What will summer bring?

[westwall]

Since the aerosols would settle in that time, but the CO2 would still be there, the temperature would do more than creep up. The PT extinction and KT extinctions are proof of that.

The CO2 residence time is far shorter than the time it takes for the particulate matter to filter back out of the atmosphere.

CO2, in the concentrations we enjoy in OUR atmosphere, does nothing but feed the plants.

You know, the foundation of all life on this planet.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That's not a commitment to swear under oath that data is not fudged....

Find your own data, p*ussy, and we'll compare it to mine.

When you run away, I'll swear under oath that you're a gutless moron.

 

[EMH]

Find your own data, p*ussy, and we'll compare it to mine.

When you run away, I'll swear under oath that you're a gutless moron.

You are a traitor.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You are a traitor.

P*ussy says what?

I can't hear you while you're running away instead of posting data.

 

[westwall]

You are a traitor.

Screeches the anti semite

 

[EMH]

P*ussy says what?

I can't hear you while you're running away instead of posting data.

So let's set the record straight here.

Pluto SAP increases as it gets closer to Sun = warmer
Mars SAP increases as it gets closer to Sun = warmer

but somehow Earth doesn't do that?

LOL!!

Even though the northern hemisphere data says it does...

and the only "evidence" it doesn't is your and WU's fudge of SAP from Sydney... posted after being busted for posting fudge that said the highest SAP on Earth was over land a mile high, and you admitted that was wrong - fudged fraud.


So you were busted lying and posting fudge to prevent CO2 FRAUD from being busted, and then your second "data" set should be trusted even though the other planets refute it?

And all forms of air pressure are correlate with temperature...


LOL!!!


No wonder you won't go under oath about the fudged Sydney SAP...


and yes, you truly do suck at basic science...

 

[EMH]

Screeches the anti semite

Card tossing is for those who suck at basic science...

 

[westwall]

Card tossing is for those who suck at basic science...

Like you. Anytime your "science" is challenged, you immediately revert to "you're a JOOOO LOVER!"

GFY, you clown.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So let's set the record straight here.

Pluto SAP increases as it gets closer to Sun = warmer
Mars SAP increases as it gets closer to Sun = warmer

but somehow Earth doesn't do that?

LOL!!

Even though the northern hemisphere data says it does...

and the only "evidence" it doesn't is your and WU's fudge of SAP from Sydney... posted after being busted for posting fudge that said the highest SAP on Earth was over land a mile high, and you admitted that was wrong - fudged fraud.


So you were busted lying and posting fudge to prevent CO2 FRAUD from being busted, and then your second "data" set should be trusted even though the other planets refute it?

And all forms of air pressure are correlate with temperature...


LOL!!!


No wonder you won't go under oath about the fudged Sydney SAP...


and yes, you truly do suck at basic science...

Pluto SAP increases as it gets closer to Sun = warmer
Mars SAP increases as it gets closer to Sun = warmer

Right.
Because Pluto has frozen nitrogen that turns to gas when it warms.
Because Mars has frozen carbon dioxide that turns to gas when it warms.

but somehow Earth doesn't do that?

Right.
Because Earth has no frozen nitrogen or frozen carbon dioxide that turns to gas when it warms

Even though the northern hemisphere data says it does...

Northern Hemisphere SAP doesn't increase when it's warmer in the Northern Hemisphere.

Show me that Southern Hemisphere SAP increases when it's warmer in the Southern Hemisphere.

Or run away.....p*ussy.

 

[EMH]

Because Earth has no frozen nitrogen or frozen carbon dioxide that turns to gas when it warms

So when ice on Antarctica or Greenland melts, no gas is released?

LOL!!!

How did they get CO2 readings from ice cores?

LOL!!!

Northern Hemisphere SAP doesn't increase when it's warmer in the Northern Hemisphere.

Correct because that is when Earth is furthest from Sun and hence Earth's temp is "coolest" during the year there, during northern hemisphere summer.

If local temps dictated SAP, we'd have huge variances, and we don't.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So when ice on Antarctica or Greenland melts, no gas is released?

LOL!!!

How did they get CO2 readings from ice cores?

LOL!!!





Correct because that is when Earth is furthest from Sun and hence Earth's temp is "coolest" during the year there, during northern hemisphere summer.

If local temps dictated SAP, we'd have huge variances, and we don't.

So when ice on Antarctica or Greenland melts, no gas is released?

A tiny bit.

Is that why, when it's warmer in the northern hemisphere, released Greenland gas causes SAP to decline in the northern hemisphere?
Is that why, when it's warmer in the southern hemisphere, released Antarctica gas causes SAP to decline in the southern hemisphere?

Correct because that is when Earth is furthest from Sun and hence Earth's temp is "coolest" during the year there, during northern hemisphere summer.

When the northern hemisphere receives more solar energy, SAP drops there.
When the southern hemisphere receives more solar energy, SAP drops there.

Do you need me to testify under oath to those facts?

If local temps dictated SAP, we'd have huge variances, and we don't.

Post some local data and we can check.

 

[EMH]

A tiny bit.

Really, so if the top layer is 12 inches of snow originally, that is 11 inches of gas originally. A mile down, it becomes compressed to a small fraction of an inch. A "tiny bit" of 8 million cubic miles of atmospheric gas compressed 50+ fold.... LOL....400 million cubic miles of gas at surface air pressure....

Is that why, when it's warmer in the northern hemisphere, released Greenland gas causes SAP to decline in the northern hemisphere?
Is that why, when it's warmer in the southern hemisphere, released Antarctica gas causes SAP to decline in the southern hemisphere?

That's the scariest part of the truth of the southern hemisphere data here, AA and Greenland aren't "melting," both are adding ice every year. The circular ellipse that is Earth's orbit doesn't alter continent specific ice age growth. And that makes the increase in Earth SAP 100% about temperature increase and 0% about gas. Pluto and Mars, granted, a lot of the SAP movement there is adding/subtracting gas, not all of it, but a lot. Earth's year is actually completely devoid of that issue now. So when it is proven that Earth SAP goes up when closest to Sun, that will align all three planets with


warmer = higher SAP (and adding gas is not the sole cause of it)


which proves that Earth, with a flat to flat/down 60 year SAP chart, hasn't warmed at all, and has experienced precisely ZERO net ice melt


and the Mossad doesn't want that truth out, does it....

LOL!!!

Mossad = you = giving aid and comfort to China

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Really, so if the top layer is 12 inches of snow originally, that is 11 inches of gas originally. A mile down, it becomes compressed to a small fraction of an inch. A "tiny bit" of 8 million cubic miles of atmospheric gas compressed 50+ fold.... LOL....400 million cubic miles of gas at surface air pressure....








That's the scariest part of the truth of the southern hemisphere data here, AA and Greenland aren't "melting," both are adding ice every year. The circular ellipse that is Earth's orbit doesn't alter continent specific ice age growth. And that makes the increase in Earth SAP 100% about temperature increase and 0% about gas. Pluto and Mars, granted, a lot of the SAP movement there is adding/subtracting gas, not all of it, but a lot. Earth's year is actually completely devoid of that issue now. So when it is proven that Earth SAP goes up when closest to Sun, that will align all three planets with


warmer = higher SAP (and adding gas is not the sole cause of it)


which proves that Earth, with a flat to flat/down 60 year SAP chart, hasn't warmed at all, and has experienced precisely ZERO net ice melt


and the Mossad doesn't want that truth out, does it....

LOL!!!

Mossad = you = giving aid and comfort to China

Really, so if the top layer is 12 inches of snow originally, that is 11 inches of gas originally. A mile down, it becomes compressed to a small fraction of an inch. A "tiny bit" of 8 million cubic miles of atmospheric gas compressed 50+ fold.... LOL....400 million cubic miles of gas at surface air pressure....

Liar.

 

[EMH]

Really, so if the top layer is 12 inches of snow originally, that is 11 inches of gas originally. A mile down, it becomes compressed to a small fraction of an inch. A "tiny bit" of 8 million cubic miles of atmospheric gas compressed 50+ fold.... LOL....400 million cubic miles of gas at surface air pressure....

Liar.

View attachment 1225958

Another Mossad manufactured climate BS piece posted online...

https://www.science.org/content/article/record-shattering-27-million-year-old-ice-core-reveals-start-ice-ages

Scientists announced today that a core drilled in Antarctica has yielded 2.7-million-year-old ice



There are 160,000 inches in 2.5 miles, and that ice core did not get to the bottom.


So the ice core layers which started as a foot plus thick (11 inches of gas at SAP) snow/frost on top get compressed to a tenth of an inch or thinner. That's 100 fold compression deep in AA's ice.



The Mossad angle also cannot explain how the flying dinosaurs got off the ground, as they required 3-5 times current SAP to do that, and the only way to get there without boiling oceans is to add gas/more than double the current atmosphere. That's what happens when AA melts. They have no other possible explanation for the increase in SAP during Jurassic.