My first draft of my stump speech.

I still have great character. I am a genius. I am highly functional. I care.
Because I have been around people who have it tough it will make me better be compassionate for people who have it tough. On the other hand, I am not a socialist; I want no war to do against the rich.

Please debate my policy and what you think I should change about it.
 
I still have great character. I am a genius. I am highly functional. I care.
Because I have been around people who have it tough it will make me better be compassionate for people who have it tough. On the other hand, I am not a socialist; I want no war to do against the rich.

Please debate my policy and what you think I should change about it.
.

Oh no ... Like I mentioned ... You are spot on for what we have planned.
We don't want to debate your policies ... And we're looking forward to the chat we'll have during the helicopter ride.

.
 
Too much for me to answer all of it. But this caught my eye:
Second Ammendment
Gun control – we have a gun that can knock someone unconscious for 40 minutes without killing them.
No problem as an option. But I am guessing (CMiIW) that in some way this would be a mandatory replacement for lethal guns?

I can't agree with that. Only the law-abiding would abide by that law - the eternal problem of gun and other controls. Criminals would come to rob me with a lethal gun, and have no reason to be afraid of my knock-em-out-humanely gun. If I pulled my Knocker Outer, what prevents him from simply shooting, hoping that he pulls the trigger first? If I get him first, he will wake up knowing that in a society that bans shooting killers to prevent them from killing, he will be treated kindly, likely confined in comfort until he can convince some board that he is harmless.
We could have cameras and microphones that monitor people for crime but no human can access the footage until an AI verifies criminal intent or a crime committed.
No government powerful enough to enforce either of those would go along with not being allowed to access the footage to monitor for dissent.
Then with guns we can invent guns where you are only allowed to shoot in true defense (so nobody will be able to shoot in offense).
I wouldn't trust that to know that I was defending myself and allow me to shoot. Just like I don't trust Smith and Wesson's little built-in lock to not mess me up at exactly the wrong time.
Killing animals shooting men – So if you have the first gun I mentioned that can knock someone unconscious for 40 minutes, and hopefully then you’ll have the police drag them away, if you use it on an animal you can then peacefully slit its throat.
Or . . . save a lot of tax dollars by allowing the animal to live and training it to be my personal protection, and then slitting the man's throat and having the people from the Soylent Green factory drag him away.


We will gradually seek to replace guns with better guns, as there is no disadvantage.
Meaning we won't ban lethal guns, just allow them to lose popularity and rust to uselessness?

Guns last a long time when properly cared for. Generations, in fact.
 
.

Oh no ... Like I mentioned ... You are spot on for what we have planned.
We don't want to debate your policies ... And we're looking forward to the chat we'll have during the helicopter ride.

.
OK; if I hear a helicopter I'll come outside.
 
Too much for me to answer all of it. But this caught my eye:

No problem as an option. But I am guessing (CMiIW) that in some way this would be a mandatory replacement for lethal guns?

I can't agree with that. Only the law-abiding would abide by that law - the eternal problem of gun and other controls. Criminals would come to rob me with a lethal gun, and have no reason to be afraid of my knock-em-out-humanely gun. If I pulled my Knocker Outer, what prevents him from simply shooting, hoping that he pulls the trigger first? If I get him first, he will wake up knowing that in a society that bans shooting killers to prevent them from killing, he will be treated kindly, likely confined in comfort until he can convince some board that he is harmless.

No government powerful enough to enforce either of those would go along with not being allowed to access the footage to monitor for dissent.

I wouldn't trust that to know that I was defending myself and allow me to shoot. Just like I don't trust Smith and Wesson's little built-in lock to not mess me up at exactly the wrong time.

Or . . . save a lot of tax dollars by allowing the animal to live and training it to be my personal protection, and then slitting the man's throat and having the people from the Soylent Green factory drag him away.
First, we open source computer code in government.
Second, we build AI camera and microphone that can monitor for crime but no one can see the details unless a crime is in progress. Everyone can see the source code. It can go detective. So a law-abiding citizen has privacy.
Third, we invent guns that are hooked up to the cameras for defense only. So no good person has any limits on their use of guns, as is already the case.
Fourth, we attempt to gather up the old guns. Nobody should need to shoot someone for no reason. That prevents bad.

I know this can be considered heavy government, but preventing murder is heavy too.
 
Remember, the AI camera and mic could be specifically voted on and configured in families, cities, states and government. And has transparent/open-source code.
 
.

Oh no ... Like I mentioned ... You are spot on for what we have planned.
We don't want to debate your policies ... And we're looking forward to the chat we'll have during the helicopter ride.

.
Noo! That's not nice.
 
Said the person who won't even pick a topic to look at.
As I said: your enormously verbose OP was just too long.

What “topics?” I don’t know; I didn’t read your multi-volume OP

Maybe (spitballing here) you could (oh, I don’t know; let’s get creative for a second) PICK a topic and then address THAT topic. when you offer an OP.
 
As I said: your enormously verbose OP was just too long.

What “topics?” I don’t know; I didn’t read your multi-volume OP

Maybe (spitballing here) you could (oh, I don’t know; let’s get creative for a second) PICK a topic and then address THAT topic. when you offer an OP.
OK; do #23 with #25
 
OK; do #23 with #25
LoL!

You're good "Catatonic."

So, who are you really?

1738288233379.webp
 
Remember, the AI camera and mic could be specifically voted on and configured in families, cities, states and government. And has transparent/open-source code.
.

Remember ... Hell, that was one of the best ideas you had.

That and the knockout gun really set you apart from the crowd.
Although the average is closer to 32 minutes than the 40 minutes you mentioned ...
Depending on body weight of course.

You just go about your business as usual ... We're still ironing a few details out.
We've just installed AI on all your devices, and it'll keep track of you until we come to pick you up.
Nothing to worry about.

Oh ... And hey ... Don't be surprised if this thread disappears.
We're thinking you might want to fine tune your message while we cover a few things on our own.

.
 
.

Remember ... Hell, that was one of the best ideas you had.

That and the knockout gun really set you apart from the crowd.
Although the average is closer to 32 minutes than the 40 minutes you mentioned ...
Depending on body weight of course.

You just go about your business as usual ... We're still ironing a few details out.
We've just installed AI on all your devices, and it'll keep track of you until we come to pick you up.
Nothing to worry about.

Oh ... And hey ... Don't be surprised if this thread disappears.
We're thinking you might want to fine tune your message while we cover a few things on our own.

.
Don't do that..
 
I do have mental problems, but I am trying to create a benevolent system that is fair and prosperous. I do see problems with many people not being able to control their lives, including myself
If you had no mental problems, and I asked you if you thought it was prudent to elect a leader of the free world that has mental problems, what would your answer be?
Don't you think you should get a handle on your mental issues like anger BEFORE you run for office?
Wanting a benevolent system is commendable. Perhaps you could serve on a little lower level, a food bank perhaps, or Goodwill, or an animal shelter, and put your kindness to work and make a difference there until you are mentally fit enough to tackle a more stressful position. :smiliehug:
 
Last edited:
Last time I was out hiking in the woods, I gave a stump speech.

I figured it was the least I could do considering that I was peeing on it at the time.
 
If you had no mental problems, and I asked you if you thought it was prudent to elect a leader of the free world that has mental problems, what would your answer be?
Don't you think you should get a handle on your mental issues like anger BEFORE you run for office?
Wanting a benevolent system is commendable. Perhaps you could serve on a little lower level, a food bank perhaps, or Goodwill, or an animal shelter, and put your kindness to work and make a difference there until you are mentally fit enough to tackle a more stressful position. :smiliehug:
I'm not diagnosed with anger issues it's just important to be in control of your words and not many people can do it so I'm working on it and will hopefully be in control in time.

As for my actual issues, I am still very highly sane, so they should not pose a problem, but we'll have to find a way to do a trial run first.

I can help at the very top, so I am trying to run everywhere , including at the very top. And I'm running every 4 years.
 
Last edited:
On another website I posted my idea in 4 threads and I've been getting a lot of feedback, some quite positive, all day.
 
I'm running for president every 4 years for the rest of my life. I might run for other things as well.

I won't be doxxed. My strategy is to go through the electoral college.

If I lose my temper, I am not running until I am calmed down again. Same with being president.
Let us know when you officially get on the ballot of any of the states.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom