What if both parties committed to protecting and preserving America’s founding principles, values, tradition and history?

The election was not free and fair?

Your proof?

We're all waiting for you to astound us with your revelation.

Remember nothing can be proven if the evidence never makes it to court. Where is your proof it did not happen? Why is every state in question not cooperating? Why are MI. GA. WI. PA. election officials and politicians actively opposing forensic audits? Why won't Dominion release their source codes?
 
Last edited:

Remember nothing can be proven if the evidence never makes it to court. Where is your proof it did not happen? Why is every state in question not cooperating? Why are MI. GA. WI. PA. election officials and politicians actively opposing forensic audits? Why won't Dominion release their source codes?
Yep. About what I figured. Trying to get people to prove a negative. <snicker> Just like Cool Hand Luke... ya'll keep comin' back with a "handful o' nuthin'" ...darned funny.

By the way... ya'll don't need the evidence to "make it to court" in order to PRESENT it, so... go ahead... we're all waiting... quivering with anticipation... :auiqs.jpg:

Of course... all of those Republican and Trump -appointed judges and justices who ruled against him were all part of the Kornspiracy, weren't they? :cool:

Lying, ignorant Losers...
 
Yep. About what I figured. Trying to get people to prove a negative. <snicker> Just like Cool Hand Luke... ya'll keep comin' back with a "handful o' nuthin'" ...darned funny.

By the way... ya'll don't need the evidence to "make it to court" in order to PRESENT it, so... go ahead... we're all waiting... quivering with anticipation... :auiqs.jpg:

Of course... all of those Republican and Trump -appointed judges and justices who ruled against him were all part of the Kornspiracy, weren't they? :cool:

Lying, ignorant Losers...
You cannot present it without an evidentiary hearing. They did not get any. Pretty stupid, aren't you?
 
What if both moved their platforms to perfectly align with our founders intent?
What if both parties committed to putting Americans and America first?
What if both parties agreed to ONLY do work for American citizens?
What if we got back to the JFK era when only little things separated the parties?

Isn’t it awfully strange that the aforementioned has to be asked?
Maybe we the people, should make our potential candidates take a test of their knowledge of the articles of the constitution before they are elected. They should also be elected with term limits to prevent them from being life long politician .
 
You can present it to the Court of Public Opinion, and so far that hasn't happened, right, clown?
It has been presented and over half the people believe Biden won because of fraud. Your lie has failed, quite miserably.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: cnm
You cannot present it without an evidentiary hearing. They did not get any. Pretty stupid, aren't you?
Hoho, even Trump's lawyers didn't vet the evidence they presented...you know you've been told this.

Judge Parker’s order came about a month after a marathon hearing during which she repeatedly pressed Ms. Powell and her colleagues about how — or even whether — they had verified the statements of witnesses who filed sworn statements making claims of widespread fraud and tampering with voting machines. Several times, Judge Parker expressed astonishment at the lawyers’ answers, telling them they had a responsibility to perform “minimal due diligence” and calling some of the lawsuit’s claims “fantastical.”
 
Hoho, even Trump's lawyers didn't vet the evidence they presented...you know you've been told this.

Judge Parker’s order came about a month after a marathon hearing during which she repeatedly pressed Ms. Powell and her colleagues about how — or even whether — they had verified the statements of witnesses who filed sworn statements making claims of widespread fraud and tampering with voting machines. Several times, Judge Parker expressed astonishment at the lawyers’ answers, telling them they had a responsibility to perform “minimal due diligence” and calling some of the lawsuit’s claims “fantastical.”
That is an opinion. It carries no legal weight.
 
Took all of 3 seconds for a lefty to bring up slavery because as we know that's what JFK was all about
The OP mentioned our founding. And considering Broke Loser is an unabashed racist, it was a valid question.
 
Not so ironically, it is Leftist / Democrats who continue telling us we need Mexican slaves.
“They do the jobs that are beneath real Americans and they do them cheaper.” Remember that?

Some things never change huh?
They aren't slaves. They are free to walk away any time they choose.

Nice try.
 
I'll entertain the crazies.
This is where the thread gets real scary so grab your straightjacket or find your safe space before I begin.........Ready......here goes.
How exactly has ANY deviation from our founders intent benefitted the core people of America or America as a whole and in general?
Don't tell us how various factions have benefitted...SHOW us the data that proves ANY deviation has made America better...better for Americans with family that served in the first and second world wars.
Good luck to you.
You poor baby. You think giving women the right to vote, and freeing the slaves, and treating gays as human beings stole something from you.

Pathetic.
 
Hard to believe, but political animosity back then was much worse than today

Just look at Alexander Hamilton
Yep. The 1824 election was probably the most vicious election ever. And it led to Andrew Jackson founding the Democratic Party. That's probably why limousine liberal Trump hung his picture in the oval office...

Then there's the 1860 election...
 
Some things never change....Dems were telling us we needed slaves pre 1865 and they’re still telling us we need slaves in the 21st century.
We hear it all the time from the Left:
“We NEED illegals...Mexicans do the jobs whites won’t do and they do it for far less compensation. If we got rid of illegals are economy would collapse.”
the-two-platforms-the-democratic-platform-the-republican-platform-is-43367870.png
You sound exactly like the old timey right wing Democrats.
 
What if both moved their platforms to perfectly align with our founders intent?
What if both parties committed to putting Americans and America first?
What if both parties agreed to ONLY do work for American citizens?
What if we got back to the JFK era when only little things separated the parties?

Isn’t it awfully strange that the aforementioned has to be asked?
Fuck your Founders intent. Win elections if you want all that Cuck boy.
 
Agree with the OPs premise. Going back to the time of Eisenhower Republicans and Kennedy Democrats would be a positive step.

The two parties would likely be able to compromise knowing that the common goals are more numerous than the ideological differences.
Kennedy Democrats were liberals. JFK asked LBJ to be his vice president in order to win over the right wing Democrats of the Deep South.

Kennedy was HATED by Southern Democrats. That was the whole reason he was in Dallas that day and had Connolly in the front seat. Connolly was a right wing Democrat. JFK was trying to win them over for re-election.

But I get your meaning.
 

Forum List

Back
Top