When I started this thread, I was mostly interested in having having access to all the supprressed negative information, but I think I'd have to add that I'd also need to see all the actual statistical date in an unmanipulated format.
You're correct deaths with patients having COVID are reported as COVID deaths even though they may have died principally from some other cause, however characterizing the VAERS data as "6,000 have died from COMPLICATIONS from the shots", is highly misleading, the VAERS data doesn't represent that, even if it did the fact that we've administered somewhere around 300 MILLION shots would indicate the vaccines are very safe (0.002% mortality rate).
Your information here is contingent on the way the MSM and big pharma present the information.You're correct deaths with patients having COVID are reported as COVID deaths even though they may have died principally from some other cause, however characterizing the VAERS data as "6,000 have died from COMPLICATIONS from the shots", is highly misleading, the VAERS data doesn't represent that, even if it did the fact that we've administered somewhere around 300 MILLION shots would indicate the vaccines are very safe (0.002% mortality rate).
Do you have more reliable information than what's being published in the VAERS database? The VAERS data is submitted by healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers (Pharma) and by the general public, what source(s) do you prefer to rely on?Your information here is contingent on the way the MSM and big pharma present the information.You're correct deaths with patients having COVID are reported as COVID deaths even though they may have died principally from some other cause, however characterizing the VAERS data as "6,000 have died from COMPLICATIONS from the shots", is highly misleading, the VAERS data doesn't represent that, even if it did the fact that we've administered somewhere around 300 MILLION shots would indicate the vaccines are very safe (0.002% mortality rate).
Do you have more reliable information than what's being published in the VAERS database? The VAERS data is submitted by healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers (Pharma) and by the general public, what source(s) do you prefer to rely on?Your information here is contingent on the way the MSM and big pharma present the information.You're correct deaths with patients having COVID are reported as COVID deaths even though they may have died principally from some other cause, however characterizing the VAERS data as "6,000 have died from COMPLICATIONS from the shots", is highly misleading, the VAERS data doesn't represent that, even if it did the fact that we've administered somewhere around 300 MILLION shots would indicate the vaccines are very safe (0.002% mortality rate).
The vairs data is not an accurate representation of how many deaths from covid shots are happening, but one can use it to statistically extrapolate some estimates.Do you have more reliable information than what's being published in the VAERS database? The VAERS data is submitted by healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers (Pharma) and by the general public, what source(s) do you prefer to rely on?Your information here is contingent on the way the MSM and big pharma present the information.You're correct deaths with patients having COVID are reported as COVID deaths even though they may have died principally from some other cause, however characterizing the VAERS data as "6,000 have died from COMPLICATIONS from the shots", is highly misleading, the VAERS data doesn't represent that, even if it did the fact that we've administered somewhere around 300 MILLION shots would indicate the vaccines are very safe (0.002% mortality rate).
Where are you getting the "only 1 percent is even reported" historical data? I haven't seen that figure, nor have I seen anything indicating that it relates to what's being reported with respect to VAERS post covid-vaccination data, after all you can't reliably know what's NOT contained in a given dataset unless you have another dataset to compare it to, what's the other dataset?
How do you know this? Where are you getting the data that supports this conclusion?Do you have more reliable information than what's being published in the VAERS database? The VAERS data is submitted by healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers (Pharma) and by the general public, what source(s) do you prefer to rely on?Your information here is contingent on the way the MSM and big pharma present the information.You're correct deaths with patients having COVID are reported as COVID deaths even though they may have died principally from some other cause, however characterizing the VAERS data as "6,000 have died from COMPLICATIONS from the shots", is highly misleading, the VAERS data doesn't represent that, even if it did the fact that we've administered somewhere around 300 MILLION shots would indicate the vaccines are very safe (0.002% mortality rate).The vairs data is not an accurate representation of how many deaths from covid shots are happening, but one can use it to statistically extrapolate some estimates.Do you have more reliable information than what's being published in the VAERS database? The VAERS data is submitted by healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers (Pharma) and by the general public, what source(s) do you prefer to rely on?Your information here is contingent on the way the MSM and big pharma present the information.You're correct deaths with patients having COVID are reported as COVID deaths even though they may have died principally from some other cause, however characterizing the VAERS data as "6,000 have died from COMPLICATIONS from the shots", is highly misleading, the VAERS data doesn't represent that, even if it did the fact that we've administered somewhere around 300 MILLION shots would indicate the vaccines are very safe (0.002% mortality rate).
Actually given the caveat I pointed out earlier the number of deaths reported post vaccination would be artificially HIGH on VAERS with respect to deaths that are actually related to the vaccine, because as I said it's not taking into account the actual cause of death, just that death occurred after receiving a dose.
This is what the msm and big lefty politics exploit to portray the likely true number that we don't know as being lower or non existent. Statistically, especially when comparing other vaccines in their database, there is a significant number of deaths that were "likely" caused by the covid vaccines.
It's unclear as to what your point is here, you seem to be discounting the fact that a "covid death with the vaccine" is still reported as a post-vaccination death on VAERS, once again VAERS does NOT take actual cause of death into account, just that the death occurred after a dose of the vaccine has been administered.
paleofam.com
You're correct deaths with patients having COVID are reported as COVID deaths even though they may have died principally from some other cause, however characterizing the VAERS data as "6,000 have died from COMPLICATIONS from the shots", is highly misleading, the VAERS data doesn't represent that, even if it did the fact that we've administered somewhere around 300 MILLION shots would indicate the vaccines are very safe (0.002% mortality rate).
Awesome! thanks for sharing the information, I'll give that Harvard Study Report a read and let you know what I think.
"The report showed that vaccine injury reports through VAERS were less than 1 percent of the actual number. According to the CDC, only about 30,000 adverse events are reported for the entire US annually through VAERS. In three years, the Harvard study showed about 35,570 adverse events in the small population of 376,452 in Massachusetts. This amounted to an adverse event every 38.46 vaccinations (or 2.6 percent of vaccinations).
This was clearly alarming and would have rocked the entire industry if given the light of day. Vaccine adverse events are supposed to be rare; they shouldn’t occur in over 2 percent of shots. So, the CDC buried the study and cut ties with the researchers."
It's True, Less Than 1% of Vaccine Adverse Effects Are Reported - Paleo Family
Vaccine safety has been a topic of concern for decades since the US government initiated...
This is an interesting report, however the conclusions regarding underreporting don't differentiate "adverse reactions" from "deaths", I suspect that's because it's A LOT harder to determine an "adverse reaction" to a vaccine than it is to determine "death occurred after receiving a dose".
"The report showed that vaccine injury reports through VAERS were less than 1 percent of the actual number. According to the CDC, only about 30,000 adverse events are reported for the entire US annually through VAERS. In three years, the Harvard study showed about 35,570 adverse events in the small population of 376,452 in Massachusetts. This amounted to an adverse event every 38.46 vaccinations (or 2.6 percent of vaccinations).
This was clearly alarming and would have rocked the entire industry if given the light of day. Vaccine adverse events are supposed to be rare; they shouldn’t occur in over 2 percent of shots. So, the CDC buried the study and cut ties with the researchers."
It's True, Less Than 1% of Vaccine Adverse Effects Are Reported - Paleo Family
Vaccine safety has been a topic of concern for decades since the US government initiated...
This is an interesting report, however the conclusions regarding underreporting don't differentiate "adverse reactions" from "deaths", I suspect that's because it's A LOT harder to determine an "adverse reaction" to a vaccine than it is to determine "death occurred after receiving a dose".
"The report showed that vaccine injury reports through VAERS were less than 1 percent of the actual number. According to the CDC, only about 30,000 adverse events are reported for the entire US annually through VAERS. In three years, the Harvard study showed about 35,570 adverse events in the small population of 376,452 in Massachusetts. This amounted to an adverse event every 38.46 vaccinations (or 2.6 percent of vaccinations).
This was clearly alarming and would have rocked the entire industry if given the light of day. Vaccine adverse events are supposed to be rare; they shouldn’t occur in over 2 percent of shots. So, the CDC buried the study and cut ties with the researchers."
It's True, Less Than 1% of Vaccine Adverse Effects Are Reported - Paleo Family
Vaccine safety has been a topic of concern for decades since the US government initiated...
In any case, it's clear that the number of deaths after receiving a dose is under-reported since (these are VERY rough numbers):
At this point, we would have to inject another HUGE assumption regarding what the ACTUAL percentage of those deaths occurred directly or indirectly as a result of receiving the vaccine to arrive at some ballpark guesstimate of the actual mortality rate (I'm not going to even attempt that since I have no data to provide basis for it).
- Using the average number of deaths per day in the U.S. to estimate the number of deaths that occurred between Dec 2020 thru May 2021 we would expect to have had 1,415,344 deaths occur in the U.S.
- A quick search for the number of individuals that have received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine is : 172,054,276 or approximately 52% of the U.S. population (330 MILLION)
- Thus if we just assume the 1% reporting (which I believe is low due to the reason I already stated) we would arrive at approximately 312,000 deaths for individuals that have received at least one dose, this is a bit screwy since it doesn't take demographics into account and assumes an even distribution of individuals receiving at least one dose.
- Then another HUGE assumption, that every death is a direct or indirect result of the vaccine, we would arrive at a 0.18133% mortality rate
Personally, I think that comparing an (likely VERY high) estimated 0.18133% mortality rate of the vaccine comparing to a (more accurate but probably still high) estimated 1.8% mortality rate of COVID in the U.S. makes the vaccine a safe bet, but of course that's just a highly subjective conclusion.
Feel free to check my logic and my math, but I think it takes us tiny step closer to seeing the actual picture than we would be if we just looked at the VAERS data in isolation.
Anyways, thanks again for sharing the Harvard Study Report, it was enlightening.
Nonsense. Messenger RNA vaccines remains in the cell cytoplasm for just a few days teaching the cells how to produce the spike protein. If you are infected with SARS-CoV-2, your immune system recognizes the same spike protein and will induce an immune response to fight the virus which includes the production of antibodies. If you are never exposed to SARS-CoV-2 you will not develop a immune response.
