What is the legality of Trump's National Guard actions?

[Rigby5]

All of those people are dead. the people here now don't count you blithering idiot.

Treaties don't die, and it is illegal for the US to interfere with commerce, employment, etc., for all the Spanish land grants in the states we purchased from Mexico.

 

[Rigby5]

And now he is protecting federal agents as they do their duty

The federal agents are the ones in violation of the law.
They are not protecting rights of anyone.

 

[drudge X]

Why are leftists still questioning the legality of this troops deployment? All you need to know that it's perfectly legal for Trump to do this.

 

[drudge X]

The federal agents are the ones in violation of the law.
They are not protecting rights of anyone.

Removing illegal aliens is perfectly legal within the law.

 

[Rigby5]

It's perfectly legal to take down insurrection, just like Lincoln had to when you all did this back in the 1800s.

By violating the 4th and 5th amendments to the Bill of Rights, it is ICE who is guilty of insurrection.

 

[Rawley]

Come on... our Home Depot has housing within walking distance... I don't know how the one is where this happened but neither do you... its about contractors having tools stolen and stepping around piss to load their truck... employees cars broken into... this is a new breed of immigrant we have never seen before and its sad because good ones will get caught up in it... you can blame Biden for that....

Seriously, why are you still arguing with that loon?

 

[drudge X]

By violating the 4th and 5th amendments to the Bill of Rights, it is ICE who is guilty of insurrection.

Perhaps under Biden

 

[Lesh]

You're a democrat. We knew it all along

That you were a liar?

Yup

And a hateful nasty “person” as well

In other words a perfect Trumper

 

[Rambunctious]

Seriously, why are you still arguing with that loon?

Its fun...

 

[Rawley]

Its fun...

You have too much time on your hands.

 

[TimFitz]

See the SCOTUS decision on Terry Stops.

.

And?

What constitutes “ the test of reasonableness in this sort of situation is whether the police officer can point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts would lead a neutral magistrate on review to conclude that a man of reasonable caution would be warranted in believing that possible criminal behavior was at hand and that both an investigative stop and a frisk was required???????

Skin color? Standing in public?

ICE didn’t go there to stop any riots.

They were sent to terrorize the population and incite them.

Trump is looking for an excuse to become the dictator he always dreamed of being.

 

[Mac-7]

The federal agents are the ones in violation of the law.
They are not protecting rights of anyone.

Of course we are not going to agree

All I can tell you is we are going to do it our way for as long as we can

 

[Rigby5]

Los Angeles has refused to enforce the law. The state has refused to enforce the law. That leaves law enforcement to the federal government.

There is no law that requires anyone to be deported.
This country is almost all descendants of illegal immigrants.

 

[Rigby5]

exploiting humans that are here illegally to help fund your social security is evil and immoral. Modern day slavery frankly, which explains why the dem confederates have started another Civil War.

I at least give you credit for admitting that's why you want them here.

How is it evil or immoral to provide jobs and tax their income?
Nothing remotely like slavery because that is unpaid and forced, while this is paid and voluntary.

 

[Rigby5]

Smart move, moving the goal posts, because you know I have the receipts.

FBI and ICE had the warrants you've been ranting about. The only real question is whether you are ignorant, a liar, or an ignorant liar.

List of ICE arrests in Los Angeles that sparked protests

ICE activity in downtown Los Angeles was part of an effort to serve warrants at a business believed to be involved in a slew of cross-border crimes.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Wrong.
There can't be valid warrants for anonymous people at a Home Depot parking lot.

 

[Rigby5]

Title 10 was used by both, and ICE agents were being prevented from doing their jobs.

Their legal jobs.

We have already proven that ICE is not doing a legal function because in abstract they protect no one, and in the physical, have not gone through due process of judicial hearings.

 

[Rambunctious]

You have too much time on your hands.

Yep I do... I post while I'm working on my 63 VW van...

 

[TimFitz]

Wrong.
The undocumented are vastly cleaner and more polite than the average citizens.
Nor would they ever take that sort of risk by harming or even remotely threatening one of their own.

That is absolutely true.

The last thing they want is to attract attention.

 

[BackAgain]

What "process is due" is a judicial hearing.
That is true for raid, arrest, deportations, and anything that can be harmful to anyone.

Wrong. You exclude other considerations.

Why is that?

 

[BackAgain]

Wrong.
Just as obviously the British were wrong and the revolution warranted, slavery was wrong, the Spanish American war was wrong, Vietnam was wrong, the invasion of Iraq was wrong, segregation was wrong, Prohibition was wrong, etc.
But we still have a lot to do because clearly all drug laws are wrong, all adult sex laws are wrong, immigration laws are wrong, etc.
The way you make a republic is fixing things that are wrong.
And ICE clearly is totally wrong.
They are harming people without the protection of due process.
That leads to the worst dictatorship imaginable.

Repeating your abject ignorance doesn’t persuade anyone of anything.