When is an embryo/fetus a human life?

As though you give a shit once the fetus is born.
Thats why they are building more and more privatized mental institutions and prisons. They'll be taken care of.

And there will be lots of jobs for police rounding up undesirable elements, and lots of work for prison guards, the green baloney suppliers, and tons of money for lawyers, judges, and courts to make sure that injustice is done.

And if they are murdered in the street? No worries. They will be classified NHI, no human involved. Cased closed.
 
Last edited:
This is what you would force a woman to bring to term?

View attachment 1143693


What a guy!

1754061682951.webp
 
I'm not convinced that it is a human life from the moment of conception (given that it doesn't have a brain, for example), but at some point during pregnancy, I believe it qualifies as a human life.
why does it grow? and what does it grow into? why do you bozo's have such a hardtime with this? fk.
If people are merely arguing that it is a "potential life"
It is life, it wouldn't grow if it wasn't alive. do dead plants mature?
from the moment of conception, then preventing a potential life from coming into existence obviously isn't the same as taking a life from existence. (If that was true, then if a person only has 2 children when they have the ability to have 5 means they should be charged with 3 counts of murder, and we know that is absurd).
well here in the real world we don't use projection possibility as a crime. How does one even know such a thing? tell us oh wise one.
 
If only there was to measure this.

I support laws to protect children and their rights, regardless of their age, location, size, race, religion, creed, color, or level of development.

If you can't say the same, what does that say about YOU?
I support laws to protect women and their rights, regardless of those who wish to subordinate and punish them by limiting their choices.

You can't say the same because you're a misogynistic jerk.
 
I support laws to protect women and their rights, regardless of those who wish to subordinate and punish them by limiting their choices.

You can't say the same because you're a misogynistic jerk.
I can absolutely say that I support women's rights.

I simply believe a woman's rights begin when her life does, and not just when a ******* tard like you can't stomach or justify denying her rights (when she is a child) anymore.

Nobody (men or women) have the right to kill a child and shield it with a made up notion of "privacy" or "choice."
 
By that logic a tumor has consciousness.

Numbskull.
Are Tumors organisms?

Are they the Young or Offspring of their species?

Do Tumors have biological parents?


Wait. . . I mean outside of YOUR family.
 
It takes a real jerk to so blatantly ignore..
Right,

So ignore the point I was making and report it.

May the mods agree that it was not an actual attack but just a measured does of sarcasm to shake the tard into some realization of how tumors are not organisms.
 
Are Tumors organisms? Are they the Young or Offspring of their species? Do Tumors have biological parents?
To answer your questions, yes, yes, and yes.

An embryo relies on its host, the mother, for survival and growth in the same way that cancerous tumors are parasitic organisms. Each one is a new species that, like most parasites, depends on its host for food, and can replicate, but otherwise operates independently and often to the detriment of its host.


Wait. . . I mean outside of YOUR family.
Ha ha.
 
Last edited:
When it breathes, which can easily be proven to anyone alive.
 
Now thats dumb.

Even if it was an unintended pregnancy from a deliberate choice to have sex thats still not your decision to make. What if the father was you? If I was that zygote or fetus "with rights" I would demand my right not to be born.

What should be aborted is this anti woman, anti civil rights, anti liberty, bastard child of politics and religion.
B.S, you are using emotions in an intellectual argument, her choice yep she made it knowing full well what could happen as did the man both participated and the child is equally the fathers but he gets no rights, nada. If she decides to keep the baby he is on the hook financially, and rightfully so. But should he want to keep his unborn child, no rights. Don't bother with she carries it, she also knew that going in, it's barbaric for civilized society, to still be murdering children in the womb, were it not a political bellwether for democrats they wouldn't care
 
B.S, you are using emotions in an intellectual argument, her choice yep she made it knowing full well what could happen as did the man both participated and the child is equally the fathers but he gets no rights, nada. If she decides to keep the baby he is on the hook financially, and rightfully so. But should he want to keep his unborn child, no rights. Don't bother with she carries it, she also knew that going in, it's barbaric for civilized society, to still be murdering children in the womb, were it not a political bellwether for democrats they wouldn't care
Ahem.

Who is using emotions in an intellectual argument?
 
15th post
Facts are not emotions! It is absolutely Barbaric to rip babies form the womb, why am I not surprised you don't get it!
Barbaric to rip babies from the womb? Not emotional? Okey dokey.

Im not surprised you don't get that its none of your business what is private information between a woman and her doctor and an extremely personal decision for the woman involved, which is not yours to make.

Drama queen.
 
Ha ha.

an embryo relies on its host, the mother, for survival and growth in the same way that cancerous tumors are parasitic organisms. Each one is a new species that, like most parasites, depends on its host for food, but otherwise operates independently and often to the detriment of its host.

Barbaric to rip babies from the womb? Not emotional? Okey dokey.

Im not surprised you don't get that its none of your business what is private information between a woman and her doctor and an extremely personal decision for the woman involved, which is not yours to make.

Drama queen.
Children have a right to the equal protection of our laws.

True or false?
 
No. Children do not have the same rights as adults. Am I telling you something that you didn't already know?
Reading comprehension is not your thing.

Do you really not see that I specified "equal protection" and said nothing about "the same rights" that you are trying to argue against?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom