What can republicans do for blacks?

[EdwardBaiamonte]

It's amazing how a bunch of white people know what black people are thinking !

good point leftard!! now apply your own logic to the constant memes coming from you losers that insist every criticism of obama from anybody on the Right must be because of racism

cant have it both ways idiot. if we cant read your mind, or his mind, then he, and you idiots, cant read ours

keep trying dimwit!!

Not everything . But how do u explain birth certificate and mooslim crap?

100% stupid!! Obama invited it not because he is half black, but because he needed to hide so much of his background which was Muslin and communist.

 

[JQPublic1]

"...Ideology makes men fight for their servitude as stubbornly as though it were their salvation." Deleuze / Guattari

You know you have succeeded when black is white and white is black. The man reminds one of the apologetics of victims of all sort. It is either I deserve this treatment or the treatment means something else. Human psychology is fascinating and bizarre.

"The White Man's Party"

"....Hardcore racism showed white supremacy in disquieting detail. In contrast, the new soft porn racism hid any direct references to race, even as it continued to trade on racial stimulation. As a contemporary of Wallace marveled, "he can use all the other issues - law and order, running your own schools, protecting property rights - and never mention race. But people will know he's telling them 'a ******'s trying to get your job, trying to move into your neighborhood.' What Wallace is doing is talking to them in a kind of shorthand, a kind of code.?"

Finally, a third bolt of lightening struck Wallace: he could be the one! The governor's mansion in Montgomery need not represent his final destination. He could ride the train of revamped race-baiting all the way to the White House. Wallace ran for president as a third- party candidate in 1964, and then again in 1968, 1972, and 1976. It's his 1968 campaign that most concerns us, for there Wallace ran against a consummate politician who was quick to appreciate, and adopt, Wallace's refashioned racial demagoguery: Richard Nixon. We'll turn to the Wallace-Nixon race soon, but first, another set of weathered bones must be excavated-the remains of Barry Goldwater.

• THE RISE OF RACIALLY IDENTIFIED PARTIES

The Republican Party today, in its voters and in its elected officials, is almost all white. But it wasn't always like that. Indeed, in the decades immediately before 1964, neither party was racially identified in the eyes of the American public. Even as the Democratic Party on the national level increasingly embraced civil rights, partly as a way to capture the growing political power of blacks who had migrated to Northern cities, Southern Democrats-like George Wallace remained staunch defenders of Jim Crow. Meanwhile, among Republicans, the racial antipathies of the rightwing found little favor among many party leaders." To take an important example, Brown and its desegregation imperative were backed by Republicans: Chief Justice Earl Warren, who wrote the opinion, was a Republican, and the first troops ordered into the South in 1957 to protect black students attempting to integrate a white school were sent there by the Republican administration of Dwight Eisenhower and his vice president, Richard Nixon. Reflecting the roughly equal commitment of both parties to racial progress, even as late as 1962, the public perceived Republicans and Democrats to be similarly committed to racial justice. In that year, when asked which party "is more likely to see that Negroes get fair treatment in jobs and housing:' 22.7 percent of the public said Democrats and 21.3 percent said Republicans, while over half could perceive no difference between the two.

"The 1964 presidential election marked the beginning of the realignment we live with today. Where in 1962 both parties were perceived as equally, if tepidly, supportive of civil rights, two years later 60 percent of the public identified Democrats as more likely to pursue fair treatment, versus only 7 percent who so identified the Republican Party." What happened?

Groundwork for the shift was laid in the run-up to the 1964 election by rightwing elements in the Republican Party, which gained momentum from the loss of the then-moderate Nixon to John F. Kennedy in 1960. This faction of the party had never stopped warring against the New Deal. Its standard bearer was Barry Goldwater, a senator from Arizona and heir to a department store fortune. His pampered upbringing and wealth notwithstanding,. Goldwater affected a cowboy's rough-and-tumble persona in his dress and speech, casting himself as a walking embodiment of the Marlboro Man's disdain for the nanny state. Goldwater and the reactionary stalwarts who rallied to him saw the Democratic Party as a mortal threat to the nation: domestically, because of the corrupting influence of a powerful central government deeply involved in regulating the marketplace and using taxes to reallocate wealth downward, and abroad in its willingness to compromise with communist countries instead of going to war against them. Goldwater himself though, was no racial throwback.' For instance, in 1957 and again in 1960 he voted in favor of federal civil rights legislation. By 1961, however, Goldwater and his partisans had become convinced that the key to electoral success lay in gaining ground in the South, and that in turn required appealing to racist sentiments in white voters, even at the cost of black support. As Goldwater drawled, "We're not going to get the Negro vote as a bloc in 1964 and 1968, so we ought to go hunting where the ducks are.?"

This racial plan riled more moderate members of the Republican establishment, such as New York senator Jacob Javits, who in the fall of 1963 may have been the first to refer to a "Southern Strategy" in the context of repudiating it." By then, however, the right wing of the party had won out. As the conservative journalist Robert Novak reported after attending a meeting of the Republican National Committee in Denver during the summer of 1963: "A good many, perhaps a majority of the party's leadership, envision substantial political gold to be mined in the racial crisis by becoming in fact, though not in name, the White Man's Party. 'Remember: one astute party worker said quietly ... 'this isn't South Africa. The white man outnumbers the Negro 9 to 1 in this country,"?" The rise of a racially-identified GOP is not a tale of latent bigotry in that party. It is instead a story centered on the strategic decision to use racism to become "the White Man's Party." p17-18 'Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class' by Ian Haney López, Oxford

The book is about today and how we got to today. But history and even reality eludes the right wing in America. Check it out learn a bit.

Funny how the "WHite Man's" party only gets about 60% of the white vote.

Meanwhile the Dems get 95% of the Black VOte, and 70% of the Hispanic vote.

So what? I 60% of the white vote is a lot more than 95% of the Black vote. 60% of the white vote is more than the black and hispanic votes combined.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

They vote 95 % dem because they can't stand GOP racism. GOP can't accept that because they think they are infallible .

so they vote for near genocidal liberal Democratic programs because Republicans are racist??

100% stupid??

 

[Timmy]

They vote 95 % dem because they can't stand GOP racism. GOP can't accept that because they think they are infallible .

so they vote for near genocidal liberal Democratic programs because Republicans are racist??

100% stupid??

Genocide ? Lol! You righties are delusional .

Think about it . What links Jews, Asians , Hispanics , blacks together? They are minorities and as such are very sensitive to racism . And they all lean towards democrat .

Explain why ?

 

[bendog]

I suppose colonization is no longer an option

American Colonization Society - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Meathead]

Sad that jobs are wasted on blacks unless the are civil servants with a lot of government position with a lot of benefits. Americans cannot be asked to take jobs which only lowly immigrants will do because they are far to elite given their
citizenship. Welfare is a much easier construct.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Then answer why EVERY minority group goes wh dems vs cons.

super simple, they want the welfare!!

Now do you understand????? See why we have to be 100% positive that a liberal will be stupid??

 

[Timmy]

Then answer why EVERY minority group goes wh dems vs cons.

super simple, they want the welfare!!

Now do you understand????? See why we have to be 100% positive that a liberal will be stupid??

Really ?

How about the Jews ? Well established minority . Many of them falling into upper class income brackets . Why don't they vote GOP? They on the dole too?

You Answr above is why they all vote dems . GOP thinks all minorities are welfare recipients . How insulting .

 

[Meathead]

+

It's amazing how a bunch of white people know what black people are thinking !

dear, they vote 95% Democratic so we know exactly what they are thinking without much difficulty.

I'm sure a libtard would imagine its somehow racist for whites to make obvious observations about blacks just as the libtard would imagine that a black who observes that that the liberal programs have been nearly genocidal is an insane Uncle Tom.

They vote 95 % dem because they can't stand GOP racism. GOP can't accept that because they think they are infallible .

Don't believe me ? Then answer why EVERY minority group goes wh dems vs cons.

It has everything to do with how much free stuff they expect Blacks 95%, is tops because they are more 'entitled' and it drops from there. Blacks are hopeless, but Hispanic and Asians are in play because the want to better their lives.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Think about it . What links Jews, Asians , Hispanics , blacks together? They are minorities and as such are very sensitive to racism . And they all lean towards democrat .

Explain why ?

too stupid!! Look at human history. People always made huge mistakes for 5 million years. Civilization began with our Founders and now liberalism is taking over again. We are reverting to type. Does it shock a libtard to learn the people make mistakes?? IF people can follow Hitler Stalin and Mao they can follow libtards too!!!

Do you understand?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

How about the Jews ?.

Jews always embraced communism!! Our liberals spied for Hitler and Stalin.
So what??

 

[Timmy]

Ha ha ! I understand u drink the GOP cool aid . The dems are cheating !!! Can't blame the GOP failures on the GOP after all!

 

[Meathead]

+

It's amazing how a bunch of white people know what black people are thinking !

dear, they vote 95% Democratic so we know exactly what they are thinking without much difficulty.

I'm sure a libtard would imagine its somehow racist for whites to make obvious observations about blacks just as the libtard would imagine that a black who observes that that the liberal programs have been nearly genocidal is an insane Uncle Tom.

They vote 95 % dem because they can't stand GOP racism. GOP can't accept that because they think they are infallible .

Don't believe me ? Then answer why EVERY minority group goes wh dems vs cons.

You have got racism confused with entitlements. Carson, a man more accomplished and even more 'black' Obama seems to be leading the Republican vote of late.

 

[bendog]

The blacks are just punishing us down here for the faults of our ancestors. Ah weep.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

How about the Jews ? .

yep. They have been brainwashed into thinking the Dems are for minorities because the Dems put minorities on the crippling dole. What a surprise to a libturd, a group of human being made a mistake!!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. Carson, a man more accomplished and even more 'black' Obama seems to be leading the Republican vote of late.

Gee, so Republicans are not racist after all and all blacks don't support the near genocidal liberal programs?

1+1=2 is shocking to the stupid,welfare is good, liberal Santa Claus world view!!.

 

[Meathead]

. Carson, a man more accomplished and even more 'black' Obama seems to be leading the Republican vote of late.

Gee, so Republicans are not racist after all and all blacks don't support the near genocidal liberal programs?

1+1=2 is shocking to the stupid,welfare is good, liberal Santa Claus world view!!.

What are liberals going to do if Carson is nominated? Seems like a bit of conundrum voting for a old corrupted white ***** instead an intellectual black man.

 

[Meathead]

. Carson, a man more accomplished and even more 'black' Obama seems to be leading the Republican vote of late.

Gee, so Republicans are not racist after all and all blacks don't support the near genocidal liberal programs?

1+1=2 is shocking to the stupid,welfare is good, liberal Santa Claus world view!!.

What are liberals going to do if Carson is nominated? Seems like a bit of conundrum voting for a old corrupted white ***** instead an intellectual black man.

I should add, an actual intelligent black man, and not half white black man with dubious intellect.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

What are liberals going to do if Carson is nominated?

Probably demonize him like they do any black who has wondered off the plantation. He will be made out to be deeply treasonous and psychotic for not marching in lock step with the liberal "welfare is good" theory that has worked out so well!!

Libtards may change their minds though when black illligitimacy hits 80% or when blacks become 80% of the prison population!!

 

[bendog]

. Carson, a man more accomplished and even more 'black' Obama seems to be leading the Republican vote of late.

Gee, so Republicans are not racist after all and all blacks don't support the near genocidal liberal programs?

1+1=2 is shocking to the stupid,welfare is good, liberal Santa Claus world view!!.

What are liberals going to do if Carson is nominated? Seems like a bit of conundrum voting for a old corrupted white ***** instead an intellectual black man.

I should add, an actual intelligent black man, and not half white black man with dubious intellect.

I'd think you'd prefer the half white to the no part white guy