What exactly is the "one state solution"?

Status
Not open for further replies.
He was merely stating why there is not peace. True, of course.

No, he's not. If he were -- he would have included both narratives and would have presented it in a balanced, fair and understanding way. He wouldn't be framing things in terms of "massacres" occurring in a vacuum. He would acknowledge Gaza's belligerence and Israel's right to respond to that belligerence. He would acknowledge that Jewish desire for self-determination is the same as Palestinian desire for self-determination and not call it Jewish supremacy.

This is a standard Hasbara troll tactic, "balanced, fair and understanding way?" oh please! When the Palestinians retaliate to Zionist provocations they're being "belligerent", thus justifying a massively disproportionate response. This cartoon sums up the situation in a "fair, balanced and understanding" way

israel-gaza-rockets.jpg


Oh, and it's not a "Jewish desire for self determination", its a Zionist desire for land that co-opts and perverts Judaism to it's goals.
 
He was merely stating why there is not peace. True, of course.

No, he's not. If he were -- he would have included both narratives and would have presented it in a balanced, fair and understanding way. He wouldn't be framing things in terms of "massacres" occurring in a vacuum. He would acknowledge Gaza's belligerence and Israel's right to respond to that belligerence. He would acknowledge that Jewish desire for self-determination is the same as Palestinian desire for self-determination and not call it Jewish supremacy.

This is a standard Hasbara troll tactic, "balanced, fair and understanding way?" oh please! When the Palestinians retaliate to Zionist provocations they're being "belligerent", thus justifying a massively disproportionate response. This cartoon sums up the situation in a "fair, balanced and understanding" way

israel-gaza-rockets.jpg


Oh, and it's not a "Jewish desire for self determination", its a Zionist desire for land that co-opts and perverts Judaism to it's goals.

In the twisted, alternate reality of the Islamic terrorist huggers, attacks by Islamic terrorists are somehow Zionist provocations™.

Taqiyya troll tactics.
 
He was merely stating why there is not peace. True, of course.

No, he's not. If he were -- he would have included both narratives and would have presented it in a balanced, fair and understanding way. He wouldn't be framing things in terms of "massacres" occurring in a vacuum. He would acknowledge Gaza's belligerence and Israel's right to respond to that belligerence. He would acknowledge that Jewish desire for self-determination is the same as Palestinian desire for self-determination and not call it Jewish supremacy.
There is the colonizer and the colonized.

There, both narratives. Happy now?
 
He was merely stating why there is not peace. True, of course.

No, he's not. If he were -- he would have included both narratives and would have presented it in a balanced, fair and understanding way. He wouldn't be framing things in terms of "massacres" occurring in a vacuum. He would acknowledge Gaza's belligerence and Israel's right to respond to that belligerence. He would acknowledge that Jewish desire for self-determination is the same as Palestinian desire for self-determination and not call it Jewish supremacy.

This is a standard Hasbara troll tactic, "balanced, fair and understanding way?" oh please! When the Palestinians retaliate to Zionist provocations they're being "belligerent", thus justifying a massively disproportionate response. This cartoon sums up the situation in a "fair, balanced and understanding" way

israel-gaza-rockets.jpg


Oh, and it's not a "Jewish desire for self determination", its a Zionist desire for land that co-opts and perverts Judaism to it's goals.

In the twisted, alternate reality of the Islamic terrorist huggers, attacks by Islamic terrorists are somehow Zionist provocations™.

Taqiyya troll tactics.
You tend to forget who is occupying whom.
 
He was merely stating why there is not peace. True, of course.

No, he's not. If he were -- he would have included both narratives and would have presented it in a balanced, fair and understanding way. He wouldn't be framing things in terms of "massacres" occurring in a vacuum. He would acknowledge Gaza's belligerence and Israel's right to respond to that belligerence. He would acknowledge that Jewish desire for self-determination is the same as Palestinian desire for self-determination and not call it Jewish supremacy.

This is a standard Hasbara troll tactic, "balanced, fair and understanding way?" oh please! When the Palestinians retaliate to Zionist provocations they're being "belligerent", thus justifying a massively disproportionate response. This cartoon sums up the situation in a "fair, balanced and understanding" way

israel-gaza-rockets.jpg


Oh, and it's not a "Jewish desire for self determination", its a Zionist desire for land that co-opts and perverts Judaism to it's goals.
Indeed!

Israeli_Palestinian_sides.jpg
 
He was merely stating why there is not peace. True, of course.

No, he's not. If he were -- he would have included both narratives and would have presented it in a balanced, fair and understanding way. He wouldn't be framing things in terms of "massacres" occurring in a vacuum. He would acknowledge Gaza's belligerence and Israel's right to respond to that belligerence. He would acknowledge that Jewish desire for self-determination is the same as Palestinian desire for self-determination and not call it Jewish supremacy.

This is a standard Hasbara troll tactic, "balanced, fair and understanding way?" oh please! When the Palestinians retaliate to Zionist provocations they're being "belligerent", thus justifying a massively disproportionate response. This cartoon sums up the situation in a "fair, balanced and understanding" way

israel-gaza-rockets.jpg


Oh, and it's not a "Jewish desire for self determination", its a Zionist desire for land that co-opts and perverts Judaism to it's goals.
Indeed!

Israeli_Palestinian_sides.jpg

Cartoons put a lot into perspective. I especially like this one:

idf-hamas-640x360.jpg


Perfect example of Zionist doublespeak Hasbara.
 
He was merely stating why there is not peace. True, of course.

No, he's not. If he were -- he would have included both narratives and would have presented it in a balanced, fair and understanding way. He wouldn't be framing things in terms of "massacres" occurring in a vacuum. He would acknowledge Gaza's belligerence and Israel's right to respond to that belligerence. He would acknowledge that Jewish desire for self-determination is the same as Palestinian desire for self-determination and not call it Jewish supremacy.
There is the colonizer and the colonized.

There, both narratives. Happy now?

Very simplistic and black-and-white. Life is full of gray areas.
 
He was merely stating why there is not peace. True, of course.

No, he's not. If he were -- he would have included both narratives and would have presented it in a balanced, fair and understanding way. He wouldn't be framing things in terms of "massacres" occurring in a vacuum. He would acknowledge Gaza's belligerence and Israel's right to respond to that belligerence. He would acknowledge that Jewish desire for self-determination is the same as Palestinian desire for self-determination and not call it Jewish supremacy.
There is the colonizer and the colonized.

There, both narratives. Happy now?

Very simplistic and black-and-white. Life is full of gray areas.
The Israeli-Palestinian problem is not full of gray areas but is rather straightforward and uncomplicated, namely, Palestinians are living and dying under a brutal half-century long Israeli occupation.
 
He was merely stating why there is not peace. True, of course.

No, he's not. If he were -- he would have included both narratives and would have presented it in a balanced, fair and understanding way. He wouldn't be framing things in terms of "massacres" occurring in a vacuum. He would acknowledge Gaza's belligerence and Israel's right to respond to that belligerence. He would acknowledge that Jewish desire for self-determination is the same as Palestinian desire for self-determination and not call it Jewish supremacy.
There is the colonizer and the colonized.

There, both narratives. Happy now?

Very simplistic and black-and-white. Life is full of gray areas.
The Israeli-Palestinian problem is not full of gray areas but is rather straightforward and uncomplicated, namely, Palestinians are living and dying under a brutal half-century long Israeli occupation.

Actually, it is only in one city, Hebron, that I consider the occupation to be brutal. Hopefully, that can be resolved soon.
 
Oh, and it's not a "Jewish desire for self determination", its a Zionist desire for land that co-opts and perverts Judaism to it's goals.

Why is Palestinian desire for self-determination seen in a positive light and Jewish desire for self-determination seen as an ugly land grab and a perversion?

See, this is the basic lack of respect that I'm talking about.
 
Oh, and it's not a "Jewish desire for self determination", its a Zionist desire for land that co-opts and perverts Judaism to it's goals.

Why is Palestinian desire for self-determination seen in a positive light and Jewish desire for self-determination seen as an ugly land grab and a perversion?

See, this is the basic lack of respect that I'm talking about.
The state of Israel is founded on a twentieth-century land grab.
 
Oh, and it's not a "Jewish desire for self determination", its a Zionist desire for land that co-opts and perverts Judaism to it's goals.

Why is Palestinian desire for self-determination seen in a positive light and Jewish desire for self-determination seen as an ugly land grab and a perversion?

See, this is the basic lack of respect that I'm talking about.
Because it is a land grab. :eusa_doh::eusa_doh:
 
Because it is a land grab. :eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

Why? What makes it a land grab and not a people seeking self-determination? What is the fundamental difference between those two things? Why is the idea of the Jewish people having sovereignty and self-determination on their ancestral lands DIFFERENT from any other people's?
 
Because it is a land grab. :eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

Why? What makes it a land grab and not a people seeking self-determination? What is the fundamental difference between those two things? Why is the idea of the Jewish people having sovereignty and self-determination on their ancestral lands DIFFERENT from any other people's?
No part of the Middle East is ancestral land of European Jews.
 
Because it is a land grab. :eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

Why? What makes it a land grab and not a people seeking self-determination? What is the fundamental difference between those two things? Why is the idea of the Jewish people having sovereignty and self-determination on their ancestral lands DIFFERENT from any other people's?
No part of the Middle East is ancestral land of European Jews.

You're right, it's not only the ancestral land of European Jews, but it's the ancestral land of Mideastern Jews too. Whenever we pray or say grace after meals, we remember Israel. On all our holidays, on Passover and Yom Kippur, we say, "Next year in Jerusalem." On the fast day of Tisha B'av, we go without food or drink for 25 hours to remember the Temple in Jerusalem. In our weddings, we break a glass for Jerusalem. Family and work opportunities might keep us in other lands, but our hearts are always in Israel. And Masada shall not fall again.
 
No part of the Middle East is ancestral land of European Jews.

So, you are essentially saying that the Jewish people who clearly and undeniably are the historical culture of the land are in no way related to the Jewish people in the Diaspora even though they share the identical culture. There is no connection between the two.
 
No part of the Middle East is ancestral land of European Jews.

So, you are essentially saying that the Jewish people who clearly and undeniably are the historical culture of the land are in no way related to the Jewish people in the Diaspora even though they share the identical culture. There is no connection between the two.

There is nothing identical culturally between Arab Jews and European Jews.

"I am an Arab Jew. Or, more specifically, an Iraqi Israeli woman living, writing and teaching in the U.S. Most members of my family were born and raised in Baghdad, and now live in Iraq, Israel, the U.S., England, and Holland. When my grandmother first encountered Israeli society in the '50s, she was convinced that the people who looked, spoke and ate so differently--the European Jews--were actually European Christians. Jewishness for her generation was inextricably associated with Middle Easterness. My grandmother, who still lives in Israel and still communicates largely in Arabic, had to be taught to speak of "us" as Jews and "them" as Arabs. For Middle Easterners, the operating distinction had always been "Muslim," "Jew," and "Christian," not Arab versus Jew. The assumption was that "Arabness" referred to a common shared culture and language, albeit with religious differences."

Reflections By An Arab Jew - Ella Shohat
 
Because it is a land grab. :eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

Why? What makes it a land grab and not a people seeking self-determination? What is the fundamental difference between those two things? Why is the idea of the Jewish people having sovereignty and self-determination on their ancestral lands DIFFERENT from any other people's?
No part of the Middle East is ancestral land of European Jews.

You're right, it's not only the ancestral land of European Jews, but it's the ancestral land of Mideastern Jews too. Whenever we pray or say grace after meals, we remember Israel. On all our holidays, on Passover and Yom Kippur, we say, "Next year in Jerusalem." On the fast day of Tisha B'av, we go without food or drink for 25 hours to remember the Temple in Jerusalem. In our weddings, we break a glass for Jerusalem. Family and work opportunities might keep us in other lands, but our hearts are always in Israel. And Masada shall not fall again.
Undoubtedly, the Jewish faith, like Christianity, has its roots in the Holy Land, millennia ago. These faiths were taken to other parts of the Roman World but forever Jerusalem represented a tradition for those who accepted the teachings. Through time, both these faiths which have an attachment to the Holy Land saw Jerusalem become inhabited mostly by Islam. Both Judaism and Christianity preserve a connection to the place in their prayers, psalms, and hymns. The Catholic Mass makes present the Passover meal Joshua Ben Joseph shared with his Jewish Apostles in Jerusalem and this is the holiest of Catholic prayers.

What you are forgetting is that it is not the city of Jerusalem that matters because wherever God's people are gathered in prayer, there God is among them. The people are Israel, don't you see? And the wish that next year in Jerusalem is an expression that we know where we come from as faith communities and one day God will take His place in His holy city and reign supreme among his faithful people. This is an eschatological aspiration. Let it not be trampled upon by mere men who disgrace the Word of God and His Kingdom (that is His alone to establish in the fullness of time) by shedding blood to take the homeland of Palestinians today. The very pretense of calling the country Israel is surely a blasphemy because Israel is wherever God's people are and cannot be embraced by a modern political state established in blood and preserved by spilling the blood of the innocents.
 
Because it is a land grab. :eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

Why? What makes it a land grab and not a people seeking self-determination? What is the fundamental difference between those two things? Why is the idea of the Jewish people having sovereignty and self-determination on their ancestral lands DIFFERENT from any other people's?
No part of the Middle East is ancestral land of European Jews.

What part of the middle East is ancestral land to European xtian Crusaders or Roman Conquerors? What part is ancestral to Turkish colonists?

I suppose for you and the identifiable Jew hating cabal it's convenient to remain ignorant regarding the Jewish ties to the area.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top