.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Fellow, your understanding, or lack thereof, of science, is so profound as to be laughable. What you are saying is that anything that science finds that disagrees with your primitive religious beliefs is not science.

Quote the part of any of my posts that says that?

 

[Old Rocks]

"The left is the one killing science. Instead of studying important things such as mathematics and science, they typically choose to study social sciences."

Really? So Geology and Biology just became social sciences?

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Keep using straw man arguments. If you look at the last 15 posts you've made that's all you've done. I've never criticized science. I'm criticizing a specific theory and the fact that you get so butt hurt about it means you obviously aren't open minded enough to see the holes.

You haven't identified any holes in evolutionary theory. You simply deny its existence and insist that the many disciplines of science that collectively support evolution amount to some global conspiracy.

The hole is that there is no evidence life came about from the way they describe. I've said it like ten times so I don't know why I have to keep typing it out. No one has showed me anything that indicates any evidence about this.

Why do you keep typing it out? The planet and all life emerged fully formed 6,000 years ago. You have your answer.

The Right strives for ignorance. Therefore the US is now less educated than other leading nations.

The left is the one killing science. Instead of studying important things such as mathematics and science, they typically choose to study social sciences. They may be educated but in nothing that relates to real life or is useful. The right pushes for education that puts out production... Asians/Indians go into the right fields of study.

Here's my quote. Stop trying to skew what my post was about. He attacked the right and therefore I attacked the left. You can't deny the vast majority of liberals in the fields I mentioned.

 

[eots]

 

[Maggdy]

I haven't seen it. What I mean by evidence is factual Information that supports the theory. I've never seen any. So. Here is a definition of a fact.

fact

\ˈfakt\noun
: something that truly exists or happens : something that has actual existence

: a true piece of information

Full Definition
1
:a thing done: as

a obsolete :feat

b :crime <accessory after the fact>

c archaic :action
2
archaic :performance, doing
3
:the quality of being actual :actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence>
4
a :something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact>

b :an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage>
5
:a piece of information presented as having objective reality
— in fact

Now. Can someone show me one piece of factual evidence? Just one will do.

 

[rdean]

I haven't seen it. What I mean by evidence is factual Information that supports the theory. I've never seen any. So. Here is a definition of a fact.

fact

\ˈfakt\noun
: something that truly exists or happens : something that has actual existence

: a true piece of information

Full Definition
1
:a thing done: as

a obsolete :feat

b :crime <accessory after the fact>

c archaic :action
2
archaic :performance, doing
3
:the quality of being actual :actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence>
4
a :something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact>

b :an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage>
5
:a piece of information presented as having objective reality
— in fact

Now. Can someone show me one piece of factual evidence? Just one will do.

I've never seen any.

And you never will DA.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

I haven't seen it. What I mean by evidence is factual Information that supports the theory. I've never seen any. So. Here is a definition of a fact.

fact

\ˈfakt\noun
: something that truly exists or happens : something that has actual existence

: a true piece of information

Full Definition
1
:a thing done: as

a obsolete :feat

b :crime <accessory after the fact>

c archaic :action
2
archaic :performance, doing
3
:the quality of being actual :actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence>
4
a :something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact>

b :an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage>
5
:a piece of information presented as having objective reality
— in fact

Now. Can someone show me one piece of factual evidence? Just one will do.

I've never seen any.

And you never will DA.

That's all I wanted the evolutionists to say. Thank you.

 

[Hollie]

I haven't seen it. What I mean by evidence is factual Information that supports the theory. I've never seen any. So. Here is a definition of a fact.

fact

\ˈfakt\noun
: something that truly exists or happens : something that has actual existence

: a true piece of information

Full Definition
1
:a thing done: as

a obsolete :feat

b :crime <accessory after the fact>

c archaic :action
2
archaic :performance, doing
3
:the quality of being actual :actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence>
4
a :something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact>

b :an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage>
5
:a piece of information presented as having objective reality
— in fact

Now. Can someone show me one piece of factual evidence? Just one will do.

I've never seen any.

And you never will DA.

That's all I wanted the evolutionists to say. Thank you.

"Evilutionists" have substantial volumes of evidence for biological evolution. You're free to indulge your conspiracy theories, but you shouldn't expect them to be taken seriously by those who actually studied the data and know the sciences.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

I haven't seen it. What I mean by evidence is factual Information that supports the theory. I've never seen any. So. Here is a definition of a fact.

fact

\ˈfakt\noun
: something that truly exists or happens : something that has actual existence

: a true piece of information

Full Definition
1
:a thing done: as

a obsolete :feat

b :crime <accessory after the fact>

c archaic :action
2
archaic :performance, doing
3
:the quality of being actual :actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence>
4
a :something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact>

b :an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage>
5
:a piece of information presented as having objective reality
— in fact

Now. Can someone show me one piece of factual evidence? Just one will do.

I've never seen any.

And you never will DA.

That's all I wanted the evolutionists to say. Thank you.

"Evilutionists" have substantial volumes of evidence for biological evolution. You're free to indulge your conspiracy theories, but you shouldn't expect them to be taken seriously by those who actually studied the data and know the sciences.

You keep ignoring my point. I believe in the evolution with evidence. I don't believe in monkeys changing into people cause it didn't happen or singe cell organisms making the jump to fish.

 

[Political Junky]

I haven't seen it. What I mean by evidence is factual Information that supports the theory. I've never seen any. So. Here is a definition of a fact.

fact

\ˈfakt\noun
: something that truly exists or happens : something that has actual existence

: a true piece of information

Full Definition
1
:a thing done: as

a obsolete :feat

b :crime <accessory after the fact>

c archaic :action
2
archaic :performance, doing
3
:the quality of being actual :actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence>
4
a :something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact>

b :an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage>
5
:a piece of information presented as having objective reality
— in fact

Now. Can someone show me one piece of factual evidence? Just one will do.

I've never seen any.

And you never will DA.

That's all I wanted the evolutionists to say. Thank you.

"Evilutionists" have substantial volumes of evidence for biological evolution. You're free to indulge your conspiracy theories, but you shouldn't expect them to be taken seriously by those who actually studied the data and know the sciences.

You keep ignoring my point. I believe in the evolution with evidence. I don't believe in monkeys changing into people cause it didn't happen or singe cell organisms making the jump to fish.

Nobody claims either of those things.

 

[Hollie]

I haven't seen it. What I mean by evidence is factual Information that supports the theory. I've never seen any. So. Here is a definition of a fact.

fact

\ˈfakt\noun
: something that truly exists or happens : something that has actual existence

: a true piece of information

Full Definition
1
:a thing done: as

a obsolete :feat

b :crime <accessory after the fact>

c archaic :action
2
archaic :performance, doing
3
:the quality of being actual :actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence>
4
a :something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact>

b :an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage>
5
:a piece of information presented as having objective reality
— in fact

Now. Can someone show me one piece of factual evidence? Just one will do.

I've never seen any.

And you never will DA.

That's all I wanted the evolutionists to say. Thank you.

"Evilutionists" have substantial volumes of evidence for biological evolution. You're free to indulge your conspiracy theories, but you shouldn't expect them to be taken seriously by those who actually studied the data and know the sciences.

You keep ignoring my point. I believe in the evolution with evidence. I don't believe in monkeys changing into people cause it didn't happen or singe cell organisms making the jump to fish.

I'm not ignoring some point you're trying to make. I'm just astounded at your profound ignorance regarding the very subject you're railing against. Your comments regarding monkeys changing into people is not merely profoundly ignorant but suggests your education has been limited to some Harun Yahya madrassah.

Your profoundly ignorant "monkeys into human beings” nonsense displays a fundamental lack of understanding. Man was never an ape or a monkey. Man was never descended from a monkey. Man and primates shared a common ancestor but branched off in separate directions. That’s not at all uncommon in evolutionary history, by the way, for species to diverge in different directions while sharing a common ancestry.

I know this has all been explained to you both repeatedly and tediously in the past so that your current and continued comatose condition is concerning.

 

[Abishai100]

Orange County: Design Doorway


How about thinking about how lifestyle-tech iconography (i.e., Apple Computer products and logo-merchandise) reveal a new age fascination with efficient electronics design and ornamental marketing, which explains why modern gadgets seem to have catchy names --- i.e., Walkmans?

Think about a concept city in which all residents display orange-colored gear and tech-toys with the same sort of nationalistic pride as did the Nazis with their propaganda machine. However, this hypothetical city is non-violent and non-aggressive and simply competitors in the consumerism-lifestyle capitalism market.

How do the residents/leaders of this model city make contracts with Starbucks?

In other words, it seems that our species as a society is focused on 'developing design,' if not destiny. Is design itself therefore evidence for progression or evolution? Where is the pulse? Everyone seems to be talking in lingo these days...





Orange County (Film)

Apple Macintosh

 

[orogenicman]

Orange County: Design Doorway


How about thinking about how lifestyle-tech iconography (i.e., Apple Computer products and logo-merchandise) reveal a new age fascination with efficient electronics design and ornamental marketing, which explains why modern gadgets seem to have catchy names --- i.e., Walkmans?

Think about a concept city in which all residents display orange-colored gear and tech-toys with the same sort of nationalistic pride as did the Nazis with their propaganda machine. However, this hypothetical city is non-violent and non-aggressive and simply competitors in the consumerism-lifestyle capitalism market.

How do the residents/leaders of this model city make contracts with Starbucks?

In other words, it seems that our species as a society is focused on 'developing design,' if not destiny. Is design itself therefore evidence for progression or evolution? Where is the pulse? Everyone seems to be talking in lingo these days...





Orange County (Film)

Apple Macintosh

View attachment 41096 View attachment 41097


View attachment 41098 View attachment 41099

I am confused as to how you see this as evidence for biological evolution.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

I haven't seen it. What I mean by evidence is factual Information that supports the theory. I've never seen any. So. Here is a definition of a fact.

fact

\ˈfakt\noun
: something that truly exists or happens : something that has actual existence

: a true piece of information

Full Definition
1
:a thing done: as

a obsolete :feat

b :crime <accessory after the fact>

c archaic :action
2
archaic :performance, doing
3
:the quality of being actual :actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence>
4
a :something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact>

b :an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage>
5
:a piece of information presented as having objective reality
— in fact

Now. Can someone show me one piece of factual evidence? Just one will do.

I've never seen any.

And you never will DA.

That's all I wanted the evolutionists to say. Thank you.

"Evilutionists" have substantial volumes of evidence for biological evolution. You're free to indulge your conspiracy theories, but you shouldn't expect them to be taken seriously by those who actually studied the data and know the sciences.

You keep ignoring my point. I believe in the evolution with evidence. I don't believe in monkeys changing into people cause it didn't happen or singe cell organisms making the jump to fish.

I'm not ignoring some point you're trying to make. I'm just astounded at your profound ignorance regarding the very subject you're railing against. Your comments regarding monkeys changing into people is not merely profoundly ignorant but suggests your education has been limited to some Harun Yahya madrassah.

Your profoundly ignorant "monkeys into human beings” nonsense displays a fundamental lack of understanding. Man was never an ape or a monkey. Man was never descended from a monkey. Man and primates shared a common ancestor but branched off in separate directions. That’s not at all uncommon in evolutionary history, by the way, for species to diverge in different directions while sharing a common ancestry.

I know this has all been explained to you both repeatedly and tediously in the past so that your current and continued comatose condition is concerning.

That also supports my belief. I think one being created all the different kinds therefore many similarities exist as far as what people are made of and animals. Evolution has occurred through the years with every animal side by side but nothing has changed from its original kind.

 

[Old Rocks]

Whatever. Fellow, you are not going to listen to reason or logic, and are no longer worth having a discussion with.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Whatever. Fellow, you are not going to listen to reason or logic, and are no longer worth having a discussion with.

Ok. Come at me with facts and then I will convert to your belief system but for now I'm content with my own.

 

[orogenicman]

Whatever. Fellow, you are not going to listen to reason or logic, and are no longer worth having a discussion with.

Ok. Come at me with facts and then I will convert to your belief system but for now I'm content with my own.

There are 130 pages to this thread, many with references to links providing you with ample evidence supporting the theory of evolution. In addition, there are these threads which provide additional support, and references to papers on the origin of life as well:

Origin of life Thread Chemistry of seabed s hot vents could explain emergence of life US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Evolution and The Age Of The Earth US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Have at it. And do us all a favor. Don't come back in less than a day and pretend that you've read everything in all of those pages and the links they contain, and still claim there is no evidence, because that would simply prove to the rest of us that you are willfully ignorant, instead of being truly interested in learning about the subject. You do want us to believe you are actually interested, right?

 

[LOki]

I didn't notice you advance an argument.

The fact they claim to understand an infinite universe ..just some joe with a Phd and they think they understand the nature and creation of the universe enough to claim that life and all of creation was accidental and there is no Intelligence or purpose to it

 

[eots]

I didn't notice you advance an argument.

The fact they claim to understand an infinite universe ..just some joe with a Phd and they think they understand the nature and creation of the universe enough to claim that life and all of creation was accidental and there is no Intelligence or purpose to it

really ? so evolutions believe in an intelligent universe ?