What will summer bring?

Now tell me, you poor old senile fellow, what was fake? That we had 280 ppm at the start of the Industrial revolution? That it is now at 424 ppm? Or that the particulates from Krakatoa have filtered out long ago?



and surface air pressure shows, despite the rise in CO2, that Earth has not warmed at all.
 
Moron. The industrial revolution started in 1760 in Britain and continued until about 1840. Pray tell, where did you gather these ridiculous claims from? SMH. That fact in itself pretty much negates any of the rest of your cut and paste word salad. I anxiously await your limited lexicon response.
LOL And you are about a fool. The industrial revolution went into high gear when we built the first coal fired generation plant. And that did not happen until 1882. Once we started stringing powerlines it meant you could put industry anywhere you it was convenient. We are quite literally still in the industrial revolution as technology expands the way and amount of energy we use. Unfortunately, we have a bunch of fossils insisting that we must generate it the same as we started to in 1882. The same type of psychology that stood in the horse dung beside the road and yelled as the first autos passed "Get a horse!".
 
You're the moron who wants to waste trillions so the weather never changes.

DURR
We are going to spend trillions on new energy no matter what. We can spend it on generation that does not create problems or we can spend in on inefficient old tech that poisons the environment. Quite obviously you prefer to poison the environment at a greater cost that the renewables cost.
 
Hope not a nuclear war :(


What will summer bring?​

 
Big whoop.

The 1862 flood turned the entire central valley of California into a lake.
And what is the geomorphology of California? The coastal basin backed by the Sierra mountains. So the rain that hits the mountains immediately runs down into the basin. And the Houston area is relatively flat, so had the rate of rain that hit Houston from hurricane Harvey hit California, it would have flooded even worse. Hurricane Harvey unleashed 40 to 60 inches of rain in 4 days, that is about ten to fifteen inches a day. The rain that flooded California in 1862 lasted 43 days, and dumped about 120 inches of rain. That is a little less than an average of 3 inches a day. Atmospheric rivers tend to stay in one place longer than hurricanes do.

10 feet (3.0 m)
In the 1862 flood event, California experienced an astonishing 10 feet (3.0 m) of precipitation over a period of 43 days. This event, known as the Great Flood of 1862, resulted in widespread flooding and significant damage across the state.
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=8647...ub3JnL3dpa2kvR3JlYXRfRmxvb2Rfb2ZfMTg2Mg&ntb=1
Wikipedia
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=8647...ub3JnL3dpa2kvR3JlYXRfRmxvb2Rfb2ZfMTg2Mg&ntb=1
Still, this fact remains;

  1. Floods are becoming more frequent globally due to climate change, urbanization, and changes in land use, which intensify rainfall and alter natural water absorption processes.

    Climate​

    Urbanization​

    Sea​

    Changing​

    Conclusion​

    The combination of climate change, urbanization, and changing land use practices is significantly contributing to the increased frequency and severity of floods globally. Addressing these issues requires comprehensive planning and adaptation strategies to mitigate flood risks and protect vulnerable communities.

    Environmental Defense Fund
    Why are floods hitting more places and people?


    Geographical
    Geo explainer: How is climate change making flooding worse?




    View all

  2. Global web icon
    Statista
 
And what is the geomorphology of California? The coastal basin backed by the Sierra mountains. So the rain that hits the mountains immediately runs down into the basin. And the Houston area is relatively flat, so had the rate of rain that hit Houston from hurricane Harvey hit California, it would have flooded even worse. Hurricane Harvey unleashed 40 to 60 inches of rain in 4 days, that is about ten to fifteen inches a day. The rain that flooded California in 1862 lasted 43 days, and dumped about 120 inches of rain. That is a little less than an average of 3 inches a day. Atmospheric rivers tend to stay in one place longer than hurricanes do.

10 feet (3.0 m)
In the 1862 flood event, California experienced an astonishing 10 feet (3.0 m) of precipitation over a period of 43 days. This event, known as the Great Flood of 1862, resulted in widespread flooding and significant damage across the state.
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=8647...ub3JnL3dpa2kvR3JlYXRfRmxvb2Rfb2ZfMTg2Mg&ntb=1
Wikipedia
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=8647...ub3JnL3dpa2kvR3JlYXRfRmxvb2Rfb2ZfMTg2Mg&ntb=1
Still, this fact remains;

  1. Floods are becoming more frequent globally due to climate change, urbanization, and changes in land use, which intensify rainfall and alter natural water absorption processes.

    Climate​

    The combination of climate change, urbanization, and changing land use practices is significantly contributing to the increased frequency and severity of floods globally. Addressing these issues requires comprehensive planning and adaptation strategies to mitigate flood risks and protect vulnerable communities.

    Environmental Defense Fund
    Why are floods hitting more places and people?



    Geographical
    Geo explainer: How is climate change making flooding worse?





    View all

  2. Global web icon
    Statista

How little you understand. It wasn’t just California, you imbecile. The storm extended from Washington state, to Mexico, and produced flooding as far east as Denver.

Do try and keep up.

You're amazingly ignorant of real facts.
 
LOL And you are about a fool. The industrial revolution went into high gear when we built the first coal fired generation plant. And that did not happen until 1882. Once we started stringing powerlines it meant you could put industry anywhere you it was convenient. We are quite literally still in the industrial revolution as technology expands the way and amount of energy we use. Unfortunately, we have a bunch of fossils insisting that we must generate it the same as we started to in 1882. The same type of psychology that stood in the horse dung beside the road and yelled as the first autos passed "Get a horse!".
Would you like salt and pepper with that crow, moron?
The Industrial Revolution began around 1760 and continued until about 1840. It started in Great Britain and later spread to other parts of the world.
I was on base in uniform when we stopped those Soviet ships off of Cuba. Ever spend a day wondering if you will even see the flash of the bomb that kills you? Now I am beginning to get that same feeling again.
Stinkin' office pogue.
Encyclopedia Britannica Sky HISTORY TV Channel
 
We are going to spend trillions on new energy no matter what. We can spend it on generation that does not create problems or we can spend in on inefficient old tech that poisons the environment. Quite obviously you prefer to poison the environment at a greater cost that the renewables cost.

So, we might as well spend it on expensive, unreliable wind and solar? LOL!

How long will we have to wait until the climate stops changing?
 
When it’s obvious that the Democommies are not gonna win enough in the Midterms they will go full Color Revolution and it will create a golden opportunity for The Right
Hopefully
 
We are going to spend trillions on new energy no matter what. We can spend it on generation that does not create problems
Green solar and turbines don't cause problems? You want to double check on that?

or we can spend in on inefficient old tech that poisons the environment.
How can you poison the environment with stuff that CAME from the environment? How is carbon which is plant food and what makes up every living thing a poison?

Green energy is just trading one set of issues for another, the only difference being that green energy puts money in the pockets of a whole other group of wannabes other than Big Oil.

Guess that's who pays you.
 
And what is the geomorphology of California? The coastal basin backed by the Sierra mountains. So the rain that hits the mountains immediately runs down into the basin. And the Houston area is relatively flat, so had the rate of rain that hit Houston from hurricane Harvey hit California, it would have flooded even worse. Hurricane Harvey unleashed 40 to 60 inches of rain in 4 days, that is about ten to fifteen inches a day. The rain that flooded California in 1862 lasted 43 days, and dumped about 120 inches of rain. That is a little less than an average of 3 inches a day. Atmospheric rivers tend to stay in one place longer than hurricanes do.

10 feet (3.0 m)
In the 1862 flood event, California experienced an astonishing 10 feet (3.0 m) of precipitation over a period of 43 days. This event, known as the Great Flood of 1862, resulted in widespread flooding and significant damage across the state.
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=8647...ub3JnL3dpa2kvR3JlYXRfRmxvb2Rfb2ZfMTg2Mg&ntb=1
Wikipedia
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=8647...ub3JnL3dpa2kvR3JlYXRfRmxvb2Rfb2ZfMTg2Mg&ntb=1
Still, this fact remains;

  1. Floods are becoming more frequent globally due to climate change, urbanization, and changes in land use, which intensify rainfall and alter natural water absorption processes.

    Climate​

    The combination of climate change, urbanization, and changing land use practices is significantly contributing to the increased frequency and severity of floods globally. Addressing these issues requires comprehensive planning and adaptation strategies to mitigate flood risks and protect vulnerable communities.

    Environmental Defense Fund
    Why are floods hitting more places and people?



    Geographical
    Geo explainer: How is climate change making flooding worse?





    View all

  2. Global web icon
    Statista



So "climate change" is causing droughts... and more rain??

Whatever happens, it is "because of climate change?"

LOL!!!


Not science at all.

Science is noticing that when Earth does warm, which it is not, Earth gets wetter....




During the Jurassic Period, the Earth's climate was much warmer and wetter than it is today
 
15th post
Would you like salt and pepper with that crow, moron?
The Industrial Revolution began around 1760 and continued until about 1840. It started in Great Britain and later spread to other parts of the world.

Stinkin' office pogue.
Encyclopedia Britannica Sky HISTORY TV Channel
By you own site, silly ass;

"Industrial Revolution, in modern history, the process of change from an agrarian and handicraft economy to one dominated by industry and machine manufacturing. These technological changes introduced novel ways of working and living and fundamentally transformed society. This process began in Britain in the 18th century and from there spread to other parts of the world. Although used earlier by French writers, the term Industrial Revolution was first popularized by the English economic historian Arnold Toynbee (1852–83) to describe Britain’s economic development from 1760 to 1840. Since Toynbee’s time the term has been more broadly applied as a process of economic transformation than as a period of time in a particular setting. This explains why some areas, such as China and India, did not begin their first industrial revolutions until the 20th century, while others, such as the United States and western Europe, began undergoing “second” industrial revolutions by the late 19th century."


Hey stupid dumb ass, never been an office queen. Always worked on, and with, machinery. Have you ever gotten your hands greasy? I doubt it. Oh yeah, retired at 76 working as a millwright in a steel mill.
 
Green solar and turbines don't cause problems? You want to double check on that?


How can you poison the environment with stuff that CAME from the environment? How is carbon which is plant food and what makes up every living thing a poison?

Green energy is just trading one set of issues for another, the only difference being that green energy puts money in the pockets of a whole other group of wannabes other than Big Oil.

Guess that's who pays you.
The problems caused by the manufacture of windmills and solar panels are the same as the problems caused by the manufacture and construction of the nuclear plants, gas generators, and coal plants. However, in operation, all those generators create significant environmental degradation from the mining of coal, release of CH4 from drilling, and the mining of uranium. And then there is the problem of CO2 release, poisonous coal ash accumulation, and nuclear waste.

LOL Another ill logical analogy. OK, if something you absolutely require to remain alive cannot possibly hurt you, just eat a pint of salt, and see what results. The sulfur compounds that volcanos spew are poisonous and the come from the environment, and have a record of killing both flora and fauna.

LOL Well, yes, green energy does put money in the pockets of people other than big oil. People like the farmers east of The Dallas that get about $5000 annually from the turbines standing among the wheat on their farms. Puts more money in the pockets of the vegetable farmers the shade their crops with solar panels. Saves money for individual home owners on their heating and cooling bills. And could provide money for our National Park System from leased lands for the purpose from the BLM, had we a sane administration. But you would rather fund the billionaires as they shit in your face and make you pay more every year for electricity.
 
The problems caused by the manufacture of windmills and solar panels are the same as the problems caused by the manufacture and construction of the nuclear plants, gas generators, and coal plants.

You over-simplify and misdirect--- these windmills prove to be very expensive, high-maintenance items that generate a lot of waste no one has any use for. Much the same for solar panels. Not just the waste they create once they are done working, but the mining just to make them. The problem is in the rare earths and concentrated minerals needed and how and where obtained.

These just are not the same problems one sees in the operation of coal mines, nuclear plants and gas generators. Nuclear does have its disposal issue, but not only is that a highly concentrated and localized issue with better solutions in the future, but there just are so few such plants.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom