Are They Stealing the Los Angeles Primary?

[Doc7505]

Are They Stealing the Los Angeles Primary?​

Are They Stealing the Los Angeles Primary?

Allegations of vote manipulation swirl in the contentious 2026 Los Angeles primary election.

hotair.com

4 Jun 2026 ~~ By David Strom

Nobody believes that Karen Bass is indifferent to whether she faces Nithya Raman or Spencer Pratt as her opponent in November.
Raman is a weak candidate, and every Democrat wants Spencer Pratt out of the race for obvious reasons, not the least of which is that anybody but a leftist on the ballot is an atrocity in their eyes. When Raman collapsed after the sole mayoral debate, Raman's polling and chances of victory, which were considered good, nosedived into single-digit territory.
On election night, nobody was shocked that Pratt had closed the gap with Bass, just as nobody was surprised that Raman came in a distant third, as the polls suggested.
But California doesn't have election nights. They have counting weeks, where vote totals change as batches of votes trickle in, and those batches show an amazing pattern: there are almost no votes for Spencer Pratt, which is nearly impossible statistically.

​

No matter how much you believe that Democrats are somewhat more likely to vote by mail than Republicans, the difference is not THAT much, especially since Republicans have become much more likely to vote by mail.

xxxxxxxxxx
​

California sends out ballots to all registered voters, and of course doesn't clean its voter rolls because that is Jim Crow 2.0. You can register to vote online without any proof of citizenship or residency, and without a Social Security number. You can just check a box that you have neither a DL nor a Social Security number, which is practically impossible.

​

~Snip~
If Democrats cared a whit about how any of this looks, they would work to reassure voters that the process is fair. They know that it looks corrupt, and that a perception of corruption undermines legitimacy in the eyes of the losers. That's why even Ecuador uses hand-counted paper ballots in front of representatives from all the parties. Because confidence in elections is almost as important as fairness in elections.
Countries that operate under democratic principles work hard to ensure transparency in election procedures. When Americans monitor foreign elections, they are only certified fair when everything is transparent.
There is nothing transparent about California elections. Democrats just don't care, because as Newsom put it:

“We all have agencies. We can shape the future. I don’t anticipate this being the case, but there is a ‘break the glass scenario.’ There are many people who have a deep understanding of what it would look like if Democrats were locked out, and we’re going to do everything to make sure that doesn’t happen. I’ll leave it there.”​

Sounds like Maduro, doesn't it?
Don't worry, though. Every Pravda outlet will spend countless hours explaining how the election really WAS fair, even though it looks hinky.
Trust us, they will say. We are sharp as a tack.

Commentary:
They've been stealing elections on California by this method for decadew. I bet that half the California Democrats in the house got in via state sponsored vote fraud.
Saddam Hussein ran fairer elections than California does. At least he'd only win with 97% of the votes.
It is Calif. only a step or two behind NYC, Nigeria and South Africa.
California a Democrat hellhole cementing down the tools to remain in power forever.

​

 

[candycorn]

Are They Stealing the Los Angeles Primary?

no

 

[candycorn]

California sends out ballots to all registered voters, and of course doesn't clean its voter rolls because that is Jim Crow 2.0. You can register to vote online without any proof of citizenship or residency, and without a Social Security number. You can just check a box that you have neither a DL nor a Social Security number, which is practically impossible.

Perhaps you should demonstrate and register to vote in California (if you live in another state). This would show how easy it is.

But you won't....will you?

 

[shockedcanadian]

Are They Stealing the Los Angeles Primary?​

Are They Stealing the Los Angeles Primary?

Allegations of vote manipulation swirl in the contentious 2026 Los Angeles primary election.

hotair.com

4 Jun 2026 ~~ By David Strom

Nobody believes that Karen Bass is indifferent to whether she faces Nithya Raman or Spencer Pratt as her opponent in November.
Raman is a weak candidate, and every Democrat wants Spencer Pratt out of the race for obvious reasons, not the least of which is that anybody but a leftist on the ballot is an atrocity in their eyes. When Raman collapsed after the sole mayoral debate, Raman's polling and chances of victory, which were considered good, nosedived into single-digit territory.
On election night, nobody was shocked that Pratt had closed the gap with Bass, just as nobody was surprised that Raman came in a distant third, as the polls suggested.
But California doesn't have election nights. They have counting weeks, where vote totals change as batches of votes trickle in, and those batches show an amazing pattern: there are almost no votes for Spencer Pratt, which is nearly impossible statistically.

​

No matter how much you believe that Democrats are somewhat more likely to vote by mail than Republicans, the difference is not THAT much, especially since Republicans have become much more likely to vote by mail.

xxxxxxxxxx
​

California sends out ballots to all registered voters, and of course doesn't clean its voter rolls because that is Jim Crow 2.0. You can register to vote online without any proof of citizenship or residency, and without a Social Security number. You can just check a box that you have neither a DL nor a Social Security number, which is practically impossible.

​

~Snip~
If Democrats cared a whit about how any of this looks, they would work to reassure voters that the process is fair. They know that it looks corrupt, and that a perception of corruption undermines legitimacy in the eyes of the losers. That's why even Ecuador uses hand-counted paper ballots in front of representatives from all the parties. Because confidence in elections is almost as important as fairness in elections.
Countries that operate under democratic principles work hard to ensure transparency in election procedures. When Americans monitor foreign elections, they are only certified fair when everything is transparent.
There is nothing transparent about California elections. Democrats just don't care, because as Newsom put it:

“We all have agencies. We can shape the future. I don’t anticipate this being the case, but there is a ‘break the glass scenario.’ There are many people who have a deep understanding of what it would look like if Democrats were locked out, and we’re going to do everything to make sure that doesn’t happen. I’ll leave it there.”​

Sounds like Maduro, doesn't it?
Don't worry, though. Every Pravda outlet will spend countless hours explaining how the election really WAS fair, even though it looks hinky.
Trust us, they will say. We are sharp as a tack.

Commentary:
They've been stealing elections on California by this method for decadew. I bet that half the California Democrats in the house got in via state sponsored vote fraud.
Saddam Hussein ran fairer elections than California does. At least he'd only win with 97% of the votes.
It is Calif. only a step or two behind NYC, Nigeria and South Africa.
California a Democrat hellhole cementing down the tools to remain in power forever.

​

If this is true, Trumps DOJ needs to demand the safe keeping of these votes and investigate for potential fraud. There are a lot of people on twitter who are raising questions.

Whwat I do know is that they cannot risk even a runoff against a GOP as the federal Dem structure revolves around California. This is where I am sure dark money arrives from, where Chinese spies exert their influence, where global socialists from Europe and elsewhere who need influence find allies.

They surely view the risk of losing California as a loss to their establishment in D.C and their ability to fund their 2028 election. They do not want heavy GOP funding for a potential winner of the state there. To them, this result must not be in any doubt