When trump's retribution tour begins, could someone tell me if....

[Rawley]

Wong vs. Kim directly addresses Elk:
The decision in Elk v. Wilkins concerned only members of the Indian tribes within the United States, and had no tendency to deny citizenship to children born in the United States of foreign parents of Caucasian, African or Mongolian descent not in the diplomatic service of a foreign country.


The real object of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, in qualifying the words, "All persons born in the United States" by the addition "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," would appear to have been to exclude, by the fewest and fittest words (besides children of members of the Indian tribes, standing in a peculiar relation to the National Government, unknown to the common law), the two classes of cases -- children born of alien enemies in hostile occupation and children of diplomatic representatives of a foreign State -- both of which, as has already been shown, by the law of England and by our own law from the time of the first settlement of the English colonies in America, had been recognized exceptions to the fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the country. Calvin's Case, 7 Rep. 1, 18b; Cockburn on Nationality, 7; Dicey Conflict of Laws, 177; Inglis v. Sailors' Snug Harbor, 3 Pet. 99, 28 U. S. 155; 2 Kent Com. 39, 42.

Rather weak distinction, but if you're happy with that.

How are you going to overcome the fact the Wong is limited to the children of legal permanent residents?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

You understand if there is no retribution tour it means you folks have been lied to, right?

Nope. That’s just what your “news” sources are telling you to believe

 

[Zincwarrior]

Rather weak distinction, but if you're happy with that.

How are you going to overcome the fact the Wong is limited to the children of legal permanent residents?

Its stood for more than 100 years.

 

[Delldude]

What case do you have to support your argument?

Trump said in a May 2023 campaign video: "On Day One of my new term in office, I will sign an executive order making clear to federal agencies that under the correct interpretation of the law, going forward, the future children of illegal immigrants will not receive automatic U.S. citizenship."

See you at SCOTUS.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Trump said in a May 2023 campaign video: "On Day One of my new term in office, I will sign an executive order making clear to federal agencies that under the correct interpretation of the law, going forward, the future children of illegal immigrants will not receive automatic U.S. citizenship."

See you at SCOTUS.

EOs are subordinate to laws which are subordinate to the Constitution

 

[Delldude]

EOs are subordinate to laws which are subordinate to the Constitution

They become law after 30 days on the federal register.

Dems will be in court in a heartbeat.

 

[Zincwarrior]

They become law after 30 days on the federal register.

Dems will be in court in a heartbeat.

No. They do not. Thats an admin reg, and admin regs do not trump the Constitution.

 

[Delldude]

No. They do not. Thats an admin reg, and admin regs do not trump the Constitution.

Meh.................

An executive order becomes law when it's issued and signed by the President of the United States:

Authority
The President's authority to issue executive orders comes from the Constitution and delegated powers from Congress.

• Effect
  Executive orders have the same force and effect as other federal laws, binding federal agencies.
  
  
  
• Publication
  Executive orders are published on the White House website and in the Federal Register.
  
  
  
• Judicial review
  Executive orders are subject to judicial review and can be declared unconstitutional by the court.
  
  

 

[sealybobo]

Naw, Carter took our education system from #1 to #24, created lower wages for Americans, did much more . As bad as budh
Was, he didn’t do that

Seems to me you are in favor of higher wages. Am I wrong?