When trump's retribution tour begins, could someone tell me if....

[otto105]

Wake up you clown.............Nixon's legacy was opening up China for world trade.....Clintstone gave China free trade status. Everyone in congress tripped over themselves kissing China's ass over investments.....screw the unions.


Thank you for supporting my claims of a failed US education system.

Sent via bipartisan lobbying.

Not according to the COTUS.

Birthright citizen ship is a lie.,

Birthright citizenship is in the US Constitution.

 

[jc456]

Birthright citizenship is in the US Constitution.

Lurch loves you…. Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

 

[Delldude]

Birthright citizenship is in the US Constitution.

Not how you think it is.

 

[otto105]

Lurch loves you…. Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Read the 14th Amendment fuckup.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Not how you think it is.

Have you read the Fourteenth Amendment?
AMENDMENT XIV

Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

 

[jc456]

Read the 14th Amendment fuckup.

You should read the thread in the forum, not gonna rehash twenty posts for your dumb ass. It’s called subjective to the jurisdiction thereof

 

[Delldude]

Read the 14th Amendment fuckup.

LoL.....

Tell us what does "subject to the jurisdiction there of" mean and how does it apply to people 'Born in the USA'?

 

[Delldude]

subject to the jurisdiction thereof,

Yes I have. Did you?
An illegal immigrant is 'subject to the jurisdiction there of' where they come from.

 

[Rawley]

Have you read the Fourteenth Amendment?
AMENDMENT XIV

Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Yup. Any particular reason you jumped over this qualification? "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,"

 

[otto105]

You should read the thread in the forum, not gonna rehas twenty posts for your dumb ass. It’s called subjective to the jurisdiction thereof

Yeah, it's clear in the amendment and doesn't include the shit you're making up about it.

Are people in our country/state not subject to its federal/state laws.

 

[otto105]

Yup. Any particular reason you jumped over this qualification? "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,"

Why do you think it means something that it doesn't.

 

[Delldude]

Are people in our country/state not subject to its federal/state laws.

Very good point Otto..... illegals are under the jurisdiction there of' the country they're from.

 

[Zincwarrior]

You should read the thread in the forum, not gonna rehas twenty posts for your dumb ass. It’s called subjective to the jurisdiction thereof

Which is about as stupid an argument you can make.

If they weren't subject to jurisdiction, you couldn't arrest them.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Very good point Otto..... illegals are under the jurisdiction there of' the country they're from.

No. Anyone in the US is subject to US jurisdiction absent treaty otherwise. Please show me where they have diplomatic immunity per treaty.

 

[otto105]

Very good point Otto..... illegals are under the jurisdiction there of' the country they're from.

Hilarious dell


Youn should lose some weight. The burgers are clogging your brain.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Yup. Any particular reason you jumped over this qualification? "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,"

Because its stupid. See post #473.

 

[otto105]

Which is about as stupid an argument you can make.

If they weren't subject to jurisdiction, you couldn't arrest them.

They wouldn't be illegal.

 

[Zincwarrior]

They wouldn't be illegal.

Exactly. Again the case that confirmed:

Constitution 101 Resources - 14.4 Primary Source: United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) | Constitution Center

Constitution 101 resource for 14.4 Primary Source: United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898)

constitutioncenter.org

 

[Delldude]

Exactly. Again the case that confirmed:

Miss this part:

To be “completely subject” to the political jurisdiction of the United States is to be in no respect or degree subject to the political jurisdiction of any other government. . . .

 

[jc456]

Which is about as stupid an argument you can make.

If they weren't subject to jurisdiction, you couldn't arrest them.

Read the thread! Ain’t repeating posts in the same thread.