Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
Spent a trillion on Obama Porkulus and all we got was a t shirt.MIT, i think, estimated a wall at $60Billion.
Yes BILLION.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Spent a trillion on Obama Porkulus and all we got was a t shirt.MIT, i think, estimated a wall at $60Billion.
Yes BILLION.
MIT, i think, estimated a wall at $60Billion.
Yes BILLION.
The time has come for a real discussion about these cities. Just how much Federal funding has gone to keep these "cities" functioning?
Should our budget keep and protect people who are not citizens of this country and, by definition, have broken our laws?
We have a deficit and many want more and more government intervention into their affairs, costing astronomical amounts of money. We have a deficit. We have to cut back and foolishly susidizing those illegals that broke our laws to come is nonsensical.
How do you feel?
Y'all had no issue wh Sherriffs who openly ignored gun regs.
Did you not hear? The wall is now a fence, and next month will be the honor system.DOJ Rewards Law-Breaking Sanctuary Cities, States with $342 Mil in “Grants”
Apparently this doesn’t apply to local governments that support the president’s broad open borders policies, even when they violate federal law. The DOJ doled out $342,168,401 to 10 sanctuary states and cities that proudly reject federal claims for criminal illegal aliens earmarked for removal, according to the agency’s independent watchdog.
Among them is Connecticut, a trailblazer in the sanctuary movement that received more than $69 million in grants from the DOJ. Connecticut has long protected illegal immigrants with sanctuary policies and even offers them special drivers’ licenses, known as Drive Only. The state also gives illegal aliens discounted tuition at public colleges and universities and authorities work hard to restrict the feds from deporting illegal immigrants. Last year an illegal immigrant who had spent 17 years in prison for attempted murder stabbed a 25-year-old woman to death in Norwich, a city of about 40,000 residents. The murderer had been earmarked for deportation at least three times.
DOJ Rewards Law-Breaking Sanctuary Cities, States with $342 Mil in “Grants” - Judicial Watch
$342 M,, that would pay for the wall and have money left over for ICE and Border Patrol! That worked out very well.... Wish I was on Trumps Advisory Board!
All estimates of the cost of a "wall" say that it'll cost exponentially more than 342 million dollars.
Not to mention, the idea that the DOJ would stop handing out grants to the states you don't like is ludicrous.
Cut federal funding to the Sanctuary Cities. Let's see how strongly they feel about protecting criminal illegals when they have to use their own money to do so.
What happen to GOP being for state rights and local gov??? Now you are cool wh the Feds forcing local govs to be Ins agents ? On their own tab ?
MIT, i think, estimated a wall at $60Billion.
Yes BILLION.
Democrats pay taxes, Illegals pay taxes, and those are included in "Individuals who work".Let's see. Who pays taxes?
Democrat supporters who leech off the taxpayer = no
Big government "programs" where the money disappears and helps nobody = no
Lawyers = no, they just take the existing pile of money and redistribute it to themselves
REPUBLICANS pay taxes. Businesses pay taxes. Individuals who WORK pay taxes.
That is the best answer I have heard yet. However, keep in mind that a sanctuary city doesn't represent the whole state. Other parts of the state might be enforcing Federal Immigration laws so yo wouldn't want to penalize them. Further, distribution of Federal funds starts from the State level, not the municipal level. In most cases punitive access by the feds to the sanctuary city is buffered by the state in which it is located.Nothing should be done. Well strip them of the federal funds given to them to enforce federal immigration laws.
That is the best answer I have heard yet. However, keep in mind that a sanctuary city doesn't represent the whole state. Other parts of the state might be enforcing Federal Immigration laws so yo wouldn't want to penalize them. Further, distribution of Federal funds starts from the State level, not the municipal level. In most cases punitive access by the feds to the sanctuary city is buffered by the state in which it is located.Nothing should be done. Well strip them of the federal funds given to them to enforce federal immigration laws.
The time has come for a real discussion about these cities. Just how much Federal funding has gone to keep these "cities" functioning?
Should our budget keep and protect people who are not citizens of this country and, by definition, have broken our laws?
We have a deficit and many want more and more government intervention into their affairs, costing astronomical amounts of money. We have a deficit. We have to cut back and foolishly susidizing those illegals that broke our laws to come is nonsensical.
How do you feel?
Every illegal Mexican immigrant is a criminal, as entering the USA without the proper credentials is a crime.The time has come for a real discussion about these cities. Just how much Federal funding has gone to keep these "cities" functioning?
Should our budget keep and protect people who are not citizens of this country and, by definition, have broken our laws?
We have a deficit and many want more and more government intervention into their affairs, costing astronomical amounts of money. We have a deficit. We have to cut back and foolishly susidizing those illegals that broke our laws to come is nonsensical.
How do you feel?
Nothing should be done. Well strip them of the federal funds given to them to enforce federal immigration laws.
I recall the estimated amolunt for the wall has been $100M. Grants should not be given to cities that are breaking the law.DOJ Rewards Law-Breaking Sanctuary Cities, States with $342 Mil in “Grants”
Apparently this doesn’t apply to local governments that support the president’s broad open borders policies, even when they violate federal law. The DOJ doled out $342,168,401 to 10 sanctuary states and cities that proudly reject federal claims for criminal illegal aliens earmarked for removal, according to the agency’s independent watchdog.
Among them is Connecticut, a trailblazer in the sanctuary movement that received more than $69 million in grants from the DOJ. Connecticut has long protected illegal immigrants with sanctuary policies and even offers them special drivers’ licenses, known as Drive Only. The state also gives illegal aliens discounted tuition at public colleges and universities and authorities work hard to restrict the feds from deporting illegal immigrants. Last year an illegal immigrant who had spent 17 years in prison for attempted murder stabbed a 25-year-old woman to death in Norwich, a city of about 40,000 residents. The murderer had been earmarked for deportation at least three times.
DOJ Rewards Law-Breaking Sanctuary Cities, States with $342 Mil in “Grants” - Judicial Watch
$342 M,, that would pay for the wall and have money left over for ICE and Border Patrol! That worked out very well.... Wish I was on Trumps Advisory Board!
All estimates of the cost of a "wall" say that it'll cost exponentially more than 342 million dollars.
Not to mention, the idea that the DOJ would stop handing out grants to the states you don't like is ludicrous.
I'd love to see that "estimate".
Just the amount of concrete needed would cost more than a billion dollars.
And there's no law against sanctuary cities.
Every illegal Mexican immigrant is a criminal, as entering the USA without the proper credentials is a crime.The time has come for a real discussion about these cities. Just how much Federal funding has gone to keep these "cities" functioning?
Should our budget keep and protect people who are not citizens of this country and, by definition, have broken our laws?
We have a deficit and many want more and more government intervention into their affairs, costing astronomical amounts of money. We have a deficit. We have to cut back and foolishly susidizing those illegals that broke our laws to come is nonsensical.
How do you feel?
If you disagree you are retarded