What will be the consequence of the right’s lies about Kirk shooting?

You know who "he" is. It's time you on the right shut up with the blame and take responsibility. This entire thing was due to the right's inflammatory rhetoric and the anger it created. Like I said, had some people been decent enough to tell Kirk what he was expressing was wrong and unacceptable, instead of yes, Charlie, you have the freedom to say racist and sexist things about others whenever you feel like it, and everybody who objects is wrong, he might still be alive right now. This has been the problem. People have felt silenced because they could not express rude or hateful opinions, so we have had people going way too far to accommodate the wishes of those people.

Quit blaming the victim you racist ******* shitbag. You're the most racist, dumbest most vile piece of shit on this forum. Do we have a right to kill you? He has a right to say whatever the **** he wants BECAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION THAT YOU CLAIM TO LOVE. If you don't like what he says, don't listen. Nothing he says gives any ******* left wing whackjob the right to blow a hole in his neck.

******* black moron.
 
Last edited:
Why does that trigger you?

Are you an INCEL?

We tend to get pissed when liberals lie. Because black lies matter. People believe the shit and then whackjobs kill people. But since lying is all you ever do, we stay pissed at your dumb ass.
 
Typical leftist lies. A good innocent Christian gets murdered by a leftist loon and it's the fault of good innocent Christians for spreading Hate. Same script, same lies
 
Your god is imaginary. That makes it hard for it to be the enemy.
This is a reason for the nation to break up into smaller ones. You go your way; others will go theirs. This will solve a lot of problems. Republicans are not the polar opposites of you guys. Yet you endlessly promote it.
 
So you're ready to admit you guys are responsible for the insurrection.

Cool.
There was no insurrection.

There was, however, months of massive riots in cities coast to coast becaise some Marxist group lied about police and set off a murderous rampage.
 
Try to stop lying about who did this and what influenced him.
I'm not lying about who did this. Charlie was murdered by a Left wing ANTIFA nut job that wanted to murder Conservatives because the rest of the Leftist morons keep calling us fascists.

You can't crawfish your way out of this one.

It's too late. You mother fuckers have gone too far. You all would be better off if you publicly accepted Tyler Robinson as one of yours, influenced by your violent rhetoric.
 
I'm not lying about who did this. Charlie was murdered by a Left wing ANTIFA nut job that wanted to murder Conservatives because the rest of the Leftist morons keep calling us fascists.

You can't crawfish your way out of this one.

It's too late. You mother fuckers have gone too far. You all would be better off if you publicly accepted Tyler Robinson as one of yours, influenced by your violent rhetoric.
That’s the problem. Instead of them facing the reality of the damage their hateful and false rhetoric has caused, they double down on it. Yes, they are THAT nasty, arrogant, and narcissistic. Can never admit they’re wrong.

And the poster you’re engaged with is the worst of the worst - shrieking “raaaaaacist!!!” or “whore!!!!” to anyone who disagrees with him.
 
Bullshit. He was angered by what he heard KirK say. He discussed that with his parents. That's the big picture, and you can't see it because you're a white supremacist, just like Kirk.
He was angered by cherry picked sound bites the same way the rest of you idiot's have been. I dare you to watch some of his full videos.

He would have given anyone a chance to speak their piece, even a race baiting loon like yourself and he would have been respectful about it.
 
15th post
That’s the problem. Instead of them facing the reality of the damage their hateful and false rhetoric has caused, they double down on it. Yes, they are THAT nasty, arrogant, and narcissistic. Can never admit they’re wrong.

And the poster you’re engaged with is the worst of the worst - shrieking “raaaaaacist!!!” or “whore!!!!” to anyone who disagrees with him.
Well, they're scared and rightfully so. They aren't just scared of violent retaliation, but retaliation at the ballot box. They're desperate to change the narrative.
 
Some on the right are attempting to sweep days of spreading disinformation and lies under the rug; other conservatives are trying to ignore the debacle as if it didn’t happen; and unsurprisingly, many on the right continue to propagate lies about the ‘violent left.’

Even the prestigious Wall Street Journal managed to contribute to the right’s campaign of disinformation and lies:

‘The Wall Street Journal has quietly walked back early reporting that suggested the fatal shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk was linked to transgender people. Republican Utah Gov. Spencer Cox contradicted the paper’s reporting in a Friday morning press conference.
[…]
The misinformation had devastating effects. A transgender woman in Seattle was falsely accused of being the shooter after her photos were circulated online. “These people really do want to kill me because they think that I killed their idol, Charlie Kirk,” she told The Advocate.’

For there to be consequences for lies, first there have to be lies.
 
They sure do twist things around, don’t they?
That's the game. Like trying to label the shooter a far right Christian who murdered Charlie Kirk because Charlie wasn't far right enough. They're worse than sick. Reddit demons.
 
You know who "he" is. It's time you on the right shut up with the blame and take responsibility. This entire thing was due to the right's inflammatory rhetoric and the anger it created. Like I said, had some people been decent enough to tell Kirk what he was expressing was wrong and unacceptable, instead of yes, Charlie, you have the freedom to say racist and sexist things about others whenever you feel like it, and everybody who objects is wrong, he might still be alive right now. This has been the problem. People have felt silenced because they could not express rude or hateful opinions, so we have had people going way too far to accommodate the wishes of those people.


You don't seem to understand that the whole purpose of the 1st amendment is to protect controversial speech, speech that everyone agrees with doesn't need protection. What would you do if everyone that disagrees with you suddenly disappeared, what purpose would your life have then?

.
 
Back
Top Bottom