Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

[SUPERMAN1929]

Time to shut down this thread, evolution is an undeniable fact, refute any of these below and maybe you have a case, but ken ham isn't a good source
LOL. The affair was heavily challenged and hated for decades, they didn't get shit.
Evolution
Human Evolution Evidence The Smithsonian Institution s Human Origins Program
What is the evidence for evolution
29 Evidences for Macroevolution The Scientific Case for Common Descent - Amazing resource
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense - Scientific American - For the OP, who suffers from brain damage.
Early Theories of Evolution Evidence of Evolution
How Do We Know That Evolution Has Occurred?

The evidence for evolution has primarily come from four sources:

1. the fossil record of change in earlier species
2. the chemical and anatomical similarities of related life forms
3. the geographic distribution of related species
4. the recorded genetic changes in living organisms over many generations
ENSI SENSI Papers Articles Macroevolution Lessons
Observed Evolutionary Changes - "WE HAVEN'T OBSERVED IT, WAHHH"
- Easy to follow
The people who critique evolution get plenty of time to speak, the problem is, they're literally full of shit.

Of course a group of scientists paid with the intent to prove evolution are going to say that they've found so much it is fact. It's like a salesman. Evolutionists can't be trusted with their premise. You guys are a bunch of blind sheep thinking everything you view in nature is "evidence" that evolution took place.

 

[Old Rocks]

And a bunch of willfully ignorant fundies are going to get nothing right. You guys are a pain in the butt. All mouth, no brains, and so proud of your willful ignorance.

DNA, fossils, and the animals living today all show that evolution occured, is occuring, and will occur as long as there is life.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

And a bunch of willfully ignorant fundies are going to get nothing right. You guys are a pain in the butt. All mouth, no brains, and so proud of your willful ignorance.

DNA, fossils, and the animals living today all show that evolution occured, is occuring, and will occur as long as there is life.

I believe in evolution. Just not the loads of shitty assumptions evolutionists use to try to deem their life works relevant. If they didn't call their research facts then they wouldn't be making as much money. They're no better than politicians with their lies.

 

[fmdog44]

Judging from your posts I feel certain any and all evidence presented would sail over your head but I'll offer up this in order to help you grasp the idea.Sit down next to a chimpanzee in a room full of mirrors for no more than 30 minutes. When you are done post your thoughts.

 

[Hollie]

And a bunch of willfully ignorant fundies are going to get nothing right. You guys are a pain in the butt. All mouth, no brains, and so proud of your willful ignorance.

DNA, fossils, and the animals living today all show that evolution occured, is occuring, and will occur as long as there is life.

I believe in evolution. Just not the loads of shitty assumptions evolutionists use to try to deem their life works relevant. If they didn't call their research facts then they wouldn't be making as much money. They're no better than politicians with their lies.

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

And a bunch of willfully ignorant fundies are going to get nothing right. You guys are a pain in the butt. All mouth, no brains, and so proud of your willful ignorance.

DNA, fossils, and the animals living today all show that evolution occured, is occuring, and will occur as long as there is life.

I believe in evolution. Just not the loads of shitty assumptions evolutionists use to try to deem their life works relevant. If they didn't call their research facts then they wouldn't be making as much money. They're no better than politicians with their lies.

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

 

[Hollie]

And a bunch of willfully ignorant fundies are going to get nothing right. You guys are a pain in the butt. All mouth, no brains, and so proud of your willful ignorance.

DNA, fossils, and the animals living today all show that evolution occured, is occuring, and will occur as long as there is life.

I believe in evolution. Just not the loads of shitty assumptions evolutionists use to try to deem their life works relevant. If they didn't call their research facts then they wouldn't be making as much money. They're no better than politicians with their lies.

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

Actually, it's pretty clear you embrace the fears and superstitions of fundamentalist Christianity.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And a bunch of willfully ignorant fundies are going to get nothing right. You guys are a pain in the butt. All mouth, no brains, and so proud of your willful ignorance.

DNA, fossils, and the animals living today all show that evolution occured, is occuring, and will occur as long as there is life.

I believe in evolution. Just not the loads of shitty assumptions evolutionists use to try to deem their life works relevant. If they didn't call their research facts then they wouldn't be making as much money. They're no better than politicians with their lies.

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

This doesn't make any sense – there will never be 'real evidence' concerning any aspect of religion.

And remaining 'skeptical' with regard to objective, documented facts concerning science is to actually remain willfully ignorant.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

And a bunch of willfully ignorant fundies are going to get nothing right. You guys are a pain in the butt. All mouth, no brains, and so proud of your willful ignorance.

DNA, fossils, and the animals living today all show that evolution occured, is occuring, and will occur as long as there is life.

I believe in evolution. Just not the loads of shitty assumptions evolutionists use to try to deem their life works relevant. If they didn't call their research facts then they wouldn't be making as much money. They're no better than politicians with their lies.

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

Actually, it's pretty clear you embrace the fears and superstitions of fundamentalist Christianity.

Your logic doesn't follow at all. You just call people names repeatedly. Typical atheist.

And a bunch of willfully ignorant fundies are going to get nothing right. You guys are a pain in the butt. All mouth, no brains, and so proud of your willful ignorance.

DNA, fossils, and the animals living today all show that evolution occured, is occuring, and will occur as long as there is life.

I believe in evolution. Just not the loads of shitty assumptions evolutionists use to try to deem their life works relevant. If they didn't call their research facts then they wouldn't be making as much money. They're no better than politicians with their lies.

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

This doesn't make any sense – there will never be 'real evidence' concerning any aspect of religion.

And remaining 'skeptical' with regard to objective, documented facts concerning science is to actually remain willfully ignorant.

I believe the facts. I don't believe the jumps the scientists try to make saying that life randomly formed together cause it didn't and there is no evidence to prove it. When I say this people show me evidence of how maybe the building blocks could have been present in the early stages of the earth's development. Just because they are present doesn't mean anything. They still have yet to prove in any way, shape, or form that life could actually be produced in this soup.

 

[Hollie]

And a bunch of willfully ignorant fundies are going to get nothing right. You guys are a pain in the butt. All mouth, no brains, and so proud of your willful ignorance.

DNA, fossils, and the animals living today all show that evolution occured, is occuring, and will occur as long as there is life.

I believe in evolution. Just not the loads of shitty assumptions evolutionists use to try to deem their life works relevant. If they didn't call their research facts then they wouldn't be making as much money. They're no better than politicians with their lies.

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

Actually, it's pretty clear you embrace the fears and superstitions of fundamentalist Christianity.

Your logic doesn't follow at all. You just call people names repeatedly. Typical atheist.

And a bunch of willfully ignorant fundies are going to get nothing right. You guys are a pain in the butt. All mouth, no brains, and so proud of your willful ignorance.

DNA, fossils, and the animals living today all show that evolution occured, is occuring, and will occur as long as there is life.

I believe in evolution. Just not the loads of shitty assumptions evolutionists use to try to deem their life works relevant. If they didn't call their research facts then they wouldn't be making as much money. They're no better than politicians with their lies.

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

This doesn't make any sense – there will never be 'real evidence' concerning any aspect of religion.

And remaining 'skeptical' with regard to objective, documented facts concerning science is to actually remain willfully ignorant.

I believe the facts. I don't believe the jumps the scientists try to make saying that life randomly formed together cause it didn't and there is no evidence to prove it. When I say this people show me evidence of how maybe the building blocks could have been present in the early stages of the earth's development. Just because they are present doesn't mean anything. They still have yet to prove in any way, shape, or form that life could actually be produced in this soup.

Just keep convincing yourself that all of science is a grand global conspiracy. That does make everything so simple.

 

[Old Rocks]

Interesting. Scientists put a group of chemicals in proximity of another group of chemicals and a certain result ensues. They do this a 1000 times, every time with the same result. But the creationists call the result that ensues random. Perhaps it is the creationists thinking processes that are stuck on random.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

I believe in evolution. Just not the loads of shitty assumptions evolutionists use to try to deem their life works relevant. If they didn't call their research facts then they wouldn't be making as much money. They're no better than politicians with their lies.

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

Actually, it's pretty clear you embrace the fears and superstitions of fundamentalist Christianity.

Your logic doesn't follow at all. You just call people names repeatedly. Typical atheist.

I believe in evolution. Just not the loads of shitty assumptions evolutionists use to try to deem their life works relevant. If they didn't call their research facts then they wouldn't be making as much money. They're no better than politicians with their lies.

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

This doesn't make any sense – there will never be 'real evidence' concerning any aspect of religion.

And remaining 'skeptical' with regard to objective, documented facts concerning science is to actually remain willfully ignorant.

I believe the facts. I don't believe the jumps the scientists try to make saying that life randomly formed together cause it didn't and there is no evidence to prove it. When I say this people show me evidence of how maybe the building blocks could have been present in the early stages of the earth's development. Just because they are present doesn't mean anything. They still have yet to prove in any way, shape, or form that life could actually be produced in this soup.

Just keep convincing yourself that all of science is a grand global conspiracy. That does make everything so simple.

Keep using straw man arguments. If you look at the last 15 posts you've made that's all you've done. I've never criticized science. I'm criticizing a specific theory and the fact that you get so butt hurt about it means you obviously aren't open minded enough to see the holes.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Interesting. Scientists put a group of chemicals in proximity of another group of chemicals and a certain result ensues. They do this a 1000 times, every time with the same result. But the creationists call the result that ensues random. Perhaps it is the creationists thinking processes that are stuck on random.

That's the exact point I'm making. If life can be formed by a chemical interaction like the claims then why can't these reactions be easily recreated in a lab? It should work every time right?

 

[orogenicman]

Interesting. Scientists put a group of chemicals in proximity of another group of chemicals and a certain result ensues. They do this a 1000 times, every time with the same result. But the creationists call the result that ensues random. Perhaps it is the creationists thinking processes that are stuck on random.

That's the exact point I'm making. If life can be formed by a chemical interaction like the claims then why can't these reactions be easily recreated in a lab? It should work every time right?

No one said that they were easy to reproduce. If they were, life would exist everywhere.

But many reactions can and have been reproduced in the lab. You should read my thread about the origins of life, where I've posted many papers on the subject.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Interesting. Scientists put a group of chemicals in proximity of another group of chemicals and a certain result ensues. They do this a 1000 times, every time with the same result. But the creationists call the result that ensues random. Perhaps it is the creationists thinking processes that are stuck on random.

That's the exact point I'm making. If life can be formed by a chemical interaction like the claims then why can't these reactions be easily recreated in a lab? It should work every time right?

No one said that they were easy to reproduce. If they were, life would exist everywhere.

But many reactions can and have been reproduced in the lab. You should read my thread about the origins of life, where I've posted many papers on the subject.

I don't see anyone denying that chemical reactions happen. I see them on a daily basis. lol. I'm denying reactions leading to life can happen. If it happened once why can't it be recreated? There aren't any other reactions that take pure randomness to happen to come together. The world is fairly organized in that way. Conditions must be met and then it happens. It is far from proven that life can be made from the reactions you speak of.

 

[Hollie]

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

Actually, it's pretty clear you embrace the fears and superstitions of fundamentalist Christianity.

Your logic doesn't follow at all. You just call people names repeatedly. Typical atheist.

What "shitty assumptions" would those be?

As is typical for you religious extremists, you revile science because it directly challenges your view of literal bible tales and a 6000 year old earth.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

This doesn't make any sense – there will never be 'real evidence' concerning any aspect of religion.

And remaining 'skeptical' with regard to objective, documented facts concerning science is to actually remain willfully ignorant.

I believe the facts. I don't believe the jumps the scientists try to make saying that life randomly formed together cause it didn't and there is no evidence to prove it. When I say this people show me evidence of how maybe the building blocks could have been present in the early stages of the earth's development. Just because they are present doesn't mean anything. They still have yet to prove in any way, shape, or form that life could actually be produced in this soup.

Just keep convincing yourself that all of science is a grand global conspiracy. That does make everything so simple.

Keep using straw man arguments. If you look at the last 15 posts you've made that's all you've done. I've never criticized science. I'm criticizing a specific theory and the fact that you get so butt hurt about it means you obviously aren't open minded enough to see the holes.

You haven't identified any holes in evolutionary theory. You simply deny its existence and insist that the many disciplines of science that collectively support evolution amount to some global conspiracy.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

Actually, it's pretty clear you embrace the fears and superstitions of fundamentalist Christianity.

Your logic doesn't follow at all. You just call people names repeatedly. Typical atheist.

I embrace science that presents testable material. The science you choose to believe does not include such information. Therefore I am a skeptic and view people that view this as fact as feeble minded. Just as much as I view people who are so certain of religious assumptions without any real evidence... You think you're smart cause you are a sheep.

This doesn't make any sense – there will never be 'real evidence' concerning any aspect of religion.

And remaining 'skeptical' with regard to objective, documented facts concerning science is to actually remain willfully ignorant.

I believe the facts. I don't believe the jumps the scientists try to make saying that life randomly formed together cause it didn't and there is no evidence to prove it. When I say this people show me evidence of how maybe the building blocks could have been present in the early stages of the earth's development. Just because they are present doesn't mean anything. They still have yet to prove in any way, shape, or form that life could actually be produced in this soup.

Just keep convincing yourself that all of science is a grand global conspiracy. That does make everything so simple.

Keep using straw man arguments. If you look at the last 15 posts you've made that's all you've done. I've never criticized science. I'm criticizing a specific theory and the fact that you get so butt hurt about it means you obviously aren't open minded enough to see the holes.

You haven't identified any holes in evolutionary theory. You simply deny its existence and insist that the many disciplines of science that collectively support evolution amount to some global conspiracy.

The hole is that there is no evidence life came about from the way they describe. I've said it like ten times so I don't know why I have to keep typing it out. No one has showed me anything that indicates any evidence about this.

 

[Hollie]

Actually, it's pretty clear you embrace the fears and superstitions of fundamentalist Christianity.

Your logic doesn't follow at all. You just call people names repeatedly. Typical atheist.

This doesn't make any sense – there will never be 'real evidence' concerning any aspect of religion.

And remaining 'skeptical' with regard to objective, documented facts concerning science is to actually remain willfully ignorant.

I believe the facts. I don't believe the jumps the scientists try to make saying that life randomly formed together cause it didn't and there is no evidence to prove it. When I say this people show me evidence of how maybe the building blocks could have been present in the early stages of the earth's development. Just because they are present doesn't mean anything. They still have yet to prove in any way, shape, or form that life could actually be produced in this soup.

Just keep convincing yourself that all of science is a grand global conspiracy. That does make everything so simple.

Keep using straw man arguments. If you look at the last 15 posts you've made that's all you've done. I've never criticized science. I'm criticizing a specific theory and the fact that you get so butt hurt about it means you obviously aren't open minded enough to see the holes.

You haven't identified any holes in evolutionary theory. You simply deny its existence and insist that the many disciplines of science that collectively support evolution amount to some global conspiracy.

The hole is that there is no evidence life came about from the way they describe. I've said it like ten times so I don't know why I have to keep typing it out. No one has showed me anything that indicates any evidence about this.

Why do you keep typing it out? The planet and all life emerged fully formed 6,000 years ago. You have your answer.

 

[Political Junky]

Your logic doesn't follow at all. You just call people names repeatedly. Typical atheist.
I believe the facts. I don't believe the jumps the scientists try to make saying that life randomly formed together cause it didn't and there is no evidence to prove it. When I say this people show me evidence of how maybe the building blocks could have been present in the early stages of the earth's development. Just because they are present doesn't mean anything. They still have yet to prove in any way, shape, or form that life could actually be produced in this soup.

Just keep convincing yourself that all of science is a grand global conspiracy. That does make everything so simple.

Keep using straw man arguments. If you look at the last 15 posts you've made that's all you've done. I've never criticized science. I'm criticizing a specific theory and the fact that you get so butt hurt about it means you obviously aren't open minded enough to see the holes.

You haven't identified any holes in evolutionary theory. You simply deny its existence and insist that the many disciplines of science that collectively support evolution amount to some global conspiracy.

The hole is that there is no evidence life came about from the way they describe. I've said it like ten times so I don't know why I have to keep typing it out. No one has showed me anything that indicates any evidence about this.

Why do you keep typing it out? The planet and all life emerged fully formed 6,000 years ago. You have your answer.

The Right strives for ignorance. Therefore the US is now less educated than other leading nations.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Just keep convincing yourself that all of science is a grand global conspiracy. That does make everything so simple.

Keep using straw man arguments. If you look at the last 15 posts you've made that's all you've done. I've never criticized science. I'm criticizing a specific theory and the fact that you get so butt hurt about it means you obviously aren't open minded enough to see the holes.

You haven't identified any holes in evolutionary theory. You simply deny its existence and insist that the many disciplines of science that collectively support evolution amount to some global conspiracy.

The hole is that there is no evidence life came about from the way they describe. I've said it like ten times so I don't know why I have to keep typing it out. No one has showed me anything that indicates any evidence about this.

Why do you keep typing it out? The planet and all life emerged fully formed 6,000 years ago. You have your answer.

The Right strives for ignorance. Therefore the US is now less educated than other leading nations.

The left is the one killing science. Instead of studying important things such as mathematics and science, they typically choose to study social sciences. They may be educated but in nothing that relates to real life or is useful. The right pushes for education that puts out production... Asians/Indians go into the right fields of study.