Ninth Circuit decision will clear California National Guard troops from Los Angeles by Monday, AG says

[DigitalDrifter]

My town doesn't have thousands of illegals running loose.

Eventually it will once Dims take back control of the WH.

 

[BackAgain]

‘A decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday will bar the deployment of the California National Guard in Los Angeles—for now, according to the attorney general's office.

“The Ninth Circuit’s decision means that, come Monday, there will be no National Guard troops deployed in California. Let me repeat: For the first time in six months, there will be no military deployed on the streets of Los Angeles,” said California Attorney General Rob Bonta in a news release.

The Ninth Circuit issued a partial administrative stay in the ongoing court battle between California leaders and President Donald Trump over control of the state's National Guard troops. The attorney general's office explained that the stay means the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California’s order barring the deployment of California National Guard troops in Los Angeles will remain in effect for now.

However, the stay also pauses the second part of the order, returning federalized California National Guard troops to Gov. Gavin Newsom's command. "While this decision is not final, it is a gratifying and hard-fought step in the right direction," Bonta said. "There is no crisis to justify the National Guard’s continued presence, and we look forward to continuing to prove that in court.”’

Ninth Circuit decision will clear California National Guard troops from LA by Monday, AG says

“The Ninth Circuit’s decision means that, come Monday, there will be no National Guard troops deployed in California," Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a news release.

www.kcra.com

“There is no crisis to justify the National Guard’s continued presence…”

Correct.

The fear, racism, bigotry, and hate of conservatives with regard to immigration is not a ‘crisis.’

The unwarranted deployment of the National Guard is a waste of time and resources.

Massive crime without the state or local governments being able or willing to do anything is a perfectly valid basis for the use of the national guard.

 

[Leo123]

View attachment 1193330​

fascism​

noun
fas·cism ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm

2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control

—often used informally in an exaggerated way

View attachment 1193334
View attachment 1193332

View attachment 1193337
View attachment 1193335

Yep. I thought I had it right, and did, according to major dictionary look up.

In America we don't have fascists. Stop trying to redefine words, Marxie.

 

[Leo123]

I see you had trouble finding a US report, even on FOX, and Australian broadcast, no date on that one.
I doubt if you are stupid enough to think that is the day-to-day level of protest in LA.
You just want troops as a useless show of force, because they don't want them and you don't like Californians, because Trump does not like Californians, so you want strong central authoritarian leadership to post troops there, for show, of some fascist military display, even though serving no purpose, not already being done by masked goons and local law enforcement.

California is a 'sanctuary State' which is illegal. ICE goes there because they have to find illegal alien criminals. If the State detained them, as they should, ICE would not have to go to the streets and get attacked causing the NG to be deployed. You are so ignorant.

 

[TimFitz]

It is not a military occupation they are there to protect ICE from being assaulted by paid left wing radicals and to protect Federal buildings. You are spreading false incendiary lies and propaganda.....as usual. This will not stand and that is another judge than needs to be removed from their position.

Not one word of this is true.

There are no paid left wing radicals, except in the fear and hate soaked imaginations of white supremacists.

 

[martybegan]

So, Trump's Federal military occupation of that city, not under any kind of emergency, will end?

So the guardsmen who back up the NYPD in places like Grand Central and Penn Station are occupying it?

 

[theHawk]

You think most of the people in Los Angeles are illegal? That is the dumbest thing, I ever heard.

Do you think most the people in Los Angeles are National Guard and ICE?

 

[Leo123]

Not one word of this is true.

There are no paid left wing radicals, except in the fear and hate soaked imaginations of white supremacists.

Which part is not true? We know the protesters are all paid too.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/compensated-activist-majority-protesters-paid/

 

[White 6]

So the guardsmen who back up the NYPD in places like Grand Central and Penn Station are occupying it?

It is only a federal military occupation of an American city, if the state and local government do not wish to have the troops stationed there, forcefully injected into a situation, they have the resources to handle on their own, as is their state's right. You are no doubt aware of the 576 protestors arrested in L.A. during the past year, the arrests were by L.A.P.D. as well as other California law enforcement as sent by California state government. The people on the front lines, that handled the protests (usually peaceful) were L.A.P.D. and state personnel (not ICE or National Guard, not even California National Guard), did not call for federal assistance as they were effectively handling the protests, as witnessed by the low levels of violence, property damage and injuries to civilians and Local/state law enforcement, no buildings burned or widespread property damage.

 

[j-mac]

‘A decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday will bar the deployment of the California National Guard in Los Angeles—for now, according to the attorney general's office.

“The Ninth Circuit’s decision means that, come Monday, there will be no National Guard troops deployed in California. Let me repeat: For the first time in six months, there will be no military deployed on the streets of Los Angeles,” said California Attorney General Rob Bonta in a news release.

The Ninth Circuit issued a partial administrative stay in the ongoing court battle between California leaders and President Donald Trump over control of the state's National Guard troops. The attorney general's office explained that the stay means the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California’s order barring the deployment of California National Guard troops in Los Angeles will remain in effect for now.

However, the stay also pauses the second part of the order, returning federalized California National Guard troops to Gov. Gavin Newsom's command. "While this decision is not final, it is a gratifying and hard-fought step in the right direction," Bonta said. "There is no crisis to justify the National Guard’s continued presence, and we look forward to continuing to prove that in court.”’

Ninth Circuit decision will clear California National Guard troops from LA by Monday, AG says

“The Ninth Circuit’s decision means that, come Monday, there will be no National Guard troops deployed in California," Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a news release.

www.kcra.com

“There is no crisis to justify the National Guard’s continued presence…”

Correct.

The fear, racism, bigotry, and hate of conservatives with regard to immigration is not a ‘crisis.’

The unwarranted deployment of the National Guard is a waste of time and resources.

Will continue to SCOTUS....You haven't won shit.

 

[j-mac]

It is only a federal military occupation of an American city, if the state and local government do not wish to have the troops stationed there, forcefully injected into a situation, they have the resources to handle on their own, as is their state's right. You are no doubt aware of the 576 protestors arrested in L.A. during the past year, the arrests were by L.A.P.D. as well as other California law enforcement as sent by California state government. The people on the front lines, that handled the protests (usually peaceful) were L.A.P.D. and state personnel (not ICE or National Guard, not even California National Guard), did not call for federal assistance as they were effectively handling the protests, as witnessed by the low levels of violence, property damage and injuries to civilians and Local/state law enforcement, no buildings burned or widespread property damage.

Except those in the Pacific Palisades...Oh wait, that was Newscum, and people like you.

 

[d0gbreath]

Well, that's some good news for all illegals and criminals.

I have a feeling that most NGs will find it as being good news too.

 

[Thinker101]

It is only a federal military occupation of an American city, if the state and local government do not wish to have the troops stationed there, forcefully injected into a situation, they have the resources to handle on their own, as is their state's right. You are no doubt aware of the 576 protestors arrested in L.A. during the past year, the arrests were by L.A.P.D. as well as other California law enforcement as sent by California state government. The people on the front lines, that handled the protests (usually peaceful) were L.A.P.D. and state personnel (not ICE or National Guard, not even California National Guard), did not call for federal assistance as they were effectively handling the protests, as witnessed by the low levels of violence, property damage and injuries to civilians and Local/state law enforcement, no buildings burned or widespread property damage.

Yep, good ole Newsom is there to protect and serve the people of California, except if fire hydrants need water, or you need a building permit, or if you need lower priced gas, or if you're waiting for high speed rail, or if you're homeless, or if you're on welfare....as long as he's not dining at the French Laundry.

 

[LeftofLeft]

The Courts will protect you. Rest easy.

 

[White 6]

Yep, good ole Newsom is there to protect and serve the people of California, except if fire hydrants need water, or you need a building permit, or if you need lower priced gas, or if you're waiting for high speed rail, or if you're homeless, or if you're on welfare....as long as he's not dining at the French Laundry.

Newsom is a fairly liberal kind of a dick, in general. While I usually disapprove of a lot of political stances of Newsom and California in general, I do recognize the right of a state to not be forced to accept Federal Troops to handle law enforcement needs. Federal Troops is exactly what Federal Title X activated Guard/Reserve troops are. In this particular string of protest events, state handling was all that was needed. Looks like various courts tend to agree.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

‘A decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday will bar the deployment of the California National Guard in Los Angeles—for now, according to the attorney general's office.

“The Ninth Circuit’s decision means that, come Monday, there will be no National Guard troops deployed in California. Let me repeat: For the first time in six months, there will be no military deployed on the streets of Los Angeles,” said California Attorney General Rob Bonta in a news release.

The Ninth Circuit issued a partial administrative stay in the ongoing court battle between California leaders and President Donald Trump over control of the state's National Guard troops. The attorney general's office explained that the stay means the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California’s order barring the deployment of California National Guard troops in Los Angeles will remain in effect for now.

However, the stay also pauses the second part of the order, returning federalized California National Guard troops to Gov. Gavin Newsom's command. "While this decision is not final, it is a gratifying and hard-fought step in the right direction," Bonta said. "There is no crisis to justify the National Guard’s continued presence, and we look forward to continuing to prove that in court.”’

Ninth Circuit decision will clear California National Guard troops from LA by Monday, AG says

“The Ninth Circuit’s decision means that, come Monday, there will be no National Guard troops deployed in California," Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a news release.

www.kcra.com

“There is no crisis to justify the National Guard’s continued presence…”

Correct.

The fear, racism, bigotry, and hate of conservatives with regard to immigration is not a ‘crisis.’

The unwarranted deployment of the National Guard is a waste of time and resources.

The troops can stay in Los Angeles, because they have a duty to disobey illegal orders.

 

[martybegan]

It is only a federal military occupation of an American city, if the state and local government do not wish to have the troops stationed there, forcefully injected into a situation, they have the resources to handle on their own, as is their state's right. You are no doubt aware of the 576 protestors arrested in L.A. during the past year, the arrests were by L.A.P.D. as well as other California law enforcement as sent by California state government. The people on the front lines, that handled the protests (usually peaceful) were L.A.P.D. and state personnel (not ICE or National Guard, not even California National Guard), did not call for federal assistance as they were effectively handling the protests, as witnessed by the low levels of violence, property damage and injuries to civilians and Local/state law enforcement, no buildings burned or widespread property damage.

The guard is in these places to assist federal law enforcement doing their legal jobs because the local authorities refuse to help the federal officers. That is their right, but the feds also have the right to nationalize the guard as is being done.

Are you saying JFK and LBJ shouldn't have nationalized the guard when the States governments tried to prevent integration back in the 60's?

 

[White 6]

The guard is in these places to assist federal law enforcement doing their legal jobs because the local authorities refuse to help the federal officers. That is their right, but the feds also have the right to nationalize the guard as is being done.

Are you saying JFK and LBJ shouldn't have nationalized the guard when the States governments tried to prevent integration back in the 60's?

BS. It is political showboating, to cram a military occupation force down the throats of a city and state, that does not need it or warrant, based on facts of primarily non-violent protest, and ICE officers proven ability to handle arrests without the intervention of Federal troops.

 

[martybegan]

BS. It is political showboating, to cram a military occupation force down the throats of a city and state, that does not need it or warrant, based on facts of primarily non-violent protest, and ICE officers proven ability to handle arrests without the intervention of Federal troops.

it's to provide safe bases for federal officers performing their legal duties. They are under attack while doing so in many situations.

Non-violent? your well used ass.

 

[Independent thinker]

‘A decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday will bar the deployment of the California National Guard in Los Angeles—for now, according to the attorney general's office.

“The Ninth Circuit’s decision means that, come Monday, there will be no National Guard troops deployed in California. Let me repeat: For the first time in six months, there will be no military deployed on the streets of Los Angeles,” said California Attorney General Rob Bonta in a news release.

The Ninth Circuit issued a partial administrative stay in the ongoing court battle between California leaders and President Donald Trump over control of the state's National Guard troops. The attorney general's office explained that the stay means the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California’s order barring the deployment of California National Guard troops in Los Angeles will remain in effect for now.

However, the stay also pauses the second part of the order, returning federalized California National Guard troops to Gov. Gavin Newsom's command. "While this decision is not final, it is a gratifying and hard-fought step in the right direction," Bonta said. "There is no crisis to justify the National Guard’s continued presence, and we look forward to continuing to prove that in court.”’

Ninth Circuit decision will clear California National Guard troops from LA by Monday, AG says

“The Ninth Circuit’s decision means that, come Monday, there will be no National Guard troops deployed in California," Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a news release.

www.kcra.com

“There is no crisis to justify the National Guard’s continued presence…”

Correct.

The fear, racism, bigotry, and hate of conservatives with regard to immigration is not a ‘crisis.’

The unwarranted deployment of the National Guard is a waste of time and resources.

AI Summary
The Ninth Circuit Court has been overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court an average of about 10.78 times per term over the past fifty years. In specific terms, during the 2015 term, the Supreme Court reversed eight out of eleven cases from the Ninth Circuit, indicating a significant reversal rate. Overall, it has been noted that the Ninth Circuit is often the most frequently overturned circuit court, with the Supreme Court reversing 15 of its cases in the October 2017 term alone