What will trump do after another school shooting on his watch ?

I only care about facts as they relate to the meme you posted.

republicans vote against post born children as evidenced by their voting.


remove lead pipes from schools?

no.


keep SNAP available to children?

no.


free school lunch?


no.


healthcare?

no.


cuts to WIC?

yes
 
Its almost like mentally ill people shouldn't be allowed to purchase firearms..... oh wait there not this is because libtards don't classify this as a mental illness.....
 
republicans vote against post born children as evidenced by their voting.


remove lead pipes from schools?

no.


keep SNAP available to children?

no.


free school lunch?


no.


healthcare?

no.


cuts to WIC?

yes
Cool. Now let's discuss the meme you posted wherein Republicans are portrayed as those who love the unborn but hate the children. Given that pro-choice people regard the unborn as not-life, not-human or not-a-person, my response to that is that Democrats love children but hate the unborn.

Fair enough?
 
Did I quote the wrong post?
I have no idea. But I will say that in 0311's post, he conflated the quote in the article he cited to mean the guy was saying the murder of these children was a great victory. Chuz Life advised him that context matters, meaning he felt that 0311 took the guy's words out of context.
0311 then took Chuz's remark about context and conflated that to mean that Chuz broached context in regard to the shooting itself which was intellectually dishonest.
 
The thread title is fake and not a clean start and is instigation
Trump does not have a “watch” over the schools.
 
My guess is nothing.The slaughter will continue.

Of coutse he was quickly in with t and ps but that is not really ation is it ?
Maybe anericas tots should club their pocket money to buy some action from the orange blob ?
Perhaps that would get a result ?



Mass public shootings are the rarest of rare crimes in the U.S.......there were only two last year....out of 350 million people......meanwhile....


Europe...

In the 1920s, they began the process of registering guns....to make their people safer. That was the lie. by the mid 1930s, the socialists in Germany began the process of banning and confiscating guns, and the same for the countries they defeated......using the gun registration lists created in the 1920s....

By 1939, the German socialists began to murder 15 million - 20 million people....in 6 years.....men, women and over 1 million children.

6 years, 15 million- 20 million murdered citizens..not war dead, innocent people rounded up and murdered in camps and forests....

Including 1 million children

15 million in 6 years.

In the United States, gun murder for our entire 247 year history?

Around 2,470,000

Europe.... 15-20 million murdered in 6 years.

U.S..... 2,470,000 murdered in 247 years

How many hundreds of years will it take the U.S. to catch up with the number of Europeans murdered by their governments.....
 
My guess is nothing.The slaughter will continue.

Of coutse he was quickly in with t and ps but that is not really ation is it ?
Maybe anericas tots should club their pocket money to buy some action from the orange blob ?
Perhaps that would get a result ?


shouldn't you be more worried about all the young girls your immigrants are raping in your country? Several hundred thousand over the last. 10 years........so...
 
My guess is nothing.The slaughter will continue.

Of coutse he was quickly in with t and ps but that is not really ation is it ?
Maybe anericas tots should club their pocket money to buy some action from the orange blob ?
Perhaps that would get a result ?



Americans with our guns save more lives than democrat party, mentally ill trans people take .........

How many hundreds of years will it take the U.S. to catch up with the number of Europeans murdered by their governments.....

Lives saved....based on research? By law abiding gun owners using guns to stop criminals?



Case Closed: Kleck Is Still Correct



There are roughly 100,000 people shot in the United States yearly, and something over 30,000 die. If this 1/3 vs. 2/3 ratio of deaths to injuries in actual shootings pertains in these DGUs, that makes for at least 176,000 lives saved—less some attackers who lost their lives to defenders. This enormous benefit dwarfs, both in human and economic terms, the losses trumpeted by hoplophobes who only choose to see the risk side of the equation.



https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/06/case-closed-kleck-is-still-correct/
 
republicans vote against post born children as evidenced by their voting.


remove lead pipes from schools?

no.


keep SNAP available to children?

no.


free school lunch?


no.


healthcare?

no.


cuts to WIC?

yes

None of what you just posted is true.......they are removing criminals from the SNAP program, not legitimate users, they are not removing lunch or healthcare and the only cuts to WIC are criminals who are stealing it, and not allowing them to use it for junk food....so they eat healthy food.....you dope.
 
shouldn't you be more worried about all the young girls your immigrants are raping in your country? Several hundred thousand over the last. 10 years........so...
The girls are not allowed to defend themselves. Arm the women.
 

'We had an unbelievable victory today': MAGA host celebrates after MN mass shooting.​


Children are dead and this MAGA MAGGOT calls their murders a victory.
Trump will do nothing.
 
Sure, hire guards. I never opposed that at all. I'm just saying that if a teacher wants to be the last line of defense for his/her students, they should be able to qualify to have at least the option of non-lethal means of protection.

Where did I ever say anything about PE teachers? That's a you thing.
MAGAS hate teachers but now want them to be Rambo.
 
15th post
Cool. Now let's discuss the meme you posted wherein Republicans are portrayed as those who love the unborn but hate the children. Given that pro-choice people regard the unborn as not-life,

human DNA ... 'life ' as in alive human DNA ... up to a point.


not-human

false


not-a-person,

after viability then it is indeed a 'person' ... per roe v wade.

howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrr........... by (R) standards & by today's so called (R) supreme court ... a corporation os more of a person than the person with the uterus.


my response to that is that Democrats love children but hate the unborn.

Fair enough?

nope. 'cause it's false. as evidenced by what i posted.
 
That's stupid. Why not just be a rational human being and hire guards.... not PE teachers with a glock? I really dont know what is wrong with you fantasy bros thinking some teacher qualifies as protection. Just hire guards are mobilize the national guards. PE teachers with guns... what is y'all's deal?
Mobilize the National Guard??????????????????


FASCIST!
 
human DNA ... 'life ' as in alive human DNA ... up to a point.

What point?

Some pro-choice people don't believe fetuses are human.
after viability then it is indeed a 'person' ... per roe v wade.

What makes a fetus not viable?
howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrr........... by (R) standards & by today's so called (R) supreme court ... a corporation os more of a person than the person with the uterus.

Are we talking about fetuses or womens' rights?
nope. 'cause it's false. as evidenced by what i posted.
But you haven't posted evidence to support the idea that Republicans love fetuses but hate children.

You can't have it both ways. If you're going to post a silly meme that's rooted in emotion and not facts, you can't very well ask for evidence when someone responds in kind.

My response to your meme was in direct contradiction of the idea in the meme and was meant to make a point. I in fact do not believe Democrats hate fetuses any more than I believe Republicans hate children. But it is a fact that many pro-choice people view fetuses as either non-life, non-human or non-person.
 
What point?

viability. per roe v wade.

Some pro-choice people don't believe fetuses are human.

m'kay ... & most pro birth are not pro life.


What makes a fetus not viable?

when that zygote, embryo. early gestational fetus cannot survive outside the womb.

Are we talking about fetuses or womens' rights?

there can only be one final decision & that belongs to the post born female who has a life history already in place.

But you haven't posted evidence to support the idea that Republicans love fetuses but hate children.

the BBB & doge cuts should fit right in here...

You can't have it both ways.

not happening.


If you're going to post a silly meme that's rooted in emotion and not facts, you can't very well ask for evidence when someone responds in kind.

uh-huh.

My response to your meme was in direct contradiction of the idea in the meme and was meant to make a point. I in fact do not believe Democrats hate fetuses any more than I believe Republicans hate children. But it is a fact that many pro-choice people view fetuses as either non-life, non-human or non-person.

okey dokey.
 
Back
Top Bottom