Where Do Ideological Difference Begin?

[Nosmo King]

Democrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...

Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun Un

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...

Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun Un

I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.


Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?




Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?

 

[Nosmo King]

Democrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...

Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun Un

I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.


Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?




Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?

Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.

 

[Sunni Man]

FDR and his commie wife idolized Stalin and thought the USSR should be a role model for America. ...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...

Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun Un

I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.


Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?




Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?

Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.

Franklin Roosevelt began his love affair with Stalin in 1933.

You imagined that that was during WWII???
You must be a government school grad, huh?


Jot this down:

1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. One of his first official acts was to recognize the USSR, November 16th, 1933.

2. If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational: "Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.

 

[xyz]

1.Playing out before our eyes, in the Congress, is the battle over response to death due to the virus. But behind the delay in responding is how the sides view human life. While there is an ever increasing number of deaths, a prominent Democrat makes clear that imposing Bolshevism is more important:

“Dem Rep. Told Colleagues Coronavirus Bill Is ‘Tremendous Opportunity to Restructure Things to Fit Our Vision’” Dem Rep. Told Colleagues Coronavirus Bill Is ‘Tremendous Opportunity to Restructure Things to Fit Our Vision’ | National Review

Understood correctly, it is merely a restatement of this:

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky




2. For every iteration of the Left, their power is always more important than the human collateral damage, after all, as we hear from the Left, “you've got to crack a few eggs to make an omelette.” And, they do:

None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

Watch the Senate hearings on the coronavirus bill and one can see where the Democrats fit right in.




3. But….why do so many on the Left have this cavalier view of humanity?

Largely because religion and morality is anathema to them. They have eschewed and abolished it from the public arena, and mainly from the schools. ‘Education’ is meaningless without any connection to a moral belief.

4. On this date, March 24, 2016: Serbian politician Radovan Karadžić was found guilty of committing war crimes, including genocide, during the civil war that followed Bosnia and Herzegovina's split from Yugoslavia in 1992; he was sentenced to 40 years in prison.
Britannica.com

"Radovan Karadzic, the former Bosnian Serb leader, was found guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity during the 1992-95 Bosnian war.
The atrocities during the war have been described as the worst crimes committed in Europe since World War Two.
One count of genocide related to the massacre of more than 7,500 Muslim men and boys in the Srebrenica enclave in July 1995...

But.....but.....such an educated individual!!!!
§ 1968: Publishes collection of poetry

§ 1971: Graduates in medicine

§ 1983: Becomes team psychologist for Red Star Belgrade football club

§ 1990: Becomes president of Serbian Democratic Party

Profile: Radovan Karadzic



Did I mention that Democrats align themselves with this sort?

Seems exactly the right type of individual that would instill powerful feelings of enamorous bromance in Russia-loving Muslim-hating Republicans.

 

[Nosmo King]

Democrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...

Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun Un

I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.


Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?




Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?

Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.

Franklin Roosevelt began his love affair with Stalin in 1933.

You imagined that that was during WWII???
You must be a government school grad, huh?


Jot this down:

1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. One of his first official acts was to recognize the USSR, November 16th, 1933.

2. If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational: "Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.

Why did you say "one of his first offcal acts" when the U.S. recognized the U.S.S.R. in November? You ignore his first 100 days. So World War II can be ignored as well as this first amazing 8 months of Roosevelt's first administration. And yet no response concerning Kim Jun Un.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1.Playing out before our eyes, in the Congress, is the battle over response to death due to the virus. But behind the delay in responding is how the sides view human life. While there is an ever increasing number of deaths, a prominent Democrat makes clear that imposing Bolshevism is more important:

“Dem Rep. Told Colleagues Coronavirus Bill Is ‘Tremendous Opportunity to Restructure Things to Fit Our Vision’” Dem Rep. Told Colleagues Coronavirus Bill Is ‘Tremendous Opportunity to Restructure Things to Fit Our Vision’ | National Review

Understood correctly, it is merely a restatement of this:

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky




2. For every iteration of the Left, their power is always more important than the human collateral damage, after all, as we hear from the Left, “you've got to crack a few eggs to make an omelette.” And, they do:

None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

Watch the Senate hearings on the coronavirus bill and one can see where the Democrats fit right in.




3. But….why do so many on the Left have this cavalier view of humanity?

Largely because religion and morality is anathema to them. They have eschewed and abolished it from the public arena, and mainly from the schools. ‘Education’ is meaningless without any connection to a moral belief.

4. On this date, March 24, 2016: Serbian politician Radovan Karadžić was found guilty of committing war crimes, including genocide, during the civil war that followed Bosnia and Herzegovina's split from Yugoslavia in 1992; he was sentenced to 40 years in prison.
Britannica.com

"Radovan Karadzic, the former Bosnian Serb leader, was found guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity during the 1992-95 Bosnian war.
The atrocities during the war have been described as the worst crimes committed in Europe since World War Two.
One count of genocide related to the massacre of more than 7,500 Muslim men and boys in the Srebrenica enclave in July 1995...

But.....but.....such an educated individual!!!!
§ 1968: Publishes collection of poetry

§ 1971: Graduates in medicine

§ 1983: Becomes team psychologist for Red Star Belgrade football club

§ 1990: Becomes president of Serbian Democratic Party

Profile: Radovan Karadzic



Did I mention that Democrats align themselves with this sort?

Seems exactly the right type of individual that would instill powerful feelings of enamorous bromance in Russia-loving Muslim-hating Republicans.

For 70 years the Democrat Party was protector and supporter of the Soviet Union....there was never any other love affair with any other political party.
Anti-Russia Actions by Trump…things that have directly and indirectly effected Russia

1.Bombed Russian ally, Syria, hitting Russian facilities killing a number of Russian military

2.Pulled out of the Iran deal…a Russian signee

3.Pulled out of Paris Accords….a Russian signee

4.Sanctions against Russia…460 sanctions against individuals and entities

5.Expelled Russian diplomats

6.Gave Ukraine Javelin anti-tank missiles to use against Russian proxies…Obama sent mittens

7. Obama….more flexible, Hillary ‘reset button,’ wouldn’t give Poland defensive missiles, Uranium one deal….

8. At the NATO meeting, he warned Germany not to make huge energy deals enriching Russia….

9. Trump created an energy juggernaut in the United States….a body-blow to the Russian economy. Anyone pro-fracking is anti-Russia.

10. And, of course, you dunce, first and foremost.....

Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????


QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.






A major problem for the Democrats is that their supporters...you...are so dumb you can't keep up with their changes in course.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...

Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun Un

I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.


Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?




Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?

Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.

Franklin Roosevelt began his love affair with Stalin in 1933.

You imagined that that was during WWII???
You must be a government school grad, huh?


Jot this down:

1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. One of his first official acts was to recognize the USSR, November 16th, 1933.

2. If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational: "Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.

Why did you say "one of his first offcal acts" when the U.S. recognized the U.S.S.R. in November? You ignore his first 100 days. So World War II can be ignored as well as this first amazing 8 months of Roosevelt's first administration. And yet no response concerning Kim Jun Un.

You aren't deny the fact....just quibbling over when he turned on America?

Pretty weak.


Now....where is your proof of a similar feat by Trump?

There isn't any....you're just a poor, sad, dunce.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...

Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun Un

I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.


Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?




Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?

Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.

Franklin Roosevelt began his love affair with Stalin in 1933.

You imagined that that was during WWII???
You must be a government school grad, huh?


Jot this down:

1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. One of his first official acts was to recognize the USSR, November 16th, 1933.

2. If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational: "Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.

Why did you say "one of his first offcal acts" when the U.S. recognized the U.S.S.R. in November? You ignore his first 100 days. So World War II can be ignored as well as this first amazing 8 months of Roosevelt's first administration. And yet no response concerning Kim Jun Un.

"... first amazing 8 months of Roosevelt's first administration."

You're not suggesting that that period was GOOD....are you????


You can't be that ignorant.

 

[Nosmo King]

Democrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...

Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun Un

I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.


Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?




Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?

Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.

Franklin Roosevelt began his love affair with Stalin in 1933.

You imagined that that was during WWII???
You must be a government school grad, huh?


Jot this down:

1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. One of his first official acts was to recognize the USSR, November 16th, 1933.

2. If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational: "Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.

Why did you say "one of his first offcal acts" when the U.S. recognized the U.S.S.R. in November? You ignore his first 100 days. So World War II can be ignored as well as this first amazing 8 months of Roosevelt's first administration. And yet no response concerning Kim Jun Un.

You aren't deny the fact....just quibbling over when he turned on America?

Pretty weak.


Now....where is your proof of a similar feat by Trump?

There isn't any....you're just a poor, sad, dunce.

While we're in the tall weeds...

Recognition of the U.S.S.R. does not amount to "turn[ing] against America" anymore than recognizing any other nation on the planet in 1933.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats have never meet a murdering genocidal Communist leader they dldn't look up to and try to emulate. ...

Check Donald Trump's public record of agreement with, if not outright praise of, Kim Jun Un

I believe he is more accurately referring to the near-intimate relationship between godfather of the modern Democrat Party and the pathological maniac, Stalin.

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.


Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?




Any similar statement by Trump vis-a-vis the emperor of the Hermit Kingdom?

Without historical context. Forgetting World War II is an intellectually stunted way to make a point on Stalin.

Franklin Roosevelt began his love affair with Stalin in 1933.

You imagined that that was during WWII???
You must be a government school grad, huh?


Jot this down:

1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. One of his first official acts was to recognize the USSR, November 16th, 1933.

2. If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational: "Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.

Why did you say "one of his first offcal acts" when the U.S. recognized the U.S.S.R. in November? You ignore his first 100 days. So World War II can be ignored as well as this first amazing 8 months of Roosevelt's first administration. And yet no response concerning Kim Jun Un.

You aren't deny the fact....just quibbling over when he turned on America?

Pretty weak.


Now....where is your proof of a similar feat by Trump?

There isn't any....you're just a poor, sad, dunce.

While we're in the tall weeds...

Recognition of the U.S.S.R. does not amount to "turn[ing] against America" anymore than recognizing any other nation on the planet in 1933.

So, the Soviet Union was just like 'any other nation on the planet in 1933"?????

In a firmament of stupid statements.....yours is right up there near the top.

Clearly you have less that zero knowledge of history.


Well, one might say, why didn't the previous President's agree prior to FDR...and what made him change US policy?
a. "On December 6, 1917, the U.S. Government broke off diplomatic relations with Russia, shortly after the Bolshevik Party seized power from the Tsarist regime after the “October Revolution.” President Woodrow Wilson decided to withhold recognition at that time because the new Bolshevik government had refused to honor prior debts to the United States incurred by the Tsarist government, ignored pre-existing treaty agreements with other nations, and seized American property in Russia following the October Revolution. The Bolsheviks had also concluded a separate peace with Germany at Brest-Litovsk in March 1918, ending Russian involvement in World War I."
http://history.state.gov/milestones/1921-1936/USSR

b. Bear in mind, eight months earlier, journalist Gareth Jones had exposed Stalin's Terror Famine: "In the train a Communist denied to me that there was a famine. I flung a crust of bread which I had been eating from my own supply into a spittoon. A peasant fellow-passenger fished it out and ravenously ate it." Gareth Jones (journalist) - Wikipedia

c. Malcolm Muggeridge " was the first writer to reveal the true nature of Stalin s regime when in 1933 he exposed the terror famine in the Ukraine. " Robot Check

Think Roosevelt knew?


Nor, it appears, do you have any knowledge of FDR's ...'interests'....in his fellow dictators, or his hatred of capitalists.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
If this is true, it’s welcome news.


Nancy Pelosi, just a day after going full Leroy Jenkins on the negotiations over the Wuhan virus relief bill, is now signaling that the House will pass whatever the Senate sends them. This follows Chuck Schumer reversing course last night and announcing he expects a deal done today as well.

Jamie Dupree
✔@jamiedupree


Judging from the Pelosi interview on CNBC, she's sending a message to House members - whatever the Senate passes is what should pass the House right away
88
10:03 AM - Mar 24, 2020

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins

She doesn't get to run from the damage she caused.

www.redstate.com

(Leeroy Jenkins is a word used to describe a person or thing that causes everything to go wrong for everyone else, usually in some extraordinary fashion. )

 

[Cecilie1200]

"Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
If this is true, it’s welcome news.


Nancy Pelosi, just a day after going full Leroy Jenkins on the negotiations over the Wuhan virus relief bill, is now signaling that the House will pass whatever the Senate sends them. This follows Chuck Schumer reversing course last night and announcing he expects a deal done today as well.

Jamie Dupree
✔@jamiedupree


Judging from the Pelosi interview on CNBC, she's sending a message to House members - whatever the Senate passes is what should pass the House right away
88
10:03 AM - Mar 24, 2020

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins

She doesn't get to run from the damage she caused.

www.redstate.com

(Leeroy Jenkins is a word used to describe a person or thing that causes everything to go wrong for everyone else, usually in some extraordinary fashion. )

Could be they realized that no one was in the mood to be polite about their excuses and lies this time.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
If this is true, it’s welcome news.


Nancy Pelosi, just a day after going full Leroy Jenkins on the negotiations over the Wuhan virus relief bill, is now signaling that the House will pass whatever the Senate sends them. This follows Chuck Schumer reversing course last night and announcing he expects a deal done today as well.

Jamie Dupree
✔@jamiedupree


Judging from the Pelosi interview on CNBC, she's sending a message to House members - whatever the Senate passes is what should pass the House right away
88
10:03 AM - Mar 24, 2020

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins

She doesn't get to run from the damage she caused.

www.redstate.com

(Leeroy Jenkins is a word used to describe a person or thing that causes everything to go wrong for everyone else, usually in some extraordinary fashion. )

Could be they realized that no one was in the mood to be polite about their excuses and lies this time.

I would have expected that one with near 150 years in the game, Pelosi, would have been able to anticipate that folks dying would not have the patience to put up with the sort of extortion she imposed.......


But....she didn't get to be the James Bond villain, Pelosi-galore, without this sort of criminal nature.

 

[DOTR]

Why does trump believe the economy is more important than human life?

This is the best defense against the OP that you can come up with?????

Its a question. Try answering it.

No it wasnt. It was a statement.

 

[DOTR]

"Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
If this is true, it’s welcome news.


Nancy Pelosi, just a day after going full Leroy Jenkins on the negotiations over the Wuhan virus relief bill, is now signaling that the House will pass whatever the Senate sends them. This follows Chuck Schumer reversing course last night and announcing he expects a deal done today as well.

Jamie Dupree
✔@jamiedupree


Judging from the Pelosi interview on CNBC, she's sending a message to House members - whatever the Senate passes is what should pass the House right away
88
10:03 AM - Mar 24, 2020

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins

She doesn't get to run from the damage she caused.

www.redstate.com

(Leeroy Jenkins is a word used to describe a person or thing that causes everything to go wrong for everyone else, usually in some extraordinary fashion. )

Could be they realized that no one was in the mood to be polite about their excuses and lies this time.

They have truly overplayed their hand this time.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins
If this is true, it’s welcome news.


Nancy Pelosi, just a day after going full Leroy Jenkins on the negotiations over the Wuhan virus relief bill, is now signaling that the House will pass whatever the Senate sends them. This follows Chuck Schumer reversing course last night and announcing he expects a deal done today as well.

Jamie Dupree
✔@jamiedupree


Judging from the Pelosi interview on CNBC, she's sending a message to House members - whatever the Senate passes is what should pass the House right away
88
10:03 AM - Mar 24, 2020

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Nancy Pelosi Signals Surrender on Relief Bill Just a Day After Going Full Leroy Jenkins

She doesn't get to run from the damage she caused.

www.redstate.com

(Leeroy Jenkins is a word used to describe a person or thing that causes everything to go wrong for everyone else, usually in some extraordinary fashion. )

Could be they realized that no one was in the mood to be polite about their excuses and lies this time.

They have truly overplayed their hand this time.

At this moment, we can all see that.....including their voters, the media, even the deaf and dumb.


My hope is that this same national feeling can be revived near November.

Then......they'll lose all 57 of Hussein's states.

 

[Hellbilly]

Why does trump believe the economy is more important than human life?

This is the best defense against the OP that you can come up with?????

Its a question. Try answering it.

No it wasnt. It was a statement.

This thing right here >? is called a question mark. It indicates a question. A statement is followed by a period >.

 

[DOTR]

Why does trump believe the economy is more important than human life?

This is the best defense against the OP that you can come up with?????

Its a question. Try answering it.

No it wasnt. It was a statement.

This thing right here >? is called a question mark. It indicates a question. A statement is followed by a period >.

You're an idiot?