Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

[orogenicman]

Sure. That's easy. The theory of evolution is used to diagnose and cure disease. And so tens of thousands of jobs are dependent on it. If you think that not understanding it makes you smarter, then you are not very smart.

No one is denying evolution exists. Just the kind of evolution that you claim turned from fishies to reptiles to people... blah blah blah. Your arguments only make you sound dumber because you know that the belief we are discussing does nothing for anyone.

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

Why do you presume to make such absolute statements about something you know so little about?

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

 

[Hollie]

Sure. That's easy. The theory of evolution is used to diagnose and cure disease. And so tens of thousands of jobs are dependent on it. If you think that not understanding it makes you smarter, then you are not very smart.

No one is denying evolution exists. Just the kind of evolution that you claim turned from fishies to reptiles to people... blah blah blah. Your arguments only make you sound dumber because you know that the belief we are discussing does nothing for anyone.

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

Why do you presume to make such absolute statements about something you know so little about?

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

That's childish, ignorant and pointless as a way to defend your ignorance. The principles that define evolution are not that difficult to understand.

It seems more likely that your inferiority complex relative to others that succeeded in their studies is an issue you're still unable to resolve.

 

[orogenicman]

Sure. That's easy. The theory of evolution is used to diagnose and cure disease. And so tens of thousands of jobs are dependent on it. If you think that not understanding it makes you smarter, then you are not very smart.

No one is denying evolution exists. Just the kind of evolution that you claim turned from fishies to reptiles to people... blah blah blah. Your arguments only make you sound dumber because you know that the belief we are discussing does nothing for anyone.

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

And there are tens of thousands of scientific papers that demonstrate clearly that the concept of micro versus macroevolution is nothing more than a mechanism invented by creationists so they can accept evolution without admitting that the Book of Genesis is wrong. The only difference between micro and macro evolution is the amount of time involved. The processes are exactly the same. And dufus, if a fish could change into a monkey, that would REFUTE evolution, not support it. Evolution acts on populations, not individuals. And dufus, if we don't discuss what we don't know, how is anyone going to ask relevant questions and make any discoveries? Or is keeping people stupid that ultimately the goal of the willfully ignorant?

BORRRINGGG. Go get a real job.

What are you? 10 years old? Does your mother know you are posting on an adult forum?

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

No one is denying evolution exists. Just the kind of evolution that you claim turned from fishies to reptiles to people... blah blah blah. Your arguments only make you sound dumber because you know that the belief we are discussing does nothing for anyone.

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

Why do you presume to make such absolute statements about something you know so little about?

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

 

[Hollie]

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

Why do you presume to make such absolute statements about something you know so little about?

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

Such grandiose claims are pretty typical of the slow child who struggled with their lessons while the rest of the class moved forward with their studies.

 

[orogenicman]

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

Why do you presume to make such absolute statements about something you know so little about?

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

You have demonstrated no knowledge of science at all here. So if you were always the best at science/math, as you claim, I have to ask, compared to what/who? I hate having to repeat myself, but you give me little choice. You don't know who you are talking to. I am a geologist with 25 years of field and lab experience, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. And so when you try to claim to have some kind of superior education with regard to science all the while demonstrating no knowledge of it whatsoever, I just have to laugh. And I'm sorry if this hurts your feelings, but laughter is all that claim deserves. You wouldn't dare try to tell a brain surgeon his business, so don't try to tell me mine.

P.S., you didn't actually answer all of my questions. This one, for instance:

"And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally?"

 

[Old Rocks]

In 2006, a team of scientists unveiled the discovery of Tiktaalik roseae,
a fossil fish known as the 'fishapod'

Tiktaalik roseae Home

They probably built it with bones from 2 different animals as evolutionists have been known to make attempts at in the past.

And who discovered the mistakes or frauds?

Probably a scientist who had no stock on either side.

Too bad that you are such an ignorant fool. There is just as much credit in science for proving a long held hypothesis is wrong, as there is in presenting a new hypothesis.

Yes, there have been a couple of cases of outright fraud in the past. And many cases of animal bones in proximity of one another, of similiar critters, and a mistake was made in assigning the bones to the animal. However, in the first case, other scientists have found the fraud, and the person lost his credibility. In the latter case, a set of bones are found by themselves, and the mistake is recognized. No big deal.

Actually, the most egregarous fakes have come from the creationist camp.

Example?

Paluxy Man The Creationist Piltdown NCSE

One of many.

 

[pinqy]

In 2006, a team of scientists unveiled the discovery of Tiktaalik roseae,
a fossil fish known as the 'fishapod'

Tiktaalik roseae Home

They probably built it with bones from 2 different animals as evolutionists have been known to make attempts at in the past.

And who discovered the mistakes or frauds?

Probably a scientist who had no stock on either side.

No, it was other biologigts (there's really no such thing as an "evolutionist"...nobody has that on his/her business card).

Science is self-correcting. When something is shown wrong it will, eventually, be discarded. There are occssions where scientists have clung on to older beliefs, but I'd be hard pressed to come up with any examples in the last century.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

Why do you presume to make such absolute statements about something you know so little about?

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

Such grandiose claims are pretty typical of the slow child who struggled with their lessons while the rest of the class moved forward with their studies.

Once again, too stupid to come up with your own insults.

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

Why do you presume to make such absolute statements about something you know so little about?

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

You have demonstrated no knowledge of science at all here. So if you were always the best at science/math, as you claim, I have to ask, compared to what/who? I hate having to repeat myself, but you give me little choice. You don't know who you are talking to. I am a geologist with 25 years of field and lab experience, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. And so when you try to claim to have some kind of superior education with regard to science all the while demonstrating no knowledge of it whatsoever, I just have to laugh. And I'm sorry if this hurts your feelings, but laughter is all that claim deserves. You wouldn't dare try to tell a brain surgeon his business, so don't try to tell me mine.

P.S., you didn't actually answer all of my questions. This one, for instance:

"And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally?"

I study nuclear power... I've known biology majors that all give different versions of evolution. I don't respect your field. I think it's the same as art, no real use to society. I got a 34 in math and a 32 in science on the ACT. I'm not a genius but I'm never at the dumber end of the class. People who study fossils try to make their studies relevant by making up stuff to fill in their vast gaps in knowledge.

At least answer these five simple questions if evolution is "proven". Best arguments against atheistic evolution

 

[orogenicman]

Why do you presume to make such absolute statements about something you know so little about?

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

Such grandiose claims are pretty typical of the slow child who struggled with their lessons while the rest of the class moved forward with their studies.

Once again, too stupid to come up with your own insults.

Why do you presume to make such absolute statements about something you know so little about?

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

You have demonstrated no knowledge of science at all here. So if you were always the best at science/math, as you claim, I have to ask, compared to what/who? I hate having to repeat myself, but you give me little choice. You don't know who you are talking to. I am a geologist with 25 years of field and lab experience, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. And so when you try to claim to have some kind of superior education with regard to science all the while demonstrating no knowledge of it whatsoever, I just have to laugh. And I'm sorry if this hurts your feelings, but laughter is all that claim deserves. You wouldn't dare try to tell a brain surgeon his business, so don't try to tell me mine.

P.S., you didn't actually answer all of my questions. This one, for instance:

"And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally?"

I study nuclear power... I've known biology majors that all give different versions of evolution.

Biology majors are not scientists. They are students.

I don't respect your field. I think it's the same as art, no real use to society.

That's an interesting conclusion since geology puts gas in your car, electricity in your house, and the metals for your car and appliances, etc.

I got a 34 in math and a 32 in science on the ACT. I'm not a genius but I'm never at the dumber end of the class. People who study fossils try to make their studies relevant by making up stuff to fill in their vast gaps in knowledge.

Really? Let's put that to the test, shall we? Here is one of my published papers. You tell me where I made "up stuff":

CRINOIDS FROM THE MULDRAUGH MEMBER OF THE BORDEN FORMATION IN NORTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY ECHINODERMATA LOWER MISSISSIPPIAN

At least answer these five simple questions if evolution is "proven". Best arguments against atheistic evolution

Who the fuck do you think you are? You have not answered my question and then presume to ask me questions? You have a lot of fucking nerve. Moreover, evolution has as much to do with atheism as it does with religion - that is to say, nothing at all. So your five questions are meaningless because they are based on a false premise.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

Such grandiose claims are pretty typical of the slow child who struggled with their lessons while the rest of the class moved forward with their studies.

Once again, too stupid to come up with your own insults.

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

You have demonstrated no knowledge of science at all here. So if you were always the best at science/math, as you claim, I have to ask, compared to what/who? I hate having to repeat myself, but you give me little choice. You don't know who you are talking to. I am a geologist with 25 years of field and lab experience, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. And so when you try to claim to have some kind of superior education with regard to science all the while demonstrating no knowledge of it whatsoever, I just have to laugh. And I'm sorry if this hurts your feelings, but laughter is all that claim deserves. You wouldn't dare try to tell a brain surgeon his business, so don't try to tell me mine.

P.S., you didn't actually answer all of my questions. This one, for instance:

"And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally?"

I study nuclear power... I've known biology majors that all give different versions of evolution.

Biology majors are not scientists. They are students.

I don't respect your field. I think it's the same as art, no real use to society.

That's an interesting conclusion since geology puts gas in your car, electricity in your house, and the metals for your car and appliances, etc.

I got a 34 in math and a 32 in science on the ACT. I'm not a genius but I'm never at the dumber end of the class. People who study fossils try to make their studies relevant by making up stuff to fill in their vast gaps in knowledge.

Really? Let's put that to the test, shall we? Here is one of my published papers. You tell me where I made "up stuff":

CRINOIDS FROM THE MULDRAUGH MEMBER OF THE BORDEN FORMATION IN NORTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY ECHINODERMATA LOWER MISSISSIPPIAN

At least answer these five simple questions if evolution is "proven". Best arguments against atheistic evolution

Who the fuck do you think you are? You have not answered my question and then presume to ask me questions? You have a lot of fucking nerve. Moreover, evolution has as much to do with atheism as it does with religion - that is to say, nothing at all. So your five questions are meaningless because they are based on a false premise.

They had a biology degree. I misspoke.

Petroleum engineers do the real work. Other engineers find ways to convert resources into power/products.

I don't know if you personally make it up or the people who make movies/books do. You tell me. Your article is short and purely factual. It doesn't represent the ideas we have been talking about on this thread.

I've been answering your questions. Now explain the ones I gave you. I looked at your small article.

 

[orogenicman]

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

Such grandiose claims are pretty typical of the slow child who struggled with their lessons while the rest of the class moved forward with their studies.

Once again, too stupid to come up with your own insults.

And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally? Sounds to me like you were the one rejected in school, because if you had actually paid attention in science class, your willful ignorance wouldn't be so obvious, or possiblly not even exist.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

You have demonstrated no knowledge of science at all here. So if you were always the best at science/math, as you claim, I have to ask, compared to what/who? I hate having to repeat myself, but you give me little choice. You don't know who you are talking to. I am a geologist with 25 years of field and lab experience, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. And so when you try to claim to have some kind of superior education with regard to science all the while demonstrating no knowledge of it whatsoever, I just have to laugh. And I'm sorry if this hurts your feelings, but laughter is all that claim deserves. You wouldn't dare try to tell a brain surgeon his business, so don't try to tell me mine.

P.S., you didn't actually answer all of my questions. This one, for instance:

"And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally?"

I study nuclear power... I've known biology majors that all give different versions of evolution.

Biology majors are not scientists. They are students.

I don't respect your field. I think it's the same as art, no real use to society.

That's an interesting conclusion since geology puts gas in your car, electricity in your house, and the metals for your car and appliances, etc.

I got a 34 in math and a 32 in science on the ACT. I'm not a genius but I'm never at the dumber end of the class. People who study fossils try to make their studies relevant by making up stuff to fill in their vast gaps in knowledge.

Really? Let's put that to the test, shall we? Here is one of my published papers. You tell me where I made "up stuff":

CRINOIDS FROM THE MULDRAUGH MEMBER OF THE BORDEN FORMATION IN NORTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY ECHINODERMATA LOWER MISSISSIPPIAN

At least answer these five simple questions if evolution is "proven". Best arguments against atheistic evolution

Who the fuck do you think you are? You have not answered my question and then presume to ask me questions? You have a lot of fucking nerve. Moreover, evolution has as much to do with atheism as it does with religion - that is to say, nothing at all. So your five questions are meaningless because they are based on a false premise.

They had a biology degree. I misspoke.

Petroleum engineers do the real work. Other engineers find ways to convert resources into power/products.

I don't know if you personally make it up or the people who make movies/books do. You tell me. Your article is short and purely factual. It doesn't represent the ideas we have been talking about on this thread.

I've been answering your questions. Now explain the ones I gave you. I looked at your small article.

Petroleum engineers design the well fields. Petroleum geologists find the reservoirs in the first place.

I study fossils, and have for my entire life. You said that "people who study fossils try to make their studies relevant by making up stuff to fill in their vast gaps in knowledge." Since you have admitted that my paper (which is ten pages, not including the photographic plates) is factual, I can only assume that when you made that statement, above, you were "making it up". And it certainly does represent some of the ideas we've been discussing - evolution for one, geology for another, and science for a third. As for your questions, I've already given the only answer they deserve, which is that because they are based on a false premise, they are meaningless.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

Such grandiose claims are pretty typical of the slow child who struggled with their lessons while the rest of the class moved forward with their studies.

Once again, too stupid to come up with your own insults.

Your defense is repeating back to me what I said to you? Your mind is as childish as "I know you are but what am I?"

I was always the best at science/math and good in every subject. I choose to reject foolishness while the sheeple follow someone they delusionally see as smarter than they are.

This reply answers all 3 of your posts.

You have demonstrated no knowledge of science at all here. So if you were always the best at science/math, as you claim, I have to ask, compared to what/who? I hate having to repeat myself, but you give me little choice. You don't know who you are talking to. I am a geologist with 25 years of field and lab experience, and am published in the Journal of Invertebrate Paleontology. And so when you try to claim to have some kind of superior education with regard to science all the while demonstrating no knowledge of it whatsoever, I just have to laugh. And I'm sorry if this hurts your feelings, but laughter is all that claim deserves. You wouldn't dare try to tell a brain surgeon his business, so don't try to tell me mine.

P.S., you didn't actually answer all of my questions. This one, for instance:

"And how many evolutionary scientists do you know personally?"

I study nuclear power... I've known biology majors that all give different versions of evolution.

Biology majors are not scientists. They are students.

I don't respect your field. I think it's the same as art, no real use to society.

That's an interesting conclusion since geology puts gas in your car, electricity in your house, and the metals for your car and appliances, etc.

I got a 34 in math and a 32 in science on the ACT. I'm not a genius but I'm never at the dumber end of the class. People who study fossils try to make their studies relevant by making up stuff to fill in their vast gaps in knowledge.

Really? Let's put that to the test, shall we? Here is one of my published papers. You tell me where I made "up stuff":

CRINOIDS FROM THE MULDRAUGH MEMBER OF THE BORDEN FORMATION IN NORTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY ECHINODERMATA LOWER MISSISSIPPIAN

At least answer these five simple questions if evolution is "proven". Best arguments against atheistic evolution

Who the fuck do you think you are? You have not answered my question and then presume to ask me questions? You have a lot of fucking nerve. Moreover, evolution has as much to do with atheism as it does with religion - that is to say, nothing at all. So your five questions are meaningless because they are based on a false premise.

They had a biology degree. I misspoke.

Petroleum engineers do the real work. Other engineers find ways to convert resources into power/products.

I don't know if you personally make it up or the people who make movies/books do. You tell me. Your article is short and purely factual. It doesn't represent the ideas we have been talking about on this thread.

I've been answering your questions. Now explain the ones I gave you. I looked at your small article.

Petroleum engineers design the well fields. Petroleum geologists find the reservoirs in the first place.

I study fossils, and have for my entire life. You said that "people who study fossils try to make their studies relevant by making up stuff to fill in their vast gaps in knowledge." Since you have admitted that my paper (which is ten pages, not including the photographic plates) is factual, I can only assume that when you made that statement, above, you were "making it up". And it certainly does represent some of the ideas we've been discussing - evolution for one, geology for another, and science for a third. As for your questions, I've already given the only answer they deserve, which is that because they are based on a false premise, they are meaningless.

Good. You acknowledge that you're too closed minded and too bought into your theory to consider other options. I viewed your dumb shit. lol. You blindly listen to the "geniuses" before you and don't look into questions yourself.
People who put your factual information together throw in their own theories as well. Not much of the public would read a boring paper like the one you showed. They just mix in lies within other factual information. That's what I mean by making it up. Your job is interesting and can provide interesting information but none of it really useful. It's like art or entertainers.
In the end I've never made claims that what I believe is fact. You evolutionists are the only fools thinking you have the start of the world figured out. It kind of helps support the scientific method by only listening to scientists who have the correct premise. If the only people studying something go into it believe that evolution happened how would they every come up with anything different? Round about stupid thinking. Anyone who challenges the theory is kicked out of the community. Hmmm. Sounds similar to the old radical church.

 

[Marxist]

Time to shut down this thread, evolution is an undeniable fact, refute any of these below and maybe you have a case, but ken ham isn't a good source
LOL. The affair was heavily challenged and hated for decades, they didn't get shit.
Evolution
Human Evolution Evidence The Smithsonian Institution s Human Origins Program
What is the evidence for evolution
29 Evidences for Macroevolution The Scientific Case for Common Descent - Amazing resource
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense - Scientific American - For the OP, who suffers from brain damage.
Early Theories of Evolution Evidence of Evolution
How Do We Know That Evolution Has Occurred?

The evidence for evolution has primarily come from four sources:

1. the fossil record of change in earlier species
2. the chemical and anatomical similarities of related life forms
3. the geographic distribution of related species
4. the recorded genetic changes in living organisms over many generations
ENSI SENSI Papers Articles Macroevolution Lessons
Observed Evolutionary Changes - "WE HAVEN'T OBSERVED IT, WAHHH"
- Easy to follow
The people who critique evolution get plenty of time to speak, the problem is, they're literally full of shit.

 

[orogenicman]

Even more evidence for evolution:

Conifer study illustrates twists of evolution -- ScienceDaily

A new study offers not only a sweeping analysis of how pollination has evolved among conifers but also an illustration of how evolution -- far from being a straight-ahead march of progress -- sometimes allows for longstanding and advantageous functions to become irrevocably lost. Moreover, the authors show that the ongoing breakdown of the successful but ultimately fragile pollination mechanism may have led to a new diversity of traits and functions.

More at the link, for those who actually want to learn something.

 

[Marxist]

Even more evidence for evolution:

Conifer study illustrates twists of evolution -- ScienceDaily

A new study offers not only a sweeping analysis of how pollination has evolved among conifers but also an illustration of how evolution -- far from being a straight-ahead march of progress -- sometimes allows for longstanding and advantageous functions to become irrevocably lost. Moreover, the authors show that the ongoing breakdown of the successful but ultimately fragile pollination mechanism may have led to a new diversity of traits and functions.

More at the link, for those who actually want to learn something.

There is so much evidence that it would crash this website to post it all.

 

[orogenicman]

Even more evidence for evolution:

Conifer study illustrates twists of evolution -- ScienceDaily

A new study offers not only a sweeping analysis of how pollination has evolved among conifers but also an illustration of how evolution -- far from being a straight-ahead march of progress -- sometimes allows for longstanding and advantageous functions to become irrevocably lost. Moreover, the authors show that the ongoing breakdown of the successful but ultimately fragile pollination mechanism may have led to a new diversity of traits and functions.

More at the link, for those who actually want to learn something.

There is so much evidence that it would crash this website to post it all.

Good idea. Wanna try?

 

[Marxist]

Even more evidence for evolution:

Conifer study illustrates twists of evolution -- ScienceDaily

A new study offers not only a sweeping analysis of how pollination has evolved among conifers but also an illustration of how evolution -- far from being a straight-ahead march of progress -- sometimes allows for longstanding and advantageous functions to become irrevocably lost. Moreover, the authors show that the ongoing breakdown of the successful but ultimately fragile pollination mechanism may have led to a new diversity of traits and functions.

More at the link, for those who actually want to learn something.

There is so much evidence that it would crash this website to post it all.

Good idea. Wanna try?

Start a new thread and I'm down for it. Actually, make a thread for many things people deny these days, we will go at it all. We could just refer people to that thread.

 

[orogenicman]

Even more evidence for evolution:

Conifer study illustrates twists of evolution -- ScienceDaily

A new study offers not only a sweeping analysis of how pollination has evolved among conifers but also an illustration of how evolution -- far from being a straight-ahead march of progress -- sometimes allows for longstanding and advantageous functions to become irrevocably lost. Moreover, the authors show that the ongoing breakdown of the successful but ultimately fragile pollination mechanism may have led to a new diversity of traits and functions.

More at the link, for those who actually want to learn something.

There is so much evidence that it would crash this website to post it all.

Good idea. Wanna try?

Start a new thread and I'm down for it. Actually, make a thread for many things people deny these days, we will go at it all. We could just refer people to that thread.

I just posted one on new evidence for the origin of life.

 

[Marxist]

Even more evidence for evolution:

Conifer study illustrates twists of evolution -- ScienceDaily

A new study offers not only a sweeping analysis of how pollination has evolved among conifers but also an illustration of how evolution -- far from being a straight-ahead march of progress -- sometimes allows for longstanding and advantageous functions to become irrevocably lost. Moreover, the authors show that the ongoing breakdown of the successful but ultimately fragile pollination mechanism may have led to a new diversity of traits and functions.

More at the link, for those who actually want to learn something.

There is so much evidence that it would crash this website to post it all.

Good idea. Wanna try?

Start a new thread and I'm down for it. Actually, make a thread for many things people deny these days, we will go at it all. We could just refer people to that thread.

I just posted one on new evidence for the origin of life.

Yeah, but the thread title only talks about one thing..