Nosmo King
Gold Member
Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun UnDemocrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun UnDemocrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...
Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun UnDemocrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...
Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun UnDemocrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...
I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.
Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.
Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'
What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?
Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?
Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun UnDemocrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...
I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.
Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.
Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'
What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?
Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?
Seems exactly the right type of individual that would instill powerful feelings of enamorous bromance in Russia-loving Muslim-hating Republicans.1.Playing out before our eyes, in the Congress, is the battle over response to death due to the virus. But behind the delay in responding is how the sides view human life. While there is an ever increasing number of deaths, a prominent Democrat makes clear that imposing Bolshevism is more important:
“Dem Rep. Told Colleagues Coronavirus Bill Is ‘Tremendous Opportunity to Restructure Things to Fit Our Vision’” Dem Rep. Told Colleagues Coronavirus Bill Is ‘Tremendous Opportunity to Restructure Things to Fit Our Vision’ | National Review
Understood correctly, it is merely a restatement of this:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky
2. For every iteration of the Left, their power is always more important than the human collateral damage, after all, as we hear from the Left, “you've got to crack a few eggs to make an omelette.” And, they do:
None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).
They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.
Watch the Senate hearings on the coronavirus bill and one can see where the Democrats fit right in.
3. But….why do so many on the Left have this cavalier view of humanity?
Largely because religion and morality is anathema to them. They have eschewed and abolished it from the public arena, and mainly from the schools. ‘Education’ is meaningless without any connection to a moral belief.
4. On this date, March 24, 2016: Serbian politician Radovan Karadžić was found guilty of committing war crimes, including genocide, during the civil war that followed Bosnia and Herzegovina's split from Yugoslavia in 1992; he was sentenced to 40 years in prison.
Britannica.com
"Radovan Karadzic, the former Bosnian Serb leader, was found guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity during the 1992-95 Bosnian war.
The atrocities during the war have been described as the worst crimes committed in Europe since World War Two.
One count of genocide related to the massacre of more than 7,500 Muslim men and boys in the Srebrenica enclave in July 1995...
But.....but.....such an educated individual!!!!
§ 1968: Publishes collection of poetry
§ 1971: Graduates in medicine
§ 1983: Becomes team psychologist for Red Star Belgrade football club
§ 1990: Becomes president of Serbian Democratic Party
Profile: Radovan Karadzic
Did I mention that Democrats align themselves with this sort?
Why did you say "one of his first offcal acts" when the U.S. recognized the U.S.S.R. in November? You ignore his first 100 days. So World War II can be ignored as well as this first amazing 8 months of Roosevelt's first administration. And yet no response concerning Kim Jun Un.Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun UnDemocrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...
I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.
Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.
Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'
What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?
Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?
Franklin Roosevelt began his love affair with Stalin in 1933.
You imagined that that was during WWII???
You must be a government school grad, huh?
Jot this down:
1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. One of his first official acts was to recognize the USSR, November 16th, 1933.
2. If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational: "Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.
Seems exactly the right type of individual that would instill powerful feelings of enamorous bromance in Russia-loving Muslim-hating Republicans.1.Playing out before our eyes, in the Congress, is the battle over response to death due to the virus. But behind the delay in responding is how the sides view human life. While there is an ever increasing number of deaths, a prominent Democrat makes clear that imposing Bolshevism is more important:
“Dem Rep. Told Colleagues Coronavirus Bill Is ‘Tremendous Opportunity to Restructure Things to Fit Our Vision’” Dem Rep. Told Colleagues Coronavirus Bill Is ‘Tremendous Opportunity to Restructure Things to Fit Our Vision’ | National Review
Understood correctly, it is merely a restatement of this:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky
2. For every iteration of the Left, their power is always more important than the human collateral damage, after all, as we hear from the Left, “you've got to crack a few eggs to make an omelette.” And, they do:
None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).
They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.
Watch the Senate hearings on the coronavirus bill and one can see where the Democrats fit right in.
3. But….why do so many on the Left have this cavalier view of humanity?
Largely because religion and morality is anathema to them. They have eschewed and abolished it from the public arena, and mainly from the schools. ‘Education’ is meaningless without any connection to a moral belief.
4. On this date, March 24, 2016: Serbian politician Radovan Karadžić was found guilty of committing war crimes, including genocide, during the civil war that followed Bosnia and Herzegovina's split from Yugoslavia in 1992; he was sentenced to 40 years in prison.
Britannica.com
"Radovan Karadzic, the former Bosnian Serb leader, was found guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity during the 1992-95 Bosnian war.
The atrocities during the war have been described as the worst crimes committed in Europe since World War Two.
One count of genocide related to the massacre of more than 7,500 Muslim men and boys in the Srebrenica enclave in July 1995...
But.....but.....such an educated individual!!!!
§ 1968: Publishes collection of poetry
§ 1971: Graduates in medicine
§ 1983: Becomes team psychologist for Red Star Belgrade football club
§ 1990: Becomes president of Serbian Democratic Party
Profile: Radovan Karadzic
Did I mention that Democrats align themselves with this sort?
Why did you say "one of his first offcal acts" when the U.S. recognized the U.S.S.R. in November? You ignore his first 100 days. So World War II can be ignored as well as this first amazing 8 months of Roosevelt's first administration. And yet no response concerning Kim Jun Un.Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun UnDemocrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...
I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.
Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.
Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'
What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?
Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?
Franklin Roosevelt began his love affair with Stalin in 1933.
You imagined that that was during WWII???
You must be a government school grad, huh?
Jot this down:
1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. One of his first official acts was to recognize the USSR, November 16th, 1933.
2. If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational: "Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.
Why did you say "one of his first offcal acts" when the U.S. recognized the U.S.S.R. in November? You ignore his first 100 days. So World War II can be ignored as well as this first amazing 8 months of Roosevelt's first administration. And yet no response concerning Kim Jun Un.Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun UnDemocrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...
I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.
Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.
Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'
What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?
Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?
Franklin Roosevelt began his love affair with Stalin in 1933.
You imagined that that was during WWII???
You must be a government school grad, huh?
Jot this down:
1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. One of his first official acts was to recognize the USSR, November 16th, 1933.
2. If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational: "Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.
While we're in the tall weeds...Why did you say "one of his first offcal acts" when the U.S. recognized the U.S.S.R. in November? You ignore his first 100 days. So World War II can be ignored as well as this first amazing 8 months of Roosevelt's first administration. And yet no response concerning Kim Jun Un.Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun UnDemocrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...
I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.
Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.
Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'
What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?
Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?
Franklin Roosevelt began his love affair with Stalin in 1933.
You imagined that that was during WWII???
You must be a government school grad, huh?
Jot this down:
1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. One of his first official acts was to recognize the USSR, November 16th, 1933.
2. If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational: "Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.
You aren't deny the fact....just quibbling over when he turned on America?
Pretty weak.
Now....where is your proof of a similar feat by Trump?
There isn't any....you're just a poor, sad, dunce.
While we're in the tall weeds...Why did you say "one of his first offcal acts" when the U.S. recognized the U.S.S.R. in November? You ignore his first 100 days. So World War II can be ignored as well as this first amazing 8 months of Roosevelt's first administration. And yet no response concerning Kim Jun Un.Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun UnDemocrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...
I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.
Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.
Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'
What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?
Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?
Franklin Roosevelt began his love affair with Stalin in 1933.
You imagined that that was during WWII???
You must be a government school grad, huh?
Jot this down:
1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. One of his first official acts was to recognize the USSR, November 16th, 1933.
2. If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational: "Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.
You aren't deny the fact....just quibbling over when he turned on America?
Pretty weak.
Now....where is your proof of a similar feat by Trump?
There isn't any....you're just a poor, sad, dunce.
Recognition of the U.S.S.R. does not amount to "turn[ing] against America" anymore than recognizing any other nation on the planet in 1933.
Jamie Dupree
✔@jamiedupree
Judging from the Pelosi interview on CNBC, she's sending a message to House members - whatever the Senate passes is what should pass the House right away
88
10:03 AM - Mar 24, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
She doesn't get to run from the damage she caused.www.redstate.com
"Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
If this is true, it’s welcome news.
Nancy Pelosi, just a day after going full Leroy Jenkins on the negotiations over the Wuhan virus relief bill, is now signaling that the House will pass whatever the Senate sends them. This follows Chuck Schumer reversing course last night and announcing he expects a deal done today as well.
Jamie Dupree
✔@jamiedupree
Judging from the Pelosi interview on CNBC, she's sending a message to House members - whatever the Senate passes is what should pass the House right away
88
10:03 AM - Mar 24, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
She doesn't get to run from the damage she caused.www.redstate.com
(Leeroy Jenkins is a word used to describe a person or thing that causes everything to go wrong for everyone else, usually in some extraordinary fashion. )
"Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
If this is true, it’s welcome news.
Nancy Pelosi, just a day after going full Leroy Jenkins on the negotiations over the Wuhan virus relief bill, is now signaling that the House will pass whatever the Senate sends them. This follows Chuck Schumer reversing course last night and announcing he expects a deal done today as well.
Jamie Dupree
✔@jamiedupree
Judging from the Pelosi interview on CNBC, she's sending a message to House members - whatever the Senate passes is what should pass the House right away
88
10:03 AM - Mar 24, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
She doesn't get to run from the damage she caused.www.redstate.com
(Leeroy Jenkins is a word used to describe a person or thing that causes everything to go wrong for everyone else, usually in some extraordinary fashion. )
Could be they realized that no one was in the mood to be polite about their excuses and lies this time.
Its a question. Try answering it.Why does trump believe the economy is more important than human life?
This is the best defense against the OP that you can come up with?????
"Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
If this is true, it’s welcome news.
Nancy Pelosi, just a day after going full Leroy Jenkins on the negotiations over the Wuhan virus relief bill, is now signaling that the House will pass whatever the Senate sends them. This follows Chuck Schumer reversing course last night and announcing he expects a deal done today as well.
Jamie Dupree
✔@jamiedupree
Judging from the Pelosi interview on CNBC, she's sending a message to House members - whatever the Senate passes is what should pass the House right away
88
10:03 AM - Mar 24, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
She doesn't get to run from the damage she caused.www.redstate.com
(Leeroy Jenkins is a word used to describe a person or thing that causes everything to go wrong for everyone else, usually in some extraordinary fashion. )
Could be they realized that no one was in the mood to be polite about their excuses and lies this time.
"Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
If this is true, it’s welcome news.
Nancy Pelosi, just a day after going full Leroy Jenkins on the negotiations over the Wuhan virus relief bill, is now signaling that the House will pass whatever the Senate sends them. This follows Chuck Schumer reversing course last night and announcing he expects a deal done today as well.
Jamie Dupree
✔@jamiedupree
Judging from the Pelosi interview on CNBC, she's sending a message to House members - whatever the Senate passes is what should pass the House right away
88
10:03 AM - Mar 24, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
She doesn't get to run from the damage she caused.www.redstate.com
(Leeroy Jenkins is a word used to describe a person or thing that causes everything to go wrong for everyone else, usually in some extraordinary fashion. )
Could be they realized that no one was in the mood to be polite about their excuses and lies this time.
They have truly overplayed their hand this time.
This thing right here >? is called a question mark. It indicates a question. A statement is followed by a period >.Its a question. Try answering it.Why does trump believe the economy is more important than human life?
This is the best defense against the OP that you can come up with?????
No it wasnt. It was a statement.
This thing right here >? is called a question mark. It indicates a question. A statement is followed by a period >.Its a question. Try answering it.Why does trump believe the economy is more important than human life?
This is the best defense against the OP that you can come up with?????
No it wasnt. It was a statement.