And no other buildings were built the same way as the towers or WTC7....... We've been through this before....
You have nothing but opinion. The facts and physical evidence prove you wrong.
I have opinion backed up by science, physics, and facts, while you have nothing but the proven lies of the absurd conspiracy theory that is your dogma.
What facts do you have that support the position you adhere to? I've asked you to post em up, like proof that the WTC fires were hot enough to distort the massive steel components, proof that fires caused the WTC buildings to explode, how about proof that there were no molten metal rubble piles that lasted for 3 months.... but you refuse.
You have nothing but a wild conspiracy theory, with unprovable scientific data that is espoused from a historically deceitful entity, that has 19 jihadists (one whose passport miraculously avoided incineration in your "massive fire") with a leader in a cave on dialysis
who infiltrated the worlds most heavily guarded nation on Earth, at the SAME TIME it was running terror drills, as the main culprits.
You're a fucking brain dead loon!![]()
Look at the videos, the towers looked more like they literally exploded, rather then collapse, with squibs protruding way below the collapse points.I'm sorry did you say that the towers exploded? Really?
What main points? The fucking date and time? What the fuck are these "main points" you idiots blabber on about, that allows for the dismissal of glaring and obvious inconsistencies?I say again that the 911 commissions Report and NIST got all the main points right.
I'm not alone in disagreement as the 9-11 panelists said they don't agree or have confidence with their own body of work.You disagree with that yet you don't have any facts or proof to back it up that hasn't been debunked by other experts.
What experts are there that you claim "debunked" anything? The ones that refuse to allow comparison with their computer modelling, and that had to to change their hypothesis when they got caught lying and fabricating? The same ones that a humble high school teacher humiliated and forced them to admit to what they said was IMPOSSIBLE, IE: freefall occurring at WTC 7?
It is you that can't post any reasonably intelligent facts to prove that the "truther" community is wrong for doubting your conspiracy theory.
You're right..The conspiracy theoristsMost of the conspiracy theorists can't even agree on one single theory. We've seen everything from planted bombs to mini-nukes to nanothermite painted on. Sorry but excuse me while I go laugh again......
that say 9-11 was an Alqaeda/Bin Laden concoction to this day have not proven that it actually was, Even the FBI admitted they had no proof he was responsible. And the NIST
changed their fuel/fire loads several times and the testing they did FAILED despite changing then using overly exaggerated heat temps in their failed attempt to blame the trusses.
One thing that has remained consistent with those wanting the truth, is that we have always claimed that the WTC buildings could not have been destroyed by fire as NIST claims, in such a short amount of time. Whatever was actually used is up for debate, but the impossibilities and lies that NIST said is still BS and is not debated as being otherwise.
The media sure made it appear that way. Perhaps you may be right-BTW, UBL wasn't living in a cave until after the attacks, just sayin.......
If the CBS report by Dan Rather is accurate and Osama had indeed been admitted to the Pakistani military hospital on September 10, 2001, courtesy of AmericaÂ’s ally, he was in all likelihood still in the hospital in Rawalpindi on the 11th of September, when the attacks occurred. In all probability, his whereabouts were known to US officials on the morning of September 12, when Secretary of State Colin Powell initiated negotiations with Pakistan, with a view to arresting and extraditing bin Laden.
The CBS report is a potential bombshell. It invalidates the Osama bin “legend” created by US intelligence. It casts doubt on the notion that Osama was the “mastermind” behind the 9/11 attacks. It points to coverup and complicity at the highest echelons of the US administration.
Experts on military ops but fucked up the alleged raid on the OBL compound, and then supposedly killed and quickly "buried" at sea the main man of the notorious "Alqaeda" instead of parading him around like Saddam and "interrogating" him to gain information.Oh, BTW being an expert on Military operations, the Military is always running exercises....On a daily basis........And who lied to you about us being the most heavily guarded nation on earth? Hell bells man Juan comes and goes at his pleasure....... And I doubt that Juan or Pedro left behind the Quran that was found along the Mexican border......
Who could have informed Alqaeda that this was gong to be happening?
On a "daily" basis, in NYC, and that there would be phoney radar blips that caused "confusion" and would delay response time?
Juan and Pedro don't hijack planes and are allowed to fly aroung unmolested while attacking our nation, but they come and go because it is allowed, it helps the GOP's buddies get cheap labor, where as an attack on 9-11 and loss of American lives should have been avoided at all costs, but was allowed to also happen.
If border guards would have been responsible for allowing Juan and Pedro to commit 9-11
their heads would have been served up on a silver platter, yet all the Bush traitors were either promoted or let off scott free. Chertoff let his Israeli countrymen off, you know the ones who admitted on Israeli TV that they were there to "document the event"
How dare you call yourself an American and hide behind your "service" or declare you fought for our freedumbs, when you can't even admit to what people supposedly in our own government did to us?
Aren't we though? It is not a paradise because of foolish, indoctrinated easily led sheepleYou are living in a fools paradise.....
that call themselves patriots, and are cowards when asked to adhere to their oath to defend the constitution against enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC. They don't even have the balls to speak out and are a disgrace. Gee...thanks an awful lot for your "service"
Again-What facts do you have that support the position you adhere to? I've asked you to post em up, like proof that the WTC fires were hot enough to distort the massive steel components, proof that fires caused the WTC buildings to explode, how about proof that there were no molten metal rubble piles that lasted for 3 months.... but you refuse.
Why?
Because you know the government and their agencies positions are weak at best and they have no solid credible evidence or proof, hell even the FBI said so, and you aren't man enough to admit it, that's why.
It is difficult to pin point if you are in fact just a dumb ass fool, or a disinformation shill
I think you are a little of both but would add "useful idiot" to your resume'.