jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,865
- 35,331
- 2,180
Their allegiance is with their home country!Yes I have. Did you?
An illegal immigrant is 'subject to the jurisdiction there of' where they come from.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Their allegiance is with their home country!Yes I have. Did you?
An illegal immigrant is 'subject to the jurisdiction there of' where they come from.
Sure you could. The rest of the words in the 14th you choose to ignore takes care of that. "within its jurisdiction"Which is about as stupid an argument you can make.
If they weren't subject to jurisdiction, you couldn't arrest them.
Case controls. Amendment controls. You may dream on at your leisure.Read the thread! Ain’t repeating posts in the same thread.
The baby that is born here? When was the swearing in?Their alliances are with their home country!
Nope. Please cite anyone but those protected by treaty that cannot be arrested in the US.Sure you could. The rest of the words in the 14th you choose to ignore takes care of that. "within its jurisdiction"
I live under US constitution. We have borders and you are far too stupid to ever grasp what the implications areCase controls. Amendment controls. You may dream on at your leisure.
I guess the real question is: what kind of country do you envision where being here doesn't mean you are an equal citizen.
Dude, read my posts In here.The baby that is born here? When was the swearing in?
You truly areHilarious fuckup
When one travels abroad, are they not subject to the laws of those states?I live under US constitution. We have borders and you are far too stupid to ever grasp what the implications are
do they become citizens?When one travels abroad, are they not subject to the laws of those states?
well yeah you did not read them and comprehend their meaning. You are taking demofks meanings and not the intent of the language by the author. That's why you need to go through the thread asshole. It's all in here.Nope. Please cite anyone but those protected by treaty that cannot be arrested in the US.
Not if someone isn't subject to jurisdiction. Then they can't be arrested. PLease cite anyone outside of a treaty that cannot be arrested in the US.I live under US constitution. We have borders and you are far too stupid to ever grasp what the implications are
it isn't in our constitution first off. And you didn't answer my question.First question, Is it in their constitution? Like it is in ours?
the grand jurors Trump supporters don't like talking about should be worried? They were an essential cog in our system of justice that came to conclusions at odds with Trump's hollow pleas of innocence. Making it necessary to demonize them. Will they be on Bondi's list to pay a price for performing their civic duty?
Mod Edit to comply with clean start rules given thread is to far along to close.
Again, you keep posting while we all told you to go read the thread. read the fking thread you useless excuse for a human being.Not if someone isn't subject to jurisdiction. Then they can't be arrested.
Again, you live your little dream bereft of legal precedent if you want.
Do you want to live in a country where not everyone is born equal?
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.it isn't in our constitution first off. And you didn't answer my question.
??? Anyone “within the jurisdiction” of the US can be arrested. You seem confusedNope. Please cite anyone but those protected by treaty that cannot be arrested in the US.
Diplomats under treaty cannot be. Please cite some case law to support your argument.??? Anyone “within the jurisdiction” of the US can be arrested. You seem confused