Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

[orogenicman]

In 2006, a team of scientists unveiled the discovery of Tiktaalik roseae,
a fossil fish known as the 'fishapod'

Tiktaalik roseae Home

They probably built it with bones from 2 different animals as evolutionists have been known to make attempts at in the past.

Read all about it.

Your Inner Fish A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body - Kindle edition by Neil Shubin. Professional Technical Kindle eBooks Amazon.com.

This fish doesn't probe much and the body that they show around the creature is just a digital image they created. Nothing more nothing less. A mere guess at what it may have looked like. They know nothing about the animal.

And you base these conclusions on what, exactly?

The fact that it is a computer image

So what? What's your point? That computer generated images are inaccurate? Evidence please?

and if the animal lived billions of years ago I know they don't know much about it.

It didn't live billions of years ago, and even if it did, we could still discover many things about it.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

They probably built it with bones from 2 different animals as evolutionists have been known to make attempts at in the past.

Read all about it.

Your Inner Fish A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body - Kindle edition by Neil Shubin. Professional Technical Kindle eBooks Amazon.com.

This fish doesn't probe much and the body that they show around the creature is just a digital image they created. Nothing more nothing less. A mere guess at what it may have looked like. They know nothing about the animal.

And you base these conclusions on what, exactly?

The fact that it is a computer image

So what? What's your point? That computer generated images are inaccurate? Evidence please?

and if the animal lived billions of years ago I know they don't know much about it.

It didn't live billions of years ago, and even if it did, we could still discover many things about it.

Lies. How do you know that it works over the course of billions of years when the longest person has only lived for a little over 100. So dumb. No evidence at all that it works.

 

[orogenicman]

Read all about it.

Your Inner Fish A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body - Kindle edition by Neil Shubin. Professional Technical Kindle eBooks Amazon.com.

This fish doesn't probe much and the body that they show around the creature is just a digital image they created. Nothing more nothing less. A mere guess at what it may have looked like. They know nothing about the animal.

And you base these conclusions on what, exactly?

The fact that it is a computer image

So what? What's your point? That computer generated images are inaccurate? Evidence please?

and if the animal lived billions of years ago I know they don't know much about it.

It didn't live billions of years ago, and even if it did, we could still discover many things about it.

Lies. How do you know that it works over the course of billions of years when the longest person has only lived for a little over 100. So dumb. No evidence at all that it works.

OMG! Do you know the events that occurred during the civil war, the revolutionary war? How do you know, since the "longest person has only lived for a little over 100"? do you see how silly that question is? We know because the laws and principles of physics, chemistry, and biology that are in operation today, operated in the past. And one of those laws is the law of superposition. When sediments are laid down, they are laid down in a progressive order of age, the oldest being at the bottom of the sedimentary deposit, while the youngest is at the top. The laws of physics requires this to be so. And it is readily apparent when you analyze the sediments.

If you truly want to understand geology, I highly recommend that you takes some classes at your local university. Otherwise, you are simply entering into a discussion about concepts you don't understand, and I am not under any obligation to teach them to you. I am not your teacher.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

This fish doesn't probe much and the body that they show around the creature is just a digital image they created. Nothing more nothing less. A mere guess at what it may have looked like. They know nothing about the animal.

And you base these conclusions on what, exactly?

The fact that it is a computer image

So what? What's your point? That computer generated images are inaccurate? Evidence please?

and if the animal lived billions of years ago I know they don't know much about it.

It didn't live billions of years ago, and even if it did, we could still discover many things about it.

Lies. How do you know that it works over the course of billions of years when the longest person has only lived for a little over 100. So dumb. No evidence at all that it works.

OMG! Do you know the events that occurred during the civil war, the revolutionary war? How do you know, since the "longest person has only lived for a little over 100"? do you see how silly that question is? We know because the laws and principles of physics, chemistry, and biology that are in operation today, operated in the past. And one of those laws is the law of superposition. When sediments are laid down, they are laid down in a progressive order of age, the oldest being at the bottom of the sedimentary deposit, while the youngest is at the top. The laws of physics requires this to be so. And it is readily apparent when you analyze the sediments.

If you truly want to understand geology, I highly recommend that you takes some classes at your local university. Otherwise, you are simply entering into a discussion about concepts you don't understand, and I am not under any obligation to teach them to you. I am not your teacher.

What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history. You can hold your belief that will change in 100 years into a new belief and then follow that one.

 

[orogenicman]

And you base these conclusions on what, exactly?

The fact that it is a computer image

So what? What's your point? That computer generated images are inaccurate? Evidence please?

and if the animal lived billions of years ago I know they don't know much about it.

It didn't live billions of years ago, and even if it did, we could still discover many things about it.

Lies. How do you know that it works over the course of billions of years when the longest person has only lived for a little over 100. So dumb. No evidence at all that it works.

OMG! Do you know the events that occurred during the civil war, the revolutionary war? How do you know, since the "longest person has only lived for a little over 100"? do you see how silly that question is? We know because the laws and principles of physics, chemistry, and biology that are in operation today, operated in the past. And one of those laws is the law of superposition. When sediments are laid down, they are laid down in a progressive order of age, the oldest being at the bottom of the sedimentary deposit, while the youngest is at the top. The laws of physics requires this to be so. And it is readily apparent when you analyze the sediments.

If you truly want to understand geology, I highly recommend that you takes some classes at your local university. Otherwise, you are simply entering into a discussion about concepts you don't understand, and I am not under any obligation to teach them to you. I am not your teacher.

What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history. You can hold your belief that will change in 100 years into a new belief and then follow that one.

Do you have any examples?

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

The fact that it is a computer image

So what? What's your point? That computer generated images are inaccurate? Evidence please?

and if the animal lived billions of years ago I know they don't know much about it.

It didn't live billions of years ago, and even if it did, we could still discover many things about it.

Lies. How do you know that it works over the course of billions of years when the longest person has only lived for a little over 100. So dumb. No evidence at all that it works.

OMG! Do you know the events that occurred during the civil war, the revolutionary war? How do you know, since the "longest person has only lived for a little over 100"? do you see how silly that question is? We know because the laws and principles of physics, chemistry, and biology that are in operation today, operated in the past. And one of those laws is the law of superposition. When sediments are laid down, they are laid down in a progressive order of age, the oldest being at the bottom of the sedimentary deposit, while the youngest is at the top. The laws of physics requires this to be so. And it is readily apparent when you analyze the sediments.

If you truly want to understand geology, I highly recommend that you takes some classes at your local university. Otherwise, you are simply entering into a discussion about concepts you don't understand, and I am not under any obligation to teach them to you. I am not your teacher.

What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history. You can hold your belief that will change in 100 years into a new belief and then follow that one.

Do you have any examples?

Evolution - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
It's constantly changing. I've heard evolutionists argue for slow change, bursts of change, big boom, just randomly in water, and others.

 

[orogenicman]

So what? What's your point? That computer generated images are inaccurate? Evidence please?

It didn't live billions of years ago, and even if it did, we could still discover many things about it.

Lies. How do you know that it works over the course of billions of years when the longest person has only lived for a little over 100. So dumb. No evidence at all that it works.

OMG! Do you know the events that occurred during the civil war, the revolutionary war? How do you know, since the "longest person has only lived for a little over 100"? do you see how silly that question is? We know because the laws and principles of physics, chemistry, and biology that are in operation today, operated in the past. And one of those laws is the law of superposition. When sediments are laid down, they are laid down in a progressive order of age, the oldest being at the bottom of the sedimentary deposit, while the youngest is at the top. The laws of physics requires this to be so. And it is readily apparent when you analyze the sediments.

If you truly want to understand geology, I highly recommend that you takes some classes at your local university. Otherwise, you are simply entering into a discussion about concepts you don't understand, and I am not under any obligation to teach them to you. I am not your teacher.

What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history. You can hold your belief that will change in 100 years into a new belief and then follow that one.

Do you have any examples?

Evolution - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
It's constantly changing. I've heard evolutionists argue for slow change, bursts of change, big boom, just randomly in water, and others.

No, you asked "What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history". I asked for examples. If you are suggesting that evolution is an inaccurate assumption, I'm afraid that is not true. Not at all. But dude, science allows for change, recognizes that our paradigm may change upon further discoveries. That is the nature of scientific discovery, and that is actually a very good thing.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Lies. How do you know that it works over the course of billions of years when the longest person has only lived for a little over 100. So dumb. No evidence at all that it works.

OMG! Do you know the events that occurred during the civil war, the revolutionary war? How do you know, since the "longest person has only lived for a little over 100"? do you see how silly that question is? We know because the laws and principles of physics, chemistry, and biology that are in operation today, operated in the past. And one of those laws is the law of superposition. When sediments are laid down, they are laid down in a progressive order of age, the oldest being at the bottom of the sedimentary deposit, while the youngest is at the top. The laws of physics requires this to be so. And it is readily apparent when you analyze the sediments.

If you truly want to understand geology, I highly recommend that you takes some classes at your local university. Otherwise, you are simply entering into a discussion about concepts you don't understand, and I am not under any obligation to teach them to you. I am not your teacher.

What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history. You can hold your belief that will change in 100 years into a new belief and then follow that one.

Do you have any examples?

Evolution - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
It's constantly changing. I've heard evolutionists argue for slow change, bursts of change, big boom, just randomly in water, and others.

No, you asked "What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history". I asked for examples. If you are suggesting that evolution is an inaccurate assumption, I'm afraid that is not true. Not at all. But dude, science allows for change, recognizes that our paradigm may change upon further discoveries. That is the nature of scientific discovery, and that is actually a very good thing.

Evolutionists assume there is no god

 

[orogenicman]

OMG! Do you know the events that occurred during the civil war, the revolutionary war? How do you know, since the "longest person has only lived for a little over 100"? do you see how silly that question is? We know because the laws and principles of physics, chemistry, and biology that are in operation today, operated in the past. And one of those laws is the law of superposition. When sediments are laid down, they are laid down in a progressive order of age, the oldest being at the bottom of the sedimentary deposit, while the youngest is at the top. The laws of physics requires this to be so. And it is readily apparent when you analyze the sediments.

If you truly want to understand geology, I highly recommend that you takes some classes at your local university. Otherwise, you are simply entering into a discussion about concepts you don't understand, and I am not under any obligation to teach them to you. I am not your teacher.

What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history. You can hold your belief that will change in 100 years into a new belief and then follow that one.

Do you have any examples?

Evolution - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
It's constantly changing. I've heard evolutionists argue for slow change, bursts of change, big boom, just randomly in water, and others.

No, you asked "What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history". I asked for examples. If you are suggesting that evolution is an inaccurate assumption, I'm afraid that is not true. Not at all. But dude, science allows for change, recognizes that our paradigm may change upon further discoveries. That is the nature of scientific discovery, and that is actually a very good thing.

Evolutionists assume there is no god

Evolution says nothing about the existence or non-existence of deity. It only explains the origin of species.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history. You can hold your belief that will change in 100 years into a new belief and then follow that one.

Do you have any examples?

Evolution - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
It's constantly changing. I've heard evolutionists argue for slow change, bursts of change, big boom, just randomly in water, and others.

No, you asked "What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history". I asked for examples. If you are suggesting that evolution is an inaccurate assumption, I'm afraid that is not true. Not at all. But dude, science allows for change, recognizes that our paradigm may change upon further discoveries. That is the nature of scientific discovery, and that is actually a very good thing.

Evolutionists assume there is no god

Evolution says nothing about the existence or non-existence of deity. It only explains the origin of species.

I don't care if people are so delusional as to believe in evolution. Just keep it to yourself. Evolutionists desire to spread their stupidity surpasses Christians or Muslims.

 

[orogenicman]

Do you have any examples?

Evolution - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
It's constantly changing. I've heard evolutionists argue for slow change, bursts of change, big boom, just randomly in water, and others.

No, you asked "What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history". I asked for examples. If you are suggesting that evolution is an inaccurate assumption, I'm afraid that is not true. Not at all. But dude, science allows for change, recognizes that our paradigm may change upon further discoveries. That is the nature of scientific discovery, and that is actually a very good thing.

Evolutionists assume there is no god

Evolution says nothing about the existence or non-existence of deity. It only explains the origin of species.

I don't care if people are so delusional as to believe in evolution. Just keep it to yourself. Evolutionists desire to spread their stupidity surpasses Christians or Muslims.

So what you are saying is that people don't have a right to be educated. Not only do I disagree, I suggest that you don't have a right to not be educated, much less demand that others not be educated. Education strengthens this country in every avenue of life one can think of. It strengthens us economically, politically, militarily, ethically, and morally. Now, if none of that concerns you, I suggest that you are not thinking in this country's best interests, because willful ignorance hurts everyone, but no one as much as the ignorant themselves.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Evolution - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
It's constantly changing. I've heard evolutionists argue for slow change, bursts of change, big boom, just randomly in water, and others.

No, you asked "What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history". I asked for examples. If you are suggesting that evolution is an inaccurate assumption, I'm afraid that is not true. Not at all. But dude, science allows for change, recognizes that our paradigm may change upon further discoveries. That is the nature of scientific discovery, and that is actually a very good thing.

Evolutionists assume there is no god

Evolution says nothing about the existence or non-existence of deity. It only explains the origin of species.

I don't care if people are so delusional as to believe in evolution. Just keep it to yourself. Evolutionists desire to spread their stupidity surpasses Christians or Muslims.

So what you are saying is that people don't have a right to be educated. Not only do I disagree, I suggest that you don't have a right to not be educated, much less demand that others not be educated. Education strengthens this country in every avenue of life one can think of. It strengthens us economically, politically, militarily, ethically, and morally. Now, if none of that concerns you, I suggest that you are not thinking in this country's best interests, because willful ignorance hurts everyone, but no one as much as the ignorant themselves.

Give me one instance where believing in evolution makes you a better member of society or how would it somehow make you smarter? No job is dependent on this simplistic belief.

 

[orogenicman]

No, you asked "What if you make key inaccurate assumptions like science always does about our history". I asked for examples. If you are suggesting that evolution is an inaccurate assumption, I'm afraid that is not true. Not at all. But dude, science allows for change, recognizes that our paradigm may change upon further discoveries. That is the nature of scientific discovery, and that is actually a very good thing.

Evolutionists assume there is no god

Evolution says nothing about the existence or non-existence of deity. It only explains the origin of species.

I don't care if people are so delusional as to believe in evolution. Just keep it to yourself. Evolutionists desire to spread their stupidity surpasses Christians or Muslims.

So what you are saying is that people don't have a right to be educated. Not only do I disagree, I suggest that you don't have a right to not be educated, much less demand that others not be educated. Education strengthens this country in every avenue of life one can think of. It strengthens us economically, politically, militarily, ethically, and morally. Now, if none of that concerns you, I suggest that you are not thinking in this country's best interests, because willful ignorance hurts everyone, but no one as much as the ignorant themselves.

Give me one instance where believing in evolution makes you a better member of society or how would it somehow make you smarter? No job is dependent on this simplistic belief.

Sure. That's easy. The theory of evolution is used to diagnose and cure disease. And so tens of thousands of jobs are dependent on it. If you think that not understanding it makes you smarter, then you are not very smart.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Evolutionists assume there is no god

Evolution says nothing about the existence or non-existence of deity. It only explains the origin of species.

I don't care if people are so delusional as to believe in evolution. Just keep it to yourself. Evolutionists desire to spread their stupidity surpasses Christians or Muslims.

So what you are saying is that people don't have a right to be educated. Not only do I disagree, I suggest that you don't have a right to not be educated, much less demand that others not be educated. Education strengthens this country in every avenue of life one can think of. It strengthens us economically, politically, militarily, ethically, and morally. Now, if none of that concerns you, I suggest that you are not thinking in this country's best interests, because willful ignorance hurts everyone, but no one as much as the ignorant themselves.

Give me one instance where believing in evolution makes you a better member of society or how would it somehow make you smarter? No job is dependent on this simplistic belief.

Sure. That's easy. The theory of evolution is used to diagnose and cure disease. And so tens of thousands of jobs are dependent on it. If you think that not understanding it makes you smarter, then you are not very smart.

No one is denying evolution exists. Just the kind of evolution that you claim turned from fishies to reptiles to people... blah blah blah. Your arguments only make you sound dumber because you know that the belief we are discussing does nothing for anyone.

 

[orogenicman]

Evolution says nothing about the existence or non-existence of deity. It only explains the origin of species.

I don't care if people are so delusional as to believe in evolution. Just keep it to yourself. Evolutionists desire to spread their stupidity surpasses Christians or Muslims.

So what you are saying is that people don't have a right to be educated. Not only do I disagree, I suggest that you don't have a right to not be educated, much less demand that others not be educated. Education strengthens this country in every avenue of life one can think of. It strengthens us economically, politically, militarily, ethically, and morally. Now, if none of that concerns you, I suggest that you are not thinking in this country's best interests, because willful ignorance hurts everyone, but no one as much as the ignorant themselves.

Give me one instance where believing in evolution makes you a better member of society or how would it somehow make you smarter? No job is dependent on this simplistic belief.

Sure. That's easy. The theory of evolution is used to diagnose and cure disease. And so tens of thousands of jobs are dependent on it. If you think that not understanding it makes you smarter, then you are not very smart.

No one is denying evolution exists. Just the kind of evolution that you claim turned from fishies to reptiles to people... blah blah blah. Your arguments only make you sound dumber because you know that the belief we are discussing does nothing for anyone.

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

I don't care if people are so delusional as to believe in evolution. Just keep it to yourself. Evolutionists desire to spread their stupidity surpasses Christians or Muslims.

So what you are saying is that people don't have a right to be educated. Not only do I disagree, I suggest that you don't have a right to not be educated, much less demand that others not be educated. Education strengthens this country in every avenue of life one can think of. It strengthens us economically, politically, militarily, ethically, and morally. Now, if none of that concerns you, I suggest that you are not thinking in this country's best interests, because willful ignorance hurts everyone, but no one as much as the ignorant themselves.

Give me one instance where believing in evolution makes you a better member of society or how would it somehow make you smarter? No job is dependent on this simplistic belief.

Sure. That's easy. The theory of evolution is used to diagnose and cure disease. And so tens of thousands of jobs are dependent on it. If you think that not understanding it makes you smarter, then you are not very smart.

No one is denying evolution exists. Just the kind of evolution that you claim turned from fishies to reptiles to people... blah blah blah. Your arguments only make you sound dumber because you know that the belief we are discussing does nothing for anyone.

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

 

[Hollie]

So what you are saying is that people don't have a right to be educated. Not only do I disagree, I suggest that you don't have a right to not be educated, much less demand that others not be educated. Education strengthens this country in every avenue of life one can think of. It strengthens us economically, politically, militarily, ethically, and morally. Now, if none of that concerns you, I suggest that you are not thinking in this country's best interests, because willful ignorance hurts everyone, but no one as much as the ignorant themselves.

Give me one instance where believing in evolution makes you a better member of society or how would it somehow make you smarter? No job is dependent on this simplistic belief.

Sure. That's easy. The theory of evolution is used to diagnose and cure disease. And so tens of thousands of jobs are dependent on it. If you think that not understanding it makes you smarter, then you are not very smart.

No one is denying evolution exists. Just the kind of evolution that you claim turned from fishies to reptiles to people... blah blah blah. Your arguments only make you sound dumber because you know that the belief we are discussing does nothing for anyone.

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

Why do you presume to make such absolute statements about something you know so little about?

 

[orogenicman]

So what you are saying is that people don't have a right to be educated. Not only do I disagree, I suggest that you don't have a right to not be educated, much less demand that others not be educated. Education strengthens this country in every avenue of life one can think of. It strengthens us economically, politically, militarily, ethically, and morally. Now, if none of that concerns you, I suggest that you are not thinking in this country's best interests, because willful ignorance hurts everyone, but no one as much as the ignorant themselves.

Give me one instance where believing in evolution makes you a better member of society or how would it somehow make you smarter? No job is dependent on this simplistic belief.

Sure. That's easy. The theory of evolution is used to diagnose and cure disease. And so tens of thousands of jobs are dependent on it. If you think that not understanding it makes you smarter, then you are not very smart.

No one is denying evolution exists. Just the kind of evolution that you claim turned from fishies to reptiles to people... blah blah blah. Your arguments only make you sound dumber because you know that the belief we are discussing does nothing for anyone.

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

And there are tens of thousands of scientific papers that demonstrate clearly that the concept of micro versus macroevolution is nothing more than a mechanism invented by creationists so they can accept evolution without admitting that the Book of Genesis is wrong. The only difference between micro and macro evolution is the amount of time involved. The processes are exactly the same. And dufus, if a fish could change into a monkey, that would REFUTE evolution, not support it. Evolution acts on populations, not individuals. And dufus, if we don't discuss what we don't know, how is anyone going to ask relevant questions and make any discoveries? Or is keeping people stupid that ultimately the goal of the willfully ignorant?

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Give me one instance where believing in evolution makes you a better member of society or how would it somehow make you smarter? No job is dependent on this simplistic belief.

Sure. That's easy. The theory of evolution is used to diagnose and cure disease. And so tens of thousands of jobs are dependent on it. If you think that not understanding it makes you smarter, then you are not very smart.

No one is denying evolution exists. Just the kind of evolution that you claim turned from fishies to reptiles to people... blah blah blah. Your arguments only make you sound dumber because you know that the belief we are discussing does nothing for anyone.

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

Why do you presume to make such absolute statements about something you know so little about?

Because I don't like evolutionists. They're dumb as fuck. Lots of butt hurt weak nerds who were rejected in school and now want to try to feel above others in some way that no one really cares about.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Give me one instance where believing in evolution makes you a better member of society or how would it somehow make you smarter? No job is dependent on this simplistic belief.

Sure. That's easy. The theory of evolution is used to diagnose and cure disease. And so tens of thousands of jobs are dependent on it. If you think that not understanding it makes you smarter, then you are not very smart.

No one is denying evolution exists. Just the kind of evolution that you claim turned from fishies to reptiles to people... blah blah blah. Your arguments only make you sound dumber because you know that the belief we are discussing does nothing for anyone.

No one is denying evolution? You just did, bubba. Talk about sounding dumb!

I've explained in 20 different posts that evolution clearly takes place, just micro evolution. Not the kind that could ever have changed a fish into a monkey. That's just plain ignorant. The kind of fake evolution you guys believe in doesn't help science or do anyone any good. The proven stuff is the only things I believe should be taught. Not the speculation about how life may have been created or how species suddenly jumped from one to another.

And there are tens of thousands of scientific papers that demonstrate clearly that the concept of micro versus macroevolution is nothing more than a mechanism invented by creationists so they can accept evolution without admitting that the Book of Genesis is wrong. The only difference between micro and macro evolution is the amount of time involved. The processes are exactly the same. And dufus, if a fish could change into a monkey, that would REFUTE evolution, not support it. Evolution acts on populations, not individuals. And dufus, if we don't discuss what we don't know, how is anyone going to ask relevant questions and make any discoveries? Or is keeping people stupid that ultimately the goal of the willfully ignorant?

BORRRINGGG. Go get a real job.