what did the russians do to control the ballot box.... ?

[JakeStarkey]

Anyone who approves the idea that the Russians hacked our elections does not support American values and institutions.

Such people should be reported to the feebs. But they already have been, I would suspect.

Thought control police. Interesting, that also seems to go against American values.

Keep tabs of those who talk against the American system in a way that aids and abet the enemy is the actions of a 'thought police.' Who knew?

What happened to the American right?
They used to be the patriotic stalwarts.

And since you lefties have NEVER been patriotic, why is it that we're supposed to be worried about proving our patriotism to you?

Since the premise of the question is false, it can be ignored as poor partisan failure.

 

[usmbguest5318]

what did the russians do to control the ballot box.... ?

My, how precociously myopic of you to ask ...Quite simply, nothing.

 

[francoHFW]

can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.

Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????

Without GOP BS propaganda for 25 years, she would have won by 30 pts...That's all you morons have...

Yeah, how DARE the GOP tell people the truth about Hillary, instead of just letting them believe her lies?

Truth my ass. How's her special prosecutor and lock her up coming along, idiot dupe?

 

[Cecilie1200]

can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.

Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????

Without GOP BS propaganda for 25 years, she would have won by 30 pts...That's all you morons have...

Yeah, how DARE the GOP tell people the truth about Hillary, instead of just letting them believe her lies?

Truth my ass. How's her special prosecutor and lock her up coming along, idiot dupe?

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!" And you wonder why leftists are viewed as immoral scum bags.

Let me clarify the concept of "truth" for you, jackwagon, since I know it's not something you deal with very much:

Were the e-mails real? Yes.

Did the Democrats in question ACTUALLY write the words that we were told were in them? Yes.

Were the e-mails, in any way, tampered with or changed to make them sound worse, or has such a thing even been alleged? No.

So yes, the release of the e-mails and attribution to Hillary's campaign staff and allies was, in fact, telling the truth.

Take notes. You may have to deal with the truth at some point in the future, and it will save time if you kinda understand it now.

 

[francoHFW]

can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.

Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????

Without GOP BS propaganda for 25 years, she would have won by 30 pts...That's all you morons have...

Yeah, how DARE the GOP tell people the truth about Hillary, instead of just letting them believe her lies?

Truth my ass. How's her special prosecutor and lock her up coming along, idiot dupe?

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!" And you wonder why leftists are viewed as immoral scum bags.

Let me clarify the concept of "truth" for you, jackwagon, since I know it's not something you deal with very much:

Were the e-mails real? Yes.

Did the Democrats in question ACTUALLY write the words that we were told were in them? Yes.

Were the e-mails, in any way, tampered with or changed to make them sound worse, or has such a thing even been alleged? No.

So yes, the release of the e-mails and attribution to Hillary's campaign staff and allies was, in fact, telling the truth.

Take notes. You may have to deal with the truth at some point in the future, and it will save time if you kinda understand it now.

Yup, and those e-mails were ALL irrelevant staffers BSing about things they had no power to do and there is no evidence that anything actually happened in the real world. Ask Bernie, not his supporters who were fooled by endless hours of pundits going on and on about nothing, dupe.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

Democrats claim the Russians told the truth about the democrats. That so disgusted the public that they refused to vote for crooked hillary.

If the public had known that CNN colluded with the Democrats to give hillary the debate questions before the debate it might have made an even bigger difference.

maybe Putin sent in about 300,000 Russian dwarfs to break into the polling stations after midnite? and somehow they were able to break into the voting machines?

 

[g5000]

can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

You actually are this stupid, aren't you.

Wow.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.

Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????

Without GOP BS propaganda for 25 years, she would have won by 30 pts...That's all you morons have...

Yeah, how DARE the GOP tell people the truth about Hillary, instead of just letting them believe her lies?

Truth my ass. How's her special prosecutor and lock her up coming along, idiot dupe?

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!" And you wonder why leftists are viewed as immoral scum bags.

Let me clarify the concept of "truth" for you, jackwagon, since I know it's not something you deal with very much:

Were the e-mails real? Yes.

Did the Democrats in question ACTUALLY write the words that we were told were in them? Yes.

Were the e-mails, in any way, tampered with or changed to make them sound worse, or has such a thing even been alleged? No.

So yes, the release of the e-mails and attribution to Hillary's campaign staff and allies was, in fact, telling the truth.

Take notes. You may have to deal with the truth at some point in the future, and it will save time if you kinda understand it now.

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!

It certainly wasn't for a lack of trying.
Your people investigated six ways to Sunday and came up empty. Do you ever get tired of losing?

 

[Lakhota]

what did the russians do to control the ballot box.... ?

I've heard that Russians hacked voting machines in several key swing states and is quietly being investigated by various state and federal authorities. That's all I know...

 

[Wyatt earp]

Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.

Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????

Without GOP BS propaganda for 25 years, she would have won by 30 pts...That's all you morons have...

Yeah, how DARE the GOP tell people the truth about Hillary, instead of just letting them believe her lies?

Truth my ass. How's her special prosecutor and lock her up coming along, idiot dupe?

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!" And you wonder why leftists are viewed as immoral scum bags.

Let me clarify the concept of "truth" for you, jackwagon, since I know it's not something you deal with very much:

Were the e-mails real? Yes.

Did the Democrats in question ACTUALLY write the words that we were told were in them? Yes.

Were the e-mails, in any way, tampered with or changed to make them sound worse, or has such a thing even been alleged? No.

So yes, the release of the e-mails and attribution to Hillary's campaign staff and allies was, in fact, telling the truth.

Take notes. You may have to deal with the truth at some point in the future, and it will save time if you kinda understand it now.

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!

It certainly wasn't for a lack of trying.
Your people investigated six ways to Sunday and came up empty. Do you ever get tired of losing?

Empty? Losing?

Remind us again which lying corrupt ***** is not in the White House?


.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Without GOP BS propaganda for 25 years, she would have won by 30 pts...That's all you morons have...

Yeah, how DARE the GOP tell people the truth about Hillary, instead of just letting them believe her lies?

Truth my ass. How's her special prosecutor and lock her up coming along, idiot dupe?

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!" And you wonder why leftists are viewed as immoral scum bags.

Let me clarify the concept of "truth" for you, jackwagon, since I know it's not something you deal with very much:

Were the e-mails real? Yes.

Did the Democrats in question ACTUALLY write the words that we were told were in them? Yes.

Were the e-mails, in any way, tampered with or changed to make them sound worse, or has such a thing even been alleged? No.

So yes, the release of the e-mails and attribution to Hillary's campaign staff and allies was, in fact, telling the truth.

Take notes. You may have to deal with the truth at some point in the future, and it will save time if you kinda understand it now.

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!

It certainly wasn't for a lack of trying.
Your people investigated six ways to Sunday and came up empty. Do you ever get tired of losing?

Empty? Losing?

Remind us again which lying corrupt ***** is not in the White House?


.

So it was purely political then?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Yeah, how DARE the GOP tell people the truth about Hillary, instead of just letting them believe her lies?

Truth my ass. How's her special prosecutor and lock her up coming along, idiot dupe?

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!" And you wonder why leftists are viewed as immoral scum bags.

Let me clarify the concept of "truth" for you, jackwagon, since I know it's not something you deal with very much:

Were the e-mails real? Yes.

Did the Democrats in question ACTUALLY write the words that we were told were in them? Yes.

Were the e-mails, in any way, tampered with or changed to make them sound worse, or has such a thing even been alleged? No.

So yes, the release of the e-mails and attribution to Hillary's campaign staff and allies was, in fact, telling the truth.

Take notes. You may have to deal with the truth at some point in the future, and it will save time if you kinda understand it now.

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!

It certainly wasn't for a lack of trying.
Your people investigated six ways to Sunday and came up empty. Do you ever get tired of losing?

Empty? Losing?

Remind us again which lying corrupt ***** is not in the White House?


.

So it was purely political then?

No she became irrelevant you know like how the democrats dropped Cindy shehan (Spl?)like a hot potato or how all of Trumps accusers suddenly dropped out of the spot light..

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Truth my ass. How's her special prosecutor and lock her up coming along, idiot dupe?

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!" And you wonder why leftists are viewed as immoral scum bags.

Let me clarify the concept of "truth" for you, jackwagon, since I know it's not something you deal with very much:

Were the e-mails real? Yes.

Did the Democrats in question ACTUALLY write the words that we were told were in them? Yes.

Were the e-mails, in any way, tampered with or changed to make them sound worse, or has such a thing even been alleged? No.

So yes, the release of the e-mails and attribution to Hillary's campaign staff and allies was, in fact, telling the truth.

Take notes. You may have to deal with the truth at some point in the future, and it will save time if you kinda understand it now.

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!

It certainly wasn't for a lack of trying.
Your people investigated six ways to Sunday and came up empty. Do you ever get tired of losing?

Empty? Losing?

Remind us again which lying corrupt ***** is not in the White House?


.

So it was purely political then?

No she became irrelevant you know like how the democrats dropped Cindy shehan (Spl?)like a hot potato or how all of Trumps accusers suddenly dropped out of the spot light..

Yep. Just like I thought. You couldn't bring yourself to answer honestly. Just drive by jibberish.

 

[washamericom]

i heard it again this morning... an investigation to find collusion with trump campaign with russia

and again i say collusion to do what ?

 

[dannyboys]

And despite that, they didn't get into the ballot box which is what the OP specified. The DNC hack only exposed the DNC for the corrupt entity that it was. For the 1000th time.

Do you believe the exposure of corruption hurt Clinton's chances of winning?

Unless you were living under a rock or just a blind supporter. Clinton's corruption and that of the DNC was well known.

By total FoxRushdupes. How's the Hillary special prosecutor coming, dupe? BERNIE says the DNC stuff was Bs ferchrissake.

The only dupes lost in Nov.
Until the DFL quits looking for scapegoats and Russian bogymen and come to the realization that the party strayed too far left and lost independents and tax paying blue collar workers get used to the agony of defeat.
Seems at this point the left is doubling down on stupid. Good luck with all that.

Do you believe that Clinton was hurt by the release of hacked emails?

I believe Hillary was "hurt" by people uncovering her illegal private server and telling the world about what she had done.
I believe her campaign was hurt when someone uncovered the collusion with CNN and corruption within her campaign.
I beleive that had she not been complicit and corrupt and a ******* liar she would have easily beaten Trump.
What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.
Does anyone find it extremely hypocritical of the LIBs to now tell everyone that "it doesn't matter how any possible 'dirt' on Trump is turned up. Leaking classified information and giving it to the WAPO/NYT so they can EXPOSE TRUMP!!!!! is just fine now but having the truth come out about Hillary is wrong!
******* hypocrites!
I can't WAIT for the DEMs to stand on the White House steps in a month and tell the world that in fact there is ZERO evidence that anyone on the Trump campaign had any 'nefarious' involvement with the Russians either before or after the election.
And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

 

[meaner gene]

maybe Putin sent in about 300,000 Russian dwarfs to break into the polling stations after midnite? and somehow they were able to break into the voting machines?

It's fascinating how republicans won't accept that it's possible for a charasmatic billionaire to release damaging information about the democdratic candidate in order to sway the electorate and change their votes.

 

[meaner gene]

What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.

And yet the parallel to the unmasking of the truth when it came to Michael Flynn and Jeff Sessions escapes the republican mindset. You should have welcomed that, like you welcomed other illegal activity.

 

[meaner gene]

And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

Didn't Trump leak that we had secret bases in Saudi Arabia, and that the CIA had been hacked by foreigners? Leaking is leaking? Right?

 

[dannyboys]

can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.

Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????

Without GOP BS propaganda for 25 years, she would have won by 30 pts...That's all you morons have...

Yeah, how DARE the GOP tell people the truth about Hillary, instead of just letting them believe her lies?

Truth my ass. How's her special prosecutor and lock her up coming along, idiot dupe?

Don't worry.
After President Trump has ferreted out every ******* seditious traitor in the intelligence agencies he'll turn his attention to a 'new hobby'. That will be to have a special prosecutor go after the Clintons.
The pair will spend every ******* penny they grifted over the years to stay out of federal prison.

 

[meaner gene]

Don't worry.
After President Trump has ferreted out every ******* seditious traitor in the intelligence agencies he'll turn his attention to a 'new hobby'. That will be to have a special prosecutor go after the Clintons.
The pair will spend every ******* penny they grifted over the years to stay out of federal prison.

And they'll find Obama's Kenyan birth certificate? Right?