What Kind of Moron Really Thinks This is a "Floors Pancaking" Collapse on 9/11?

[Soupnazi630]

You wouldn't accept them.

I would

You cannot post any

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I can list many of them, but it would do no good. Your mind is closed. You've been believing for years the fantasy that you defend here, and that suggests you know nothing at all about the laws of physics.

You are a self described Patriot according to your handle here, and that says something. I suppose you also think the Patriot Act is legitimate. Words are cheap Todd The Patriot.

I can list many of them, but it would do no good.

It would do you no good, because then I could once again mock your ignorance.

You've been believing for years the fantasy that you defend here, and that suggests you know nothing at all about the laws of physics.

Big words, as I watch you run away.

Words are cheap Todd The Patriot.

So is your knowledge of the laws of physics.

 

[ozro]

It's been 24 years, 24 years of fact-free arguments that fail to disprove the 911 commission report.
Kinda makes the twoofers look like idiots....and crazy.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes I do understand those things, but I'm a pilot, not an architect or engineer. Did YOU know that the architect who designed the towers is on the record that the exoskeleton design of the towers incorporated the ability to absorb such a strike? Did YOU know that several thousand architects and engineers are on the record saying the collapse of the towers from jetfuel fires on a few floors was impossible? Did YOU know that all the steel in the building complied with New York fire standards and insurance fire standards? Steel is a poor conductor of heat. That's why it complied with fire standards.

Did YOU know that the architect who designed the towers is on the record that the exoskeleton design of the towers incorporated the ability to absorb such a strike?

Absorb a strike? What does that even mean? The planes should have bounced off?
They were hit by planes, right? With passengers and crew on board?

several thousand architects and engineers are on the record saying the collapse of the towers from jetfuel fires on a few floors was impossible?

How many tests have they run on the towers and burning jet fuel?
Or did they base their "on the record claims" on feelings?

 

[PeterPilot]

Toddsterpatriot

Simple English Todd. Is English your primary language?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Toddsterpatriot

Simple English Todd. Is English your primary language?

 

[candycorn]

No evidence of explosives or thermite.

Plenty of evidence of explosions...no evidence of explosives....
A bag blown up too much explodes...without explosives being present

 

[Zebra]

They do not build any tower to withstand the weight of a large plane all that fuel plus passengers and suitcases plus all the office equipment. Add to that taking out a number of support columns and the fire not helping. It was amazing that they held up as long as they did.

convincing

 

[PeterPilot]

Did YOU know that the architect who designed the towers is on the record that the exoskeleton design of the towers incorporated the ability to absorb such a strike?

Absorb a strike? What does that even mean? The planes should have bounced off?
They were hit by planes, right? With passengers and crew on board?

several thousand architects and engineers are on the record saying the collapse of the towers from jetfuel fires on a few floors was impossible?

How many tests have they run on the towers and burning jet fuel?
Or did they base their "on the record claims" on feelings?

If you spent some hours, days or weeks informing yourself, you could answer your questions yourself. Simple English sir, combine "absorb" and "strike". Engineers designed the exoskeleton to be able to absorb the strike of a fully loaded B707. They were prompted to do that by the accident in which a B-25 flying in poor weather over Manhattan crashed into the Empire State building. Check it out Todd. Inform yourself.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If you spent some hours, days or weeks informing yourself, you could answer your questions yourself. Simple English sir, combine "absorb" and "strike". Engineers designed the exoskeleton to be able to absorb the strike of a fully loaded B707. They were prompted to do that by the accident in which a B-25 flying in poor weather over Manhattan crashed into the Empire State building. Check it out Todd. Inform yourself.

Engineers designed the exoskeleton to be able to absorb the strike of a fully loaded B707.

Were they hit by a fully loaded B707?

 

[PeterPilot]

Engineers designed the exoskeleton to be able to absorb the strike of a fully loaded B707.

Were they hit by a fully loaded B707?

Are you able to formulate intelligent questions?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Are you able to formulate intelligent questions?

They weren't hit by a fully loaded B707.

 

[PeterPilot]

They weren't hit by a fully loaded B707.

With every post you demonstrate an inability to think very well.

According to the government story the towers were struck by fully loaded 767 aircraft, a derivative of the 707. The numbers for weight and speed between the 2 different aircraft are reasonably close.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

With every post you demonstrate an inability to think very well.

According to the government story the towers were struck by fully loaded 767 aircraft, a derivative of the 707. The numbers for weight and speed between the 2 different aircraft are reasonably close.

What's the real story?

 

[PeterPilot]

What's the real story?

The real story is that neither AA11 nor UA175 struck the towers.

The north tower was struck by a smaller airplane, described by callers in to NYPD and so reported by mainstream media in the very early days as a commuter aircraft or corporate aircraft. That strike was actually recorded in the background by a parking lot camera near WTC. It was a very short clip which I viewed several times at Pilots For 911 Truth on the internet. You could not tell exactly what type it was, but it was a smaller airplane. By about 2006 it was taken down from the internet.

The strike on the South Tower which the whole world saw was a B767, but it was modified into an apparent tanker configuration, and was not a stock 767 in airline service. The engine that flew off at impact and landed on the sidewalk blocks away was determined by those who work on those things to be an engine from a 747

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The real story is that neither AA11 nor UA175 struck the towers.

The north tower was struck by a smaller airplane, described by callers in to NYPD and so reported by mainstream media in the very early days as a commuter aircraft or corporate aircraft. That strike was actually recorded in the background by a parking lot camera near WTC. It was a very short clip which I viewed several times at Pilots For 911 Truth on the internet. You could not tell exactly what type it was, but it was a smaller airplane. By about 2006 it was taken down from the internet.

The strike on the South Tower which the whole world saw was a B767, but it was modified into an apparent tanker configuration, and was not a stock 767 in airline service. The engine that flew off at impact and landed on the sidewalk blocks away was determined by those who work on those things to be an engine from a 747

Any actual passengers or crew on the planes?

 

[PeterPilot]

Any actual passengers or crew on the planes?

Negative, they were both drones.

 

[Dragonlady]

Towers 200 feet wide, speeds of those cut beams flying calculated at 80 MPH. But some people really really are not going to see anything but what they want to see.

What kind of moron believes, conspiracy, theories, and stupidity after all these years???

 

[PeterPilot]

What kind of moron believes, conspiracy, theories, and stupidity after all these years???

Pretty much the whole damn country believes conspiracy theories. They fall into 2 broad categories: those who believe Official Conspiracy Theories promoted by the government, and those who believe other conspiracy theories.

Right now Trumpanyahu & Co want us to believe that there are no files on his Main Man Jeffrey.

 

[hadit]

Negative, they were both drones.

Where are the people listed in the planes' passenger lists? Barbara Olsen springs to mind.